AW: Database Restores
Take a look at Q224977 and Q200941 Doris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. März 2002 21:00 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Database Restores When doing a restore (online) ex.5.5 sp4, does the restore put the restore in process entry in the regristy for DS and IS? Are we suspose to delete those entries and then restort the services Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Some Hosts Unreachable
As it turns out one of our upstream ISPs has misconfigured a router and there was an MTU issue. Daniel was correct to guess that it was a Black Hole Router. My understanding is that basically it's what happens when a router simply discards packets larger than it's MTU size, rather than responding with the proper error code to let the server know to fragment the packets and retransmit. Since the packets just get dropped, the server keeps transmitting the over-large packets until it times out the connection. It was only happening to some domains because the router in question was enough hops away from us that only certain domains were sent that way -- others like SWNYK.COM didn't go through that router and so they weren't affected. The ISP realized their problem late in the day and by 17:30 all of our mail was flowing normally again. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Some Hosts Unreachable First guess, Ben, is that they are set to deny relaying, but I would guess incorrrectly. IIRC, that's RFC compliant behavior for denying relaying - as long as it tanks before giving a valid response to the 354 section. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Some Hosts Unreachable This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it before. Exchange 5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect through an ISA server. On a handful of hosts the message queues up with a Host Unreachable error. On most hosts (including old favorites like aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) mail comes and goes just fine and we don't seem to be having any problems RECEIVING mail. But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and hawaii.rr.com) the mail just queues up. Here's a snippet from an SMTP log that may shed some light: 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=1977 RET=FULL 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : IO: |250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK | 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : DATA 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : IO: |354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF | 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF 3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net. Message subject: Plain Text Test. Rescheduling delivery for later. Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 354 message, then it sits for a little over a minute and seems to time out. This particular test message was just a couple of lines of plain text; so it shouldn't be a size issue. We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire Exchange server once. Judging by the oldest message in the queue this problem seems to have started this weekend and no unusual system maintenance or changes occurred over the weekend. As far as I know we were able to send mail to/from those domains just fine on Friday. Baffling. Any thoughts on what might be causing this and how we can resolve it? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's (was content)
'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'. Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery restrictions imposed. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) what about this one? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.7.1 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's (was content)
I don't control the recipients do I? -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) 'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'. Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery restrictions imposed. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) what about this one? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.7.1 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's (was content)
Morning/Afternoon/Evening (Delete as applicable) This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too far, and bear with me .. it all ultimately relates to mail .. honest :) I wish to use a stand-alone root CA on Win2K, certificated (is there such a word?) through one of the trusted root authorities - Verisign/Thwaite/Entrust. Hanging off this stand-alone root will be subordinate stand-alone's and subordinate Enterprise CA's. The ultimate aim, being able to distinguish between internal/external users from an certificate enrollment perspective, and to use various encryption/signing techniques for transmitting mail. Questions are twofold: 1. Do I have to use DSSTORE to import the certificate from the trusted third-party into the stand-alone Root CA and is the only valid format PKCS#12 ? There is an import button on the Install wizard during the Certsrv installation phase which suggests certs can be brought in from trusted sources. 2. Is the use of certificates in this grandfather/father/child type manner a valid one. btw... any URL's or links to sites concerning PKI and Messaging would be appreciated. Ta muchly, Mylo PS: Has anyone actually done this ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CA's/PKI
Damn previous post should have been under the CA's/PKI subject header, not NDR's (was content) Apologies Mylo This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too far, and bear with me .. it all ultimately relates to mail .. honest :) I wish to use a stand-alone root CA on Win2K, certificated (is there such a word?) through one of the trusted root authorities - Verisign/Thwaite/Entrust. Hanging off this stand-alone root will be subordinate stand-alone's and subordinate Enterprise CA's. The ultimate aim, being able to distinguish between internal/external users from an certificate enrollment perspective, and to use various encryption/signing techniques for transmitting mail. Questions are twofold: 1. Do I have to use DSSTORE to import the certificate from the trusted third-party into the stand-alone Root CA and is the only valid format PKCS#12 ? There is an import button on the Install wizard during the Certsrv installation phase which suggests certs can be brought in from trusted sources. 2. Is the use of certificates in this grandfather/father/child type manner a valid one. btw... any URL's or links to sites concerning PKI and Messaging would be appreciated. Ta muchly, Mylo PS: Has anyone actually done this ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
Only unsupported methods - Q273478 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 23:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k Is there anyway of undoing what Forestprep domainprep do to AD? i.e. start again? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k What would the fun be in that.. I was trying to get the guy all worried = ] --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k You can run them again for kicks if you wanted. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k No problem at all.. Just remember that you ran them so you don't do it again. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k Do you see any problem with me running these now and then running the actual setup in a few months? I want to test the PF replication and some other stuff as well. Thanks. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's (was content)
but the message comes back instantanuously -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the administrator responsible for that users mailbox. Its showing a permissions problem. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 09:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) I don't control the recipients do I? -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) 'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'. Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery restrictions imposed. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) what about this one? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.7.1 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5
Please remember to reinstall the appropriate Service Pack, though.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5 It's a no-brainer to upgrade to Enterprise. Seriously. Just put the CD in and answer the questions appropriately. Other then the requisite downtime it's not even a blip on operations. - Original Message - From: Russell Hopkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:28 PM Subject: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5 We are getting ready to hit our head on the 16Gb limit of our Exchange Server (5.5, SP4). How difficult is it to upgrade to the Enterprise version? Also, how strongly should we consider taking this opportunity to upgrade to 2000 Enterprise directly from 5.5 Standard? (We're not currently running any 2000 servers). Thanks, in advance, Russ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's (was content)
