How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from
the command line (Exchange 5.5)?
I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the
source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process.
Tim.
We're attempting to conceive a plan to create a hot swappable Ex5.5 box
that serves exclusively as a bridgehead server (a.k.a., connector server,
for those who insist). Here's your chance to be an idea-stomper.
The idea:
- two servers, identical in hardware;
- one connected to the LAN--the other
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Connections Conference
Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??
_
List posting FAQ: http
Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
- Set your VPN client to allow UDP compression.
- Try using an MTA tweaking tool and knock down the value in units of 10.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: NetNinja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002/XP
Are the users offsite via VPN?
Outlook is sensitive to packet fragmentation. Weird stuff occurs like the
user can receive email but cannot send it.
Try lowering the MTU, stepping down from the max in 10's.
Also see if the vpn client or router supports udp encapsulazation.
Tim.
x3683
Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
So now what are we to do for a week in October?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Are the users offsite via VPN?
Outlook is sensitive to packet fragmentation. Weird shit happens like the
user can receive email but cannot send it.
Try lowering the MTU, stepping down from the max in 10's.
Also see if the vpn client or router supports udp encapsulization.
Tim.
x3683
: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
MEC is no more... :-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Friday, August 01
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year?
Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in
the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I
see nuthin on MS' site.
_
List
, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
MEC is no more... :-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MECC 2003 Venue
... :-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MECC 2003 Venue
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year?
Traditionally, the event is located
I occasionally BCC-send broadcast messages to 2500 recipients within our
company. The email contains less than 1k of text. The size of the message in
the sent items folder is 500k, which makes sense when the recipient field is
taken into account.
I find it odd that the email appears with message
://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:39 PM
Subject: Message Size w/BCC
I occasionally BCC-send broadcast messages to 2500 recipients within
our company
to work.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
We are exploring the possibility of using a secondary IMC.
Anyone attempt to configure concurrent IMC services?
Doesn't seem to be any MSWP on the subject, little relevant in MSKB, and
some dead threads on the MSNGs..
Tim.
(championing the use arbitrary acronyms since TWCACS)
Q246153: DumperAlwaysOn=1 reghack
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIScan / exmerge
Tools | Recover Deleted Items?
On 2/6/03 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
BLAMESTORMING: Sitting around in a group, discussing why a server went down,
and who was responsible.
SEAGULL MANAGER: A manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, craps on
everything, and then leaves.
CUBE FARM: An office filled with cubicles.
MOUSE POTATO: The on-line, wired generation's
Anyone set the tombstone value lower than the exchsrvr55 default?
If so, why?
Tim.
x3683
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
A survey:
How many days to you have your smtp gateway servers (wexchsrvr or otherwise)
set to reattempt delivery of messages to unreachable hosts?
Tim.
x3683
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Mailboxes can be moved while the user has them opened; neither the server
push, pulling, or driving the move will complain, nor will the Outlook
client. Bottom line, for issue-free movement of mailboxes, null the
PriNTacct prior to moving the mailbox.
MS recommends the user be prevented from
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp
Anyone hankerin' to upgrade?
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts
Hi,
I have a
I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EXMERGE ERROR
Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from
eek.. migration of GroupWise Client to Exchange. Here's what we learned
after migrating a mere 70 mailboxes.
We eval'd a few of the few GW_2_exchsrs migration utils out there: CompuSven
E-Mail Shuttle, Transend Migrator (a.k.a Unity), OpenOne Direct-to-One, MS
GW5MIG, Novell GW Plug-in for OL2k.
..and block MSG file type for the same reason.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: .eml attachments
Honestly, there is no reason they should be receiving those.
Robomon?
Bindview?
NetIQ?
Quest?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List
Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
On 1/10/03 12:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robomon?
Bindview?
NetIQ?
Quest
the uncustomizable
If you've got the money honey, I'll make it say whatever you want.
On 1/6/03 15:16, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique
to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say
something more
Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique
to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say
something more meaningful..
_
List posting FAQ:
. By design.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
From the This Just in Dept.:
The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User
permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound
Any value in excess of 12 is ignored.
Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior
to the current day, plus the current month).
ref: Q262812
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002
If..
1) the deleted item retention time is set to some number of days, and
2) you are still within that number of days
then,
1) close Outlook
2) open the affected user's registry
3) drill to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options
4) add the DWORD: DumpsterAlwaysOn with a value of 1
5)
reply.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
or the boss?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2.
mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From
on an individual message basis.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2.
mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply
send a message
... ?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No more free/busy data?
