I was wondering
vbg
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tech Buddies
Get bent??? Why, whatever do you mean? I know what my definition of
bent is, but it might be different
Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which is Microsoft's minimum spec?
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 September 2001 17:48
To:
And for that, I am profoundly grateful.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Office Assistant
I usually vaporize the people singing that before they get that far.
(:=
Yes. No.
- Original Message -
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:38 AM
Subject: RE: Defrag Drives
Do I have to schedule Exchange IS Maintenance period? Does it stop the
service?
Cheers
Do you need a third party tool for it ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 08:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Defrag Drives
Yes. No.
- Original Message -
From: Van
No.
- Original Message -
From: David N. Precht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Defrag Drives
Do you need a third party tool for it ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
If I read the question correctly, you scanned the server and saw other
folders in their mailbox. How did you do this? If you saw folders on the
Exchange server, then what you saw were not PST files. And PST files do not
prompt with a warning about running out of disk space. Can you please
clarify
Dear Exchange Admins,
We upgraded to Ex2000 from Ex 5.5 about 3 or 4 weeks ago. We're still
using the ADC but there are no accounts or public folders that exist on
the 2 remaining Ex5.5 servers. Our public folders work great through
the Outlook client, but through OWA 2K, people with
Does anyone know what this error means:
A RUNTIME ERROR HAS OCCURRED.
DO YOU WISH TO DEBUG?
LINE: 87
ERROR: dek is undefined
IT happens when I go to a website.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Herrick, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:02 AM
To:
This is an Exchange list. The MS newsgroups for IE would be a more
appropriate place to ask this question.
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: # of folders in
You must like soggy crust.
Warm the oven to 350. Take the pizza out of the box and place on a cookie
sheet and warm inside the oven for 10-12 minutes.
A warmed baking stone would be better than a cookie sheet, but more
difficult to come by.
...Joel
PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories
Alert - Thread Hijacking in Progress
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: # of folders in mailboxes
Does anyone know what this error means:
A
Although we hadn't been using the full domain\logon when we logged on, I
just verified that that does not make a difference.
Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577
-Original Message-
A warmed baking stone would be better than a cookie sheet, but more
difficult to come by.
buy unglazed quarry tiles dead cheap, better than a pizza/baking stone.
dan.
_
List posting FAQ:
Does anyone know what this error means:
A RUNTIME ERROR HAS OCCURRED.
DO YOU WISH TO DEBUG?
LINE: 87
ERROR: dek is undefined
IT happens when I go to a website.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:19 AM
To:
Missy is NOT, repeat, NOT Richard's Tech Buddy, since this was not an
Exchange question. Play on.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
I'll need to see two forms of ID and inspect your calculator.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Van Huissteden,
Adriaan
Sent: Sunday,
i COULD TRY TO TRICK U GUYS SAY IT HAPPENS WHEN i GO INTO OWA AND GET THE
ERROR
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
I'll need to see two forms of ID and inspect your
If you touched M: Drive permissions in ANY way, you are among the hosed. If
you did any hardening of your IIS on that machine, check to see what the
hardening did.
Does this work if you use a front-end server for it?
Does this work if you use http://servername/exchange to start the OWA
session?
Nope. It would still be an IE error.
Schlemiel.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001
Why are you replying to your own question with the same question?
The error usually means that the person who wrote the website made a mistake
in their coding.
But that isn't really on-topic for this list.
Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a
Heh heh.
Actually, it would be better to ask whoever it is who writes dodgy code.[1]
[1] Tiggers don't like code errors
Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!
My bad. I submitted a change to the maintainers of the FAQ.
___
Mitch Claborn - Ignite Sales
(972) 458-5519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Make your own.
Create an IIS server. Expose it to the Internet. Don't patch it. Wait a day
or two. You'll have your test box.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No.
And don't frag them, either.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Van Huissteden,
Adriaan
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 11:19 PM
No. Just militistic strategery.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:50 AM
To:
Through experience we've learned that M: drive permissions are a no-no,
but that was after this was already occurring and is still occurring on
folders that we've never looked at through the M: drive.
We are using OWA as a front-end server.
I tried the http://servername/exchange rendition with
hmm thats too much of cookin for me ... My definition of cooking is much
simpler than that.
Kuminda Chandimith
Sr. Technical Consultant
Ducont.com FZ-LLC
Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
Fax: +971-4-3913001
http://www.ducont.com
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL
You know, you'll get much better results if you start a new thread for your
question, and leave all responses there.
You'll get even better responses if you ask questions about Exchange.
You *could* claim the error came from OWA, but you'd have to specify exactly
which page causes the error.
That wouldn't be an AD MANAGEMENT class would it?
...Joel Osborn
How dare you use your constitutional right to question my contitutional
right to criticize your right to do away with my constitutional rights?