Then its on your end, not the recipients. Sounds like that user has been blocked at your IMCs -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) but the message comes back instantanuously -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the administrator responsible for that users mailbox. Its showing a permissions problem. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 09:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) I don't control the recipients do I? -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) 'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'. Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery restrictions imposed. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) what about this one? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.7.1 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Exchange 5.5 Server
Hi Just out of curiosity, is there anything in the event viewer? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a. Everyday, the server will gradually use up all avaliable memory (non-paged) and fail. A reboot will resolve the issue for another 24 hours. I don't know if the OS has a memory leak or if Exchange has a corrupted DLL. Re-applying SPs doesn't solve the problem. I would like to create a new server with a clean Exchange install and migrate this failing Exchange to it. I would then redo the original server and bring everything back. Is this a good strategy? Any and all tips are appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dsexport utility
All, We have a requirement to remove the ADC-Global-Names attribute from all 40,000 PF objects in one of our Exchange 55 Sites. However this is proving somewhat tricky to do. A conventional directory import/export is not up to the job due to not being able to export hidden public folder objects. There is a dsexport utility mentioned in the following article which can be used to extract hidden public folder objects from an Exchange 55 directory. However I can not find whereabouts it is on the MSDN disks. [I can find some of the C code but really need the pre-compiled .exe] support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q185/0/18.ASP Can anyone point me in the right direction (i.e. which CD?) or suggest an alternative? Thanks Mark P.S. We are doing this in order to move PF directory objects that have already been replicated into one AD domain, into another AD domain. PSS have ruled out using Movetree and suggested removing the ADC's PF Connection Agreement, deleting ADC-Global-Names from the 55 PF objects and create a new PF CA into the new domain. However any other suggestions are welcome. This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zvon RFC hypertext system
This is just too nice. All of the online Internet RFCs (Request For Comments, the standards definition) have been turned into a hypertext system and placed online here: http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC_share/Output/ Features include hyperlinks to other RFCs when referenced, status, links to obsoleting, obsoleted, and referencing RFCs, and STD/BCP/FYI/humor and other selections. Anyone who has ever had to worry about Internet interoperability will greatly appreciate this system. (My apologies to any who are subscribed to the multiple lists I posted this to, and thus received this message more than once. This web site is just so darn nice and useful that I figured it would be worth the possible waste of bandwidth.) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Good morning, I wasn't here yesterday. Could you please point me to the thread that talked about this? Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I don't have a PIX for our firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this. Thanks in advance for any information. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox? I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of this feature. -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options Hi, I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user. Once you get the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail forwarding. Hi all, i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users computers when i right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Importance: High Good morning, I wasn't here yesterday. Could you please point me to the thread that talked about this? Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I don't have a PIX for our firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this. Thanks in advance for any information. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Q233207 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox? I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of this feature. -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options Hi, I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user. Once you get the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail forwarding. Hi all, i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users computers when i right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message FYI, I am not nor will I ever be confused with the Official Thread Monitor. I just happen to remember this thread for the reprimand delivered, not a soda spurt but a pretty good chuckle. Doctor, I have a pain. Where? Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my neck. Daniel Chenault -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Importance: High Good morning, I wasn't here yesterday. Could you please point me to the thread that talked about this? Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I don't have a PIX for our firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this. Thanks in advance for any information. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Umm yes behind on my reading.. OK 6GB drive for your Ipaq hey? well I have one of those users. Yup he got the 3850...It still was not enough for him. So he bought the dual slot expansion sleeve...then goes out and gets himself one of the PCMCIA mircodrives + the modem to hook to his cell phone..Downloads about every piece of software out there for the thing. And has the lovely need to call me even on the weekend about it at all hours..nice guy..too much coffee ;-) Now I get a call about every two day's or so about syncing his 3850 to the system. at this point all Ive got to give him is the OWA. SO...Hey I tried reading all the threads...My brain is still missing something. Is there really a way to sync thru OWA? I get the pop/smtp/VPN thing...just not using it yet/at all. Yes I'm gullible...humor me... think of it as flipper boy isn't all there today... There isn't a way to sync via OWA right? Bill Ive forgotten more then I'll ever know -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST I'm waiting for the iPaq with 6GB drive so I can get rid of my laptop. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST I'm waiting to be able to synchronize my 32-terabyte PST to my PDA. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Well, they're now in bug-fix mode as you've read, so there's a general moratorium on desired feature updates as well as the more numerous you want this--trust us stuff. Probably worth the wait -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a we're tough, we can take it sort of thing, or what? Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small machines should only be used as companions to real machines. Sheesh, I thought that attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried to convince everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the real workgroup messaging systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple departmental messaging only tasks. It's amazing. The PC guys have grown up to become the dinosaurs that they displaced. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Actually, although it is quite small and requires you to move around the screen a lot, I just did what Serdar suggested. Threw an Ethernet card in my iPaq and went straight to the OWA...logged in and it worked like a charm! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST What I'm trying to say is that currently the technology is available to access my data when I am not at my desk. As long as you have a wireless modem in your PDA, you can A. Browse to OWA. B. Connect directly to Exchange via POP3. So, from the PDAs you can access your data. If they already have IMAP, then you can pick and choose what you want to download to your PDA when you're on the road. Then when you're back on the network you can simply synch your PDA again. If you have your OWA available on the Internet, then you can access your data even from a kiosk in an airport. All I'm saying is there is no need to force a web front end to synchronize with an offline copy of your mailbox when you can directly connect to the back-end database. S. PS: These are my personal views. If you want the official position of Kmart on the subject, you'll need to contact our Corporate Communications, I am not authorized to talk about that. What they think at Wal-mart or Target or any other company doesn't have any relevance to the discussion here. Countering the argument by saying you're wrong because your company is in bad shape is quite childish. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST You
