RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Not me. I keep mine in the jewel case. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent:

RE: Public Folder Chaos

2002-09-12 Thread Hurst, Paul
You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor (if the emails are confidential). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 September 2002 19:54

Any experiences with Allocity Live!Ex?

2002-09-12 Thread Swynk Exchange Support List
Boss got a flyer in the mail. Is talking to sales rep. Wants me to produce an opinion from experienced E2K Admin(s). Anyone? www.allocity.com __ Paul E. Pelfrey, MCSE, MCP, A+ Messaging Engineer, Cardinal Health, Inc. 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, OH 43017

RE: restore problem

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Was this the only server in the site? -Original Message- From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: restore problem Tried both Constantly get permissions problems (access denied) -Original

RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K

2002-09-12 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
It is so limited that you have to leave it in the CD jewel case. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K I thought I heard there was a really limited

RE: Public Folder Chaos

2002-09-12 Thread McCready, Robert
OK. Anonymous = yes with 2000, not needed with Exchange 5.5. Thanks! Robert -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos in e2k, you *do* have to set

RE: Public Folder Chaos

2002-09-12 Thread McCready, Robert
Excellent idea. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor (if the

Exchange 2000 Features

2002-09-12 Thread CHRIS H
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a per mailbox basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting

Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Pillai, Raj
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks

RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday,

need help with setting up a recipient policy

2002-09-12 Thread Varghese, Wilson
Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com

Re: Exchange 2000 Features

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
You cannot. - Original Message - From: CHRIS H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 Features Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on

Exch2000 OWA new mail notification

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Levis
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail notification icon. However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. Without

RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...

2002-09-12 Thread Yoda
Mail server down is not. UTP cable unplugged it is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... You must give in to

Meeting requests between two Exchange 5.5 Organizations

2002-09-12 Thread Hein, Arlyn
Whan a user in Exchange Organization A send a meeting request to users in her Exchange Organization and Exchange Organization B, the users in her Exchange Organization receive the meeting request without any problem, but the users in Exchange Organization B receive it as a regular email message

Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations

2002-09-12 Thread AHein
A user sends a meeting request to several different individuals. Some are in the same Exchange Organization, some are in another Exchange Organization. The recipientes in the same Exchange Organization receive the requests without any problems. Those recipients in the Other Exchange

RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Pillai, Raj
Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although the q article does not say so? TIA. Raj -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange

Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though. Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Missy - Original Message - From: Chris Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: Exch2000

Re: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: Meeting

RE: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Levis
As as 10 seconds from now, I have. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good

Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Karen McLaughlin
I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is not good enough, and that's the only product

RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Scharff
The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked). -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Scharff
There are a number of high availability solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com in the weblinks section including pimp hatEMS/pimp hat. What are the actual requirements and how does DoubleTake not meet those? -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
try www.mail-resources.com -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Leo Ballester
We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the

Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread blambert
Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information

sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Rob Hackney
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks

RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using? yyy.com or xxx.com -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy

RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.

2002-09-12 Thread Pillai, Raj
I will give it another whirl tonite before heading out the door. The one thing I did not do was restart the SMTP service from services. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? Missy - Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Andy David
So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.
My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Karen McLaughlin
Missy, when you say doesn't do it nicely, does that imply that it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? - Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it nicely. There are other possible

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Andy David
Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Levis
MS Office SP2 requires SP1... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Levis
Office XP, that is. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited MS Office SP2 requires SP1... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Andy David
Are any of the Office SRs cumulative? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Office XP, that is. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Stevens, Dave
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12,

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Avi Smith-Rapaport
Service packs are most always cumulative, most, if not all of the time. That is except during leap years. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Office XP, that is.

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no product out there today that can

Re: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
Just one. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From:

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Andy David
Just looked it up. SP3. You're right. I was thinking SP2 as well, but it was cumulative. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: sp3 revisited Just one. - Original Message

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Karen McLaughlin
I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on the understanding that the replication is a best effort process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC,

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
It's not worth the huge chunk of money they're asking, or tons of organizations would be happy with the solution. I've tested most of these solutions in the past, and the only one that made me even think about deployment was the solution from Marathon Technologies. Missy - Original Message

RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+

2002-09-12 Thread Moore, David K
Follow up answer to this problem: It turns out to be a bug in the Outlook client. If you give additional rights beyond Editor to any DL or Default then the Outlook client will produce the below listed errors. So, you should only grant Editor and Author rights when using the direct booking

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Jonathan Beeler
I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message-

Extracting permissions of all folder in EX5.5

2002-09-12 Thread bezeqint
Hello. I need to list all permissions applied to all folders in all mailboxes on Exchange 5.5 server. Can any one recommand on a tool or product to do it? Thanks, Mark. _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Stevens, Dave
have you upgraded your Promodag to the newest version, 5? It is much faster spitting out reports than the previous. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct book ing in Outlook 2k+

2002-09-12 Thread John Strongosky
David, there is a fine article at www.exchangeadmin.com by Joseph Neubauer in this months issue (oct2002) entitled Using and Configuring Outlook Direct Booking, article number is 26184. john -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12,

IMAP Contacts

2002-09-12 Thread Mike Carlson
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder as a subscribed IMAP folder but that just displayed it as an email folder. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Scharff
Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. g My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution which used

RE: IMAP Contacts

2002-09-12 Thread Chris Scharff
There is if you use Ximian Evolution. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMAP Contacts Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user through

RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch

2002-09-12 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Did you re-apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation as what is on the Exchange Server? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Except in Microsoft's Office Suites. Don't know about the new ones, but the old ones you could not jump to SP3 from SP1 without applying SP2. I remember doing this some years ago. Maybe 3 years. So maybe it was Office98??? IDR. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle

display names during conversion

2002-09-12 Thread Jonathan Beeler
So we've finally started our migration to 2000. The environment: w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode. a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k. After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from 5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes. Instead of taking the

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Jonathan Beeler
yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up. There is a

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Stevens, Dave
I had copied my scheduled reports off the server and then onto a new server... the .pro extensions...worked like a champ. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Tony Nguyen
Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recommendation please We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good.

