RE: CC:

Yeah, But no way to restrict them there. Anyway thanks -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: CC: In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients

RE: Config Reader

Don't know of a specific product... However, go get a copy of Windows NT shell scripting by Tim Hill. ISBN 1-57870-047-7 This will show you how to write a scripts to do it for you. I do exactly this to back up critical files and config information on a firewall, and it can be scheduled using NT's

RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k

I tried uninstalling the e5.5 IMS (whilst the e5.5 server was still operational) and letting e2k SMTP services take over... Unfortunately, the messages just sat in the x.400 queue waiting to go to the e5.5 server for sending. They didn't seem interested in travelling via SMTP. I also tried

Dumb Public Folder Question

OK. This is probably a dumb question, but how can I set up a public folder to automatically delete contents older than 7 days. I've set the age limit for replicas to 7 but still seem to have several items older than a week in a folder I subscribed to this mailing list. Technical details: I'm

RE: Dumb Public Folder Question

I've found in the past that you need to set this limit such that it plays catch up, e.g. if the oldest item in the PF is 10 days old, you need to set the age limit to 11 days. The item will then be deleted when it becomes 11 days old. If you were to set the age limit to 9 days, the item won't

workflow management in Exchange 5.5

I would like some help on how to implement workflow management on 5.5 Thank You, Lucia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To

RE: Config Reader

I've written a vbscript using CDOEXM to get the basic config of E2k out to a file. I've half-written another script using ADSI to get the config of the ADC out to a file. So you should be able to write your own custom file; check out MSDN as there's useful examples/references. Neil Hobson

average lifespan server

Hi, how long do you generally use the following servers before replacing them: 1. mailserver 2. PDC 3. BDC 4. Database servers tx, Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Invisible PF mail address after mixed to native mode

I have the exact same problem and posted it to the Exchange 2000 list. No repsonse. If you indeed contacted PSS (I haven't until today), let me know if they know the issue (and better, how to fix it) Should this require a non-public fix, I'll call them as well. Regards, Michel Erdmann

RE: average lifespan server

Depends on server configuration and load..etc..etc -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:average lifespan server Hi, how long do you generally use the following

RE: average lifespan server

how do you deal with your accounting department? They can't grasp it that a machine is worthless as a server after three years... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan

RE: Dumb Public Folder Question

Thanks. I've deleted everything to the start of this week. I guess we'll see whether it works next week. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 09:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dumb Public Folder Question I've found in

RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 connections

From the old exinternals Permissions Guide... To create a CCA Technically, you need to have the following permissions: * Read on the CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration, DC=your-domain-here object * Full control on the CN=Active Directory Connections,CN=Microsoft

RE: average lifespan server

-Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 10:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server how do you deal with your accounting department? They can't grasp it that a machine is worthless as a server after

RE: Protocol Error

barf on command... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Protocol Error At one point usa.net servers were non-RFC compliant and would advertise as being ESMTP ready, issue

RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article

That was a good comeback and was easy to read. I give it a 90. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article If you're going to make fun

HELP -- Details Templates --- HELP

Hello Exchange gurus, I have a problem I can't resolve. Situation: Migration phase from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. Issue: Customize the various details templates in Exchange 2000 so they look like as the ones in 5.5. Problem: Of the different details

RE: average lifespan server

Till I need to. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: average lifespan server Hi, how long do you generally use the following servers before replacing them: 1. mailserver 2. PDC

RE: OWA backup error

Yup. They are session files that are left when users don't click Logout They can be deleted -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From:

RE: average lifespan server

Kim, A server is only worthless after 3 years if the load on it has outgrown it's capacity, or it's becoming difficult to maintain the hardware. We have several machines around 5 years old, happily running along doing their jobs. One of my mottos is 'if it ain't broke don't fix (or replace) it'.

Old Site Connectors still being displayed

If I connect to my local E55 server and check another remote sites site connectors I can see connectors that do not exist. Connecting to a server in the remote site lists the correct connectors for that site. Any idea how to fix this so that when I connect locally the remote site connectors are

RE: average lifespan server

-Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server Kim, A server is only worthless after 3 years if the load on it has outgrown it's capacity, or it's becoming difficult

RE: average lifespan server

Our two main fleservers are up for replacement but accounting sees it differently 'as they are only three years old', but I do not want to support those anymore because they carry too much weight in this organisation. To replace HDD's takes two weeks for deliver so I don't even dare to think

RE: average lifespan server

I would disagree with that as well... PC's yes. Servers, no. Say you have a mail server that is no longer up to the job, Well, that could make a nice file server now. An old file server could become a DC or a DNS server. It is all about specs. Our servers are a year old and most of them are shot.

