Hello All.
Exchange 2000
OWA
Windows XP Desktop
After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting
having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or
reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office
2000 CD in.
I did my homework and
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Hello All.
Exchange 2000
OWA
Windows XP
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000
2000/OWA Question
I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop
machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out
to 250 machines and fix them because I was the one that upgraded
Exchange and since I upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked
: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere
on the network and they could browse to it.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED
Knowledge Base Article Q298110 talks about a reg hack to fix this. Maybe
that would work?
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:42:16
Thanks! I thought I knew that.LOL
s.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original
I thought for some reason that you could view others calendars via OWA. Is
it possible to view the calendars of others via OWA. If yes, how?
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 08:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Question
I thought for some reason that you could view others
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Is there a way for those users who access Exchange via OWA to view calendars
of others in the organization?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
Owaserver/exchange/username/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Is there a way for those users who access
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
Owaserver/exchange/username/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced
and Network Services
School of Business
University of Connecticut
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
I'm guessing we are talking two different versions of OWA here.
Ken
PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:41 AM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: OWA Question
Subject: RE: OWA Question
huh? Could you elaborate a littleplease.
Go to IE
URL - owaserver/exchange/username/calendar
When I do this get Page Cannot Be Displayed. What am I doing wrong
, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
I'm guessing we are talking two different versions of OWA here.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1
I'm sorry for posting this here but I've searched everywhere on the net
including Slipstick and other Outlook forums and have only seen questions
regarding this not answers.
In our OWA most people don't have Sent to Sort choice option under send
items folder. I thought it was because we were
Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on Windows 2K SP2
Is It possible for OWA to check names in both the Global address book and
your primary contacts when you are addressing a mail or forwarding a mail..
At the moment I can only get it to check names from the global address book
Thanks in advance for
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu, May 30, 2002 15:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. Let me explain
My root domain is aaa.bbb.com
My child domain ccc.aaa.bbb.com
However, when you send me mail
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
headquarters (OWA question)
It is an IIS issue. Possible a DNS issue. You can have multiple AD
directories that are accessible by using server1.domain.com or domain.comm
but the user must know to type the FQDN in where the domain name field is. I
hope this pushes you in the right direction
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2002 7:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the
addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient
policy??
Thanks
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
headquarters (OWA question)
It is an IIS issue. Possible a DNS issue. You can have multiple AD
directories that are accessible by using server1.domain.com or domain.comm
but the user must know to type the FQDN in where the domain name field is. I
hope this pushes you in the right direction
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2002 7:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the
addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient
policy??
Thanks
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
headquarters (OWA question)
It is an IIS issue. Possible a DNS issue. You can have multiple AD
directories that are accessible by using server1.domain.com or domain.comm
but the user must know to type the FQDN in where the domain name field is. I
hope this pushes you in the right direction
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2002 7:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the
addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient
policy??
Thanks
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
headquarters (OWA question)
It is an IIS issue. Possible a DNS issue. You can have multiple AD
directories that are accessible by using server1.domain.com or domain.comm
but the user must know to type the FQDN in where the domain name field is. I
hope this pushes you in the right direction
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2002 7:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the
addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient
policy??
Thanks
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
headquarters (OWA question)
It is an IIS issue. Possible a DNS issue. You can have multiple AD
directories that are accessible by using server1.domain.com or domain.comm
but the user must know to type the FQDN in where the domain name field is. I
hope this pushes you in the right direction
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2002 7:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
Hi there
I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the
addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient
policy??
Thanks
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the inevitable screwup.
Our E2K server will be in a child domain to HQ, I want to run a totally
separate domain (ultimately W2K w/AD) with trust relationships setup. The
child
-
From: Robert Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)
HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't
trust
them. I'm trying to minimize exposure
to point to the DC
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:42 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Exchange 2000\OWA question
Subject: Exchange 2000\OWA question
I am working in a lab environment so I can get more familiar
I am working in a lab environment so I can get more familiar with Exch2k
and OWA and I have run into a stumper. I have gotten OWA to work
before, but that was when Exch2k was a DC as well. In this case I built
the DC and Exch2k as separate machines and I can't seem to get the
authentication to
Your right this means you can't see the DC. Make sure your default domain
settings are correct.