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am. It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited. -- be - MOS This is Vergon 6. -Professor Bah. -Amy It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little doomed animals. -Professor -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST A little behind on your reading Bill? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig. Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to download the synch file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 1.44MB? What if the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, how do you transfer the file to there? OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive Lounge from your own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, connect into your LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client. Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook installed, so why re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser anywhere (I can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like most Web-based services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session. I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a we're tough, we can take it sort of thing, or what? Implementation of this isn't trivial, and there already exist multiple better ways to do what you want. So why would Microsoft spend money developing another one? Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small machines should only be used as companions to real machines. Well, no. If you have an IMAP/MAPI client and a Web browser on your handheld you're in good shape. But your Web browser sucks as a mailtool, so why not use the IMAP/MAPI client? Sheesh, I thought that attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried to convince everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the real workgroup messaging systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple departmental messaging only tasks. It's amazing. The PC guys have grown up to become the dinosaurs that they displaced. I resent that implication. I have not become a PDP/11. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
share Outlook information betwen OLXP and 2000
Hi NetFolder does not exist anymore for OL XP (sharing of OL Data with somekind of invisible eMail going from one OL to the other, syncrhonising data ) A PST cannont be access at the same time by 2 computers. Who Could I share information between 2 outlook without an exchange server Thanks JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Thanks. I understand all that. I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still does not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to mailbox-enabled user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Q233207 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox? I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of this feature. -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options Hi, I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user. Once you get the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail forwarding. Hi all, i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users computers when i right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Lookiing for Document
Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
Well, first - do not give disgruntled employees permission to post Organizational forms. Second, password protect all the forms before you post. Keep the password list safe so you can unlock the form. Usually, the developers want to password protect their own forms - don't let them. You need to be in control. The password protection on forms is not the greatest, but it keeps most of the home grown wanna be's at bay. And if you happen to run into a REAL hacker and he has access to your network, Outlook forms will be the least of your problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lookiing for Document
What is there to compare? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lookiing for Document
ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why I need it without me saying another word . . . The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . . - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document What is there to compare? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lookiing for Document
This information should be readily available on MS's web site. - Original Message - From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why I need it without me saying another word . . . The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . . - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document What is there to compare? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disaster Recovery Center
We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C Compression Utility
I have the product running on my server at this time. For the most part it works okay, however, watch out for the BATCH PROCESSING functionality. It can be a real killer. I've also had C2C eat a bunch of attachments that were previously zipped outside of Exchange. I have reservations, but management mandated it's use. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C Compression Utility Does anyone have experience with the C2C Compression Utility for Exchange? Are there any other compression utilites that are better? Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery Center
I would avoid Arthur Anderson. -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery Center
And Loni. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center I would avoid Arthur Anderson. -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery Center
Or Richard Tener. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center I would avoid Arthur Anderson. -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
properties of a message
Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500 Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20]) by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: 5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: text msg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it was from. We have public folder at are office and people have send as rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this message came to our server I would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5
You can't buy 5.5 Enterprise anymore, you have to buy 2000 and you will get the 5.5 Enterprise cd for around $23 (you have to request it). the upgrade is just a reinstall and reapplication of service pack. (15 minutes). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Take for example Joe Contractor. Joe is contracted in your organization for 3 months. Joe needs a user account to gain access to file shares in order to perform his tasks. Joe have a mailbox at his consulting firm and he would like all correspondence to be sent to it. You can mail-enable Joe Contractor and use the SMTP address of his choice. This way he can be included in the GAL. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Thanks. I understand all that. I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still does not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to mailbox-enabled user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Q233207 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox? I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of this feature. -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options Hi, I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user. Once you get the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail forwarding. Hi all, i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users computers when i right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lookiing for Document
Looking through the whitepapers on the MS website it strikes me that it might be easier to compare the similarities rather than the differences. :) Do either of these help? http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/whyupgrade/default.as p http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/features/default.asp Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: properties of a message
I'm gonna take a guess at this. But doesn't the TO line says it's TO midship.com? Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: properties of a message Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500 Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20]) by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: 5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: text msg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it was from. We have public folder at are office and people have send as rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this message came to our server I would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors
Hi folks, Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed. The Dell tech came in and replaced the hard drive then started the 'Restore'. He left and I finished up the restore of the OS (win2k pro). I then installed Office 2000 sr-1. That is all that is on this box, all that was, and all that is on all the boxes in the office. My problem is now that the user can't view nor save *any* attachment in email because of an error that states: Can't create file: filename. Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder. So, I reset the permissions on \winnt\temp to Everyone/full access to test. Same thing. Changed permissions on the user's profile folders, same error. Tried permission changes on the user's My Documents folder, same error. Nothing changed on the server. What the heck is causing this? .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: properties of a message