E2k user unable to delete return receipts - looking for old 5.5 server

This is very odd. I have an Exchange site that has 2 E2k servers and 2 5.5 servers. One of the 5.5 servers was my old first server in the site so I followed the Q articles moving everything to a E2k server and shut it down. The last users had been moved to one of the E2k servers almost a week

RE: average lifespan server

So write a docco detailing the lead times on parts/service. Ask the accounts dept for their figure for what it costs the business each day if email were not available (e.g. number of messages thru the IMS multiply by cost of postage stamp) along with any other pertinent factors and give it to

RE: average lifespan server

As an accountant once told me Sometimes a company has to feel pain before it opens the pocketbooks. In other words, sometimes things have to fail first before the company opens its eyes. Then they feel the pain of not being able to access data for a week while you wait for that replacement drive

Outlook error on free/busy data.

Exchange 5.5 SP4 Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct.

MaX Compression

Does anyone know good bad or ugly of a product called MaX Compression? http://www.c2c.com/products/max_com/Max_Comp_Server.htm Apparently it at configurable intervals it zips attachments within both priv and pub into standard zip format. Some of our European locations are getting ready to use

Re: MaX Compression

Hi We use it... No trouble with it so far You have the choice to zip attachments as you attached it to an email and as you receive attachments with zipped files... you can unzip it. Very straight forward.. easy to use ! Vas Constantinou MCP - Original Message - From: Mezyk, Tom

RE: CC:

At a limit of 15 recipients you'll have a wonderfully non-RFC compliant mail server serving as a poor technical solution to behavioral problems. However the answer you seek can be found at support.microsoft.com by selectign the E2K search category and applying the search term limit recipients.

RE: Public Folder Message

Ok, I did everything the instructions stated, I did have a question about where I actually insert the DL. I did a test run and it didn't work, could anyone lend a helping hand. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:40 PM

RE: MaX Compression

I use MicroEye's ZipOut myself, but it's more of a client level solution (and a good one at that). In any event, the product itself has been around for a few years now and I haven't seen any death threats posted against the makers of it. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center

RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article

I'm surprised that no one who read the aricle ha said mm Honey-pot Would have been worth another half-point imho -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend

RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article

M Half-point -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article I'm surprised that no one who read the aricle ha said mm

RE: average lifespan server

I remember someone around here not too long ago was speccing for 10 yrs... :) -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server -Original Message- From: Kim

HELP - Details Templates - HELP

Hello Exchange gurus, I have a problem I can't resolve. Situation: Migration phase from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. Issue: Customize the various details templates in Exchange 2000 so they look like as the ones in 5.5. Problem: Of the different details templates: 1. Users 2. Groups 3.

RE: average lifespan server

Yes, but that person had no clue on real life in IT, and also reneged on that claim when I pressed them to provide one example of a server they had that was that old still running in a production. The original question requires more parameters. Were they inquiring about the general life span of

RE: average lifespan server

yeah, but how do you educate them? Thing is: a large scale refurbishment of the building is planned but I'm gonna have to defend a budget for IT. They don't even want to fork out for decent cabling If I have some best practices to back me up then at least I have something to say... K/

RE: average lifespan server

When I was at Cerner, it was a 6 year depreciation schedule. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server Yes, but that person had no clue on real life in IT,

RE: HELP - Details Templates - HELP

This is the 3rd time I've seen this message posted, there were even 2 replies the first time. If you haven't gotten an answer you like by now, asking the same question over and over again to this group is probably sub-optimal. I'd recommend calling PSS and dropping $249 if it's that important to

RE: average lifespan server

10yrs? are they nutz? This is an easy one Lease for 3yrs. This pretty much assures of hardware replacement as obsolescence occurs and accounting loves leasing effects on the cash flows. The 3yr term just happens to match most manufactures' warranty period so you never have to worry about

Name Resolution problems

Good morning to you all: I am currently working on a problem that has me pulling out what little hair I have left. The situation is this: An Exchange server was moved from one physical location to another, a different network address, different DNS server, but everything else

restricting recipients

Does anyone know a way to limit who a mailbox can send to? I have already restricted the accept messages from attribute but am still trying to figure out how to restrict who a specific group of users can send mail to. _ List

RE: restricting recipients

Restrict it using the accept messages from attribute on other mailboxes in your organization. As for internet e-mail, it's an all or none restriction without the use of 3rd party software I believe. Why would one want to restrict who a user can send to? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales

RE: Name Resolution problems

Does it have a hosts file entry for itself with the old IP address by chance? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:00

Re: average lifespan server

Are you saying all my servers are worthless? - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:59 AM Subject: RE: average lifespan server how do you deal with your accounting department? They can't

