E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org?
I am trying to add it to the default policy then apply the ppolicy, and
it isn't working..
_
List posting FAQ:
Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I
Ok, now he says we need to restart the SA for it take effect...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policies
Nothing at all..
I am on the phone with PSS as we speak, he seems a tad confused
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org?
I am trying
. You don't have a 5.5 box in your org,
do you?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday,
January 12, 2004 12:30 Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Recipient Policies
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea
I have a very stooopid St Bernard.. Does that count as big? ~190lbs
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
Cool. A dog thread.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
lol
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
And just to be clear, I said meet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
That is not funny
Haiku is for more than that
I think I need beer
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK, since it is Friday, I declare that further
We have a sendmail box out in front of our exchange org purely for spam
filtering. We are running PureMessage on Slackware 9.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by
We do it because puremessage runs on sendmail.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Back to my original question, we use Surf Control in
Hi russki
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Just call me Russki.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL
By the way, I am still waiting for my book...
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
That would be Hemmoroid.
-Original Message-
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins,
Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
By the way, I am still waiting for my book
I only have aspirations of reaching that plateau..
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I'm a male whore. :)
_
John Bowles
Those are the outbound queues.
-Original Message-
From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue
I am looking at my default SMTP virtual server queue under protocols in
Yup yup
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Use of OST's over WAN
Those guys are PERFECT candidates for Outlook 2003 with Cache Mode.
-Original Message-
From: Gavin
I will definitely take you up!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List
Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen
to engage in
Winroute
reskit
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: is there a way to display LinkState?
Exchange servers do all this nice work discovering route failures by
sending linkstate
Brick Level Backups, baad..
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Brick Level Backup
Hi all
What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have
gave up on
I have a Thunder Grey truck.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Anyone know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL
Please describe the issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We actually had this same problem last week. The fix for 2 servers wouldn't be bad,
but it involves installing post SP3 rollup for exchange to keep it from happening
again.
Basically unregister xlsasink.dll on both servers. Shut down both servers. Bring
routing master back up first then other
Actually, the KB article states the March one, so that's the one I did.
Here is the info I received..
Here's the summary of actions:
The first step is to apply Exchange 2000 SP3 and the post SP-3 hotfix in
article; 330279 XCON: Deleted Routing Groups Are Listed in the WinRoute
Tool; Fix
Wasn't it released in March?
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New E2K Roll-up fix working OK
Hello,
FWIW, the newly released E2K post-SP3 Roll-up fix has been working fine
Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;824282
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:37 PM Posted To: Exchange
Discussion List
You need an smtp connector to the internet. The address scope should be
* and a cpst of 1.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Newbie question. No flames please, I am covered with
My bad, I wasn't paying attention.. On phone with pss..argh..
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Newbie question. No flames please, I am covered with jet
fuel.
By default E2K
No
What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)?
ActiveDir.org
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List
Does anybody know of
Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
No
What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)?
ActiveDir.org
Create a contact and forward it to that contact.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forwarding Email
Hey all...
(2KSrv/EX2K Fully Spacked)
one of my users would like me to forward
If they were released after sp4 was, yes. All SP's and hotfixes need to
be installed chronologically.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security
We have done a few here with no issues so far.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any issues with W2k RPC patch on Exchange 2000?
Has anyone applied the Blaster RPC patch to a W2k
lmao
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
And so it begins...
At least Robert spelled *plonk* correctly... G
-Original Message-
From: Robert
Just then? :=/
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Items moving to deleted items folder
Yeah, what he said. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL
: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Can't spell when your upset.
I don't want to argue anymore. I have work to do.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services
situations, and enjoy it.
Is this with strangers?
Are you often punched?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2003 14:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
I do.
It is rather annoying
grammatical errors in regular day to day
situations, and enjoy it.
Is this with strangers?
Are you often punched?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2003 14:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot
LMAO!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Oh wait... this is the swynk list. Nevermind. Carry on.
-Original Message-
From:
Loser boy. If you are gonna call people names, please at least spell the
name correctly. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Loser boy. If you are gonna call people names, please at least spell the
name correctly
Yeah, like lance hasn't got better..lmao
-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
That's harsh..
Nick Thakkar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Ehh?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: special question for you
RFRC
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::: taps Chris on the shoulder :::
Can I have one?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
::: pops 3rd beer of the hour :::
How many AD domains? Was
heh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
I drink the generic, non-DMCA approved equivalent. ;)
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL
Kool-aid
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.
You can always
Iis, windows family 2k or higher, ie, and something I cant remember. lol
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
SUS is software update services. Like
:
1. Copy Smtpreinstall.exe to the \Exchsrvr\Bin folder.
2. Run Smtpreinstall.exe from that folder.
3. Restart the computer when you receive the prompt.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange
metabase.bin file but Ms is
not sure. There will be a KB article published in the near future that
covers this problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have googled
I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get
this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Maybe so
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
no
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Anyone know of a good Active Directory discussion forum? The forum has
been so helpful and I need one for Active Directory.
Thanks
Export, find/replace, import?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does anyone know of an automated solution to cleanup the ACLs within a
5.5 Public Folder tree. I am referring to the DN's that
We have a few users who out of the blue cannot send to (example)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the alias has a dot, they cannot send to that address. This started
about 15 minutes ago. I have googled and will continue to do so. Help?
