I have a public folder with 20 thousand accounts listed (By the way my I
have a dedicated public folder server). When I attempt to update accounts
all was going well until I hit about 20 records that give me the following
error:
The item could not be saved to this folder. The folder has been
I have an issue with a form associated with a public folder. When I select
one of the tabs on the form in design mode, it gives me the error:
One or more controls are not properly licensed
I have looked on MS KB and TechNet and found nothing on this error. Any one
has any ideas? I am
When I go to tools servicesExchange server propertiesAdvanced, I select
the add button and get the error name could not be resolved, action could
not be completed. This happens before I get the next screen to type
anything in. Just hitting the button causes this error to pop up. It's
I have another co-worker who stated that if our Exchange 5.5 server database
crashes, he would simply restore everything back to the same box. Can this
be done? In my years of training, I was taught that you need to have
another box identical to your production box in the case that you may have
I know this seems like a rather stupid question. Just in most
environments I have worked in, they always had extra server for this. I
brought the point up because our company has supplied us with a restore
server. The restore server they provided is an old box that does not have
enough space
Flame me if you wish.. I've seen dumber questions posted!
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Restore challenge
Yuo = Teh loser
-Original Message-
I already tried a new user profile and it didn't work. Any other ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Can not add additional mailboxes to open problem?
Well, the question I posed to management is, How important is it that in
the event of a crash that you bring it up to the time of failure? They
said they are expecting to lose a days worth of data. I'm a consultant
here, so I really don't think the company knows or understands what they are
I guess I should say one other thing. The question I guess isn't whether
you can do it, but is this a good practice to use?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Restore
NO.. no I get enough flaming from my boss.. thank you though. :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Restore challenge
It wasen't a flame.I could if you
Sorry, I forgot to add that I tried a new profile also.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Can not add additional mailboxes to open problem?
A new user profile
I guess if a scenario came up and the database was corrupted you would just
need enough space to run the utilities against the database to fix it. So I
guess your production box would work if you have double the space available
to run your utilities against it. I don't know. I have never
This may seem too obvious of an answer...
Select the mailbox from the recipient container and hit the delete key?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: How to delete a
I told the other admin that is dealing with the problem the same things you
have told me. Re-create the profile and it doesn't work. I don't know what
to tell the poor guy... it's still a problem for him. I can't find anything
on KB to help him either... its weird.
-Original
Good question about the part of naming it different. I will confirm that
with him. Maybe that will do the trick.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Can not add
Well, I confirmed it and yes he did make sure they have different names.
Any other ideas...? $200.00 is a little expensive to spend on a client
problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange
He tried your suggestion and still not working. This is an NT admin who is
trying to make logic out of how Outlook works to solve the problem. He
stated he gave the user Domain Admin privileges (Exchange service account
belongs to the Domain Admins group) and it still doesn't work. When I
Thank you. This looks like the problem, I will see if this works and let
you know!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Can not add additional mailboxes to open
By the way you can turn it off where the user can not create .ost files when
using a desktop computer.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: 2002 Calendar
I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through
public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to
work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a
desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052
No, it's not available. Not there at all.???
Regards,
LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM
To:
We run a script here that makes massive changes and I wasn't sure if it's
caused by the script or what? If they tell me what is in the script they
told me they would have to kill me.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
That's why I am asking if this is this way by default or if it's just my
environment. If I determine it's my environment, I will make them take
ownership of the problem. I have to prove that first.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I had heard that Exchange 2000 has built in protection for content filtering
and spamming. Is this true? If so, then can anyone point me to
documentation about it? I am still searching on Microsoft's website as I
send this. Anyone that has information would be helpful, I'm writing a
document
I have been seeing slow queues on our bridgehead. Can anyone recommend a
tool that will allow me to monitor email traffic? I have also had
complaints about Outlook dropping connection via RAS and VPN. I would
really like to find a tool that would help identify the problem here. Any
ideas
Can you elaborate? I've used message tracking to troubleshoot many things
however, I'm not sure how you mean.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Slow Queues?
Does anyone know where to get the CeMail client that allows PDA's to access
OWA without frames and lower graphics for Exchange v5.5?
LaCretia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I am getting a 4283 error about 4 times an hour on my bridgehead server.
Anyone know if I should be concerned or what the cause is?
The error says:
Unable to recognize an internal message identifier. Internal connection
handle (LPI) 1-15-2 Error cod:8465 [POP4 POP4 UP 7 228] (14)
Any ideas?
There's no love today. No one wants to answer :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:4283 Error
I am getting a 4283 error about 4 times an hour on my bridgehead
I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site.
The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit
going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one
site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move.
Its working so, I think I am going to leave it alone. It appears to be
caused from a migration they did in the Bay City site. Thanks for helping
me though.
-Original Message-
From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:04 AM
To: Exchange
I have an Outlook user that is putting his laptop into hibernation mode
everyday. When he does this, his secretary realized that when she was
entering appointments on his calendar he was not seeing them until after he
synchronizes. I am wondering if anyone knows any issue between hibernation
Isn't there a way to create address book views that separate the
distribution lists from the mailboxes in the Address book? We have the same
here where they put a zz in the front of DL's and it drives me crazy.
Especially since we have so many!
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni
I suggested this to our corporate admin and he wants me to manually add
these back in on our bridgehead and then pull an update from the other
servers. He said he did an experiment where he added one person, pulled an
update from the other servers. That added the person, then the other
I'm curious...How did you set it up to capture all undeliverable mail?
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Permission to send the message?
Exchange 2000 SP1.
Is that only available in exchange2000?
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Permission to send the message?
Under the Default SMTP Virtual Server Properties,
Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name
rather than the mailbox icon?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Can you share your crack pipe?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Gears
By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the
mechanism
NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in
Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear
by their name. Here is an example.
...OLE_Obj...
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed.
When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500
address appearing. Do you know the cause of this?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is
probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in
manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be
expected to happen during a migration?
-Original Message-
I tested the DL and it works fine. I also, viewed it through the OAB and
the names all look right. I thought about asking the owners to clean it up
however, when you view it in the OAB the icons are not shown so, they would
not be able to identify them. Do you think it would create a problem
That's what I was thinking however, our corporate admin was making a big
deal about it insisting that I clean it up.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Gears
If
I have worked in an environment with 30,000 users and 30 servers. The big
difference I have seen between large and small environments, is the large
environment had no exceptions, had their processes and procedures
streamlined, had a team of 12, had change control, and new their stuff
really
My experience has been that if you delete data from a .pst file, you must
compress the .pst file to regain the space.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Let's see if I can explain this. We moved a dir rep connector over the
weekend and during such a move all users on that dir rep should lose their
membership to any distribution lists. This occurred on the bridgehead
server and therefore the admin felt the dir rep move was successful. On
One problem, the dir rep has already been added back. The funny thing is
the other admin added one of the users back on the bridgehead. It
replicated successfully to the users servers and then all of the other users
disappeared from the list. This is weird.
So, he suggested that I add one
Make sure the user logs out of Outlook and back in after update his PAB. I
have had Outlook cache the information until logging the client out and back
in. Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:24
What I am finding is that intersite replication is not working. Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Problem with dir-rep move
They way I did it
Yes...
Ok I did more testing here and after I added one of the missing members to
the bridgehead, I forced an update from server A (I had waited an hour for
intersite replication to happen and nada, so I pulled an update to force
it). The new member was added and the other members disappeared.
50 matches
Mail list logo
