On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 12:23 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> what uses them?
>From a very rough grep:
./calendar/libedata-cal/e-cal-backend-util.c
./servers/exchange/storage/exchange-account.c
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what uses them?
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 16:30 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 11:23 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > EAccount and EAccountList are private to Evolution app and should not be
> > used inside e-d-s
>
> Would it be best to rename the e-account and e-account-list
> f
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 11:23 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> EAccount and EAccountList are private to Evolution app and should not be
> used inside e-d-s
Would it be best to rename the e-account and e-account-list
files/functions in e-d-s then, as they are used and there is obviously
potential for
EAccount and EAccountList are private to Evolution app and should not be
used inside e-d-s
Jeff
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 10:43 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:36 +0800, Irene wrote:
> > Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
> > files in evoluti
Hi,
> When we get around to doing unified account management then this might be
> of great help if most of the desired structures are in libedataserver.
> So i am waiting for a somebody to validate my line of reasoning here.
The reasoning is good. We finally should have only one set of API's to
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:57 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> As evolution obviously depends on libedataserver already, surely for the
> files which are identical there is no problem at all?
My thoughts exactly. I couldn't control myself, sorry, and went ahead
with one of the duplicates: I changed the i
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:49 +0530, Shreyas Sriniavasan wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:48 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > > > Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most
> > > > of the
> > > > files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
> > > > evolution-data
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:48 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > > Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
> > > files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
> > > evolution-data-server/libedataserver.
> Thanks Ross :-). That really gets us moving to the next ste
> > Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
> > files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
> > evolution-data-server/libedataserver.
Yes. To be more precise, evolution-exchange in addition to e-util and
libedataserver :-).
> I've created a wiki page http://
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:36 +0800, Irene wrote:
> Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
> files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
> evolution-data-server/libedataserver. We are worried that in the future,
> if files in libedataserver are modified with t
Hi,
Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
evolution-data-server/libedataserver. We are worried that in the future,
if files in libedataserver are modified with their counterparts in
e-util unchanged, more annoy
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:27 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:19 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote:
> > > Currently, the MD5Context structures in
> > > evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and
> > > evolution/e-utils/md5-util
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:19 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote:
> > Currently, the MD5Context structures in
> > evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and
> > evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are different with the first one not
> > having a doByteReve
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote:
> Currently, the MD5Context structures in
> evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and
> evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are different with the first one not
> having a doByteReverse member.
Hm, that would be my fault: I've been working with
Hi, Harish
I built evolution 2.6 on my Solaris X86 the other day. The build process
was successful, however, as soon as I started evolution-2.6, it crashed.
We investigated this problem and arrived at the following conclusions:
camel_vee_folder_hash_folder in
evolution-data-server/camle/camel-ve
15 matches
Mail list logo