hehactually it's the pain meds I'm now taking at work. Otherwise I can only work a 4 hour shift :( Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: properties of a message Bob you're such a rebel! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 15:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: properties of a message I'm gonna take a guess at this. But doesn't the TO line says it's TO midship.com? Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: properties of a message Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500 Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20]) by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: 5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: text msg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it was from. We have public folder at are office and people have send as rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this message came to our server I would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lookiing for Document
You would think . . . but I have been searching for 3 days and can only find a few blurbs in different places - Original Message - From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:47 AM Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document This information should be readily available on MS's web site. - Original Message - From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why I need it without me saying another word . . . The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . . - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document What is there to compare? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, anderro rs
Q198083 -Original Message- From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors Hi folks, Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed. The Dell tech came in and replaced the hard drive then started the 'Restore'. He left and I finished up the restore of the OS (win2k pro). I then installed Office 2000 sr-1. That is all that is on this box, all that was, and all that is on all the boxes in the office. My problem is now that the user can't view nor save *any* attachment in email because of an error that states: Can't create file: filename. Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder. So, I reset the permissions on \winnt\temp to Everyone/full access to test. Same thing. Changed permissions on the user's profile folders, same error. Tried permission changes on the user's My Documents folder, same error. Nothing changed on the server. What the heck is causing this? .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000 server specific options
Its probably most useful for situations where you have disparate email services and want a unified GAL. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Thanks. I understand all that. I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still does not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to mailbox-enabled user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Q233207 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox? I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of this feature. -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options Hi, I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user. Once you get the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail forwarding. Hi all, i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users computers when i right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: properties of a message
Via SMTP would be my guess, probably hitting the internet mail service on logistics.midship.com -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: properties of a message Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500 Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20]) by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: 5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: text msg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it was from. We have public folder at are office and people have send as rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this message came to our server I would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
what is an SMTP fixup? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and erro rs
Or simply make sure you have a temporary internet folder in your profile. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce Sent: 21 March 2002 16:03 To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors Hi folks, Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed. The Dell tech came in and replaced the hard drive then started the 'Restore'. He left and I finished up the restore of the OS (win2k pro). I then installed Office 2000 sr-1. That is all that is on this box, all that was, and all that is on all the boxes in the office. My problem is now that the user can't view nor save *any* attachment in email because of an error that states: Can't create file: filename. Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder. So, I reset the permissions on \winnt\temp to Everyone/full access to test. Same thing. Changed permissions on the user's profile folders, same error. Tried permission changes on the user's My Documents folder, same error. Nothing changed on the server. What the heck is causing this? .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disaster Recovery Center
I know of a financial company in SF that uses off-site data storage. They told me while I was there that they have tested their DR procedures and can be 80-90% operational within 24 hours of a complete disaster (i.e. their SF offices being completely destroyed). Contact me offlist if you'd like more details about their setup. Sorry, I can't divulge the name of the company due to NDA. - Original Message - From: Shields, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:00 AM Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail
It's a Cisco PIX firewall command to tell the PIX to stop acting like it knows what it's doing. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:11 AM Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail what is an SMTP fixup? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, anderro rs
Thanks for the quick response. The network is all ntfs, just for the record, but I did check to make sure the tech used ntfs on the user's box. The q-article wasn't the exact fix but did get me to do a further search and this led me to the fix. For the record, the q-article that did it was Q305982 For some reason the permissions on the \winnt\temporary Intenet Files\ was set too restrictive. Strange. Thanks everyone for the help. Dean -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, anderro rs Q198083 -Original Message- From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors Hi folks, Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed. The Dell tech came in and replaced the hard drive then started the 'Restore'. He left and I finished up the restore of the OS (win2k pro). I then installed Office 2000 sr-1. That is all that is on this box, all that was, and all that is on all the boxes in the office. My problem is now that the user can't view nor save *any* attachment in email because of an error that states: Can't create file: filename. Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder. So, I reset the permissions on \winnt\temp to Everyone/full access to test. Same thing. Changed permissions on the user's profile folders, same error. Tried permission changes on the user's My Documents folder, same error. Nothing changed on the server. What the heck is causing this? .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Ask your Cisco PIX firewall administrator. If your not using Cisco PIX it may be called something else on your firewall, what ever it is. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:11 AM Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail what is an SMTP fixup? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange confused
That screen does not show the mailbox owner, but instead just the last user account to access the mailbox. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange confused Hey, We have some resource mailboxes that were owned by users that are no longer with the company. Those users personal mailboxes and user accounts are gone. However, they still show up in the mailbox resources page as being owned by that person instead of the primary nt account that I set when they were axed. It's like the directory service is not updating correctly, tried running the consistency adjuster but nothing changes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox