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Thanks!
See this article:
http://www.swynk.com/friends/haifley/policiespt1.asp
-Original Message-
From: Luis Pérez Lazo
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Mailbox size advice
Hello
I'd like to know your opinions on whether to let user's
You got anything backing up or scanning the M: Drive?
Apply any recent security patches?
Can you connect directly to the back-end server and have things work?
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
There's a KB on that.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nizar El-Assaad
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Exchange
OK, so what changes the rules in the PIX to allow the mail to flow after the
ETRN?
ETRN is /not/ TURN. ETRN merely indicates to the queueing host I'm here
now. The host still uses the same inbound SMTP connectivity it would have
tried to use before the mail was queued.
There seems to be something wrong with permissions on few of our public
folders on Ex2000 and AD native mode.
It seems to be impossible to get and grab owner permissions for the
administrator. Possibly this could be because of mixup of clients (Outlook,
cdo 1.21, OWA) accessing this folder.
It
I dub thee, Iron Chef Migration!!!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Batching exmerge
Funny you should mention this.. I do this about quarterly. Seriously.
You didn't
Kuminda's definition of cooking has three components[1]
1. Heating
2. Boiling
3. Mixing
[1] If you have to do more than one for the same foodstuff, put the
stuff back and find a restaurant. :)
-Original Message-
From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday,
It is just that I want the server in the secure zone to open the connection,
and not vice versa. I am not sure if this improves security, but that is
what the guys from Cisco told me. Is it true, or just opening port 25 on
both sides would be the same, no matter which server initiates the
hi all,
we've just moved a load of users onto outlook 2001 (mac) from OE5. They're
not too happy because of missing features and no easy migration tools, but
hey ho.
The admin at one site has raised the point that in outlook, as with the pc
version, you can edit and save messages in the
We use BackupExec and Trend Micro's Scanmail for Exchange.
It's not worked from Day One so I doubt the security patches caused
issues.
Interesting through, if I connect through the one PF server directly, I
have problems. If I connect through the 2nd PF server, it's peachy.
This is a huge
In my experience the guys from Cisco are a bit bumbling when it comes to
email. Don't let them tell you MAILGUARD is a good thing. Ugh.
Your configuration a) won't work, b) is overly complex, and c) doesn't add
any measurable security.
Feel free to use the DMZ system to relay the SMTP traffic
If the staff are not trusted that much then they shouldn't be there (or the
admin, for being so untrusting). Let the bosses decide what to do with staff
if they do this and not worry about fixing the cause (after all, they could
use Word to send themselves memos..)
Tris
-Original
thanks for your comments - my thoughts exactly!
dan.
If the staff are not trusted that much then they shouldn't be
there (or the
admin, for being so untrusting). Let the bosses decide what
to do with staff
if they do this and not worry about fixing the cause (after
all, they could
We're still not out of the woods as I can replicate the folders to a 3rd
server (supposed to be identical to the first 2), remove the replica off
the bad server, and the 3rd server has the exact same folder
permissions issues as the original first server. The 2nd server remains
good for
Exchange Version: 5.5
OS: NT4.0 SP6
ISSUE:
OWA works fine when one firewall (checkpoint) is up and running. When
second firewall comes up, OWA doesn't work from outside (except if HOSTS
file on the client is configured for exchange's ip address).
Firewalls are configured like each
In Outlook, you can have 3 sets of folders: top-level which is your mailbox
items that come canned with the application (Inbox, Deleted Items, Sent
Items, Calendar, etc), Public Folders and in between, Personal Folders. When
running the scan, you can see each mailboxes' folders (Inbox, Sent
-Original Message-
From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID 13003
You guys such a fun ppl... Thank you all of u for being such a cool,
nice, helpful and
Hi guys,
We have an x400 connector between 2 exchange servers (UK and US) connected
by a VPN through Checkpoint FW1 firewalls.
Messages are routed fine from US to UK but get rerouted through our other
conectors when sending UK to US, cost is ok, getting eventID 1290, 1294,
279 etc in the logs
We are currently using Antigen Anti-virus software on all of our Exchange servers. We
have not used any other anti-virus software to protect the server or operating system
itself. Three years ago when the Exchange systems were being installed it was known
that file scanning anti-virus software
I have a large NT4 /nt workstation environment 3000 plus desktops,
without using a desktop support tool like SMS is their a decent way to
deploy outlook 2000, such as creating a share on the network then
emailing all the users a batch file or something that will start the
install process???
Oh, but it is MUCH funnier to hear my 2-year old son imitate it. Absolutely
hilarious!
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Exchange
I have. Can be slow at times, but it still works. Check this out...I've
got a PC with a P2-266 and 64mb ram running W2K Server and it is a DC. Used
to be a GC Server as well. It is a bit slow, but it hasn't keeled over and
died yet. I've also run W2K Pro on P133's and P166's also with 64mb
Dear Steven,
Wawa uses NAI for both NetShield and GroupShield.