Any value in excess of 12 is ignored.
Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and
one
it appears Darcy was a winner of them there MEC session eval drawings..
twice!
(and here we were just chucking those sheets under the chairs..)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC
in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst
venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated
enough already.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Murray
I believe a 553 NDR means you goofed-up some part of the address
formatting (i.e., added a space, used something other than the @ sign, et
cetera).
-Original Message-
From: Welton, Gene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
how'd you discover this?
find it in the lab?
a cursory check of the usual resources against the likely keywords reveals
no mention of this item.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
create a CR or PF, grant User role to sender's NT acct
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-reply email
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a user to be able to send
There are a ton of events that are attributed to various Move Mailbox
whatnots.. but that doesn't seem to be what you are asking.
But I believe the answer to your question is No, not log file specific to
Move Mailbox exists. In any case, I'm curious what you hope to find were
such a log to
Thanks for the clarification over your first post.
..same answer.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move mailbox log data
When you use Move Mailbox
You've introduced an add'l Site into the Org, am I correct?
It takes a bit of time for a cross-site replication of directories to
complete. Sometimes they never do.
Shame you went right for KCC and essential as prospective remedies.
A no-cost and much more prudent t-shooting step would have
/gratuitous comment/
You've discovered the DL management is one of the many short-comings of
Microsoft's Most Poorly Designed Management Interface Ever: Exchange Server
Administrator. Viva MMC (so far).
/end gratuitous comment/
Not easily, in my opinion.
But here's my approach for 5.5
what she said..
Hey Missy!
(weren't you and I and our spouses 'sposed to meet in Annapolis for a beer
last year?)
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Modifying Users
I'd
: RE: Move mailbox log data
That's what I thought. This is going to be a small nightmare. Build each old
email server, do a restore and hunt for the old mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Perhaps. But I don't believe PSS hires necromancers.
Luke, are any of the users OST Outlook clients? If so, disable their NT
accts before answering my question. Tell them to export their mailbox to a
PST. You'll at least preserve what mail was synced locally prior to the
incident.
-Original
I went down a rabbit hole last night..
(didn't get her name, though)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spell Check
lol. True, but based on the information provided, I think
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software..
Gimme the good bad.
My sole criterion in this request is that you have some experience with the
software you mention.
_
List posting FAQ:
Gosh, I et me a fish taco last night.
(didn't get her name, though..)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front
This feature seems similar to PowerQuest's Partition Magic Server Manager
products--hardly tools one needs running under an exchsrvr.
Dynamic drives seem a waste of CPU cycles on any application server. But
then, I may be missing the bigger picture. Am I (erm.. missing the bigger
picture)?
hardly a rant.
more like an excellent suggestion.
Tim (corresponding thru a PF subscribed to this list)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Messages to the Internet
rant
It
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch any scuttlebutt on the venue for the next conference?
(cue Chris)
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified
ahem.. never mind..
http://www.microsoft.com/MSCorp/corpevents/mec2002/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto
I want OL2k clients to resolve a mailbox against some specific value entered
into a recipient field of a new message. Q151198 describes the
straightforward process of setting this up: set the Search-Flags schema
object of the desired Custom Attribute to 1 or 2. The change is immediate
across each
har.
a message recall sent to a List..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recall: Meeting Requests
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests
Funny that OL even allows it.
I had to try. I just had to.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
::snicker::
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
(yessir, I am pushing the mouse nicely today..)
As you may have already read..
I want OL2k clients to resolve a mailbox against some specific value entered
into a recipient field of a new message. Q151198 describes the
straightforward process of setting this up: set the Search-Flags schema
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange
shad'dup..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
imagine my horror
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
no. you shad'up.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
shad'dup..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
shad'up, the both of you.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
no. you shad'up.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange
a global mechanism, then create a subfolder and
move the worked messages into it.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:28 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Public Folder Character Trait #263
Subject: Public Folder
mdbvue32 is on the exchsrvr setup CD.. proving once again the old adage that
the most obvious is the first overlooked..
and what a remarkable little utility it is.. jiminy christmas!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
OL rules and such are, of course, marginally effective at blocking spam from
the Inbox. Removing the target smtp address from the mailbox (mbx) is much
more effective. I offer both as remedies to prevent spam to those suffering
from it.
Opt. 1: OL Rule
- Create a client-side rule which directs
Care to recommend any good, non-MS resources (ref'ed 'em all, I think)
for migrating GW clients to OL2k? Specifically, know any good utils or
tricks/techniques for importing GW client pab's and archived mail into
OL2k?
