there -
barnone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format
to use in
Outlook 98.
Text/HTML or RTF.
Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful.
The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3.
Thanks,
Darrin
Plain text.
On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in
Outlook 98.
Text/HTML or RTF.
Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful.
The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3.
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I
think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But
I'm dealing with 200
I try not to look at anyone else's briefs.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Have you ever read legal briefs? They make
It's common law.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J.
Carter
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text.
On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in
Outlook 98.
Text/HTML
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it.
- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups
dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text.
On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL
that is
going on, it is really an apples and oranges comparison.
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion
, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format.
I try not to look at anyone else's briefs.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09
.)
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I
think that plain text is the way to go
.
--
be - MOS
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I
think
Jeremy
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client
can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not
be able to read RTF format
14 matches
Mail list logo