To get to your issue, we have set up exclusions in NetShield
Any drive letter:\exchsrvr\
and subfolders
This works fine for us.
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
I'm coming in late on this thread so excuse me if you've answered this.
What are you using to SCAN the folders with? Are you sure your scan their
Personal Folder? Sounds like you are scanning the Exchange server
mailboxes, not the Personal folder. You do realize that they aren't the
same??
I'll buy a book on sentence structure..damn I need to proof-read before
clicking send.
Matthew
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: # of folders in
Search technet for ports exchange without quotes.
Who is asking, BTW?
- Original Message -
From: Exchange NewsGroups [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: How does outlook 2000 connect to internal exchange mail
If you are talking about having NetShield and Groupshield on the same box,
don't!!! I have only seen trouble with that combination. GSE should be all
that you need. You shouldn't be using the Exchange box for user shares
anyway.
That having been said, Robert is correct :)
Ken Powell
Systems
Greetings all,
We recently ran Exmerge to recover from a damaged IS. (We followed the
instructions in Q259688.) Message traffic is flowing fine however, there are
two problems that we've noticed.
1. Mailbox rules do not work. We've deleted the rules and tried creating new
ones but the we get a
Rob Murawski,
We are using a script created thru an AutoAccept Wizard downloaded from
exchangecode.com. We have not applied the Post SP4 Fix to Exchange yet
(per q281935). I currently have no direct access to the resource's
calendar, thus cannot search for duplicate or corrupt entries. Will
Yes. As long as you exclude the Exchange and the Antigen folders, you
should be ok.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Plender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
We are
I am not confused. As I stated in the previous response, I specifically
described the folders I was seeing and where they were located. And yes, I
do know the difference between the mailbox folders and personal folders. I
did not scan for their personal folders, only the mailbox folders
I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4, and when users are working remotely they
sometimes get the error message No Transport Provider Was Available.
Microsoft's Q166163 states to do a registry hack, however doesn't cleary
say what it does. Does anyone have any information on this problem or
what this
Fellow Exchange people,
I'm stuck.
Single forest, single domain.
Three Win2k AD GC servers, two Win2k Exch2k servers (well almost).
I am trying to install the second Exch2k server, but setup halts with:
The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services
cannot be assigned
The S. Korea server is, well, out of disk space. Nothing you can do about
that.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 1:51 PM
Subject: SMTP;452 4.4.5 Insufficient disk space;try later
Hello!
Anyone else for a nice game of Russian Roulette?
-Original Message-
From: Steven Plender
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/23/01 8:28 AM
Subject: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
We are currently using Antigen Anti-virus software on all of our
Exchange servers. We have not
Alright Ms. Smarty Pants, so what happens when one of your Lusers has a
virus within their Personal Folders, they execute it and take your
network down? It's not possible you say... HA! These are Lusers
we're talking about... ANYTHING is possible.
I think you and your management should
The one that works has the ADC on it.
Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577
-Original Message-
From: Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We do tell them to sort their mail into personal folders if they
insist on keeping everything but we ask them to keep them on their Home
drive. This way, they can keep their mailbox sizes down to well below our
corporate standard limit.
If you are worried about viruses and the potential danger
You are risking a lot by not putting Antivirus software on your server.
We've been running ScanMail and ServerProtect on our Exchange server for
a while w/o any problem. We did exclude ScanMail and Exchange folders
from scanning.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven,
The scenario of adding NAI NetShield to your Exchange server(s) with Antigen
is compatible and supported by our Tech team, as long as you configure
NetShield to exclude the Exchange and Antigen directories from real-time and
manual scanning.
Feel free to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you
What's he risking by not having file-based A/V on his Exchange server?
There shouldn't be anything other than Exchange on the server, so Antigen
should protect his server quite nicely.
I'm not a proponent of file-based scanners on servers that aren't file
servers.
Missy
- Original Message
I guess I'm confused now. Let's get our terminology aligned. As you
pointed out, there are three types of stores: Exchange Mailbox, Exchange
Public Folders, and PSTs.
Let's focus on the Exchange Mailbox. Within an Exchange mailbox, a user may
choose to create additional folders anywhere
My Linux users who use Netscape 6.1 configured with IMAP to read their
mail are extremely frustrated with the 'glarp' they receive in
appointment invitations. The subject is ok but the body seems to
display code. If they view the message via OWA it displays properly but
asking them to either
Don't know if it will help but have a look at Q196381. It does talk about a
Raptor FW, but might have some bearing on your situation. The other
connectors you speak of, how are they configured?