RE: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good experience with it? They have been around for a long time too. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct book ing in Outlook 2k+

2002-09-12 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
I did not have to do that. But as someone suggested on this list I made sure that Exchange Event service would use a service account (which has Exchange full admin rights) instead of System. -Original Message- From: DWYER Brian (Powerlink) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Minesweeper: Start Programs Accessories Games Minesweeper and hit F1. Mimesweeper: http://www.mimesweeper.com might have something. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 02:27 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing

Re: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
Google. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Missy Koslosky
um. No. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good experience with it?

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Or read the book Mien Kompf -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: recommendation please Google. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

RE: Exchange 2000 Features

2002-09-12 Thread Kim Cameron
you cannot even set it on an administrative group basis. OOF and autoreply capability is set at the Org level. yeah, it's stoopid. -Original Message- From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Forum Conversation:

RE: recommendation please

2002-09-12 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Praetor TumbleWeed GFI Mail Essentials you can find info on them on google. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I

RE: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
bad experiences then? -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA um. No. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread M2web
Actually Double Take works for replication, however it is not High Availability Solution as the developer NSI or Sunbelt promote it on their site. But if you just want the data replicated then if you tweek it (and not according to their support way's soultion) , it does the job. Their other

Exchange aware ADUC without ESM?

2002-09-12 Thread Ken Cornetet
Is there is a way to install the Exchange aware version of ADUC, but not the rest of the Win2k adminpak or Exchange System Manager? We are going to install ADUC on our help desk staff's computers, but we'd prefer not to pollute their PCs with stuff they don't need.

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Coleman, Hunter
tracking.zip at http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Not nearly as swell as Promodag, but it's free ;-) Hunter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring

RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy

2002-09-12 Thread Varghese, Wilson
Yyy.com. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy When getting the bounce message which email address

Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher Hummert
My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Mark Peoples
Too many negative points to mention them all really... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this: http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf Optional Mail Filters Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed messages, including

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as Hey my System

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher Hummert
He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Martin Blackstone
Not to mention, how many backups can you get on one drive? A couple, maybe 3? That's not a lot of old backups to have around. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Mark Peoples
Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure. For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and someone else picks it up? For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to pay for proper offsite storage services. It's their data, so they should want to be

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I don't

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Do it for free. Throw 'em in your bank's night drop. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 05:55 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Ah

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
What I meant to say taking tapes offsite is normal. Companies that have one employee take them home. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher Hummert
Ok any other reason I can throw in there besides the Vibration/Temperature RAID box dying? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at it I guess. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM To:

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Hell just burn the business down after you upped the insurance to 5 million dollars and retire. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Do it for free. Throw 'em

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows... -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Why a Linux box? Is this a

RE: Mailbox monitoring

2002-09-12 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
I figured that was the reason. Free is good! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows...

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-12 Thread Brian Ko
Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes the HD. Before fire/flood can happen, you'll probably lose your RAID 5. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To:

Automatically archiving ALL sent messages

2002-09-12 Thread Jeffrey Dubyn
I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks!

RE: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages

2002-09-12 Thread Kevin Miller
Yes you can do this on the server. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Any experiences with Allocity Live!Ex?

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Saw the sales presentation. Seems the company was started by a professor I had at Berkeley. At the time I saw the presentation, however, it wasn't in a form that would work for my customer's needs yet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
So how much time did you spend looking up that useless bit of trivia?! I would have told you the correct answer had you asked. In fact, I think I posted it recently. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!

RE: display names during conversion

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
No way. First, moving the mailbox doesn't affect the display name. That would be established when you ran the connection agreement. Second, ADC doesn't talk to the NT SAM. My guess is that the display name got populated the way you see it from when you ran the ADMT, and your connection

RE: Exchange 2000 Features

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Not granular enough for you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:45 PM To:

RE: Exchange 2000 HA

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
More importantly, it's very hard to determine if it does work. You have to fail it over to tell, and do it enough times to be sure that it'll really work when you do need it. That is, it might work five times you test it, and then when the real event occurs, the database is corrupt. In

RE: Exchange aware ADUC without ESM?

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
The supported way is to install the system tools. If you want to experiment with which files you don't really need, then be my guest. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Post the full NDR. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:29 AM To:

RE: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Search for TechNet for Exchange 2000 message journaling. It keeps all messages both sent and received. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Meeting requests between two Exchange 5.5 Organizations

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
Be sure the sender has the recipient's entry in Contacts or the address book set to use rich text. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: sp3 revisited

2002-09-12 Thread David N. Precht
You do mean SR1... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Levis Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited MS Office SP2 requires SP1... -Original Message- From: Andy David

Multiple updaters for a DL

2002-09-12 Thread Murray Alexander
In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former.

  1   2   >