Have you run Cleansweep against it? Check the BORK for a copy
(cleanswp.something)
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The hardware requirements for E2K3 vs E2K are generally equivalent, whether
that hardware is sufficient for you org is not really something I can say
with any degree of certainty. It meets the minimum hardware requirements I
believe.
Whether or not it is worth $1000 for you is not really a
A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote
agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange
server).
I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately
3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent.
Raj
-Original Message-
I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the
non-supported possibility always exists otherwise.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Sure. I don't fear in-place upgrades from 2000 to 2003 like I did from
5.5 to 2000, though. :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:26
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE:
Even if I plan on not using the FE to access the new Exchange 2003
server?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
You always have to upgrade FEs first
We are looking at services from Message Labs, Postini, Frontbridge, and
Appriver. Anybody have any experience with these services in general or
any one of them in paticular? I've been looking for any write ups,
reviews, or comparisons but havent had much luck.
Michael
For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd
2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good
replacement for MEC:
http://www.winconnections.com/exc/
It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights:
Tony Redmond
Sue Mosher
Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much?
Thanx
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
157.124.218.229
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 14:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet Header Question
Hello Group,
The cost is per user. We got a huge discount for holding out for a
while. I can tell you it is much much cheaper than some others we
looked at. Its well worth the money if you are wanting to stop SPAM
dead. They claim they can block 95% and they have kept their word and
more.
-Original
Are the users offsite via VPN?
Outlook is sensitive to packet fragmentation. Weird shit happens like the
user can receive email but cannot send it.
Try lowering the MTU, stepping down from the max in 10's.
Also see if the vpn client or router supports udp encapsulization.
Tim.
x3683
Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will
prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy.
From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Bob,
Its all about IIS. That is the easiest way to remember it. Exchange 2000
cannot run on IIS 6.0, but Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0.
-Steve
What? I thought it was the other way around?
OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange
first, then OS? Or OS
You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup
So now what are we to do for a week in October?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at
Didn't you get the memo?
Um.yeah, it's just that we're putting new coversheets on all the TPS
reports now before they go out.
So if you could do that... it would be great.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ummm that's my stapler...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup
Didn't you get the memo?
Um.yeah, it's just that we're putting new coversheets on all the TPS
Use an Export /Import for AD. There are samples on MS's site IIRC. I assume
your using Exchange 2000
From: Berry Schreuder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003
As others have intimated, you need to download at least some of it to check
it, and without checking the message body you're fairly limited in what you
can test for.
I'd give SAProxy a try from http://saproxy.bloomba.com - it's free, and it
uses the spamassassin engine which is pretty damned good
ADSIEdit
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange permissions
I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of the first
things that I noticed was that all Domain
This is for mail outside my organization. My boss has a personal email
account with an isp that he checks via http.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for
One doesn't necessarily have to create a new profile. One could actually
re-resolve the old profile and that should do the trick as well.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phillip Yan
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:31 AM
To:
Sweet, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download
it from
When the services stop are you able to simply restart them or do you have
to reboot?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS WWW service randomly
What about it?
If I use ADSIEdit to view the permissions at the Org, I see the same
thing that I see in ESM: Domain and Enterprise Admins are inheriting
allow rights for Send As and Receive As. If I go up one level in
ADSIEdit, to the CN=Microsoft Exchange container and view the ACL there,
the
It's one followed by a 100 googles worth of zeros
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
Isn't that the new theaters down
These upgrade articles are kind of quirky to me. I don't think they
quite explain the upgrade scenarios that well. For instance the part
about removing MMIS before an upgrade to Exchange 2003. Would if I am
not doing an in place upgrade and doing a fresh intall on a separate
server? I
Ya, I thought about that one but I thought there might be something out
there that people use for reporting and could recommend
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Monitoring DL
You can specify to only register one of the NIC's IP address in DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Wasinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too much
Jose,
We had bad issues with
I actually was just asking what people might be using and would/could
recommend. I don't remember asking anyone to research, I can do that all on
my own. Reading through some posts I found MessageStats, which was
recommended by Missy for mailbox limits and I will also look at NetIQ's
product which
Exchange 2000 SP3.
Starting last week, users are having problems forwarding attachments
that they receive from the internet. Getting Operation Failed from
outlook.
This happens when the user is logged into the domain. They can move the
message into another folder and forward it without any
32 matches
Mail list logo
