I love my Hotmail spam. Where else can I get cheap car insurance
announcements and learn how to quit my job by spamming everybody else with
every known cure for everything.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:20
Did you check to see if Scheduling is properly set?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Intrasite Replication Issue?
Are you getting any error messages in your server
Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm trying to
What? Do it in AD. Besides what does right clicking on Calendar have to do
with Mailbox access?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
Hi,
www.spellchecker.com I believe that is the link. Also www.messageware.com
has a product.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spell check in OWA
Is there a way to do a spell
Is it named correctly?
-Original Message-
From: Topayung, Amdys Max [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help pls, exchange Virtual Directory
Hi guys !
By default, Excahnge 2000 will generate virtual directory for
www.ecora.com has a reporting tool that digs all the way down to mailbox
container, but not sure if it will show the OOA setting. You might want to
give them a call.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange
Not sure if you want to do this but OWA 5.5 lives with E2K, but you will
lose all the cool fixes in OWA 2000. But at least you will get your login
displayed as you like it.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To:
Was this the only server in the site?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore problem
Tried both
Constantly get permissions problems (access denied)
-Original
try www.mail-resources.com
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please
Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter
the un-wanted
e-mail like porn
When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using?
yyy.com or xxx.com
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy
Or read the book Mien Kompf
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: recommendation please
Google.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I
have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know
when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and
put another in. This is too funny.
Almost as good as Hey my System
is
pretty short from all that rebuilding.
I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case
of a fire. Any problem with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse
Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Sent: Thursday
What I meant to say taking tapes offsite is normal. Companies that have one
employee take them home.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux
box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at
it I guess.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM
To:
from all that rebuilding.
I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their
offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Sent: Thursday
...
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring
Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only
runs on a Linux
box
is about 2
minutes, SECOND
session takes 30 seconds because of the cached graphics.
5. Remembering that dialup is slow to begin with, make sure
you don't have
your SSL key set to 4096 bit length. This will really slow
down your users.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek
yes
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
Our users have complained about OWA (5.5)... Is OWA any better
(more user
Permissions don't always move correctly in a mixed Exchange environment. If
you use a third party tool like NetIQ EM tool you will not have that
problem. Or that is what NetIQ says/recommends.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September
After a company has moved and installed Exchange 2000, not including any of
the migration, upgrade or installation problems. What are the most common
problems you Exchange Admins have to deal with. With 5.5, IS store failure
and having a good knowledge of disaster recovery are top on my list. Any
When you delete a bunch of emails, what happens to the space on the private
store. Same rules apply to Public Store.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: public folder
Hello all,
You could try, but not recommended, the proper way is to follow the Disaster
Recovery White paper from MS. It is on their Exchange server site I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
(Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the
selected mailboxes messages
You can search under subject and or attachment but not individual word in
the body. No tool known of from MS unless you go a 3rd party or upgrade to
Exchange 2000 and rollout full index searching.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected
mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that
will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't
find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document.
What's wrong with using find under tools? This will allow them to search
their own mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err
Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to search
attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err users) have asked for
Not exactly sure of your setup. But in general terms 5.5 OWA works OK with
E2K. E2K OWA however does not work with Exchange 5.5 boxes.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
There is a Q article on MS site that tells exactly how to setup. Also if it
is a SSL from Verisign or some other vendor, they should have sent the step
by steps along with the SSL. I have used Verisign in the past with excellent
results. just follow their steps and related Q article and you will
Well I once told Wal-Mart's (Exchange 5.5) Senior Exchange man that defrag
wasn't really necessary unless there where performance issues or temp. disk
space issues. Well he said that MS says run it so that's what they do. I was
interviewing for the job and he said anyone who doesn't run Defrag on
Check message size on connector's Advanced tab on the properties page.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 3:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMC connections
Hi,
We have a problem when
People actually fix PC's? I thought you just throw them away and buy new
better/faster ones.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Way OT - Websites
I'm going to be putting together
(Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
People actually fix PC's? I thought you just throw them away and buy new
better/faster ones.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Are you running Consistency checker correctly? Double check your settings
maybe.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: More ExMerge Problems :(
I have run into this
STFW? or did you mean STFM
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
STFW
-Original Message-
From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45
meant the former. Took me 0.63 seconds to get the results.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
STFW? or did you mean STFM
-Original
what does NSLOOKUP tell you. I do not have access to check for you.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No MX Record ?
Hi,
I've been having problems sending email to users in a domain
What I have heard in the past from this group is no. Search archives.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in
Uses Cname record in this case I believe.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
How does Exchange 5.5 handle mail in the absence of an MX record ?
-Original
They all use the same browser and revision?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA .. .. .. .. .. .. ARGH!
ok, I have been on the list for a little while, and I have seen all
When you use Move Mailbox on Exchange 5.5, does anybody know if the event
log shows a record of that or does it write it to a log somewhere. If so
does the information reside on the server where Move Mailbox was run or is
it on both servers? Reason is customer moved mailboxes to new server. They
log data
Thanks for the clarification over your first post.
..same answer.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move mailbox log data
When you use Move
.
..your confidence a little shaky that ArcServe was backing up
your stores
properly?
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move mailbox log data
That's
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas!
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange
No
-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mirror Exchange
Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server?
