.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
I read somewhere that it was possible to use one IIS server to front
multiple Exchange 5.5 servers, member of different Exchange sites. Is it
true?
If yes, can you point me in the right direction on how to implement this?
Thank you.
Daniel
-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5
I read somewhere that it was possible to use one IIS server to front
multiple Exchange 5.5 servers, member of different Exchange sites. Is
it true
to see what kind of conversations are going
on between the servers?
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP relay to smarthost
Ok, trick question time...
I have installed IIS 5.0SP3
to use IIS SMTP to forward all to the internet?
Daniel Bourque
Support réseau - Centre d'assistance technique
Loto-Québec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(514) 499-5056
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
I have this error in my log every couple of seconds. Does anyone know how
to get rid of it and what causes it?
Error 0x8004010f occurred while generating an outgoing replication
message.
Type: 0x4
Folder: (1-526A)
Database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store
Thanks
Daniel
?UmVjZWl2ZSB5b3VyIFNpbGRlbmFmaWwgQ2l0cmF0ZSAgb3JkZXIgaW4gMjQgdG
8gNDggaG91cnM=?=
I would like to be able to feed words in the page or program and get the
caracter translation so I can adjust anti-spam filter.
Thank you.
Daniel Bourque
[EMAIL PROTECTED
If they send you a test e-mail, what is the delay?
Can it be that their mail server is sending Ident Request and that your FW
is dropping it instead of Rejecting it?
-Message d'origine-
De : Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 18:20
À : Exchange
Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in
your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW
log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was
sent at the same time...
No need to look in everybody e-mail...
Anybody with a link to a site or program to do 8859-1 caracter convertion?
A lot of spam msg have the subject field in this format so you cannot just
filter on some common keyword...
-Message d'origine-
De : Bourque Daniel
Envoyé : 24 octobre, 2003 21:37
À : 'Exchange Discussions
so I can adjust anti-spam filter.
Thank you.
Daniel Bourque
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
Why is that correct?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
The correct line is, You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go
unused, now did you?
Ed Crowley
memory if it is
available. Now do you understand why we always use that line?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:44 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk
Something strange is happening with POP3 clients on our Exchange 5.5 SP4
server. When they send mail to other mailboxes on the exchange server, no
problem, the mail arrives immediately. When they send to external recipients
the mail takes ages to be delivered, e.g. we sent a test message on
I run 2 Exchange 2000 Enterprise servers on an HP EVA2 SAN.
Each server has a 65GB IS right now and a 2GB Public IS.
16,000+ mailboxes total. I have seen no issues since migrating from our
5.5 environment 1 month ago to 2000 and moving away from direct attached
SCSI disk environment. The big
We are being forced to re-evaluate arcserve by our development team because
it's the only product they've found that they can properly interface with
via CLI or API. This isn't for exchange backups, but I still feel a bit sick
about the idea of arcserve being installed on any of our servers.
Veritas NetBackup can be fully controlled via CLI.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:47 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Brick Level Backup
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
We are being
Do you enjoy correcting people's grammar when you're not on the internet?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August 2003 19:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
That would be you're.
Ed
Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
I do.
It is rather annoying to hear people speaking incorrectly.
Please drive through.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I'm thinking about trying out citrix
-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
-Original
to be of
Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly.
Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP?
-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com
- Original Message -
From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Configuring an Outlook for the Mac to
connect across subnets? I need that ongoing pain like I need
another hole in my head.
It's not hard, just a hosts file or DNS entry then it workshow is this
so different from windows?
Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?
Hopefully
An update is available for office X on the mac which includes the new
exchange-aware entourage.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx?pid=downloadlocation=/mac/DOWNL
OAD/OFFICEX/exchangeupdate.xmlsecid=5ssid=14flgnosysreq=True
Our first impressions are that it's a load of rubbish. Seems
No, you don't have to stop the services.
Please clarify how you are using veritas; i.e. are you looking on the
relevant drive and ticking priv.edb as a file to backup? If so, this won't
work, you need to tick 'Microsoft Exchange Information Store' in the veritas
directory tree. If this doesn't
, and
extract mailboxes or actual messages.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
No, you don't have to stop the services.
Please clarify
or actual messages.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
No, you don't have to stop the services.
Please clarify how you are using
administrative tools.
Finally, if you need immediate help, call PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel
P.
Sent
Hey all,
First off.. thanks for the help with the ADC issue I was having earlier
this week.
Using the SP3 ADC worked, also running the install as the same
named-account as what
Exchange 5.5 service acct. provided the appropriate work around.
Now that I have gotten my ADC installed, a Recipient
Hey all,
I am setting up a development environment to test our migration scenario
from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but ran into a snag.
