Could be anything. Are your servers on SP3 or SP4? Have you patched for
MS03-026? Running with the most recent AV defs? Have you read about the
MSBLAST worm?
On the hardware front, have you tried replacing the switch that your servers
are on?
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds like the authentication is improperly configured. How do you have the
IIS set for the OWA folder(s)
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OWA Problems
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003
Leave up the old Ex5.5 server for a little while. Outlook will see that
it's mailbox has moved to a new server, and update the profile itself.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua
Hello All.
I need to assign rights to a mailbox on Exchange. When I am in AD Users and
Computers, I go to the Advanced Exchange tab and click on the Mailbox Right button.
When I do I get the following error:
The Microsoft Exchange Information store service cannot find the specified object.
That is correct Ed. It is the Domain admin account.
The account you're using to run the backup has administrative rights on the
server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
Originally I though it was an Exchange 2K3 (RC1) problem until I went to
another machine and ran Outlook 2K2 (latest patched) to recover a deleted
item (from the deleted items folder). I try to recover the same deleted
email from a Win2K3 server (which is running the Exchange 2K3) and I get a
It's working now actually.
We had blocked port 135 because of Blast. The other guys figured out a
way to do it to allow 135 without getting slammed for the virus.
Thanks for all the info
Ali
-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Looking up c1041722 in Technet yields a number of hits.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges,
original issue = it sucks eggs
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
Scott,
What was your original issue? There is an
There is LAN in IsLANd
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
from California.
to the New York Island...
I am really enjoying your humor, however,
::: pops 3rd beer of the hour :::
How many AD domains? Was domainprep run in all of them? Have the default
groups created by Exchange been moved? Have you used the security policy
checkign tool referenced in several of the aforementioned KB articles? If
so, what were the results?
From: Bridges,
Are you doing it all in one shot? You can just put a cname in dns and a
static record in wins pointing to your old server.
If I remember correctly, Outlook was able to find the new exchange
server for mailbox that have been moved to e2k as long as the exchange
5.5 server was online the first
I'm not confused; I need to change the LegacyExchangeDN value. I know
this because I've done a directory export and verified it. I was just
refering to the surname portion of alias that happens to be incorrect in
my situation.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Hi guys,
I'm getting ready to add a Windows 2003 DC to my Win2k AD network,
which will eventually be an all Win2k3 AD domain. However, I'm also
planning an Exchange 2000 upgrade in a matter of weeks. My question is,
will I be able to run Forestprep and Domainprep against the Win2k3 AD?
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking
it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message
means. This was generated by our external
You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance,
contact your system administrator.
This Lan is your Lan.
This Lan is my Lan.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
No. On company LAN
-Original Message-
From:
Pete,
I had it running on my 5.5 box on NT 4.0 with no problems. I recently
bought a sweet new box (thanks Dell) and began the server move (thanks
ed). For some reason Groupshield doesn't play well with permissions and
the service accounts on Windows 2000. I guess until you run into a
specific
Absolutely. Even out of cheap arse hotel rooms where I didn't get more that
21.6k.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
What will they accept as a valid reason? Not wishing to sound funny there,
but if they won't take that just about every reference you find to it
involves problems of some sort what will they take?
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information
Stores...does brick level also.
Nick Thakkar
Network Administrator
American Medical Response
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
209-993-6974
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326894
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:45:14 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hide a Name from Address Book - Exchange
Amazing what you find if you search on MS's site troublshooting owa 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326303
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help! Accounts
It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't like
you or 2) is horribly isconfigured by someone who shouldn't be touching
production mail systems.
I'd vote for A personally, but I could see 2 as a valid option too..
Amicus is our external relay. They cannot like us since we pay them.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't
like you or
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and it didn't come
through...sending as plain text this time.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Server running OWA IIS 5.0. Have current security
patches. Check version of CDO.DLL version 5.5.2655.79 CDOHTLM.DLL
5.5.2655.77 which seems to be current.
For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my
problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange. Needless to say
it's gone now. Is Scanmail still the defacto? I would like to get the
best antivirus package out there. Thanks, Scott.
MSN?
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana (CIP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Creating a group list
Importance: High
Hi friends,
Do you know about of any software for manage List group ( free/cheaper) . No
hotmail
If I gave you a part of my check there would be nothing left. (LOL)
Thanks for your reply.
I am new to this stuff and I appreciate all the patience from this
listserve.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:09 AM
To:
I have a client whom we are going to move to exchange 2000/3. He is
accustomed to having all email incoming and outgoing to have 2 copies
delivered to him and 1 copy delivered to his secretary (don't ask me).
So no matter who the email is for if it has his domain on the address he
wants to see it
Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then
go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3
AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep
running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and
We are seriously considering building a Red Hat / SpamAssassin /
gateway antivirus box. Can anyone recommend a good Linux SMTP gateway
antivirus product?
