Dear All,
I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask,
but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a
consultant.
Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using
Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities.
Sounds like its your machine - the UUNet mailer is sending the reponse it
got from the next hop, which is your machine.
What, exactly, did you change when you say If I have turned of my open
relay on my exchange server
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
No need to apologize, I was just being a smart a$$ per my usual behavior..
;o)
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5.
yes, apologies, you are
It's an active/passive cluster. It doesn't seem to work for anyone.
Tara
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting Request not showing responses
Multiple servers or
That didn't make any difference. There are only 3 users who seem to
have the problem and they are all Mac users. Their calendars are all
unde 2 meg.
Tara
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange
You have a smart user.
http://www.grinningshark.com
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That reminds me, I need to reinstall my copy of that here at work.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/10/2002 13:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mail loop
Switch to x.400 connectors. There is precious little difference, at the
network level, between Site Connectors and intrasite communications - they
both rely entirely on RPC connectivity, which frankly blows across unstable
or tempermental WANs.
Alternately (since you'd need to own Enterprise to
Do their calendars work correctly on Windows machines?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In my experience the Outlook resource booking has always booked duplicates.
This is why I prefer using the AutoAccept script.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto-accept
I think doing IPCONFIG /FLUSHDNS once in a while may help.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA service just quits...
I have been
Since I rebooted yesterday and
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000
users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost
prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that
system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as
well for
I get this for one domain.
You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance,
contact your system administrator.
Server.com #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
Domain
I checked the KB and the only thing that it told me to do is add the
domain in the
How about posting the actual error message, rather than a sanitized one?
You've removed all the interesting information that might actually lead to a
solution.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger
You should be able to prevent the recipient from receiving notification.
What is the Notifications=Inbound set to for the filter that is being used
(Default?). Under advanced options set the notification settings for that
Notification Name.
Let me know if you have further questions, I have
I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? Do you really
need one at each location.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure
Your server is reporting that the server with which it is trying to connect
is refusing because it won't relay for that address/domain.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Good point
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM
To:
Hi All,
I recently moved all mailboxes from 3 connected (Site connectors) Exchange sites to a
single site, for purposes of consolidation. Removed all references, replicas,
free/busy connections, etc. before removing replication and site connectors. After
removing the retired servers from the
Hi
Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users,
then each site has around 10-15
Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our central server
first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back?
Thanks
Nik
-Original Message-
From:
The users don't see any problems. There is just a message in the app
log that says the rendering of large calendars may be slower
for those users. They don't know there's any issue at all.
Tara
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
For that small of a user base I'd put them all on one single server at the home
office. It would be a much better use of resources and a WHOLE lot easier to
manage. We have our exchange deployed almost the same except with a frame relay
network and our sites are all 60 plus users. We also tend
Ah the perils of 5.5 and moving mailboxes. How did you move the mailboxes.
- Original Message -
From: Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: Client problem
Hi All,
I recently moved all
No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange
servers.
I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links
without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with
30 users each, to the only office there that can support
Sure, go right ahead.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5.
Hi
Can the .dat files in the MTA folder be deleted?
Thanks
You mean my local Server right? That is what is so weird about this is
that I have 3 other domains receiving email at that remote addresses
location and they receive just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:40
Wow send some of that extra money to burn this way.
- Original Message -
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Hi
Very few to be honest, at
Is it possible for you to get point-to-point ADSL links to connect your
smaller offices to your main office in a star fashion? This you could
have just 1 server in the main office as already suggested and will
avoid the VPN/Internet overhead and unpredictability.
And you'll also have 4 extra
Rebuild the profiles on the affected clients.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for
Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to?
I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed
also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies?
Thanks for the help.
If you moved the mailboxes and shut down the original servers before the
clients could update their profiles (to point to the new server), they have
no way of finding where their mailbox has moved.
If possible, start up the old servers again, and let them run for a week or
so until the clients
I was wondering if anyone could help with any of the 3 PF problems I am
having below. I think all 3 are related and are symptoms of the same
underlying issue. I am new to Exchange 2000 but have used 5.5 for many
years. I am testing a migration. We are moving to a new domain but will
be
Hello !
Anybody knows exactly what Maximum receipt headers exceeded (possible
mail loop) means ?
