Try http://servername/exchange
James Forbis, MCSE, CNE, CCA, CNS
4BIS.COM, Inc.
11491 Gideon Ln.
Cincinnati, OH 45249
PH (513)469-7887
FAX (513)469-7877
Cell (513)200-4079
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:41 AM
To: Exchange
That happened because the first access to the mailbox was using a client
that was configured for Arabic.
You can change the folder names using an old Exchange 5.0 client. The
easiest way for you to do this might just be to create a new mailbox,
though.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance
Hmm... 'screen shots of a gal' gets by spam filters
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Rotman
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Try messageware for the Plus Pack 5.5
http://www.messageware.net
I believe that if you have a Titanium front-end and 2000 back-end you
will still get 2000 OWA. Ti OWA requires a Ti backend.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
Messageware has one but it won't look like what your expecting. OWA
Titanium much looks better than 5.5. We are in the mist of finding out
if you can run OWA Ti in a front end mode with no ill effects with
Exchange 2000 on the back end. The Microsoft Eng. Onsite has calls into
the Development
message one has a cool suite. But before they had their 55 solution I had to
get one
I've been using Ten Four's GAL enhancement to OWA for over a year, very
nice.
http://www.tenfour.com/english/default.asp
its call OWA Address List
bill
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR
Try messageware for the Plus Pack 5.5
http://www.messageware.net
here are some screen shots - check out the GAL!
http://www.messageware.net/enews/pp5531j03/PlusPack55NewsFlash.html
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003
-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:elmerick;timken.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
We have this problem when the surname is not unique therefore
in my case
there is more than one Elmerick
Not guaranteed to be unique or unambiguous.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/1/2002 6:34 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
That's why its best to use the alias for the initial OWA login screen.
That's guaranteed
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
Not guaranteed to be unique or unambiguous.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/1/2002 6:34 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
That's why its best
] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Swynk)
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
But SMTP addresses are (unique at least) and work quite well in OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff
Administrator
330-471-3409
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
What versions??
Here is the OWA5.5 Troubleshooting whitepaper
;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Elmerick, Ralph
H.
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access - Access denial Error Message
We have this problem when the surname is not unique therefore in my case
there is more than one Elmerick in the company
What versions??
Here is the OWA5.5 Troubleshooting whitepaper:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content
/whitepapers/owa_tshoot.aspFR=0
For access is denied:
Access Is Denied
When you log on and try to type authentication credentials, you may be
repeatedly
some UK webhosts force everything through proxy servers that break
authentication.
Freeseve and NTL are two I've had problems similar to what you describe.
If you use only basic authentication it should work (but you might not want
/ be able to do this)
If your user uses a web anonymiser it
Most likely he was NOT using Internet Explorer and you require Strong
Authentication which is only support through IE.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Have him try logging in from Germany.
But seriously, don't you think a he can not login is a little vague?
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access
I have a user who is
we are using Basic Authencation and windows authentication and i asked him he was
using IE...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
Most likely he was NOT using
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
Have him try logging in from Germany.
But seriously, don't you think a he can not login is a little vague?
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web
Try using aoptix\user or aoptix/user.
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
he uses IE to browse the net in his browser he types
http://mail.aoptix.com
Access
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
he uses IE to browse the net in his browser he types
http://mail.aoptix.com/exchange a login and password prompt comes up
he enters his user@aoptix
and password press enter the same prompt comes back asking
for the same informations then i had him try
Have him try domain\user to login. Or specify the default domain for basic
authentication.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
he uses IE to browse the net
try using domain\account name
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bashir Malekzada
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
he uses IE to browse the net in his browser he types
http
Exchange 2000 does not apparently need the log on locally right for OWA to work.
However, you really should look at the NTFS permissions on the /exchweb virtual
directory. I experienced the same symptoms when, in an effort to tighten security, I
removed the Everyone has Full Control NTFS
And numbers and exclamation points and icons, oh, my!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error
Square, a few columns - with some text. Kinda cute actually
What do the Application Event Logs look like?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error
I can't speak for Exchange 2000 but I ran into the same issue with OWA
Square, a few columns - with some text. Kinda cute actually.
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error
What do the Application Event Logs look like
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
More comments inline
...snip...
How about
How much does each cost you? What is the additional cost of the reduced
function?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
1:56 PM
To: Mark Rotman; Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
I'm not sure how one would quantify those things in hard dollars. What cost
would one assign to the inability to create note objects via OWA?
If you don't need them, there's $0 cost associated with the inability
More comments inline
...snip...
How about the tangible fixed costs like:
OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
-- Same cost.