Thanks
Jason
_
List posting FAQ:
Ah, that old chestnut! Use a column 'secondary-proxy-addresses'. See
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=148339
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 12 August 2003 11:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Secondary smtp
Can do a rebuild of RUS online, does it affect exchange at all?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
Of course I meant we'Ve, not we'Re.
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
We're run it many times over the years and have never had a problem with
it. It's always done just what
Where is that at? From AD Users and Computers or in ESM?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Hide a Name from Address Book - Exchange 2000
Check the box which says 'hide this entry
You're going to try that tired argument in every thread until it sticks?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The original message was received at Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 552 Requested mail action aborted:
exceeded storage allocation)
- Transcript of session follows -
Full? Do you mean near their limit?
I'd imagine that Message Stats from Quest could help you do this quite
nicely.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Scribner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: Finding full
Yes it can be run during the day? Or Yes it should be run off hours?
Thanks for the reply.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: KCC
Yes.
From: Bridges, Samantha
We are having problems removing a client from a black list and need a
little help. This particular blacklister wants us to have an email
address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] where x.x.x.x refers to the IP of our
Exchange server. RFC 1123 talks about this in some detail. My only
problem is that I can't
When you say the IMS is set to only route mail for your domain, does that
mean its set to relay and the domain is listed, or is it set to not relay at
all?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
Yah...that seems to be so far. Everyone who is complaining are located outside or are
trying from home.
Thanks for the replies.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Almost. It cost too much to keep Outlook up to date for the handful of
users left on that dying platform.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, August 05,
I just have to simply restart them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS WWW service randomly stops few time a day
When the services stop
Anyways, I figured it out. He was forwarding a yahoo email
message(html) and it had an embedded GIF image on it that may be acting
as a beacon.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It means
that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there
being one..
but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see...
my poor rep...
thanks martin
bill
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06,
Is it possible for me to use non mail-enabled universal security groups
for public folder permissions? Or does it have to be mail-enabled?
I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3.
Thanks,
Carmila
This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to
Babcock Brown or a
Not too sure that will work. The E2K servers are in AD will the 5.5 servers
are not. Also, the E2K servers are in a new Exchange ORG.
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K
Tried that argument but unfortunately, they won't accept that as a valid
reason.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
original issue = it sucks eggs
Had to rebuild... had office XP, now have office2k.
Trying to open my .PST. When I try to add it to the service, a pop-up so thoughtfully
informs me:
Exchange.PST is not a personal folders store.
No, it is not checked read-only.
Ideas?
TIA,
Ali
What is funny there are actully 100 zeros there. Ok well had to do something
this morning while drinking my coffee.
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
21.6k... Darn youngin's back in my day...
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:19:57 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Absolutely. Even out of
A number of our customers use FrontBridge or MessageLabs and I've heard
generally positive things about both.
From: Michael Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:24:54 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Oh I naturally thought OE would handle RTF. Thanks. I guess also keep to
the simplest rule and run plain text, hard to screw that up :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange2K
Just make sure that you know the requirements for RPC/HTTP. 1 Windows
2003 server running the RPC Proxy service (or ISA Server can do it as
well)- I don't recall if that can run on the Exchange 2003 server or
not, then obviously Exchange 2003. All clients must be Windows XP SP1
plus a hotfix, and
Sometimes you will get additional e-mail addresses when you do that.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rebuild RUS
Can do a rebuild of RUS online, does it affect exchange at all?
Hello,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows NT SP6a
The distribution lists within one of my sites are very slow to open in
Exchange administrator. The mailboxes open just fine. I have turned off
the AV. The event logs do not show anything revealing. Not finding any
info on the web that is relevent.
Any
Going on the information provided I'd say it was a glitch of some sort.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2003 13:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is
I do not use Public Folders, and want to hide the Public folders view from
all users.
When users login with OWA and click on the folders list, they get an Access
denied error.
How can I enable it so that this window does not pop-up everytime they go to
the folders list view in OWA?
This is a
What is the limit on the information store in Exchange 2000? If it is 18 Gbyte, how
can you bring the store back up once it has reached this size?
Thanks!
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential
Check out Imanami SmartDL (Groups controlled by a query) or WebDir (List
server capabilities for Exchange)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana
(CIP)
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE free as part of an
upgrade advantage purchased with Exchange 5.5 EE. Upgrading to E2K3 EE
would cost me upwards of $1000. Is it worth it? In addition, I will be
doing the install on a P3600 with 512MB of RAM and 3 18GB RAID1 arrays. Can
Thanks Ben.
No, I have actually turned off the options Disabled Automatic Replies to
the Internet Disalbe Out off Office responses to the Internet. Just
in case it has not recognised my settings, I will reboot the server today
try again.
BY
-- Original Message --
From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL
We're using the Altiris solution and rolling it out to all boxes, server or
client. Haven't had an issue so far, and we're probably 95%+ installed with
it..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
It's not Outlook, but an incredible simulation!
