Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us
- full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen
or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent
server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine
That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet)
We are currently using Lotus Notes and Document Libraries. I want to do
the same thing in Exchange.
Basically what I want to do is:
1) User sends a message to a group of people, one person at a time.
2) When the first user is done (may add comments) it is sent to the second
person.
3) After the
Martin ... It worked like a charm. Thank you. We now have Outlook and
Exchange talking again like before port 135 was closed.
Here is a recap of what we did:
Enable VPN on our W2K server.
Enable VPN on each client (all are remote)
* Had to use the absolute IP address for the server
* Changed
Do you have multiple Exchange 2000 servers? Did you install one of them
to be the front end server for the F5 to do the SSL proxy to? If not,
it might be the case where the server is located on a different E2K
server, and hence it used the standard http://
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
To a Samba share or Windows share?
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 18:42, Tony Nguyen wrote:
I just wanted to know if anyone who is running Windows XP is having this
problem or is this by design.
When I access a map drive it take about 30 second to open. Then everything
work fine but if I go away
We are currently experiencing a weird issue where there are calendar
events in OWA that are not showing up in Outlook. Anyone ever seen this
before? We are running Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 SP3. I have
checked the filters and views and everything looks normal. Now we also
have
Windows share
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Non-Exchange related Sorry
To a Samba share or Windows share?
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 18:42, Tony Nguyen wrote:
I just
Do the users have mail delivery configured for the Exchange server?
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:31:42 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Calendar items show in OWA but not Outlook
Hello all,
I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above
services could take a moment and share them, good or bad?
We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and
add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while
the anti-spam
Yes they do. I know that because I am one of them.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Do the users have mail delivery configured for the Exchange server?
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL
We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has
been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical
support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good
job of
detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't
Yes, I have 2 backend mail servers and one front box dedicated to just
owa.
What I did was that the F5 was using round robin DNS to load balance OWA
to 2 Exchange 5.5 OWA servers. I replaced the 2 5.5 OWA servers with 1
E2K OWA server and just assigned the new server the 2 IP's of the old
5.5
We have used Postini for a couple of months now. Looks good so far, we
are only using it for spam control on inbound mail.
I would highly recommend it, Tech support is good as well.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003
Sorry, I only have good experience troubleshooting Win XP + Samba
shares.
AW
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:08, Tony Nguyen wrote:
Windows share
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects
alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much
better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there
is a positive ROI.
Jeff
-Original
I dunno how much you're paying for MessageLabs' service, but it's pretty much a
customized front end for the open-source SpamAssassin. The only benefit I can see
over a stock Postfix/Sendmail gateway using Spamassassin, perhaps with MailScanner or
amavisd or Anomy Sanitizer for some more
Thanks for the reply Aaron. Do you happen to know what percentage of
spam Postini is catching at your company?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Thanks for the reply, Raj. Are you letting your users control their own
spam settings (I believe that Postini offers this), or do you control it
company-wide?
Thanks again,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:03 AM
This may sound extremely corny to some, but we have been handed down a
directive from our COO to remove the ability for users to add fancy
backgrounds and images in Outlook.
He has also asked us to force the user to use a specific font and font
size.
He would like all messages to look the same,
Tom,
Messagelabs was right around $4500/yr for the services we've contracted
for - antivirus, antispam and antiporn. The first two work well. The
last one is worthless, IMHO. The users are happy with the spam levels
we're seeing. Messagelabs also offers an outbound scanning service
(comes with
95% would be a conservative estimate.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Thanks for the reply Aaron. Do you happen to know what percentage of spam
When I set up the account,the settings are set to maximum security. But
the users have control of their own settings.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini,
You need to lock those settings down thru a policy. Although I am not sure
all can be locked. You will have to find each one and see if or what
settings can be done.
From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Well, it already has. We just haven't been able to figure it out yet.
Likely it ahs to do with native vs. mixed AD modes, but even the Enterprise
Admins are relative newbies and none of us are really knowledgable about
this. I'm still having trouble finding adequate documentation on how to
I can assure you that it isn't due to mixed modes of AD - that has no effect
on the schema changes.
Now, it could be because of a lack of 'local' global catalogs because you're
still using a downlevel BDC.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS
Hah! OK, I was wondering about whether we needed to be set up as a Global
Catalog. I was seeing that that was not set up when looking at the schema
with LDP to see if the Exchange settings has replicated down to us. So,
this is most likely more of a problem with us not being set as a Global
Any chance you can point me to the policy?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Locking down exchange
You need to lock those settings down thru a policy. Although I am not
sure all
You need to have a Global Catalog server in every AD Site that hosts
Exchange (not Exchange site, AD Site).