In my development environment I have a Domain Controller that was built
and added to our production domain in order to have a recent
list of user accounts,
.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Yes, I see your point, although I'd hope my
just wondering if anyone has a favourite AV scanner for linux with postfix
as the mta? our trend renewal is coming up and i'm thinking i'd like to
remove the CPU burden of AV scanning from the exchange box and put it on our
linux relay which also does the spam filtering.
thanks
dan.
and all.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2003 13:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2003 14:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Well, the linux products do file blocking etc so I don't any
difference
protection you might be running.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Well, the linux products do
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2003 15:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Yes, I see your point, although I'd hope my desktop AV would
catch this
stuff before it reaches the exchange server.
What I don't
How access to Public Folders in different Sites, in Differents Domains??
I configure Public Folder Affinity, but nobody have access out the Site.
Trust relationship?? It´s necesary??
I access to Public Folders in other Sites, without Trust, and Public folder
Affinity.
Thanks.
Daniel Mataloni
it from there.).
This will do for a start.
Regards.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Atkinson, Daniel
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: slow login with mac clients after
to see if the slow logon still occurs?
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 13:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
Hmmm, this slow login problem has appeared again. All mac
clients
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Atkinson, Daniel
Sent: woensdag 18 juni 2003 14:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
Hmmm, this slow login problem has appeared again. All mac
last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors
in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files
as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except
now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in.
are running MacOSX
then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.).
This will do for a start.
Regards.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Atkinson, Daniel
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have an exchange server at another office on the end of a vpn tunnel. When
the users from that office come here to work they can't connect to it.
Similarly, when our users go there they can't connect to the exchange server
here. The servers are in different orgs and different nt domains, no
-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:54 AM
Subject: seems like a name resolution problem
I have an exchange server at another office on the end of a vpn
tunnel.
When
the users from that office come
.
The same policies are working fine on all other mailbox servers.
Thanks,
Daniel Rosenthal
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to
National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the
individual or
entity to whom they are addressed
Time synchronisation? Only one DC in the root domain should have an
external Time source.
Whar is the status of the replication if you run Replication Monitor
(RepMon)?
-Message d'origine-
De : Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 25 février, 2003 20:16
À : Exchange
To answer my own question, Imsext.Dll remove the read receipts request from
the journaling mailbox.
-Message d'origine-
De : Bourque Daniel
Envoyé : 23 février, 2003 14:52
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE : ImsExt.Dll
Ya but that's not what I am looking for. Imsext.dll seem
that they all have the same time because of a
3rd party source should be just fine right?
You did bring up a good point though.
Thanks for your input,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I need to translate comment send to users by a program only available in
english... I think I read a long time ago here about a program (MSDN?) that
would allow to edit text msg inside a DLL.
Any idea if it really exist? What/where?
Thank you
Daniel Bourque
Analyste - Centre d'Assistance
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bourque Daniel
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ImsExt.Dll
I am replacing my DMZ
Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel
P.
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mass e-mail removal?
Hey all,
A situation receive
Hey all,
A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an
ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community
in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student
body
which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail
Hey all,
Just underwent a major move in our e-mail systems and noticed an
issue with our Alternate Recipients. They aren't working!
Ok, more information... We created mailboxes and custom recipients
to facilitate mail delivery for a legacy system. By Import script I
modified
each mailbox to
!
-dan
-Original Message-
From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Alternate Recipients not working
Hey all,
Just underwent a major move in our e-mail systems and noticed an
issue with our Alternate
Hey all,
I am currently ripping my hair out over this and haven't been able to
find enough information in the archives to help me.
Am running Exchange 5.5 SP3 which receiving incoming e-mail from our VMS
system.
Well, our VMS system has run into many issues over the past weeks and
e-mail has been
The message is not making it to the IMC; the MTA is puking. Look for other
events regarding the MTA or the IS complaining about the MTA.
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: IMC
that was free?
On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is this wireless calendar or sync?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 January 2003 14:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free Mailing List Software
Sensitivity: Private
Hello
Can anyone recommend a
Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.
- Original Message -
From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.
Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
100% Active
All on it's own the bits and bytes spinning in a virtual world of magnetic
potentialities up and changed themselves.
Yeah-huh, right.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:59 AM
Depends on the connection and how it is built; it's determined by the
software. Note there is a choice in later versions of OL (starting with 98 I
believe) to use RPC encryption. The level of encryption is based on the
bitness of the underlying OS.
You don't find too many whitepapers on it
If BLAT failed the problem is on his end. Period.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: messages frozen in an SMTP queue
Hi all. I have Exchange 2000, SP3.
