RE: Working Offline

2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Of course, that would be 160K avaialable bandwidth. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Working Offline

Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks

RE: Working Offline

...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I

RE: Working Offline

;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki

RE: Working Offline

users' folders when working offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki

RE: Working Offline

others calenders, so I'm thinking we could achieve the same by them using public folders instead -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline 1) yes, they have to mark that folder

RE: Working Offline

[mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange servers, and they worked online. We've now moved all mailboxes to our central server, seperated from our remote

RE: Working Offline

others calenders, so I'm thinking we could achieve the same by them using public folders instead -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline 1) yes, they have to mark that folder

Re: Working Offline

, 2002 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Working Offline If they are connected using ADSL (how fast?) there is no reason why they can't continue to work online. My office currently does not have enough user to warrant an exchange server, so we connect remotely to our corp HQ. We are connecting over a 384K

RE: Working Offline

Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Working Offline This issue has come up a few times

RE: Working Offline

needed for Outlook. Seems most here agree 4K range per user. I have seen some say as high as 8K though. - Original Message - From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Working Offline

RE: Working Offline

, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Working Offline This issue has come up a few times regarding bandwidth needed for Outlook. Seems

RE: Working Offline

: RE: Working Offline Because total bandwidth and available bandwidth are two entirely different animals. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions So if you, say, have 20 users in a remote

RE: Working Offline

: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline So if you, say, have 20 users in a remote office, using a high estimate, they would need a total of 160K for outlook. In that scenario, why bother with offline folders and forcing users to synchronize? Even

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

. Any further help appreciated. Nik -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 19:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server His connection is not finding the exchange server. Can he ping it by FQDN

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 09:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server Hi I realised I have the exact same problem with my own laptop whilst trying to replicate during troubleshooting. I've never sync'd over a modem before so never realised, always done

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

-Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server Nik, Is the 'cached info' used/collected from when you was on-line? and not when lasted connected using DUN. Cheers Paul

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

His connection is not finding the exchange server. Can he ping it by FQDN? William -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline From Exchange Server Dear All, I have half