Brian
Late on this but also look at the Protocol Stack order. Make sure TCP/IP is
first.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook logon process
Paul,
Try putting the server in the
There is no M: drive. Just pretend it doesn't exist. If changed permissions
on it then I could tell you what to do except for never touch that virtual
figment of you imagination.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:32 PM
You can use a 2000 server with Exchange 5.5 on it. If you do not access to a
NT4.0 box, you can load 5.5 (same SP' loaded) on a 2000 server. You may need
to use Q224977 to get the store to start. Follow the instruction exactly it
worked for me.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane
Sounds like an issue on the other end or you have DNS problems.
What's with the HTML attachments???
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
Text of the NDR
I have found one caveat when running Exmerge in Batch mode (latest version).
If you state which folder to put the PST files and if it does not exist it
will create it for you and put the PST files there. If you state which
folder to place the log file and if it does not exist, it will not create
My Timex.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Time Sync
Hi everyone,
What is everyone using to sync the time on servers and workstations?
Thanks
Paul
: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 550 Relaying Mail
What do you mean by hand?
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12
Never tried it but it sounds like it should work if you have the proper
rights given to you.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Automatic Formating of OL XP (Calendering)
Doing a restore/recovery project that dates backs two years. They are not
certain when Service patches were applied to either the Exchange 5.5 server
or the MS 2000 server Exchange was running on. Will this keep me from
starting the IS store so exmerge can do it's thing. I feel that different
More info. You could start by telling if they are in the same site. How did
you install the second. New org and site? Did you join?
-Original Message-
From: Elias, Delores [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2 Exchange
It's the same as far as I know.
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maximum number of rules per user per server
Q147298 implies that there is a maximum number of rules that a
user is
I have seen the old Cisco smtp fixup cause this. Are you behind one of
those.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 550 Relaying Mail
What happens when you try to send them mail by
Try these. Q261655 , Q305088 , Q308601
-Original Message-
From: marwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: event log
Hi all;
each night I get the following error messeges in
the event log of my exchage 2000
The users belong to different groups and the item that needs changing is
their permissions/rights on their mailbox. The environment is Exchange 5.5
running on MS Server 2000. Would like to do this via some program as opposed
to manually doing it. Have not had to do this before. Has anyone had to
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bulk changes to permissions
What permissions are you changing on their mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Or why not install a new server with E2k and join the site. Then move
mailboxes. In place upgrades are plain scary if you can not test before
hand. When you do upgrade in place will all your AV and Backups work the
same way. Too much to chance I agree with Ryan.
-Original Message-
From:
Search FAQ. BTW use spell check next time. Exchnage
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: adding a email disclaimer for Exchnage 2000
I have a Exchange 2000 SP3 server and without
I would put a stop on the check to Accenture. Need more info. Could be DNS
issue, connector, Communication RPC? Beside queues building up, are you
getting any error messages?
-Original Message-
From: Swynk Exchange Support List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002
If it's a DNS issue that they can not resolve the address, add a line to the
host file or use the outside IP address of your POP server in the setup. Can
they ping the POP server address?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01,
Can't load IS. Sounds like fun. Better get to repairing so you can mount
then, run Exmerge to extract the virus. All this info on MS's website. If
you can't repair it to a point were you can mount the IS store they are
screwed and tattooed.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane
I am extracting a number of mailboxes, using multiple tapes, from a recovery
server to PSTs. To ease the process I am trying to use the batch method. I
correctly changed the exmerge.ini file to use a the file mailboxes.txt,
where the directory names belong. The recovery server is a standalone MS
in batch mode.
You're correct in thinking that the directory name is what you need. You
might try leaving out the commas, leaving just the slash separators in your
strings.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Too funny
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How Do I Restore Something That Has Been Deleted and IsPast
T he Deleted Item Retention Period?
Still pissed about Nadia Comaneci's
Does anyone know if the version on E2K SP3 is the same as E2K SP2
Tony Hlabse
Exchange Administrator
574-237-5726
Bosch Automotive North America
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
/ exportation of double byte characters (that sp2
exmerge had problems with). The MS tech also said there were other
fixes in the beta version, so I would assume that the release version
is definitely different.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL
http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Discussions [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
friggin OWA
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey
What your thinking of is something called Front-end/Back-end configuration
for E2K. There are many good articles on this.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, IIS 5,
I have looked hard for this myself months ago. Nothing available like in 5.5
But with E2K SP2 allows for segmentaion of OWA use. It can be set Global or
Individual. Individual settings override Global. There are also some 3rd
party stuff at www.messageware.com and www.spellchecker.com
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q320027
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, IIS 5, OWA 2000, and SSL
yes i know it is enabled by default on the
I think you will find the same issue with other mailbox folders such as
tasks, notes, etc. Two different security schemas. It's all or nothing. Best
to get everybody on 2K to resolve. My experience.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24,
I lost that url to your outfit's 5.5 OWA custom pages. Really liked them for
customers needing them. What is the link again. Looked and couldn't find
them on your site.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange
issues in E2K
Give full access to all?
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K
I think you will find the same issue with other
Sunbelt makes one. But I think like most of them they are client based. If
your looking for server based I don't have any options for you.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange
I have heard from my new emplyer that they have been told that when they
upgrade to E2K from 5.5 they may have issues with calendar functions not
working 100%. Things like free/busy not working right. i am trying to
remember if this was a early problem with E2K that has been resolved with
the
I wonder why he wants to go to all the trouble in the first place. He did
not specify?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuring for automatic purge of deleted items in Outlook
Search on MS KB they have stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: List of common NDR's that users may receive and what they mean?
(In Exchange 5.5/2000)
I'm looking for something like
Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: List of common NDR's that users may receive and what they mea
n? (In Exchange 5.5/2000)
Search on MS KB they have stuff
84 matches
Mail list logo
