Who doesn't?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
I read Martins Email.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
Who doesn't?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
They are sequential: E001.log., E002.log. etc.
E00.log is the current log file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: DBs and daylight savings
I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO,
I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot
going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc..
Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with
to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400
I don't think you will be able
Start simple: Does this user have local logon rights to the OWA server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Connelly
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 6:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot
Sure its just not something screwy within whatever app is generating those
emails?
As an example, in Veritas Backup Exec, the job status email notifications
are sometimes off by an hour. Its a bug within BE itself.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Pst = bad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
Dear Brethen,
May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be
] On Behalf Of Nathan Boyd
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet
Is it possible to create an out of office message for a public folder?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Have you tried restoring to a recovery server with another backup to see if
you can grab the mailboxes that way?
What caused the initial corruption?
- Original Message -
From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003
Defrag?
I guess the next question is what errors are in the event logs and if this
is 5.5, did you re-run the Performance Optimizer.
- Original Message -
From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:33 PM
Subject: RE:
It typically takes 3 runs or so to fix everything if it can.
- Original Message -
From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:40 PM
Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes
Ai, ill do that now, but I did do it
start afterward, even with a reboot of the restored server.
I'm currently looking through some knowledgebase articles to see if I
can figure anything out...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Create a separate, distinct, backup job for the Exch store and it should
work.
- Original Message -
From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
I am a
sure I didn't miss a step.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Is this an online or offline restore?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL
You backup to a tape can?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5
That's exactly how I limit it as well. It cant be
Mongo head hurt.
You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make
sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5
server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as
the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop
as to why the management console on another server will not pick up
this 5.5 server??
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Mongo head hurt.
You should
, 2003 8:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just
as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September
Mongo check headers.
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have
no
What tape drive are you using?
- Original Message -
From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups.
Hello,
Veritas 9 - were using version 8 and getting the
] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What tape drive are you using?
- Original Message -
From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: Not using BLB
Do you have Jim McBee's 24seven book handy?
I believe its covered in there.
- Original Message -
From: McBee, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Replying to messages from System Administrator
Hi all:
I had
? Yeah, done. Now, to lock RPC to one port, do I need to do that
for all win2k servers or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange back-end
servers?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 16:10
Posted To: Exchange
://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=3052ID=224196).
My question is, does back-end servers above refer only to exchange
servers or all win2k servers on the LAN?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02
Posted
I block at the Gateway using a Dell.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:09 PM
Subject: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server
Hello All.
Windows XP defaults to
Vitamin Fortified Power Control ?
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM
Subject: Extracting to pst
Hi all
I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary.
How about Winroute in the support directory?
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:39 AM
Subject: is there a way to display LinkState?
Exchange servers do all this nice work
just apply the durn patch. Sheesh.
- Original Message -
From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
Quick question.
When restricting RPC to one known port by adding
Set the format to Plain Text and see if that helps.
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook XP on E2K
Nope, they are set to HTML, Instant messaging is
1.
2.
3.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: Brick Level Backup
Hi all
What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have
gave up on Arcserve as
Sounds stupid, but delete the local admin profile, log back in as admin and
try again.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:47 AM
Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Setup;
Anyone know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The one about hijacking threads and thinking the world revolves around
Apply Latest Office and OS Patches and make sure they do not have the IM
thing enabled in Outlook ( Tools/Options/Something)
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: Outlook XP
Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400
-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
that is the puzzling part . . .
auth to different dc's
mail on different mail servers
different segments/switches on the network
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
part . . .
auth to different dc's
mail on different mail servers
different segments/switches on the network
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log
Which tests do you fail?
Are the test messages actually delivered?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Cant pass a relay test.
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
1 smtp
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Hello All.
Exchange 2000
OWA
Windows XP
. But the mails
DO NOT appear to deliver. What I dont understand is in the past we have
passed these tests. Suddenly I get a email that we are on the ORDB list.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Exchange
...and that in
their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put
it back in their court.
I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept.
Thanks for the reply.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11
a relay test.
Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test. I
never get a 550, its alway 250 ok.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test
test.
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test. I
never get a 550, its alway 250 ok.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
IE/Tools/Internet Options/Programs
- Original Message -
From: John Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: Outlook Express issue.
Hi there.
I have a user who is using outlook with Exchange.
If he clicks
I thought the solution was alcohol.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
It sounds like the former.
I think hiding the M: actually helps prevent lost email and attachments.
- Original Message -
From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: M: Drive Removal
Hi,
If I remove the M:\ drive, because
All your M: belong to us.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal
All Lead Consultants do it.
From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Well, it doenst sound like everything is working fine to me.
Ask the technician who is working on that machine what he changed. My
guess is he mucked something up in DNS or with that ISA server. I would look
through those event logs again. If a user creates a new Outlook Profile can
they resolve
At least they arent picky about message sizes g
220 ingoio.seanet.com ModusGate ESMTP Receiver Version 2.1.258.0 Ready
250-ingoio.seanet.com
250-SIZE 4872
250-ETRN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-X-IMS 5 22
250-DSN
250-VRFY
250-AUTH LOGIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250 8BITMIME
-Original Message-
Not really that odd! :)
Telnet on port 25 from your mail server to theirs and see if you can both
connect and send a test message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange
Actually, their mailserver is : mail.ci.marshfield.wi.us
But no, I cant connect there from here either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delayed
I dont know.
