Take a look at Q224977 and Q200941
Doris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. März 2002 21:00
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: Database Restores
When doing a restore (online) ex.5.5 sp4, does the restore put the restore
As it turns out one of our upstream ISPs has misconfigured a router and
there was an MTU issue.
Daniel was correct to guess that it was a Black Hole Router. My
understanding is that basically it's what happens when a router simply
discards packets larger than it's MTU size, rather than
'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.
Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery
restrictions imposed.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21
I don't control the recipients do I?
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.
Check the permissions of the recipient.
Morning/Afternoon/Evening (Delete as applicable)
This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too
far, and bear with me .. it all ultimately relates to mail .. honest :)
I wish to use a stand-alone root CA on Win2K, certificated (is there such a word?)
Damn previous post should have been under the CA's/PKI subject header, not NDR's (was
content)
Apologies
Mylo
This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too
far, and bear with me .. it all ultimately relates to mail .. honest :)
I wish to use a
Only unsupported methods - Q273478
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 23:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
Is there anyway of undoing what Forestprep domainprep do to
AD? i.e.
but the message comes back instantanuously
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the administrator
responsible
for that
Please remember to reinstall the appropriate Service Pack, though..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Then its on your end, not the recipients.
Sounds like that user has been blocked at your IMCs
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
Hi
Just out of curiosity, is there anything in the event viewer?
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server
I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on
All,
We have a requirement to remove the ADC-Global-Names attribute from all
40,000 PF objects in one of our Exchange 55 Sites. However this is proving
somewhat tricky to do. A conventional directory import/export is not up to
the job due to not being able to export hidden public folder
This is just too nice. All of the online Internet RFCs (Request For
Comments, the standards definition) have been turned into a hypertext system
and placed online here:
http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC_share/Output/
Features include hyperlinks to other RFCs when referenced, status,
Good morning,
I wasn't here yesterday. Could you please point me to the thread that
talked about this?
Thanks.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa
Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail
address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox?
I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of
this feature.
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Importance: High
Good morning,
I wasn't here yesterday. Could
Q233207
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail
address enabled
Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message
FYI, I am not nor will I ever be confused with the Official Thread
Monitor. I just happen to remember this thread for the reprimand
delivered, not a soda spurt but a pretty good chuckle.
Doctor, I have a pain.
Where?
Well, I'm not going to tell you
Umm yes behind on my reading..
OK 6GB drive for your Ipaq hey? well I have one of those users.
Yup he got the 3850...It still was not enough for him.
So he bought the dual slot expansion sleeve...then goes out and gets himself
one of the PCMCIA mircodrives + the modem to hook to his cell
Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am.
It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited.
--
be - MOS
This is Vergon 6. -Professor
Bah. -Amy
It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little
doomed animals. -Professor
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
Hi
NetFolder does not exist anymore for OL XP (sharing of OL Data with somekind
of invisible eMail going from one OL to the other, syncrhonising data )
A PST cannont be access at the same time by 2 computers.
Who Could I share information between 2 outlook without an exchange server
Thanks
Thanks. I understand all that.
I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still does
not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to mailbox-enabled
user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
SVR?
I have been looking to no avail . . .
It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
Well, first - do not give disgruntled employees permission to post
Organizational forms. Second, password protect all the forms before you
post. Keep the password list safe so you can unlock the form.
Usually, the developers want to password protect their own forms - don't
let them. You need
What is there to compare?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document
Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
SVR?
I have been
ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why
I need it without me saying another word . . .
The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . .
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
This information should be readily available on MS's web site.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document
ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am
We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions.
Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you
host your own?
Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I
should look into?
Thanks
I have the product running on my server at this time. For the most part it
works okay, however, watch out for the BATCH PROCESSING functionality. It
can be a real killer. I've also had C2C eat a bunch of attachments that were
previously zipped outside of Exchange. I have reservations, but
I would avoid Arthur Anderson.
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Center
We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some
questions.
Does
And Loni.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center
I would avoid Arthur Anderson.
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL
Or Richard Tener.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center
I would avoid Arthur Anderson.
Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248])
by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)
id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500
Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20])
by
You can't buy 5.5 Enterprise anymore, you have to buy 2000 and you will
get the 5.5 Enterprise cd for around $23 (you have to request it). the
upgrade is just a reinstall and reapplication of service pack. (15
minutes).
_
List
Take for example Joe Contractor.
Joe is contracted in your organization for 3 months. Joe needs a user
account to gain access to file shares in order to perform his tasks. Joe
have a mailbox at his consulting firm and he would like all
correspondence to be sent to it.
