The problem was, or is, that Outlook keeps its own time and that was
incorrect - differing from the PC by an hour in some cases. Some had that
little box checked in Outlook and some didn't. The box is always checked in
Windows.
This is, or was, my problem. I imagine it'll happen again when we
It will be taken into consideration but not just now. There are certain
matters (like SSL etc) which have to be resolved with the ISP and it will
take considerable time.
_
List posting FAQ:
Thank you all for your contributions.
Any one who can throw some light on exmerge.exe use?
I'll be grateful for the help.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Is it not recommended to run DHCP and DNS services on the Root server in a
Windows AD setup? I will be upgrading our domain to AD next week and wonder
if I should setup another server or two for the DCHP services and DNS
services.
What should the root server be capable of handling? Should it be
While this question is better answered on an AD list, or even WinNT-L, I'll
bite.
It depends on the size of your network. It's generally recommended, on
large networks, to separate DNS/DHCP from AD servers, because of logons.
Let's say your company of 1 all log on at 8am EST. We'll, during
Thanks for the Reply. I did post on the AD list...I thought
Thanks anyways.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DNS DHCP Question
While this question is better
I'm not getting messages and the web interface for the list is not beign
helpful.
No need to reply.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Had same problem on one server. I changed all services (third Party)
veritas AV Web to manual rebooted and then applied svp 4
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on
Curently running Exchange 2000, SP3 .. Started getting a lot of Event
ID's 12002, Source MsExchangeIS, Content Engine on one of my exchange
servers.
Desc: Error F9BB 8000 occurred when processing message from
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Check TechNet but get no list of any 12002 errors.
Also,
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=12002source=
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=12800source=
Hope this helps :)
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
There's a security hole in running DHCP on a domain controller in that it
can easily take over name registrations. It's best to run DHCP on a member
server. I believe that DNS is best run in Active Directory Integrated mode
on every domain controller. In Windows 2003, DNS is improved to
What else is running on the server? Are you doing a file-level backup or
file-level virus scan of the M: drive?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
NO to the file-level backups or scanning of the M drive.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EventID's 12002 12800
What else is running on the server? Are you doing a file-level backup
That's good. What about file-level virus scanning of the exchsrvr\*data
directories?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pennell,
Joe,
When you restart the SA are there any errors generated? If the RUS is
going to spit out any initialization errors...this is when you would see
them (learned this the hard way when I put a RUS on a mailbox server
that also hosted over 5000 mailboxes a year or so ago). Initialization
errors
Greetings,
I know I am going to open myself up to a bunch of grief, but here it goes..
My disaster recovery person is looking for the new buzz word for security
violations. The person does not breach security nor do they impact. Does
anyone know the answer?
Thanks in advance for helping.
http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?r=2q=intrusion
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is another buzz word for violation?
Greetings,
I know I am going to open myself up to a
I think Swynk has just jumped the shark.
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: What is another buzz word for violation?
Greetings,
I know I am going to open myself up to a
The most versatile word in the language carries connotations of penetration
and (potential) violation.
I'd use that.
And right off., of course.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2003 17:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is another
The past tense is probably most appropriate after the violation has occured.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shotton Jolyon
Can you provide more information, or point me in the direction of said
information, regarding this DHCP security vulnerability.
Thanks,
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Search TechNet for hijack dhcp and you should find some interesting stuff.
BTW, The Key School is an excellent school. Good gig - and I'd maim to be
able to have that commute (assuming you live near/in Annapolis!)
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
It's there in TechNet somewhere.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:15 AM
To:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255134
- Original Message -
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: DNS DHCP Question
Can you provide more information, or point me
Good afternoon everyone,
I have Outlook 2000 hooked to Exchange 2000. I want to set up some
additional from address, to respond to messages that redirected to me
via another mail system. All mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets redirected
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I need reply from [EMAIL
Hi all. Please tell me where I can download the good old Exchange client
from. Thanks!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Exchange using MAPI won't allow you to use alternate addresses unless
they're in the directory and you have Send As permissions, in which case you
can specify them in the From: field. Being that you're trying to
impersonate external accounts, this may not be a satisfactory approach.
With Outlook
Thanks for the reply. I'm using Outlook 2000 right now, and I'm not sure
how to create another profile. I set up a new account under my primary
profile, and set the SMTP server to the exchange server (which has SMTP
running), but the problem is, I can't tell the account not to check
email (OE has
Control Panel Mail Show Profiles
Be sure to select Prompt for a profile to be used so you'll be given a
choice.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
We have a requirement to have all users see 12 months out on their and the
company calendars, is there a way I set this as a default in Exchange? We
have manually set it for some users, but it is too time consuming to hit
all of them, but I guess a group policy or sorts would also work.
Thanks-
I need to chnge this to 12 months for all of the users...
Is there a way to modify it on the back end, so we do not need to do it in
Outlook on all the workstations? (think the default is 2 months?)
Thanks-
ps - Exchange 2000
_
List
It's not an Exchange, but an Outlook setting. I don't know an easy way to
make this happen, but if something exists, it'd be at
http://www.slipstick.com.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
To exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a window nt4.0 sp6 box ?
thanks!!!
Joe
***
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged
and
We used a bat file with a reg push in it like below.
reg push bat file
IF EXIST c:\12months.reg GOTO NTC
Copy \\novell server\sys\public\12months.reg c:\*.*
c:\windows\regedit -s c:\12months.reg
12months.reg
You might gain some additional performance if CPU is causing you any
bottleneck. The disk subsystem, however, is more typically the limiting
factor in Exchange systems.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
Thanks - we will give that a try :)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
You still need it? I can send it to tomorrow when I get to work let me know
offline.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all. Please tell me where I can
I have a client who wants an open PC to be able to sync multiple palm
pilots with multiple outlook profiles. Their exchange server is 5.0 on
an NT4.0 server, while the new main server is Win2k. We setup a new
domain, setup the trust to NT4 domain then changed the exchange mailbox
accounts to the
If the Outlook is configured to prompt users for their credentials in
addition to the profile to be used, there shouldn't be an issue. Ditch the
generic logon and the superset of permissions.
On 07/28/03 22:23, Ron Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a client who wants an open PC to be able
39 matches
Mail list logo