She seems rather goofy to me:
http://www.uc.edu/presidentsearch/remarks.htm
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: Icon's and piping
And there usually is when Martin uses the bathroom.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages
I think that point is that it isn't for you
Any AV software on the server?
- Original Message -
From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the
Not in 5.5
- Original Message -
From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Hey Guys,
Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5?
Thanks,
]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Already went through that path, no luck...
Adam Berns
Sr. Systems Administrator
Remedy, a BMC Software Company
650-919-5966 Office
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails
So you disabled it and you still couldnt delete the emails?
What AV software are you using? It wouldnt hurt to temporarily
Remedy, a BMC Software Company
650-919-5966 Office
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails
So you disabled it and you still couldnt delete the emails?
What AV
Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt match
their host name. Thats what you are referring to yes?
I suspect most mail servers will not reject mail because of that.
You will need to use some sort of relay to accomplish that with 5.5 or as
Chris mentioned, I guess you
Does anyone know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Maybe a new SMTP banner prevents thread hijacking...
2000
which resolves that...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt
match
resolves that...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt
match
their host name
Recreating the mailbox is the last resort for me.
Please tell us what AV software you are using. We gots to know.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Berns
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Didnt take kindly to your pink dress did they?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: Mass Mailings
No offense, you're not the city of San Antonio. The city of San
That article was created for the one person who still runs the license
logging service.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Nold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: OOO not working
Forgot to mention that: no
That wont take care of the mail sent by Joe.
This sounds like a HR issue, nonetheless, Patrick, look up Message
Journaling in Technet.
- Original Message -
From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject:
permission
(inherited). Any other ideas?
Adam Berns
Sr. Systems Administrator
Remedy, a BMC Software Company
650-919-5966 Office
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
Quite simply, setup cant verify the service account.
Either something is screwy with the account or your network setup.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JCalero
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 5:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Someone mucked around with the default permissions and now has corrected
their mistake:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054
We used to be able to get into anybodies mailbox on exchange2k. Either
through and outlook client, or through the m drive directly. For
Anyone using Outlook 2003?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
One other thing -- I have the
Sounds like someone has enabled directory browsing on the Exch virtual
directory.
- Original Message -
From: Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:43 AM
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
Suddenly my OWA stopped
Using newprof?
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP
workstations.
use it?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Using newprof?
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: John Orban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages
awaiting
Certainly sounds like DNS to me.
When you do nslookups from the Exch Server, what server does it attempt to
contact and can it successfully resolve external names?
- Original Message -
From: John Orban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Subject: Re: Timeout Errors
Can you back up the store from that same server using NTBACKUP?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec
Blimy!
I had the same problems with 8.6. Different error message, but it would fail
at least 2 times a week when it was part of a bigger job.
I wound up separating it and by itself it ran fine. Forgot completely about
that.
Never could explain why.
- Original Message -
From: Ray
Yea, we went through all that as well.
I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck.
Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds..
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27,
Holy Wrap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Well I found this
From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to
work on to your local drive on the laptop.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Port 135 and
or sync their files offline.
For the end-user, Citrix is a no-brainer it seems.
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
From within Citrix, its
to taking their office with them may not appreciate
those changes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying
use when your online.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Other than offline mail, there really is no difference.
I dont know too many laptop users who
Shultz!
- Original Message -
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: Locking down exchange
Zerr vill be no deffeations from ze corporate polizee!!!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
Thoughts from his manager? lol
As in all of these things, it depends on the company. Simple is relative
term and troubleshooting VPN issues with remote users can be a headache in
itself.
I could easily argue that using the NFUSE web interface to access Citrix is
a heck of lot easier to walk Joe
Sounds like you have applied the IIS Lockdown Wizard .
.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309677
- Original Message -
From: Mats Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:44 AM
Subject: Owa Not
.
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you
need
to
work on to your local
Reason 25 why a SMTP gateway rocks.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Exchange 5.5.
We've been getting hammered
Damn Recruiters!
- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: DEU Resume
Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this
list
I get another email from
42.
- Original Message -
From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We use 3.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
How old was the restored backup?
- Original Message -
From: Sean Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed me
ssages
Hi All,
A few days ago some
question for you
Ehh?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: special question for you
RFRC
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED
scans = trashes
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP
traffic.
Did you bang your head against your desk?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: PST version - revisited
Yep.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
RFRC
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: special question for you
You're just jealous.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
a very special question for you and 4000 of your friends...
- Original Message -
From: Locey, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:03 PM
Subject: special question for you
Chris,
I noticed your name on several postings, and
Sticking with them for now.
May rethink that when we go to Exchange 2003.
- Original Message -
From: Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Is anyone out there supporting or
Looking up c1041722 in Technet yields a number of hits.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Hello All.
Still having a problem viewing
1 - 100 of 1834 matches
Mail list logo