You can mail-enable Joe
Looking through the whitepapers on the MS website it strikes me that it
might be easier to compare the similarities rather than the differences. :)
Do either of these help?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/whyupgrade/default.as
p
I'm gonna take a guess at this. But doesn't the TO line says it's TO midship.com?
Thanks,
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi folks,
Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed. The Dell tech
came in and replaced the hard drive then started the 'Restore'. He left
and I finished up the restore of the OS (win2k pro). I then installed
Office 2000 sr-1. That is all that is on this box, all that was, and
hehactually it's the pain meds I'm now taking at work. Otherwise I can only work
a 4 hour shift :(
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL
You would think . . . but I have been searching for 3 days and can only find
a few blurbs in different places
- Original Message -
From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document
Q198083
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors
Hi folks,
Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed.
Its probably most useful for situations where you have disparate email
services and want a unified GAL.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Via SMTP would be my guess, probably hitting the internet mail service on
logistics.midship.com
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
what is an SMTP fixup?
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Or simply make sure you have a temporary internet folder in your profile.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce
Sent: 21 March 2002 16:03
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a
I know of a financial company in SF that uses off-site data storage. They
told me while I was there that they have tested their DR procedures and can
be 80-90% operational within 24 hours of a complete disaster (i.e. their SF
offices being completely destroyed).
Contact me offlist if you'd like
It's a Cisco PIX firewall command to tell the PIX to stop acting like it
knows what it's doing.
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
what is
Thanks for the quick response. The network is all ntfs, just for the
record, but I did check to make sure the tech used ntfs on the user's
box. The q-article wasn't the exact fix but did get me to do a further
search and this led me to the fix. For the record, the q-article that
did it was
Ask your Cisco PIX firewall administrator. If your not using Cisco PIX it
may be called something else on your firewall, what ever it is.
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject:
That screen does not show the mailbox owner, but instead just the last user
account to access the mailbox.
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
Ok, so I'm a fairly NEW exchange administrator. :) I've set that up and
waited about an hour. Still no dice. Any other ideas?
Thanks for your patience
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
OK, so what have you looked at? Did you look for rules? Delegates? Who
has permission to the inbox from the server? Preview pane in use?
-Original Message-
From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5
I cannot get outlook 2k to connect via pop3 spa to and exchange 5.5
server. Outlook Express does seem to work ok though. Ive set the server
site Protocol options to Windows Challenge Response and tried changing
outlook between internet only and corporate workgroup modes. I also have
the spa
Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without
re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk
to . . .
TIA
It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
Hello all,
I was wondering how to change the greeting message when a telnet session to
a POP3 server is successful. I am basically looking to change the name of
the DNS name. I want to give it some type of alias instead of the FQDN.
Thanks
Ed
http://www.sungardthenetbeneathyou.com/
Comdisco is in Chapter 11 and sold off the disaster recovery part of
their business to SunGuard Systems.
I have been a part of a disaster recovery and business continuity
project using comdisco, now SunGard. They are quite expensive, but also
full
Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their points, but
apparently not. I thought that last response to my post was so off the
point that it only underscored what I had said.
I think this is where systems architects and operations folks have their
most difficult problems in
Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4
Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that
asks for
User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information
is not
retained when coming and going from Outlook.
Have a great day.
First full day of
Not yet. There are several solutions that work, but not directly.
You can leave a MAPI client (Outlook) running on a PC and do a remote synch
to that. Any network connection will work.
You can use the Extended Systems synch server.
You can use any of several UM servers.
None of these work like
Gotcha,
I was deleting the user account of a person who had multiple mailboxes(one
for her team), I changed the owner from her to the person taking her
place, but when I deleted her account through usrmgr it prompted to delete
that mailbox as well as her personal. This is what prompted me to
Have you tried checking his or her profile? Maybe the Logon Network
Security,
under the Advance tab of the user's profile, was set to None. Either that
or
the user's NT account is locked out.
Jose David P. Camara II
IT - NT Administrator
Credit Lyonnais
-Original Message-
From:
Everything is set the way it should be set... I need to know where the
registry setting is for this Pop Up box.
Thanks.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Camara, David
Chris,
If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at:
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameters
There is a server object under Parameters and all you would need to do
is point it to the correct server. I am assuming you are talking about
OWA 5.5.
Many of my users are getting the following message when they open meeting
requests that have been sent to them:
This meeting is not in the Calendar; it may have been moved or deleted.
Once the user Accepts or Accepts Tentative, the meeting appears in the
Calendar where it belongs.
Our
that did it! Gracias!
- Original Message -
From: paragon400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Settings
Chris,
If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at:
Dear Jeff,
Are you sure it is the Store that is growing, or are you noticing
less and less available disk space?