Right, its just the cost of Outlook, which includes a CAL so something like
$60 Outlook versus $20 OWA, dependent on order quantities and licensing
programs?
Bandwidth of
Bandwidth of Outlook versus OWA
-- How much does bandwidth cost?
Depends, I guess we need to know the avg utilization of Outlook in kpbs
versus OWA in kpbs. I suppose this will also be dependent on Outlook 97
versus 2000 versus XP.
Serdar says:
We have done a network utilization comparison
Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Rotman
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
More comments inline
...snip...
How
User error? OWA wouldn't know where the user is located.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Farquharson,
Do the OWA and the local computer time zone properties match at home
(should at the office)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Farquharson,
Andrea
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access
Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and
implementing Outlook Web Access?
We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that
says
Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related
fixes required for Outlook Web
Access.
The
It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that
there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 13:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that
there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it.
-Original Message
We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename the files to
Setup.exe
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
It's a Select disk - from memory you
Success! Thanks Tristan / Matt!
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:30 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
Hi Martin
That's exactly what I did. I reinstalled service pack four, and then
retried to install OWA, all with the same error.
Thanks
Did you SP Exchange again after installing OWA? That is important
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access
Hi everyone
I was hit hard
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
Did you SP Exchange again after installing OWA? That is important
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access
]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Mahesh,
FYI, PSS recommended reregistering the cdo.dll and cdohtml.dll on these IIS
servers. Right now we are monitoring them to see if that helped or not.
S./
-Original Message-
From
Message-
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 11:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Serdar,
Did you get any results yet?
We brought our problem to the attention of Microsoft, there is a engineer
working on it right now. But so
?
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 11:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Serdar,
Did you get any results yet?
We brought our problem to the attention of Microsoft, there is a engineer
working on it right now
: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 12:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Hi
Just install W2K (with most recent sp) and install owa on it.
There is no easier way. What problems did you encounter?
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 12:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
From memory: built W2K, stick in Exchange EE CD, select custom, just OWA,
click install and then get message complaining about incorrect service packs
and only option is to exit. Think I didn't
Notes for
further instructions.
which is nicely detailed in Q179796 but doesn't mention W2K.
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 13:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
I assume the CD you are using is Select
.
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
I assume the CD you are using is Select. What you need to do is copy all of
the files from CD to the local drive and rename
September 2001 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Correct. Svrmax is Enterprise. Svrmin isn't. Still can't find the Q you
mention. If you have the time to find it I'd be most grateful. Error message
is:
Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT
Wicked. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Always like replying to myself!!
Here is the article for the error you're getting:
Q245785
06, 2001 10:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Mahesh,
FYI, PSS recommended reregistering the cdo.dll and cdohtml.dll on these IIS
servers. Right now we are monitoring them to see if that helped or not.
S./
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto
is
not high, performance shouldn't be an issue.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Thank you, Serdar for this replay.
I'll tried it.
How many owa
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Ok. We are having the exact same problem and I've been trying to figure it
out, too. We have a very similar setup. OWA5.5 SP4 running on W2K SP2 and
separate Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers running also on W2K SP2. So, it's not a
W2K to NT4.0 issue. Here's
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Nothing changed.
I think that maybe there are some sort of connections or sessions that owa
opens and never closes but i can't find any.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski
]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Define really hard. Is is the same interval every time? How do you get
it back to letting you connect -- rebooting?
Are you running DNS? WINS? LMHOSTS? How is the OWA server set up
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mahesh
Bharatsingh
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Hello
After a few days it's impossible to connect to it, the only thing i can do
is rebooting the server.
We have no DNS or WINS running
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Do you have DNS or WINS running at all? it sounds to me like that's a
memory leak or something -- does the processor or RAM become completely used
up?
Drew (MOS)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Not at all.
The processor is being used for about 10% at the most and with memory no
problems also.
I have a DNS server in the network.
Could there be a problem with DNS?
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL
Of Mahesh
Bharatsingh
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Yes, if clients can't connect to owa, because the owa server Failed to
connect to the mailserver, we are able to ping the server.
We also can browse the default website, IIS keeps
Define really hard. Is is the same interval every time? How do you get
it back to letting you connect -- rebooting?
Are you running DNS? WINS? LMHOSTS? How is the OWA server set up? Is
there a seperate exchange server?
What's the versions? They are the same version, right?
Paper or
I will assume that it is rellay hard to connect at this moment.
Enjoy the weekend!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Define really
, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access 5.5 on Windows 2000
It works beautifully.
-Original Message-
From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access 5.5 on Windows 2000
64 matches
Mail list logo