Mike Hutchins
error messate they're getting when they try to send?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003
As long as it takes, and no, you can't stop it. It depends on DS access
speed, processor, etc..
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I know how to do that.
I am talking about when you do a rebuild
You could also ask Digital Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it may take a couple months to get the answer..
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It should be pretty quick... You can
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update service
As long as it takes, and no, you can't stop it. It depends
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update service
Are there any network problems going on locally?
Can you get attributes from a user in the GAL very fast, or does it seem
abnormally slow?
Do you have ant
-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update
As a side note, another of my teammates here just installed 023 and says
his machine is unusually slow... Maybe something to do with it? Try
uninstalling 023 and see what happens.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update service
As a side note, another of my teammates here just installed 023
Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update service
Well, that may not be too odd, but does it deliver
We have unity from cisco for our unified messaging and as far as the
exchange server is concerned, no biggie. I however am not the admin for
our VOIP stuff, someone else is. But it hasn't hurt me.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08,
Pure Message if you need an 800 # for support for the letter guys.
Spamassassin if you can get whatever you want.
Nuff said.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sybari Antigen combines
Also Lotus doesn't help if it's on the other end.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have seen this occasionally with various 3rd party products
(Anti-virus or Anti-spam products). Do
Ok, so I am a little confused now...
In the AutoDL 2.1 upgrade it says:
Next, run the install program that came with this readme file.
This will install the files needed to create the website, COM+
application, and services. It will also have the scripts
needed to upgrade the existing AutoDL
Does she have read only permissions to the items she cannot open? Are
you Running Norton Corp Edition pre-v8.x?
Try this one out if so..
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/3d2a1f71c5a0033485
25680f006426be/a6b13da3189e3c5888256b88007bb053?OpenDocument=3D20
-Original
In the ether?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Either.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003
On a side note, how about those ihatespam shirts? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks Bob...this is exactly why I would never install a 3rd party
product on the e2k server itself
Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder
server.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all,
I need a brain refresh...
here is the scenario:
there is an
Did you check all of your recipient policies? It doesn't need to be
checked, just present to hose it up.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well I rebooted the server and the RUS
: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yeah, it is not present in any of them.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Did you check
Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hmm... We had a similar problem with Faxmaker, although one of our
servers in Boston had it previously. If you want, I can send you the DLL
it is looking for so it will shut up
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange...
(Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot)
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I will spare the gory 'political' details as
Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Real world experience
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange...
(Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot)
-Original Message
lol
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Uh oh
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Exchange
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange...
Read it, live it, love it.
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Anyone running Exchange 2000 on a Stratus (hardware based) cluster?
Do you think it
LMAO
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
packs portable meth lab
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:00 AM
To: Exchange
I have a question regarding the never restore method. What type of space
is typically used in a retention time of 30 days on say a 15 GB database
with 400 users?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:31 PM
To:
Folder Restore
My SWAG on that would probably be in the neighborhood of...2-3 GB?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Restore
I have a question regarding
Ahh, but how do I find out how much of that space is dumpster space?
I currently only have like 7 or 8 IT people on that box, with about 400
more to go in next week.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange
of the Exchange System manager and
total the sizes used. Or I believe the perfmon object
MSExchangeIS Mailbox/Total size of Recoverable Items and the
corresponding field for MSExchangeIS Public will provide this
information as well.
On 4/2/03 14:19, Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I remember seeing all the reasons to not cluster exchange, can someone
point me to those please?
Thanks! :-)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Try telnetting to post 25...
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Yes, here is what I get..
Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
information not
directly containing either of those items.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
Argh...
Which
Ok, my eyes are going crossed.
I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound
email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone
happen to have any ideas?
I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have
searched for exchange 2000
be sufficient?
What does your security policy say?
Leeann
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange server level encryption
Ok, my eyes are going crossed.
I have
Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
Well, basically, any information transmitted outside of our
company through a public channel
://www.marshalsoftware.com if of any
interest.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:34 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
Well, basically, any information
that
email encryption is one of the addressables. They removed
it from the required section. Be that as it may, we too, are
looking into email encryption.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
know of no products that implement this (but then again,
I've never looked)
You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box
as an outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would
need PGP to read the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
are.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
Well last info I got from compliance yesterday was we got an
extension til Oct 13, 2003. I hope you
network scan for what's wrong with
all the servers etc. As far as e-mail he suggested looking at PGP 1st.
I want to know how you got off with one day, I am going to be
hippa-tized for the rest of the week.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
,
I've never looked)
You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box
as an outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would
need PGP to read the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM
probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box as an
outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would need
PGP to read
the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
PureMessage does that as well as products by:
Tubmbleweed
Lyris
Cipghertrust
Clearswift
Elron Software
Net IQ
SurfControl
Trendmicro
Vircom
Symantec
NAI
I can't attest to the voracity of this statement, this was gathered from
-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:25 AM
Posted To: dsm_lists
Conversation: Yet another SPAM question
Subject: RE: Yet another SPAM question
PureMessage does that as well as products by:
Tubmbleweed
Lyris
Cipghertrust
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