Check to see if you are archiving your Internet e-mail messages,
both inbound and outbound.
d:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive
etc.
Rob Garrish
Have you seen this behaviour in person? Sounds fishy to me. And stop
looking about in the registry. Keep your fingers out of there. This is
controlled by a checkbox.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:32 AM
To:
I thought Microsoft had some MAPI over HTTP plans some time ago. Even
Outlook XP was supposed to be like that. Or was XP supposed to be a
mini-Exchange server synching with the mothership?
Whatever happenned to all those rumors?
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL
I think we are waiting to be amazed.
I suspect that a little more clarity on the part of the customer community
in terms of what we need would help.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does anyone have an idea on how much resources this might use up on an
Exch2k server with 500 users?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using
plain text. It has always worked fine until today?
-
Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the
Internet.Com.
The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text.
Dear all,
We are having a problem with one of my colleagues. When he tries to assign a
task to someone, he gets the following message. 'Could not complete the
operation. One or more parameter values are not valid.' Anybody seen this
kind of message before? He is using OL2000. We are using
Is there a Blackberry or a PDA (sync) involved that could be flagging the
messages as read?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
Assuming somebody else is
Is there an Exchange anti-virus product running on the box? I had a server
with a buggy version of Scanmail that had similar symptoms when running
ScanMail 3.6, the ESE Shim version. When I removed it and installed 3.52,
the problem went away.
Also,are there any other apps (SQL, etc.) on this
Why do neither of these utilities use the full processor capability of the
system? I'm only seeing 7 - 10% CPU utilization when repairing the
information store.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop?
I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!?
Anyone who knows for sure?
/micke
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
You are looking for a user named adams at domain lostwax.com.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: properties of a message
Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248
Hi all, due to some breakup in our company we're being forced to break our
Org into two.
If we have two organizations, is there a way to replicate (share) Address
books?
Is it possible to replicate (share) public folders?
What other issues should we consider?
Thanks in advance.
These are called orphan mailboxes and there is no easy way of getting rid
of them. There is a Q-article on the support site that shows how to take
care of them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange
Are you running E2K?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is this?
I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using
plain text. It has always worked fine
OOFs reply once to a mail address until you turn it off and back on again.
-Original Message-
From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ouf Of Office
Does Out Of Office responses to the internet
Im running scared.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is this?
Are you running E2K?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a
help desk ticketing system which uses a unique e-mail address for every
e-mail message received and autoreplies to the sender.
More importantly is a security risk from a human engineering standpoint.
-Original
Which is a much better answer than mine!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office
It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a
help desk
Good movie. One of Billy Crystal's better one's. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is this?
Im running scared.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
Man I love TechNet.
support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = unpopulated | answer =
1st link
support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = logon box registry |
answer = 2nd link
support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = registry logon |
answer = 3rd link
Possibility 1: There are other limiting factors, such as disk speed, that
are keeping the utilities from using all of your CPU.
Possibility 2: Your CPU is too busy sending triple copies of all of your
email.
--
be - MOS
The trouble with opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard
No they're not. Chris's answer was the correct one.
-Original Message-
From: Dockery, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange confused
These are called orphan mailboxes and there is no easy way of getting
It can. It has. It might not ever for you, but there is a risk.
-Original Message-
From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ouf Of Office
Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop?
internet.com sux. I get it all the time and I don't even allow html to go
out the ims.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is this?
I get this from the list when I try to send a
I fixed the problem with disabling sending both plain text and html in
global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy
for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after
that.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This should have read:
I fixed the problem by disabling sending both plain text and html in
global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy
for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after
that.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
The best I can do is guess. But the process could be going like this:
Disk: here's your data.
CPU:OKOKIGOTITI'MDONEWRITEITOUTGIMMEMORENOWGIMMEGIMME
Disk: Um, hang on a second.
Understand that this is not an exact transcription of the process. But I'm
sure you get the idea. The system has to
We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box.
I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this
before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the
Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend?
Thanks
Saul
I'm doing the same thing..slow as hell right?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange
Newsgroups
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
We
It does get slow at times. I receive a few of the Requesting data from
Server messages. I have done monitoring on the server and both network
and CPU seems fine. I just want to off load the other services so that
the Exchange Server does just that.
Saul Gonzalez
-Original Message-
Hmmm... build another DC first, move all the master roles to the new DC,
demote the original DC... this should work.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
We did this as well, and patience was the order of the day.
William
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
Hmmm... build another DC
I want OL2k clients to resolve a mailbox against some specific value entered
into a recipient field of a new message. Q151198 describes the
straightforward process of setting this up: set the Search-Flags schema
object of the desired Custom Attribute to 1 or 2. The change is immediate
across each
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