Ok, so I'm a fairly NEW exchange administrator. :) I've set that up and waited about an hour. Still no dice. Any other ideas? Thanks for your patience Aaron -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Exchange Admin, double-click the mailbox (in the Recipients container, typically) that you want users to be able to open. Select the permissions tab - if that's not visible, go to Tools, Options and find the checkbox that turns on Permissions tab on all objects. Back to the mailbox, Select the user(s) and add them in, granting User permission. This will allow them to do anything that a normal user would be able to do with a normal mailbox - eliminating the need for you to select each individual folder and specify owner permissions in Outlook (yick!) -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Ok now I'm feeling REALLY stupid... User permission from exchange admin... I know where to change it from within Outlook, but where do you change it in Exchange Administor? Thanks, Aaron -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Have you granted user permission to this mailbox (from Exchange admin) for all the users who will be logging in? -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Hi, I have a mailbox on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 WinNT 4.0 SP6a server that is being stubborn. It has a rule in it to redirect messages to certain people. I have given owner permissions to 3 people at the mailbox level and at the inbox level. They are running Outlook 2000. If they click file, open, other user's folders and choose the mailbox and inbox, they can open up that folder fine. If they create a separate profile for the mailbox and try to log into it with their login credentials, it gives them Unable to open your default e-mail folders. You do not have permission to log on. I have set owner permissions for them on every folder underneath the mailbox and waited for a couple hours. I have checked out Q244523 and it hasn't helped either. Any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
OK, so what have you looked at? Did you look for rules? Delegates? Who has permission to the inbox from the server? Preview pane in use? -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem I have a mail box that when new messages arive they are marked as read after 70 seconds or so. The user does not have to have the exchange client open for this to happen. This only happens with in inbox. If a message arrives that is forwarded to another folder the message rmains marked as unread. This has just started to occure. No changes that I know of were made on the server. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pop3,outlook 2k spa
I cannot get outlook 2k to connect via pop3 spa to and exchange 5.5 server. Outlook Express does seem to work ok though. Ive set the server site Protocol options to Windows Challenge Response and tried changing outlook between internet only and corporate workgroup modes. I also have the spa box checked in the outlook account and also tried outlook 2000 sp2 but I still get the same error... unable to logon to server using Distributed password athentication. -ERR the auth protocol exchange was cancelled by the client error number 0x800ccc18 thanks andy frost _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Settings
Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk to . . . TIA It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change greeting from POP3 telnet session
Hello all, I was wondering how to change the greeting message when a telnet session to a POP3 server is successful. I am basically looking to change the name of the DNS name. I want to give it some type of alias instead of the FQDN. Thanks Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery Center
http://www.sungardthenetbeneathyou.com/ Comdisco is in Chapter 11 and sold off the disaster recovery part of their business to SunGuard Systems. I have been a part of a disaster recovery and business continuity project using comdisco, now SunGard. They are quite expensive, but also full featured. Does your company have multiple sites? It's far better to build a disaster resistant infrastructure, if you can, than to plan on being out of business for 24 hours while you rebuild your company at SunGard's site. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shields, Anthony Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you host your own? Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I should look into? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their points, but apparently not. I thought that last response to my post was so off the point that it only underscored what I had said. I think this is where systems architects and operations folks have their most difficult problems in communicating with each other. It is ok for an operations view to be pressed that suggests that given the current technology using a specific approach is a best practice. However, that does not translate into where it is best to take the product. MAPI is a painful legacy at this point. I don't think anyone is suggesting that it should be ported to any other platform, including the Pocket PC and Windows CE families. We don't want it, and neither does Microsoft. That creates an interesting situation. Should the services in MAPI that go beyond what is currently in IMAP4 and OWA be extended to other platforms or not, and if so, how? This is where I got bent. There was a rabid non-thinking defense of the status quo: a sort of I'm not giving up my MAPI until you pull my cold dead fingers from my keyboard approach. That attitude is not defensible. About the only technology arguments that I respect less than those that start Linux is best . . . or Apple is best . . . are the ones that start Microsoft is best . . . Exchange is a superior product because it is mostly very pragmatic in its design. When this stops to be true, it's roadkill, and so are the sys admins that make their living off of it. I don't think that is in the best interests of anyone on this list. Evolving trends in security systems suggest that the one high level protocol that looks like it has the best shot at transiting the greatest number of transport links, and being useful for the widest possible number of non-streaming media applications is http. Similarly, the well equipped browser has displaced all other offerings and attempts to build platform neutral systems that still work well with market-centric systems (i.e. Wintel). This can only lead to one conclusion. MAPI clients are not strategic. They have at best a limited future. The premier client protocol for Exchange, if it is to survive, has to be http. Get over it. Adapt and thrive. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am. It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited. -- be - MOS This is Vergon 6. -Professor Bah. -Amy It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little doomed animals. -Professor -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST A little behind on your reading Bill? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig. Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to download the synch file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 1.44MB? What if the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, how do you transfer the file to there? OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive Lounge from your own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, connect into your LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client. Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook installed, so why re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser anywhere (I can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like most Web-based services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session. I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a we're tough, we can take it sort of thing, or what? Implementation of this isn't trivial, and there already exist multiple better ways to do what you want. So why would Microsoft spend money developing another one? Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small machines should only be used as companions to real machines. Well, no. If you have an IMAP/MAPI client and a Web browser on your handheld you're in good shape.
Registry for maintain Logon information
Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that asks for User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook. Have a great day. First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana. How cool is that? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Not yet. There are several solutions that work, but not directly. You can leave a MAPI client (Outlook) running on a PC and do a remote synch to that. Any network connection will work. You can use the Extended Systems synch server. You can use any of several UM servers. None of these work like a regular MAPI client in which you synch as an accessory or menu item to a message store browser. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Umm yes behind on my reading.. OK 6GB drive for your Ipaq hey? well I have one of those users. Yup he got the 3850...It still was not enough for him. So he bought the dual slot expansion sleeve...then goes out and gets himself one of the PCMCIA mircodrives + the modem to hook to his cell phone..Downloads about every piece of software out there for the thing. And has the lovely need to call me even on the weekend about it at all hours..nice guy..too much coffee ;-) Now I get a call about every two day's or so about syncing his 3850 to the system. at this point all Ive got to give him is the OWA. SO...Hey I tried reading all the threads...My brain is still missing something. Is there really a way to sync thru OWA? I get the pop/smtp/VPN thing...just not using it yet/at all. Yes I'm gullible...humor me... think of it as flipper boy isn't all there today... There isn't a way to sync via OWA right? Bill Ive forgotten more then I'll ever know -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST I'm waiting for the iPaq with 6GB drive so I can get rid of my laptop. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST I'm waiting to be able to synchronize my 32-terabyte PST to my PDA. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Well, they're now in bug-fix mode as you've read, so there's a general moratorium on desired feature updates as well as the more numerous you want this--trust us stuff. Probably worth the wait -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a we're tough, we can take it sort of thing, or what? Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small machines should only be used as companions to real machines. Sheesh, I thought that attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried to convince everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the real workgroup messaging systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple departmental messaging only tasks. It's amazing. The PC guys have grown up to become the dinosaurs that they displaced. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Actually, although it is quite small and requires you to move around the screen a lot, I just did what Serdar suggested. Threw an Ethernet card in my iPaq and went straight to the OWA...logged in and it worked like a charm! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST What I'm trying to say is that currently the technology is available to access my data when I am not at my desk. As long as you have a wireless modem in your PDA, you can A. Browse to OWA. B. Connect directly to Exchange via POP3. So, from the PDAs you can access your data. If they already have IMAP, then you can pick and choose what you want to download to your PDA when you're on the road. Then when you're back on the network you can simply synch your PDA again. If you have your OWA available on the Internet, then you can access your data even from a kiosk in an airport. All I'm saying is there is no need to force a web front end to synchronize with an offline copy of your mailbox when you can directly connect to the back-end database. S. PS: These are my
RE: Exchange confused
Gotcha, I was deleting the user account of a person who had multiple mailboxes(one for her team), I changed the owner from her to the person taking her place, but when I deleted her account through usrmgr it prompted to delete that mailbox as well as her personal. This is what prompted me to think something was wrong with the DS. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Registry for maintain Logon information
Have you tried checking his or her profile? Maybe the Logon Network Security, under the Advance tab of the user's profile, was set to None. Either that or the user's NT account is locked out. Jose David P. Camara II IT - NT Administrator Credit Lyonnais -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Registry for maintain Logon information Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that asks for User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook. Have a great day. First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana. How cool is that? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais, S.A., Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc., Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia Ltd., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA) Ltd., and Credit Lyonnais Rouse Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Registry for maintain Logon information
Everything is set the way it should be set... I need to know where the registry setting is for this Pop Up box. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Camara, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Registry for maintain Logon information Have you tried checking his or her profile? Maybe the Logon Network Security, under the Advance tab of the user's profile, was set to None. Either that or the user's NT account is locked out. Jose David P. Camara II IT - NT Administrator Credit Lyonnais -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Registry for maintain Logon information Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that asks for User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook. Have a great day. First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana. How cool is that? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais, S.A., Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc., Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia Ltd., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA) Ltd., and Credit Lyonnais Rouse Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Settings
Chris, If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameters There is a server object under Parameters and all you would need to do is point it to the correct server. I am assuming you are talking about OWA 5.5. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Settings Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk to . . . TIA It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meeting Requests
Many of my users are getting the following message when they open meeting requests that have been sent to them: This meeting is not in the Calendar; it may have been moved or deleted. Once the user Accepts or Accepts Tentative, the meeting appears in the Calendar where it belongs. Our Environment: * O2000 SR-1 * Exchange 5.5 SP4 * We connected an Exch2000 sp2 server to our site a couple weeks ago but have only moved two mailboxes so far. The Exch 5.5 server has ADC (from the Exch2K sp2 CD) installed. In Outlook, Tools | Options | E-mail Options | Tracking Options | Process Requests and Responses on arrival is checked. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Settings
that did it! Gracias! - Original Message - From: paragon400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:50 PM Subject: RE: OWA Settings Chris, If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameters There is a server object under Parameters and all you would need to do is point it to the correct server. I am assuming you are talking about OWA 5.5. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Settings Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk to . . . TIA It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5
Dear Jeff, Are you sure it is the Store that is growing, or are you noticing less and less available disk space? Check to see if you are archiving your Internet e-mail messages, both inbound and outbound. d:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive etc. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 09:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5 The space was freed up within the database. The database won't reduce in size without compacting it. You might want to review the list archives. We've covered this at least two times in the last week. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jeff Toates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5 My exchange database seems to keep growing and growing. We moved some users from one server to another thinking that this would free up some space on the original server. Once we moved users it didn't free up any additional space. How do I free up that space? Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Registry for maintain Logon information
Have you seen this behaviour in person? Sounds fishy to me. And stop looking about in the registry. Keep your fingers out of there. This is controlled by a checkbox. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Registry for maintain Logon information Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that asks for User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook. Have a great day. First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana. How cool is that? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
I thought Microsoft had some MAPI over HTTP plans some time ago. Even Outlook XP was supposed to be like that. Or was XP supposed to be a mini-Exchange server synching with the mothership? Whatever happenned to all those rumors? -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their points, but apparently not. I thought that last response to my post was so off the point that it only underscored what I had said. I think this is where systems architects and operations folks have their most difficult problems in communicating with each other. It is ok for an operations view to be pressed that suggests that given the current technology using a specific approach is a best practice. However, that does not translate into where it is best to take the product. MAPI is a painful legacy at this point. I don't think anyone is suggesting that it should be ported to any other platform, including the Pocket PC and Windows CE families. We don't want it, and neither does Microsoft. That creates an interesting situation. Should the services in MAPI that go beyond what is currently in IMAP4 and OWA be extended to other platforms or not, and if so, how? This is where I got bent. There was a rabid non-thinking defense of the status quo: a sort of I'm not giving up my MAPI until you pull my cold dead fingers from my keyboard approach. That attitude is not defensible. About the only technology arguments that I respect less than those that start Linux is best . . . or Apple is best . . . are the ones that start Microsoft is best . . . Exchange is a superior product because it is mostly very pragmatic in its design. When this stops to be true, it's roadkill, and so are the sys admins that make their living off of it. I don't think that is in the best interests of anyone on this list. Evolving trends in security systems suggest that the one high level protocol that looks like it has the best shot at transiting the greatest number of transport links, and being useful for the widest possible number of non-streaming media applications is http. Similarly, the well equipped browser has displaced all other offerings and attempts to build platform neutral systems that still work well with market-centric systems (i.e. Wintel). This can only lead to one conclusion. MAPI clients are not strategic. They have at best a limited future. The premier client protocol for Exchange, if it is to survive, has to be http. Get over it. Adapt and thrive. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am. It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited. -- be - MOS This is Vergon 6. -Professor Bah. -Amy It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little doomed animals. -Professor -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST A little behind on your reading Bill? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig. Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to download the synch file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 1.44MB? What if the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, how do you transfer the file to there? OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive Lounge from your own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, connect into your LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client. Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook installed, so why re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser anywhere (I can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like most Web-based services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session. I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a we're tough, we can take it sort of
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
I think we are waiting to be amazed. I suspect that a little more clarity on the part of the customer community in terms of what we need would help. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST I thought Microsoft had some MAPI over HTTP plans some time ago. Even Outlook XP was supposed to be like that. Or was XP supposed to be a mini-Exchange server synching with the mothership? Whatever happenned to all those rumors? -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their points, but apparently not. I thought that last response to my post was so off the point that it only underscored what I had said. I think this is where systems architects and operations folks have their most difficult problems in communicating with each other. It is ok for an operations view to be pressed that suggests that given the current technology using a specific approach is a best practice. However, that does not translate into where it is best to take the product. MAPI is a painful legacy at this point. I don't think anyone is suggesting that it should be ported to any other platform, including the Pocket PC and Windows CE families. We don't want it, and neither does Microsoft. That creates an interesting situation. Should the services in MAPI that go beyond what is currently in IMAP4 and OWA be extended to other platforms or not, and if so, how? This is where I got bent. There was a rabid non-thinking defense of the status quo: a sort of I'm not giving up my MAPI until you pull my cold dead fingers from my keyboard approach. That attitude is not defensible. About the only technology arguments that I respect less than those that start Linux is best . . . or Apple is best . . . are the ones that start Microsoft is best . . . Exchange is a superior product because it is mostly very pragmatic in its design. When this stops to be true, it's roadkill, and so are the sys admins that make their living off of it. I don't think that is in the best interests of anyone on this list. Evolving trends in security systems suggest that the one high level protocol that looks like it has the best shot at transiting the greatest number of transport links, and being useful for the widest possible number of non-streaming media applications is http. Similarly, the well equipped browser has displaced all other offerings and attempts to build platform neutral systems that still work well with market-centric systems (i.e. Wintel). This can only lead to one conclusion. MAPI clients are not strategic. They have at best a limited future. The premier client protocol for Exchange, if it is to survive, has to be http. Get over it. Adapt and thrive. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am. It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited. -- be - MOS This is Vergon 6. -Professor Bah. -Amy It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little doomed animals. -Professor -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST A little behind on your reading Bill? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA. I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig. Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to download the synch file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 1.44MB? What if the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, how do you transfer the file to there? OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive Lounge from your own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, connect into your LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client. Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook installed, so why re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser
Instant Messaging Server?
Does anyone have an idea on how much resources this might use up on an Exch2k server with 500 users? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is this?
I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tasks assignment problem
Dear all, We are having a problem with one of my colleagues. When he tries to assign a task to someone, he gets the following message. 'Could not complete the operation. One or more parameter values are not valid.' Anybody seen this kind of message before? He is using OL2000. We are using EXchange 5.5 SP3. When I try to do the same, it works fine. TIA Anil The information contained in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any form of disclosure, production, distribution or any action taken or refrained from in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately. The content of the email is not legally binding unless confirmed by letter bearing two authorized signatures. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
Is there a Blackberry or a PDA (sync) involved that could be flagging the messages as read? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem Assuming somebody else is not reading them, how do you know it happens after 70 seconds if the client is closed? Or is it 70 seconds when the client is open? Does this user utilize the Preview Pane? -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem I have a mail box that when new messages arive they are marked as read after 70 seconds or so. The user does not have to have the exchange client open for this to happen. This only happens with in inbox. If a message arrives that is forwarded to another folder the message rmains marked as unread. This has just started to occure. No changes that I know of were made on the server. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Server
Is there an Exchange anti-virus product running on the box? I had a server with a buggy version of Scanmail that had similar symptoms when running ScanMail 3.6, the ESE Shim version. When I removed it and installed 3.52, the problem went away. Also,are there any other apps (SQL, etc.) on this box? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a. Everyday, the server will gradually use up all avaliable memory (non-paged) and fail. A reboot will resolve the issue for another 24 hours. I don't know if the OS has a memory leak or if Exchange has a corrupted DLL. Re-applying SPs doesn't solve the problem. I would like to create a new server with a clean Exchange install and migrate this failing Exchange to it. I would then redo the original server and bring everything back. Is this a good strategy? Any and all tips are appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eseutil and isinteg
Why do neither of these utilities use the full processor capability of the system? I'm only seeing 7 - 10% CPU utilization when repairing the information store. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouf Of Office
Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? /micke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: properties of a message
You are looking for a user named adams at domain lostwax.com. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: properties of a message Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500 Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20]) by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: 5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: text msg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it was from. We have public folder at are office and people have send as rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this message came to our server I would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharing info. between two orgs.