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Exchange
Have Norton Enterprise AV. Many users stuck on ver 8/6/2003 instead of being at
8/13/2003. Please advise.
TIA
Orin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I understand the difference between domain and exchange admin rights. I
only wrote that for purposes of brevity in this post. (I should have been
more specific). For clarification, I have a service account setup to
start and run the Exchange services and the admin account has appropriate
Maybe it isn't? Did you try running scanpst against it.
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PST version
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:03:23 -0400
Had to rebuild... had office XP, now have
We're using Blackberrys and sticking with our Blackberry Enterprize Servers for now.
The best alternative I've heard of is Good's (www.good.com). They support Blackberrys
as well as their own handheld.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient problem.
Hey you all,
My users have been getting the following NDR when they try to send an
email,
Unable to deliver
Andy, I take it then, that it does not come with the install of exchange, but, a third
party POS that you buy and install!!
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problems with
You would be looking at a third-party product, such as NetIQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lloyd
Sent: Wednesday,
Well, these things are a matter of money and time. Money for a test lab and
a new copy of Exchange. We purchased E2K a while ago and have not had the
AD environment to install it in until recently. It's what we bought, so
it's what we're using... Off the top of your head, does E2K3 need to be
IS the machine you are trying this on your Exchange Server? Or a box with
the Admin tools?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
It's going to use the same account that it used to authenticate against the
mailbox. In my config, it automatically selected a GC to query, and is doing
AD lookups out of the box. I take it, it's not for you? Are you getting
errors?
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange
Geez, I missed the Exchange 5.5 part, with the talk of Windows 2000.
I recommend against using the Exchange Service Account for anything except
running the Exchange Services; it's too easy to screw things up with that.
Make an account for running backups with lower permissions.
Ed Crowley
The SMTP Virtual Servers don't have any limits either?
There are three places for message size limits
- Org-level under Global Settings/Message Delivery
- User-level in the user properties
- SMTP in the virtual SMTP server settings
You have 12 GB of disk space left, but is that on the partition
Wouldn't it be easier to map a network share on the Exchange server and
use that as the location of the temporary .edb files?
If I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4.0 sp6a and want to run the
eseutil on another non-exchange server because it has more disk space,
would that other server need to
Isn't that the new theaters down at the mall?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 20:46
To: Exchange
We're run it many times over the years and have never had a problem with
it. It's always done just what it's supposed to do.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DS/IS Consistency
Promodag has a report for used DLs. It works great for us. A ton of
reporting.
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage
I actually was just asking what people
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Hell no.
Outlook in offline mode synchronizing every 10 minutes or so works
perfectly. To
Yes, we excluded E2K directories from Trend AV. Again, the server was
running fine without a problem until last week. We did not make any
changes to the server nor Trend Micro Server Protect. For Priv1.edb to
mount, we have to turn off Trend Server Protect service.
To change just one user's LegacyExchangeDN - just use ADSIEdit. However
there is no special area of LegacyExchangeDN that is responsible for
surname, so I think you are a bit confused about what you want to
change. LegacyExchangeDN is based on the mailbox nickname (alias).
And after you change
Thanks! I thought I knew that.LOL
s.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original
However, this can be caused by other things, such as a virus scanner.
Sybari Antigen, in particular, does this with certain old versions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
I just setup a new Exchange 5.5/4 server on Windows 2000. (I'm in the
process of using Ed's move server method). I installed the new server in
the same org/site with a different name and I moved all my users mailboxes
over. Everything seems to be working as planned until I try to backup the
IS.
I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the semi-absurd situation of
maintaining three entirely different mail clients for the Mac, none of which made
everyone, happy, and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major upgrades,
and were free. I don't find it at all
Just shut off the mail servers. You'll save even more money and have fewer
problems.
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:49:52 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was
Please post the complete NDR
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the
1000
0
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
from California.
to the New York Island...
I am really enjoying your humor, however, do you have any ideas about my question.
Thanks and always laughing,
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 5:44pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that inbound meant _all_.
One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound. Many ISPs are concerned
with stopping existing compromises from
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Problems
Are they able to logon to their mailboxes via Outlook?
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just one. I already ran it. Ran fine...and very quick. And happy to
report it was successful!
Thanks for the response.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KCC
How
We had the problem here. Once we pulled the Intel 510 switches and put in
Cisco, it went away.
-Original Message-
From: Russ Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too much
I
What troubleshooting have you done so far?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login
Will win2k vpn allow me to set up so only internet traffic destined to
the exchange server is routed correctly and I do not carry
Well it's your reward.
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:11:34 -0400
from California.
to the New York Island...
I am really
Of course.I would never ask the list first without searching first. (just
kidding). Yes, I did do a search on thatnothing.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this before or knows a resolution.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
201 - 300 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
