GD wrote: I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped
Erm, could it be down to the fact that the budget was allocated before the
consultant even knew which GroupWise client was most suitable for the task?
The information contained in this e-mail is intended for
Would you like a free pen, and some notepaper?
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 22:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources
GD wrote: I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped
Erm, could it be down to the fact that the budget was allocated before the
consultant even knew which GroupWise client was most suitable for the task?
The information contained in this e-mail is intended for
True.. True. Now that my data center move is almost done, I can start
looking at that again...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
Would that make the rest of us Deckler's Hecklers?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 23:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 3: Lessons Learned GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
We should change the name of this list to Deckler's
I read somewhere that it was possible to use one IIS server to front
multiple Exchange 5.5 servers, member of different Exchange sites. Is it
true?
If yes, can you point me in the right direction on how to implement this?
Thank you.
Daniel
I have one for our two sites here - there's no additional configuration
necessary - as long as the OWA box has connectivity to all sites.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from
the command line (Exchange 5.5)?
I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the
source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process.
Tim.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container
How does one export the contents of
Google search using:
command line exchange 5.5 gal export
Yields a lot of stuff including:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Help,
Under the folder mdbdata there is suddenly a .IFS file, can anyone tell
me what it is/does, and how it got there?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point
during normal processing.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IFS
Help,
Under the folder mdbdata there is
Thanks,
I was worried, because I received a number of messenger pop-ups on that
server, and it is behind a firewall and no-one should be able to do
that, then I bumped on to that file...
Kim
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003
Why is your messenger service running? You can safely disable it.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:41 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:49 AM
To:
How?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IFS
Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX
Don't pay any attention to him. He's kidding. Eric? You're kidding,
right??? Eric???
Seriously though, I'd disable that service. It's part of my standard
build procedures for all servers (there is no reason that you need to
send popup messages to/from servers) and it does not affect anything
How???
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
bulletin/MS03-043.asp
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was actually just trying to antagonize Kim, but Phil has given us all
something to think about.
sounds of quickly checking to make sure messenger services is disabled
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax:
Yes, only teasing... Sort of
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange
Hi Guys,
Can an Exchange 5.5 connector (x.400) in one exchange site talk to another
connector (x.400) connector in Exchange 2K?
Thanks
Davinder
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Yes, but what reasoning would you have for just using an X.400 connector? Because it
has a lot of limitations that's why I ask.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Link speed/latency limitations.
Davinder
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
Yes, but what reasoning would you have for just
Hi all,
I've got a SBS 2000 server who's Priv.edb is 9GB. Its causing me some
space issues. However, when i look at the mailbox resources they total to
no more than 2.7GB.
I have also just disabled circular logging, and am worried about the disk
the size of this store.
Do i need to run eseutil
Actually, it has a lot of advantages - in Exchange 5.5, that is.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yowza, that's a loaded scenario...
Check your Application Log for Event ID 1221 and find out how much white
space you have in the store...
Regarding Circular Logging; Read the Exchange DR Whitepapers. This should
be enabled and your nightly online backups will flush the logs.
9GB is a fairly
You mean circular logging should be disabled, right :-)
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:30 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Priv.edb
If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts
if you use them?
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IFS
Yes, only teasing... Sort of
Eric
Yes, it is lot more resilient and robust than other connectors.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
Actually, it has a lot of
Yes, yes it would. You think this is a bad thing?
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IFS
If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts if
you use
Yeah, that's what I meant and now I'm even more confused in reading the
original post...
Must get more coffee!!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
You mean circular
What do you mean? Do you send popup messages as alerts? Even the
Monitoring notifications from Exchange send out e-mail alerts (though
one could argue the usefulness of that feature) or scripts (which
require an executable to be specified). Neither one uses the Messenger
service, though I
Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful.
I will be disabling the messenger service on all server too.
Thanks again.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I already did :-)
Kim
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 17:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IFS
Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful.
I will be disabling the messenger service on all server
SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right?
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
Yes, it is lot more resilient and robust than other connectors.
Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave
of circular logging then. Its just i've always dealt with 5.5 servers and
that's how i had it there.
The weird thing is when i check the setup of Exchange 2000 i see that on
the C:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\
*.log files
Pub1.edb =
Those html files are your .stm files. Leave them be!
-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave
of circular
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no backups. What
should I do now?
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Those html files are your .stm files.
Update your resume
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no backups. What
should I do
*drinks beer*
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2003 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no
backups. What should I do now?
-Original Message-
Do'h!
