RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

2002-01-11 Thread Veitch, Michael
I for one want to know how he got management to pay for it. Then maybe I could use the same methods to talk my wife into letting me buy a dual AMD 1900+, 2 GB RAM, 2x 120 GB disks (RAID of course), 18 TFT, 64 MB Ti 500 video card (or ATI 8500). PS. From what I have just read it should be just

RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external

2001-12-18 Thread Veitch, Michael
I believe that you could also leave the smtp addresses in tact and simply empty the address space on the IMS. Also set the IMS to inbound only. Removing the address space will stop Exchange from sending (route will be removed from the routing table) but the IMS can still receive mail. This

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Veitch, Michael
Not an answer but Symantec have commented that this can happen using NAV for Exchange (in their usual extremely humours way): Use the following link to see what they say and what their solution is !! http://service2.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Veitch, Michael
-security.nsf/pfdocs/20010108134 41448 -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:46 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan

RE: exmerge

2001-12-11 Thread Veitch, Michael
Version 3.71 is still on the microsoft site at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/exchange/downloads/lovlettr.asp (part of the love letter removal kit). Mike _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Building large number of mailboxes

2001-12-07 Thread Veitch, Michael
Maybe you should try the following: Obj-Class,Directory Name,Issue warning storage limit,Prohibit send storage limit,DXA-Task Mike Veitch -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 12:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: LOTR Haiku

2001-12-07 Thread Veitch, Michael
Well find out what sort of LOTR character you are before seeing the film http://www.lifesupportal.com/LOTR Mike -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 15:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LOTR Haiku I had a dream

RE: Will restored folders be destroyed by replication

2001-11-26 Thread Veitch, Michael
If you want to preserve Permissions you can (Method 1): 1. Using the DR method but copy all of the PF's to somebody's mailbox 2 Export the mailbox using Exmerge with the option Folder permissions selected. 3. Move the PST file to a production machine. 4. Copy the folders

RE: Moving 45 users between sites

2001-11-19 Thread Veitch, Michael
migration. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November

RE: Moving 45 users between sites

2001-11-19 Thread Veitch, Michael
://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving 45 users between sites We have never had a single issue with using this option selected! Well I

RE: Moving 45 users between sites

2001-11-19 Thread Veitch, Michael
Additional point (after offline chat with Roger) is that we missed at least one other possible issue: If somebody has a rule set to forward to a user that is moving these should be deleted and recreated after the move has taken place. Mike -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael

RE: Moving 45 users between sites

2001-11-18 Thread Veitch, Michael
Exmerge should be able to move rules etc if the option Associated folder messages is selected. Mike -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2001 23:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving 45 users between sites There is no

RE: IMS questions

2001-11-16 Thread Veitch, Michael
Removing the address space completely (no address space) is far more efficient way of dealing with your problem. The removal of the address space will result in your IMS being removed form the routing table (an advantage in a complex environment) while still allowing the IMS to receive mail.

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe - FOR THE LAST TIME!

2001-11-12 Thread Veitch, Michael
Shawn's Comment: The smarter solution would have been to remove the dangerous capabilities of their scripting language. Is that so difficult for some to understand? [Veitch, Michael] Sure is a very black and white picture you paint, is it safe to assume that you