As far as the remote offices, it depends. GC's can help with a number
of things, including password changes, logins, etc. If you don't have
local DNS servers though, having or not having
You might be able to accomplish some of them if you deployed Office via
a Group Policy and custom Transform file. I don't know if you are going
to be able to enforce them though. Group Policy does not cover Office,
only Windows.
Better solution would be to get with HR and draft a policy stating
I was S disgusted on Friday with our federal government's anti-virus
policy!!
I had to make a trip over to the passport office in Seattle to get a new
passport for the wife, who was leaving on a 1:23pm flight that day for
Chile. The passport office is an office of the Department of State.
Last time I checked they were human too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
I was S disgusted on Friday with our federal
My home email account has been blasted with the virus all weekend long, probably
hundreds of them. But I have my my home email address on my web site. Have never seen
any virus that comes anywhere even close to this one in volume.
Bill Kuhl
Yeah, it was no big deal here. I'm not quite sure why we didn't think about
it at the time. It's really our first foray into remote DC's. In the past
we always just had two domain controllers for Windows NT 4.0 here, and if
the T1's went down then people had no access to anything. Now (and
Greetings,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000
Is there any way to use a wildcard when doing messaging filtering on
Exchange 5.5 Admin? (Connections, IMS, Connections, message filtering) We
are trying to filter eMAIL using this feature and there are several domains
that are the same except for
You can wildcard your filters for domains.
On the IMS under Message Filtering you can enter domains using the
@domain.com (.net, etc.)
You can filter a whole country in a similar fashion by using
@fr (for France)
For example.
Regards.
Nate Couch
EDS
Hi all, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3.
Every 10 seconds and up to every 2mins I get the following entry in the
Application Event Log:
ID: 41
Source: MSExchangeDSExp
Starting the directory export.
And then one second later...
ID: 38
Source: MSexchangeDSExp
The directory export is complete.
And this surprises you???
--
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
I was S disgusted on Friday with our federal government's anti-virus
It shouldn't...but yes, it does.
I mean, come on. For the cost of a $250 PC and a $50 copy of RedHat 9.0
(actually, a recycled PII or PII would do), thrown in front of every access
point to the network, they could be blocking every attachment on the Martin
Blackstone list!
BAS!
-Original
That is actually overestimating the price of security. Redhat is free
(without support), and a pc to run this would cost less than 250 if you
knew where to look.
Thank you,
Mitchell D. Lawrence
**Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)**
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL
Which begs an analysis of your .sig line, eh?
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:34 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Sobig.F alert
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
That is actually
You've never tried purchasing a computer for the government have you?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:30 PM
Posted To: Exchange
With Exchange, you can rarely have enough GC's.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003
Actually, yes...I have.
I work for one of the prime contractors at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation
in SE Washington St, which is run by the Dept of Energy.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, we've only got the one server. But, I've already gone in and set up
GC's at all our AD sites. DomainPrep seems to have now worked, and our
replication actually seems to have been solved by a time sync. Apparently
when our servers were set up, the Time Service wasn't set to look at the
And a quick glance shows that state.gov's email passes through (something generic),
sendmail, and Trend InterScan Viruswall before being delivered to an Exchange 5.5 box.
The latter two, and presumably the former one, are all easily configurable to block
based on any number of criteria,
There is a registry fix for the new message notification UDP blockage.
The fix causes Outlook to refresh every 1 minute and display the new
messages.
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Nate,
I don't understand what you are saying? I know I can block full domains
(@yahoo.com) but what I want is to block @**.ivy.net for @01.ivy.net and
@02.ivy.net
You see the suffix is .ivy.net but the prefix is 01 and 02...
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate
Two stars (**) would be an overkill
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Nate,
I don't understand what you are saying? I know I can block full domains
Mike,
Get a good Exchange book and read it. Paul Robichaux's Managing MS
Exchange Server, Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of the page:
@foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com
So...Nate's response was right on the money.
We played around with demos of both products, and had a much worse experience with
ARMex. We found that ARMex would only work if the server was recovered to the extent
that Exchange services could be started. With Powercontrols, we just restored the
.edb.
Unfortunately, Ontrack refuses to
Hi all,
W2KAD+sp4 - 1 forest-1tree
MSX2000+sp3
Using outlook client we can see the list of members of our *users* OU and send
messages to them.
How can we see a list of other users in another forests? any other way to populate our
gal maybe based on public folder? or another views?
thx
52 matches
Mail list logo