RE: average lifespan server

mine sure are, if they don't live up to the needs, then to me they are worthless. Kim -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January, 2002 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: average lifespan server Are you saying all my servers are

Server side mail management

Hey, Can someone point me to a good app for archiving old mail from the server side. I'm taking a look at Archive One has anyone had any experience with this type of product. (Recommendations?) Thanks _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Server side mail management

www.mail-resources.com has a few listed in the weblinks section. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange

RE: average lifespan server

Ah yes, one must count on always having to defend one's budget. I would actually worry if I didn't have to defend it. Not knowing how you are set up or how big you are, I'll make some general pointers here. Usually it's up to a manager/director/CIO to ultimately defend the budget. And this needs

RE: restricting recipients

It's an executive thing. They need to be assured that emails going to their confidential mailboxes cannot be forwarded to others. This would create a security breach of sensitive info. who is watching the watchers deal. Restricting everyone from those boxes would be a large pain in the ass. I

RE: average lifespan server

I think we're talking about worthless from an accounting perspective. Most asset accounting methods consider a depreciation scale of 3 years for most computer hardware, so after 3 years, the product has no asset value - in accounting terms, it is then worthless. They are still usable, but they

Re: average lifespan server

Well, of course. That is totally different than your previous sentence. My quad IBM Pentium Pro 1GB RAM is almost 5 years old. There is no need to replace it. Clearly if your hardware is falling short, then that needs to be documented to justify the need. Storage issues? Throughput issues?

RE: Name Resolution problems

You've got WINS installed on the server, and it's registered with itself? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: restricting recipients

Well sheesh...if that's all you want, go into the properties of the mailbox and click on the limits tab. In the IS Storage Limits section, uncheck the Use IS defaults box, check the prohibit send and the the value to 0. Won't that work just as easily? Jim Blunt -Original Message-

RE: restricting recipients

Any other ideas that are less work? Yes, tell them to sod off. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs:

RE: restricting recipients

So, there's a technet article which says to set it to 0k too, but I thought 0k == no limit and that 1k was the smallest limit one could set. I'd hate to be mistaken. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message-

RE: Name Resolution problems

Nope. Wins is not installed on this machine. However, IP forwarding has been enabled, and NetBEUI protocol has been installed as well. The server also has IIS ver 3.0 installed. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 He who would

RE: How to hide IMS

Set the address space scope to Site rather than Organisation. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24

RE: How to hide IMS

Change the scope on the address space to This site. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs:

RE: How to hide IMS

HUH?!?!? That was about as clear as the Gulf of Mexico... What or shall I say why do you want to do this? D -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to hide IMS Hello dear

RE: How to hide IMS

I already tried this, but so far other sites are still routing their stuff through my IMS. Of course I stopped/restarted the IMC MTA sevices Peter -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

Re: How to hide IMS

When creating a connector one has the ability to make it org-wide, site-wide or location-wide. You can assign this one server a location of whatever and then set the scope of the IMS to whatever and you're done. Setting this name (whatever) does not affect any other operations. Consider it a

RE: How to hide IMS

Ahhh That's what he's talkin about... I thought I'd try and be funny at least... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS Change the scope on the

RE: How to hide IMS

Check the GWARTs on the remote sites. You may need to recalculate routing. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: How to hide IMS

You may have to recalc the routing for all the sites for your changes to take effect... D -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS I already tried this, but so far

RE: How to hide IMS

Basically I want to ''isolate'' my site, on the SMTP connectivity only, from the rest of our org to be able to solve some other problems without having to route outside other sites messages. Peter -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24,

RE: How to hide IMS

Is it me or has your display name changed its appearance Don? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How

RE: How to hide IMS

I'll do this again and ask the other sites to recalculate routing again too. Thanks guys Peter -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS You may have to recalc the

RE: How to hide IMS

It has... I've migrated to the east coast and moved my 700mb mail box to a real server versus the sendmail server I was having to work off of... D -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: How to hide IMS

All go smoothly? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS It has... I've migrated to

RE: How to hide IMS

Looks like they've gone to the more corporate feel of last, first. :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:

RE: How to hide IMS

You don't have control of those sites? I'm sorry to hear that... D -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS I'll do this again and ask the other sites to

RE: How to hide IMS

Thus far... My car and belongings will arrive next week. This is my first week here... Oh and here is North Carolina. :o) D -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide

RE: How to hide IMS

Yeah, I'm getting used to it... Had to change my Exchange Admin options to cooperate with that standard. :o) D -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to hide IMS Looks like