Due to company's needs
MCS only.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A
quick Google on
I use the USPS as my analogy. I do believe when Mr. Postel wrote the
original RFC he used the Post Office as his model.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs
The person attempted to delete an item and does not have the rights to do
so. The delete operation is failing during sync and thus the message.
Clear it by removing the folder from being synched, synch once, then add it
back.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it.
- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups
And when the file gets overwritten by a service pack you'll have to do it
all over again.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
We worked with MCS
Both archived and a FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am
Dang, ain't much that can't be accessed. FTP is not there, nor is a web
server, but hey, with 135 and 139 there are possibilities.
Perhaps you should considering hiring a security consultant to go over your
current setup? *cough*personal plug*cough*
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
And that server is running:
220 mpd.com.sg ESMTP Sendmail 8.11.6/8.11.6; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:42:39 +0800
The explanation should be pretty straightforward.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a user working at a customer site who has mail forwarded from an
account on the customer's Groupwise server to our exchange server. She can
read the mail fine when dialled in with Outlook, but no good with OWA. The
mails appear as attachments called 'read.htm' and when she opens them it
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Delay
All,
Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should
I be
to change, and modify
the value of 'Start' to equal either 2 (for automatic), 3 (for manual)
or 4 (for disabled)
http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/198/
:)
4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Friday, December
IMAP will do that as well.
- Original Message -
From: Tim John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 1:39 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Security
Thanks for the reply. I have played with BLAT and Jmail, but the beauty of
using the MAPI
Any body heard from the Dynamic Trojan Horse Network (DTHN)? Can't seem to
find this name at TrendMicro
https://gtoc.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21693
Alerts
Synopsis:
ISS X-Force has been monitoring the spread of the Dynamic Trojan Horse
Network (DTHN) Internet worm.
If you are talking about the version for Exch 5.5, I can tell you that I
have activate/configure it and remove it as fast... It was killing my mail
system. You normally would use that kind of product to filter what is
coming from the internet but using it inside corp make you filter all
mail
Or a .REG file imported. Can't remember off the top of my head what the
numbers are to represent disabled, manual and automatic but a little
experimenting and poling will reveal them.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Offhand I'd say it first checks the subnet, then response times.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Hitchcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC
Hello all,
Has anyone
And don't turn it off. Set it to run in the offhours. And whoever set it to
run during the day, remove his admin privileges.
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Online
Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being
uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB
folder.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19,
Two choices:
1. Do a Disaster Recovery to a standby server. Extract the necessary data to
a PST. Admonish the user that important mail doesn't go in the Deleted Items
folder.
2. Tell the customer he's toast and show him some best practices.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák
Well, uh... an unauthenticated logon was attempted. What part of this is
mysterious?
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Event ID: 1174
Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0.
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things)
someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his
name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF
said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is
10:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning
So Daniel, why would you assume that I am running a relay server?
You seem so sure of yourself that there is absolutely no possibility of
anything else gone wrong!
Like I've stated already, unless
If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
Hi all.
Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service?
In terms of programming logic I recall it was on the order of 2^20, twenty
times more than what you heard.
- Original Message -
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:57 PM
Subject: Maximum
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Add custom smtp header ?
Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ?
I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data
Not without an external program. The specific functionality you seek is not
inherent in the product beyond archiving and/or logging. Since you have
programmers available they could write something to parse out the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Crystal Reports, comes with Exchange
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange log file utils and tools
Anyone out there with a free one?
-Original
Perhaps you should close your machine against relay.
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Connelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3 week
s)
I am
and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt).
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail
Daniel: Yes, email over
Ensure that the webware SMTP daemon is indeed sending .CRLF. to end the
SMTP conversation. This is what the error message is referring to. Some
mailers aren't as strict about it but that is the proper format. Qmail is
claiming that the mailer is sending .LF. to end the conversation.
-Original
NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)... Still hoping someone can
tell
me if this can be done?
Joe Pochedley
If you have time to do it twice,
you had time to do it right in
the first place.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
You could do this in excel using VBA, write a little app that will parse the
text file and update the excel sheet. Any VB/VBA developer should be able to
help you with this.
The idea is to find/create a little code that pushes the data
in this txt file to exell on a daily basis.
Do you
You mean the UK users will have to access their mail over a link across the
pond? Oy...
Exmerge the whole mess out, give the PSTs to the users. Create the accounts
in your server and be done with it.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Ah... little light goes on
A clear example of why obfuscating data when asking for help tends to cause
problems.
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
I'll assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address
good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bourque Daniel
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail routing
OK, stupid question time. I feel stupid
Nope. First logon will create the mailbox.
- Original Message -
From: Petschow, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: cleaning a mailbox
That sounds like a good idea. Do I need to do anything after it
what is appening?
Thank you.
Daniel Bourque
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