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
No you are not confused...I apparently am just completely wrong. I've taken
this over recently (thrown into the fire so to speak when the virus hit us
last week). Based upon the documentation I am trying to quickly read over
left by my predecessor, the reasoning for the personal folders kept on a
This is what you call pushing it over the line. Do yourself a favor and get
more out of your server and bump your ram up to the max for your system
board. I don't think it's going to get any cheaper (RAM) that is. go here
http://www.crucial.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hello everyone,
I'm new tom this list and hope not to do everything wrong the first
post ;)
I've got a small problem with an Exchange v5.5 server :) The company I
work for wants to operate an Exchange server, mainly for the group
stuff, like shared addressbook.
We're running it on a T1, hooked
TMI!!
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy.
I don't see any harm in it as long as the products
play nicely together. However, unless you're using
the server for a file server, I really don't see any
point in it.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Steven Plender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are currently using Antigen Anti-virus software
on
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/outlook-dev if it can be done, they can do it
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
FYI Folks
-Original Message-
From: Trend Virus Info [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Martin Blackstone
Subject: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_VOTE.A
Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_VOTE.A
Dear Trend Micro Customer:
Agreed. There are seldom good technological solutions
to behavioral problems.
At a previous employer, I was tasked to write a
program that walked all file shares and moved
illegal files (like PSTs and MDBs) to a quarantine
area. It's not a hard thing to script. (I also had
to write a separate
Our users are limited to 30 meg each, which for 90%
of the corporation, this is more than sufficient.
If people are bending or breaking the rules to work
around it, that should be an indication that it is not
more than sufficient.
Any e-mail worth retaining belongs in the Information
Store.
Ed
You should. It does not, but it does use resources,
so schedule during off hours.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Van Huissteden, Adriaan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I have to schedule Exchange IS Maintenance
period? Does it stop the
service?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From:
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/directory/phonepro.asp?sd=gn
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Doc, I can't
There are seldom good technological solutions to
behavioral problems. I don't really see how it's any
different than if they compose their e-mail in
Notepad, then cut and pasted it later. What is the
real worry? Please provide a scenario.
What does skive mean?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
---
Just another reason to block EXE and VBS...
Some people have such flat-slope learning curve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/24/01 3:45 PM
Subject: FW: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_VOTE.A
FYI Folks
-Original Message-
Have you ruled out permissions?
Have you verified that you have a schema master that's
accessible?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Steve Rollings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fellow Exchange people,
I'm stuck.
Single forest, single domain.
Three Win2k AD GC servers, two Win2k Exch2k servers
How is your Internet Mail Service configured to route
outbound mail?
What messaging service(s) are you using in Outlook
(Tools--Services)?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Johannes M. Posel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new tom this list and hope not to do everything
wrong
Hi everyone
I was hit hard with the Nimda virus. Rather than try and fix the server, I
took the server off line and rebuilt it (NT 4.0, SP6a, Ex 5.5, SP4). I
installed Exchange w/o OWA, installed IIS 4.0 and all the security patches.
I then went to install OWA and now I am getting this error:
Exmerge wouldn't be the tool I'd use to recover from a
damaged IS, so I'm not sure what you've done. In any
case, there is a limit of 32K for rules, period. It
sounds like maybe yours are corrupt.
Failed to get inbox could mean just about anything.
It's a pretty generic message.
Ed Crowley
That would work.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Exchange NewsGroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a large NT4 /nt workstation environment 3000
plus desktops,
without using a desktop support tool like SMS is
their a decent way to
deploy outlook 2000, such as creating a share on the
Are you referring to any manager in particular?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PResent the facts differently. Like in a graph.
Managers are genetically
predisposed to prefer information in graphical form.
Seriously, if the message isn't getting
Have you ever tried driving a car with the minimum
amount of gas in the tank?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which is
Microsoft's minimum spec?
-
Phil Randal
Network
Wouldn't matter. We're not paying any attention to
anything you're saying.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i COULD TRY TO TRICK U GUYS SAY IT HAPPENS WHEN i GO
INTO OWA AND GET THE
ERROR
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones
Try specifying the other host with an IP address
rather than a NetBIOS name (which won't work at all)
or a DNS name (which often doesn't work right).
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
We have an x400 connector between 2 exchange servers
(UK and US) connected
Did you SP Exchange again after installing OWA? That is important
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Web Access
Hi everyone
I was hit hard
I think better would be running a V8 on 2 cylinder.
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Guys, I have been asked by my bosses to look into to using Exchange 2000
Conferencing Server.
Has anyone tested this or using it and has advice as to where to start
or what they think of it?
Opinion and advice greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Nathan
Thanks for the reply Ed.
The server which I presume to be the schema master is running fine, no
bad event logs (this was the first AD server we built).
NTDSUTIL should confirm that it is the schema master - right? Or is
there an easier way?
Regarding permissions, I'm using the account which ran
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