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000\OWA question
I am working
: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000\OWA question
Your right this means you can't see the DC. Make sure your default
domain settings are correct.
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL
, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000\OWA question
I enabled clear text and set the default domain to the correct domain
(under directory security for the default website), but still no juice.
To test I went to http://server1/exchange/account and it comes up with
the Username and Password
: RE: OWA Question
The delay, accourding to a Microsoft Tech I spoke with, can be up to 2
hours.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
Thanks, Andy.
It's strange
NT4 domain, Exchange 5.5
I've just created a new user and new mailbox for that user within the last
15 minutes. In OWA, however, I get the message OWA was unable get to your
inbox.
Is this because I need to wait and if so, why the delay?
TIA.
Bill Lambert
Network Consultant
Endoxy
Q173470
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Question
NT4 domain, Exchange 5.5
I've just created a new user and new mailbox for that user within the last
15 minutes. In OWA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
Q173470
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Question
The delay, accourding to a Microsoft Tech I spoke with, can be up to 2
hours.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
Thanks, Andy.
It's strange...all the existing
Conversation: OWA Question
Subject: RE: OWA Question
The delay, accourding to a Microsoft Tech I spoke with, can be up to 2
hours.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Question
Does anyone know where to get the CeMail client that allows PDA's to access
OWA without frames and lower graphics for Exchange v5.5?
LaCretia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Here's a question with probably a very simple answer: Why can't you access personal
distribution lists from OWA? Is this a feature or a bug?
Thanks,
Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Robert Moore, MCSE
Network Administrator
The Agnes Irwin School
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q249551
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA question
Here's a question with probably a very simple answer: Why can't you access
personal distribution lists from OWA
page view of some stuff on the fly.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA question
Here's a question with probably a very simple answer: Why can't you access
personal distribution
A.very wise oh exchange master!
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Epoch
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: another OWA question
I've set up a test W2K box with IIS enabled, Exchange 5.5, Proxy 2 and OWA
(all current patches and SP's installed). Test users can
Swynk
Conversation: another OWA question
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Are you refreshing the inbox page periodically? OWA doesn't work like
Outlook-- you need to manually refresh the page periodically to see new
mail, and there are no notifications of new mail arriving.
Mike Morrison
My fault I didn't realize you were using Exchange 5.5. Disregard last
post.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: another OWA question
I've set up a test W2K box
, October 31, 2001 7:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Please explain cannot receive any.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Sorrycant receive any means that when users have
authenticated onto OWA there is nothing showing as received;
no messages are there.
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED
No...PST=BAD
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Where is the users mail
Ok. What happens when you login to these mailboxes with the standard
client? Do you see any messages then?
S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
Ok. What happens when you login to these mailboxes with the standard
client? Do you see any messages then?
S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Epoch?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: another OWA question
I've set up a test W2K box with IIS enabled, Exchange 5.5, Proxy 2 and OWA
(all current patches and SP's installed). Test users can authenticate onto
OWA and can send messages but cannot recieve any. IMS shows the recieved
messages in the Mailbox Resources window. I've read all the FAQ's and
, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: another OWA question
I've set up a test W2K box with IIS enabled, Exchange 5.5, Proxy 2 and OWA
(all current patches and SP's installed). Test users can authenticate onto
OWA and can send messages but cannot recieve any. IMS shows the recieved
Hi all,
Forgive me if this has been answered in the past but I can't seem to
find it in the FAQ's, Microsoft Tech Database, or anyplace else for that
matter!
I've just finished (?) rolling out a brand new W2K server farm with
Exchange 2K server and Outlook Web Access as the remote mail
Could you rephrase the question?
John Fullbright
MOSMWNMTK
SGkgYWxsLA0KIA0KRm9yZ2l2ZSBtZSBpZiB0aGlzIGhhcyBiZWVuIGFuc3dlcmVkIGluIHRoZSBw
YXN0IGJ1dCBJIGNhbid0IHNlZW0gdG8NCmZpbmQgaXQgaW4gdGhlIEZBUSdzLCBNaWNyb3NvZnQg
VGVjaCBEYXRhYmFzZSwgb3IgYW55cGxhY2UgZWxzZSBmb3IgdGhhdA0KbWF0dGVyIQ0KIA0KSSd2
79 matches
Mail list logo