We use micorsoft exchange 5.5 sp 4, and a user said that
he can receive mail from another user on the Internet, but
he can´t send mail to the same.
When he does, he only recieves the Maximum receipt
Hello everybody,
I'm using the archive all email feature from exchange 2000.
My client wants more :-)
do you have any advice for a gateway product that can archive all email
inside a database (SQL) ? There're gonna be a lot of traffic so we need a
very robust product.
Thanks for your advice,
We are unable to recieve email from one of our customers. We are running
Ex 2000 with SP 3. The customer is getting the following message on the
bounced mail: A critical function for the transfer or delivery of the
message was not supported by the originator of the report nts.4.ntdom.noodleco.com
We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange
2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active
cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world
experiences with similar setups. Each server would have about 800 active
users and
Has anybody used the Exchange product from this outfit. Just ran across it
and don't recall if it was ever given a thumbs up or down.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
200 users , 3 server in the organization, we have noticed that just 21
concurrents users access the IS.
I am wonder if 100 concurrent users will make the server to stop working?
-er
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:34 PM
We have seen the MTA stopping from time to time and place a message in the
event log that we were low on storage. There was over 150 MEGS free space
on the IMCDATA drive at those times. I have seen other times when the IMC
was running just fine with only 15 Meg free space (unplanned; but it did
3rd party tool from DiscusData. Does a good job except for the UpdateProfile step.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Client problem
Ah the perils of 5.5 and moving mailboxes.
What do you mean it failed. What specifically happened? You could have a
corrupted mailbox.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exmerge issue
FAQ 3.5.A3
The other option it to spring for a full internet T1 at the main office instead of
DSL. That should work well. We connect some small offices and warehouses
that way but we use PIX's for the VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October
Exmerge for 2000 only runs on a 2000 box workstation OK It has better
error logging. But even better has explanations for common problem in the
document that comes with it. Look there. It is in Exchange 2000 SP3
- Original Message -
From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
SWAG Maximum Hops exceeded?
- Original Message -
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject: Maximum receipt headers exceeded
Hello !
Anybody knows exactly what Maximum receipt headers exceeded (possible
It means that the message has been around
Too many hops on its way from origin to destination. Each hop adds to the header. Too
many headers - message gets canned.
-Original Message-
From: Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yup - sounds like some IS issues. If you have another box you can move the
mailbox to that might help
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
The server at nts4.ntdom.noodelco.com is running an SMTP mailer that doesn't
know how to handle some extended command being passed to it. It's never even
getting to you. They will need to confer with their own IT staff.
- Original Message -
From: Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Probably a mail loop associated with the other's address.
- Original Message -
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject: Maximum receipt headers exceeded
Hello !
Anybody knows exactly what Maximum
Sorry, specific message after OL2000 export to .pst Sorry items could not
be copied. They were moved or deleted, or access was denied. I have also
tried client export on a number of boxes thinking the corrupt mailbox
possibility.
I have given my logon account Service Account Admin rights and
Note: when doing using the Internet for your VPN/WAN/etc
connections...remember!
their is no QOS.
Ive got a mix of direct WAN via partial dedicated T's and others using SDSL
at remote offices to Internet into our main office on a full T1.
I also most never see my more $$$ dedicated T's drop or
We've recently gone through a merger, and I've been tasked with collapsing
the other company's 5.5 org into our 5.5 org. My first thought was the Move
Server Wizard, but I started having second thoughts after seeing the
simplicity of their setup. I'm wondering if it's worth taking the risks
I've seen this exact behavior when the mailbox server doesn't have a
workstation record in WINS.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Unusual OWA problem
You have to ask what
...maybe the little check mark in the:
Advanced E-mail Options|Save Messages
In folders other than the Inbox, save
replies with original message
is checked.
On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
In my experience the Outlook resource booking has always booked =
duplicates.
This is why I prefer
What do you mean each will have 800 users?