RE: average lifespan server

Agreed, just because a machine is worthless to the bean counters doesn't it make it so in reality. I would look on the warranty side of things for critical servers. If I can no longer get 4 hour on site service, 7 days a week I can't use a machine for critical functions but it may be perfectly

Re: average lifespan server

S don't tell anyone. I run my Exchange5.5 backups using NTBackup on a P166 w/ 32MB RAM. - Original Message - From: Ed Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:46 AM Subject: RE: average lifespan server Agreed, just

RE: average lifespan server

I think my toaster is faster than that! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24,

RE: average lifespan server

My exchange (5.5 SP4) server runs on Pentium 300Mhz/256Mb/20Gb (RAID 5), it is 4 year old Compaq Proliant machine and works great . -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:

RE: Name Resolution problems

Multiple NICs? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name Resolution problems Good morning to you all: I am currently working on a problem that

Public Folders in System Manager Error

I'm in the processing of upgrading from Exch 5.5 to 2000. Yesterday I replicated my public folders from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server; they're still homed on the 5.5 server, but they appear in Administrative Groups\My Group\My 2000 Server\First Storage Group\Public Information Store\Public

LoudPC

Sometimes your friendly neighbourhood CFO will read an ad [1]. And because the ad says something can be done like 'access your work PC from anywhere' [2] then it should be done. Ignoring the spelling of 'compared': www.loudpc.com/what-is/comparisons/exchange.htm Has anyone here played with

RE: LoudPC

There is one solution for remote home access of your work pc in my world Windows XP. This loudpc thing is nothing compared to that. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

RE: Old Site Connectors still being displayed

Orphaned objects can be fixed via http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q183739 or by using Admin /R. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hill, Marty (Hong Kong) Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange

RE: LoudPC

I agree, That is how I am right now sitting in my living room, working on my Work Pc just like I was there. Windows XP Ts session. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Thursday,

RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error

Cool, an AGGIE. Did you look at Q289492? Do you see the folder under the folders/public folders object of the root org in ESM? -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders in

RE: Name Resolution problems

Single Token Ring nic. Two protocols installed NetBEUI and TCP/IP. However, I have learned that the server is a BDC, and I can't seem to find the PDC for the domain on the network. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 He who

RE: LoudPC

That Kevin is a pretty fart smeller. I agree completely with him. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LoudPC I agree, That is how I am right now sitting in my living room,

RE: LoudPC

That's why companies hire guys like us. To keep CxO's out of the way. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LoudPC Sometimes your friendly neighbourhood CFO will read an ad [1].

is there a project template to use for upgrading from 5.5 to 2000?

Does anyone know of where I can find a Project template that shows some sort of guidelines for upgrading an exchange 5.5 environment to a 2000 environment?? Is there one for NT to 2000 SERVERa as well??? Thanks Rich _ List posting

project template for 5.5 upgrades

first message was rejected.. Does anyone know of where I can find a Project template that shows some sort of guidelines for upgrading an exchange 5.5 environment to a 2000 environment?? Is there one for NT to 2000 SERVER as well??? Thanks Rich

RE: LoudPC

Who's Kevin? I thought we were speaking to Dr. Dogg. (G,DR) Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LoudPC

RE: Name Resolution problems

Might want to point the server to the orig DNS srvr and see if symptom still exists. If so, check again for incorrect or duplicate entries in the current DNS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, January 24,

RE: is there a project template to use for upgrading from 5.5 to 2000?

There's a migration cookbook on Microsoft's website for W2K migrations and the Exchange 2000 Resource Kit contains a migration template I believe. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: LoudPC

Well, it requires a PC be left on, which leaves me right out given that I have a laptop. It also poses a few security questions I'd want to have policies in place for if one did implement it. Personally, I'd look at identifying the underlying business need and then trying to find an appropriate

Antivirus Suite recommendations

Hello! Upon attempting to renew our license with NAI for our TVD suite, I've found that the cost of renewal is significantly greater ($8500 +) than what we originally purchased the suite for (around $3000). Of course, we are going from 101 nodes to 175 nodes, but the jump in cost is enormous.

RE: is there a project template to use for upgrading from 5.5 to2000?

MS Project 2000 has a Win2k migration deployment template. Yep, Exch Rskit has 4 templates. Not sure if Win2k Rskit has some too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange

RE: OWA Exchange 5.5

It's preferable to put it on a different server - OWA requires log on locally access on the server hosting it. Darcy -Original Message- From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 Planning

RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations

Martin, since I have no experience with Trend, I assume that there are similar methods for updating workstations with the latest virus definitions and engine upgrades? Is the cost reasonable? Unfortunately, Ohio libraries (like us) are losing money this year due to state budget cuts.

  1   2   3   >