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
H, will that get these files back?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Update your resume
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
R U sharing?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
*drinks beer*
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2003 16:16
To:
My boss currently has over 230 MB worth of Mail in his mailbox. He has
asked me to bump it to 250 MB in the Private Info. Store Limits because he
will be on vacation. I have done that but he is still getting bounced at
230 MB. This was working prior to the upgrade to Outlook 2003. Has anyone
We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to
open their mailbox on the server: Unable to display the selected folder or item. You
do not have permission to log on while no permissions have changed and their accounts
are not locked out. Any ideas?
Exchange
Very true. The problem with this usually comes because of separate domains
with trust issues.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Still, in Exchange 2000 you're probably just as well off with SMTP. You
might try both and see which works best for you.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a
login script, just use this in a reg file:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger]
Start=dword:0004
Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script:
start
Thank you. In our setup, there is a different Exchange 5.5 site per W2K
domains, all part of the same AD tree. The setup will be:
- Reverse proxy in the outside DMZ with access only to the IIS server
- IIS server in an internal DMZ with specific access only to DC
(DNS/Authentication) and
Well, shoot. You can disable the Messenger service via Group Policy as
well. Then, you don't have to worry about missing a server. GPO's are
nifty that way :-)
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL
Did they recently change their passwords?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error
We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error
Sounds kinky.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right?
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta
Hello All:
I would like to know if anyone has had bad/good experiences with Diskeeper
running on Exchange 5.5? I do not want to implement it on our Exchange
servers but Mgmt is pushing the issue. I would like to go to the meeting
with some ammunition why it shouldn't be implemented. Apparently my
You mean aside from the fact that Diskeeper will not be able to defrag
the drive the databases are on because the database is an open file that
cannot be locked for exclusive use?
Other than that, there shouldn't be any problem with running Diskeeper
on the other drives. Log files are written
We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 2003 without incident.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange
Hello All:
I would like
Hi There,
Be careful if your Infromation Store is over 4gb as things live AV and
disk keep can corrupt your exchange box. Here is what I recommend:
1. Only run disk keeper after shutting off the exchange serverices
2. do an offline defrag of exchange every 3 months (to get rid of chain
If the Exchange IS databases are on their own drives (AND THEY SHOULD BE!)
then the drive / array will not become fragmented because Exchange uses
online degramentation to keep the databases tidy. Diskeeper will be useless
because the only thing that it will do is try to reassmble file fragments
Hi All,
I was wondering if you all have maybe heard of a resolution for the
following problem:
As of Exchange 2k SP2, MS has removed the ability for teh service
account
to view users email content. This means I cannot bind to a user mailbox
with
my service account for maintenance or
To clarify, we only run diskeeper on the OS drives not the drives that house
the logs and/or exchange db's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
That works fine, but I seriously doubt that you are gaining much from
it. How often does your OS drive change? Exchange tends to use
physical memory rather than the pagefile, and you don't often install
programs, or create documents and such on your Exchange server, right?
To me, that means that
Well, actually your exchange tracking logs, IIS logs (if you are running
OWA), and your BadMail directories actually do thrash quite a bit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:59 PM
To:
Group Policy?? That would required changing to Active Directory This
is for us old fashioned NT4 domain people.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IFS
Well, shoot. You can
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
Hi All,
I was wondering if
A) Exchange 2000 doesn't have a service account. This would explain why
you can't get your service account to access a mailbox. :)
B) If you want an account to have the ability to open another users'
mailbox, grant it Send As and Receive As rights.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thank you the Q article was exactly what I was looking for.
-Timothy
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting
direct gifts from third parties, especially significant gifts such as
large dollar items and titles, presents a real or perceived conflict of
interest between an IT professional's client (either the customer or
company that he
So, did you have a point?
(aside from I'm right, you're wrong. If I say it enough times, you *will*
understand?)
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 21:43 PM
Subject: RE: Migrating from
This is the most very basic definition of conflict of interest. One
cannot serve two masters. If you have been given something, and
ESPECIALLY if it is something significant that can be taken away, then
it presents a conflict of interest. This, from an ethical,
perspective is wrong.
The
Do you have a Blackberry server and do the people that get duplicate
meetings have blackberries?
If so MS has a fix:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;en-us;312269
Cheers and HTH
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 12, 2003
Kindly define significant gifts such as large dollar items and titles.
Where, exactly is your threshold? Let's get down to specifics, Greg.
How is it a conflict of interest when it is my job to provide consulting
services surrounding Microsoft products? It is not my job, for example, to
steer
Make m!oney from home fast!
http://www.christmas2.faithweb.com?Apple.Baldwin
Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit.Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit.
71 matches
Mail list logo