- Original Message -
From: Imran Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:35 AM
Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part
Lately, our School District has been getting more and more SMAM e-mails. We
are currently using Scan Mail for Exchange 5.5 and the e-manager part to
filter out SMAM which leaves a lot to be desired because when a user gets a
SMAM e-mail, it is deleted (about 50%) of the time, however the user,
Lately, our School District has been getting more and more SMAM e-mails. We
are currently using Scan Mail for Exchange 5.5 and the e-manager part to
filter out SMAM which leaves a lot to be desired because when a user gets a
SMAM e-mail, it is deleted (about 50%) of the time, however the user,
However, I have run into a bug with ExMerge 2000. Not quite sure what it
is, however, I am able to ExMerge the data from the Exchange Server into a
.pst file. But, when I go to import the file into the new mailbox, it will
hang and then give the error Exchange cannot yada, yada, yada connect to
How many users do you want to have on the system, and what it is the
purpose of said system.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM
To:
Stalker.com not cheap but we think the best.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting
Hi all,
i'm looking into the feasiblity of setting up a hotmail style web
For your company users or to resell? If the former, OWA
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting
Hi all,
i'm looking into the feasiblity of setting up a hotmail
Hi Tony, thanks for the response -
I'm guessing that when users hit the OWA box, (if authentication is
stipulated) they are authenticated against the domain, then once
authenticated the OWA code attempts to contact the mailbox specified in the
'Log On' textbox, I am unsure how it determines
I wish, single site single server. I wanted to try the latest Exmerge that
Tony suggested but ExSp3.exe (165Mb grr) download came through Not a Valid
Win32 App.
Anyone out there willing to contribute the latest Exmerge to a very thirsty
irritated Admin?
SoupNazis
No Exchange for you, you get
Some mail servers (Rockliffe MailSite comes to mind) simply count the number of
headers. Too many headers and the server assumes that there is a loop.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Then rebuilding profiles is about your only hope.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ashraph,
Elizabeth A.
Sent:
I think at this stage of its development clustering provides very poor
business value. It really protects you from very few failure scenarios.
Instead, I'd make sure I had the most highly internally redundant system
I could afford, buy a capable recovery and hot standby server, and
practice my
RAM is cheap, hook your servers up. 256MB at the minimum...
Have your run any perfmon counters against your server yet?
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
KVS Enterprise Vault (http://www.kvsinc.com/) is arguably the leader in
this field. I don't know that they write to SQL, though, but their
product has indexing and searching capabilities.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to
Or that the new store's default public folder server isn't misdirected.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger
Yup, checked that also. Could it be related to how Exchange expires tombstones,
perhaps still looking for free/busy server info, there was no problem until the
servers were actually taken out of the domain. What do you think?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
Andrey,
You say AutoAccept works on 2000 but I sure can't get it to. When I try to
install it onto a mailbox, it says it doesn't have rights on the
EventConfig_ServerName system folder. And, of course, the only folder names
are old Exchange 5.5 servers. How did you get it to work?
Thanks,
James,
You have posted this 3 times. No one has replied. This can only mean one of
five things:
1) those that can help are busy on other things
2) those that can help are busy trying to think up a helpful solution
3) those that can help are sick of you posting this message, and are
refusing to
We are using Surf Control's Email Filter product after using Trend. I found
Trend's EContent Manager to be a pain. We use them for everything else
though with great results mostly.
Surf can either send no messages, or any combination of messages/content you
configure. We send a simple message to
I have not done any clustering nor have much XCH 2000 experience but if it
is worth anything I am at MEC right now and so far 3 speakers over 3 days on
HA have said to stick with active/passive and avoid active/active.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Imran Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I fold.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elmerick, Ralph
H.
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:59 AM
You also might want to look at www.assentor.com I used it once for a
financial firm. I think all/most SEC type must use a type like this. That
was 2 years ago but remember that they said they can port out to a database.
Might worth a call.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL
To say again what was posted earlier on this thread. There is an excellent
article on this subject pertaining to Outlook 2000 and XP versions.
ExchangeOutlook Administrator Oct. 2002 has an article named Using and
Configuring Outlook Direct Booking by Joseph Neubauer. It goes into great
detail on
Oh hell spend the bucks and get NetIQ. I believe they support it. On thing
bad about Exmerge is Calendaring and permissions
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: RE:
Last time I did this (and it WAS a while ago) we used a utility called PILGRIM to
change Exchange server organisation names. It worked a treat for us ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 5:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
One of our customers is having trouble emailing us. We have no problem
emailing them but they get the following NDR when sending to us:
A critical function required for the transfer or delivery of the message
was not supported by the originator of the report
nts4.ntdom.noodleco.com #5.3.3 smtp;500
79 matches
Mail list logo