Hi all, due to some breakup in our company we're being forced to break our Org into two. If we have two organizations, is there a way to replicate (share) Address books? Is it possible to replicate (share) public folders? What other issues should we consider? Thanks in advance. Hector Minero Systems Engineer NSWCDD Code K55 Ph: (540)653-8859 Fax: (540)653-8575 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange confused
These are called orphan mailboxes and there is no easy way of getting rid of them. There is a Q-article on the support site that shows how to take care of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange confused Hey, We have some resource mailboxes that were owned by users that are no longer with the company. Those users personal mailboxes and user accounts are gone. However, they still show up in the mailbox resources page as being owned by that person instead of the primary nt account that I set when they were axed. It's like the directory service is not updating correctly, tried running the consistency adjuster but nothing changes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
Are you running E2K? -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouf Of Office
OOFs reply once to a mail address until you turn it off and back on again. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? /micke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
Im running scared. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? Are you running E2K? -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouf Of Office
It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a help desk ticketing system which uses a unique e-mail address for every e-mail message received and autoreplies to the sender. More importantly is a security risk from a human engineering standpoint. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouf Of Office
Which is a much better answer than mine! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a help desk ticketing system which uses a unique e-mail address for every e-mail message received and autoreplies to the sender. More importantly is a security risk from a human engineering standpoint. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
Good movie. One of Billy Crystal's better one's. ;) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? Im running scared. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? Are you running E2K? -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Registry for maintain Logon information
Man I love TechNet. support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = unpopulated | answer = 1st link support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = logon box registry | answer = 2nd link support.microsoft.com | Product = Outlook | Query = registry logon | answer = 3rd link Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Registry for maintain Logon information Good morning. Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that asks for User ID, Domain and Password. We have a user that reports this information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook. Have a great day. First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana. How cool is that? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eseutil and isinteg
Possibility 1: There are other limiting factors, such as disk speed, that are keeping the utilities from using all of your CPU. Possibility 2: Your CPU is too busy sending triple copies of all of your email. -- be - MOS The trouble with opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard work. -- Herbert V. Prochnow -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eseutil and isinteg Why do neither of these utilities use the full processor capability of the system? I'm only seeing 7 - 10% CPU utilization when repairing the information store. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange confused
No they're not. Chris's answer was the correct one. -Original Message- From: Dockery, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange confused These are called orphan mailboxes and there is no easy way of getting rid of them. There is a Q-article on the support site that shows how to take care of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange confused Hey, We have some resource mailboxes that were owned by users that are no longer with the company. Those users personal mailboxes and user accounts are gone. However, they still show up in the mailbox resources page as being owned by that person instead of the primary nt account that I set when they were axed. It's like the directory service is not updating correctly, tried running the consistency adjuster but nothing changes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouf Of Office
It can. It has. It might not ever for you, but there is a risk. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? /micke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
internet.com sux. I get it all the time and I don't even allow html to go out the ims. -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
I fixed the problem with disabling sending both plain text and html in global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after that. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? internet.com sux. I get it all the time and I don't even allow html to go out the ims. -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is this?
This should have read: I fixed the problem by disabling sending both plain text and html in global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after that. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? I fixed the problem with disabling sending both plain text and html in global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after that. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is this? internet.com sux. I get it all the time and I don't even allow html to go out the ims. -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is this? I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using plain text. It has always worked fine until today? - Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eseutil and isinteg
The best I can do is guess. But the process could be going like this: Disk: here's your data. CPU:OKOKIGOTITI'MDONEWRITEITOUTGIMMEMORENOWGIMMEGIMME Disk: Um, hang on a second. Understand that this is not an exact transcription of the process. But I'm sure you get the idea. The system has to write and read in chunks; obviously it won't load all 72GB of your store into your 384 MB of RAM. -- be - MOS Save a little money each month and at the end of the year you'll be surprised at how little you have. -- Ernest Haskins -Original Message- From: Poole, Timothy F. - SCO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:03 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Eseutil and isinteg Bill- We're running a test doing an offline recovery. The test box is a Pentium IV 1.5 GHZ, 384 MB RAM, with a Maxtor ATA100 120GB hard drive. OS is Win2K server w/ Exchange 5.5 SP4. Nothing else is running on the system. Priv.edb is about 72 GB. I understand this should take a while, I'm just curious why the repair apps aren't maxing out the CPU. Tim And I've fixed the triple e-mail thing -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Eseutil and isinteg Possibility 1: There are other limiting factors, such as disk speed, that are keeping the utilities from using all of your CPU. Possibility 2: Your CPU is too busy sending triple copies of all of your email. -- be - MOS The trouble with opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard work. -- Herbert V. Prochnow -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eseutil and isinteg Why do neither of these utilities use the full processor capability of the system? I'm only seeing 7 - 10% CPU utilization when repairing the information store. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box. I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
I'm doing the same thing..slow as hell right? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Newsgroups Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box. I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
It does get slow at times. I receive a few of the Requesting data from Server messages. I have done monitoring on the server and both network and CPU seems fine. I just want to off load the other services so that the Exchange Server does just that. Saul Gonzalez -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:33 PM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server I'm doing the same thing..slow as hell right? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Newsgroups Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box. I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
Hmmm... build another DC first, move all the master roles to the new DC, demote the original DC... this should work. -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box. I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recall: Meeting Requests
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
We did this as well, and patience was the order of the day. William -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server Hmmm... build another DC first, move all the master roles to the new DC, demote the original DC... this should work. -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server We currently have Exchange 2000, DC, and DNS, running on the same box. I want to move the DC and DNS to another server. Has anyone done this before? Is there something I need to worry about that might affect the Exchange Server? Any steps you recommend? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Requests
I want OL2k clients to resolve a mailbox against some specific value entered into a recipient field of a new message. Q151198 describes the straightforward process of setting this up: set the Search-Flags schema object of the desired Custom Attribute to 1 or 2. The change is immediate across each Dir in the Site, or so sez the server. Yet hours have passed and I still cannot resolve a mailbox from values specific to a CA I have made searchable. Is something else required that article fails to mention? Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