GET INTERNET
technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inherited Perms within MultiSite Orgs - 5.5
I'm confounded.
Scenario:
- Remote Site B
I'm confounded.
Scenario:
- Remote Site B introduced into Org; lists along with Site A after
connectors are configured, blah, blah..
- Site A B both coexist within same NT4 domain--no Trusts necessary.
- Installed Site B using svc acct common to the Domain
Discovery:
After cursory run thru
ahhh... I remember you now! yeesss...
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
All's fair in war. I am a birds and bees guru.
Hmmm, Liz a ghost writer for Cecil Adams..?
('whazzat?' ref: www.strightdope.com)
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Latin Lesson
Actually Ed, you're a little out
curse these fingers!! The correct URL is www.straightdope.com.
(geez.. you ever notice that OL2k's Message Recall doesn't work on this
list? Maybe Tener could find out why..)
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:11
Forgot 'bout Friday
what with being so busy
messing with Exchange.
Gonna migrate some
GroupWise clients pretty soon.
I will enjoy this.
-Original Message-
From: Vivino, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku
-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:11 AM
Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/
Sue was at MEC2001, btw..
just chimin' in, here
My resume sits.
Bad time to ache for new job.
We're in recession.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
and a little old man who are still friends
even after they know each other so well. Tommy - age 6
-
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame52.html
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3/IMAP
Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I
could free some
Sue was at MEC2001, btw..
just chimin' in, here..
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/
Sure looks like an issue on your end.
Sue has a few nice articles
Take a gander at the following code.
I cp'd it from an HTML-formatted message.
Tell me what it does (then I'll tell you if you are correct).
SCRIPT language=JavaScript
!--
window.open('http://images.free4all.com/pop.html','').blur();
window.focus();
--
...
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail shenanigans
Take a gander at the following code.
I cp'd it from an HTML-formatted message.
Tell me what it does (then I'll tell you if you
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 October 2001 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail shenanigans
Shenanigans? Does this mean there's gonna be a ro-sham-bo? Underpants
Gnomes?
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tim
While I think the attribute is appropriate, I also think the point of the
attribute is sorely missed by a few participants of this list: Trolls are to
be ignored.
Trolls stop their inane posts when--and only when--they notice 1 of 1
responses to them in the list.
On that note, I hate the fact
You are thinking of Eraser2k, maybe?
It purges the registry of all Office2000 apps references. The utility is run
'after' an uninstall of Office2k. Eraser2k works in cases where OL2k is the
only Office2k app installed. Again, however, OL2k must be uninstalled prior
to running the utility.
OWA pages are just HTML.
Makes copies of the OWA.asp files and alter them within an HTML editor to
your liking.
It's a nice way to remove some of the character traits of OWA..
visit email.westat.com (for a peek at my wack at login.asp)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson
Exactly.
The only legitimate reason to defrag the store is after the removal of a
large number of mailboxes which cumulatively represent a significant debit
of space. The qualifications in that statement are necessary: folks get such
a hard-on to defrag their stores, it seems. Moving the
PFAdmin is significantly limited in the information it exports. And by
extension, DirExport's inability to dump the PUB is a marked limitation in
that feature as well. Save Windows Contents--the
'workaround-cum-feature'--is plain silly product design. But I digress.. If
PFAdmin were able to
..and here I simply assumed Jason was being clever and mildly risqué with
his subject line..
Shall we suspect some repressed yet latent Freudian issues with Jason
regarding the size of his IS?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001
..braggart
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
IS : 90 gig
MBX : 3 gig [1]
And all is still running just fine.
[1] Have been lazy this
Another week ends
with no stops in the EV.
Doing something right.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do
some CDO, you are still gonna need a
down menu next to the Show Messages from in the
address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs
will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto
Oh my, 1018.
Helpdesk calls; the day is young.
Time to prove my worth.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Lambert, Mcp, Mcse
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Another week ends
with no stops in the EV.
Doing something right
Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on
your investigator hats..
My wife forwarded this message to me:
From: McDonald, Arthur K.
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM
To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems
Subject: Much to be
a SMTP spoof site it will have details from out side the organisation.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
+44 (0)1392 459155
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33
To: Exchange
: Investigating a Forged Message
Headers, Let us see the headers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Investigating a Forged Message
Here's a little something
, there would be an event in the
event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did
it..)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Investigating a Forged Message
Here's a little something
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
