Hi, Is there anyway to set an automatic deletion of mails after certain time/mailbox
size on per user basis.
Regards,
Irf.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Another option is an SSL based VPN, there is no client software to install
and you can users can get access to your 'internal' OWA server from any web
browser, public terminals included. Several companies make them, we have
one from Neoteris installed. It works great, we use an RSA ACE server
Actually, we use squid and OpenBSD for just that purpose, and I don't recall
falling into the issue with the absolute URLs, though. It might be because
squid is rewriting the URLs on their way through - its been a year since we
set it up and we haven't had to touch it since..
I don't believe you are correct, even though I do abhor the process.
Many anti-spam will do lookups of the sender's domain, yes. And that part
will break. Of course, I'd just set any domain which resolves to the
Verisign IP address as an instant reject - problem solved.
However, a reverse lookup
All you base are belong to us
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain
yes
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Automatic Deletion
Hi, Is there anyway to set an automatic deletion of mails after certain
time/mailbox size on per user basis.
Regards,
I just installed Office 2003 final from MSDN and was able to export my whole
mailbox to a PST. It shows up as 1.8Gig on the exchange 5.5 server, and the
PST file is 3.5Gig.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:35
How Can i log all access to public folders(via Web, MAPI ...)?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
From Wired.com (http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60473,00.html):
VeriSign's controversial typo-squatting Site Finder service is about to be bypassed
by an emergency software patch to many of the Internet's backbone computers.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
Hello all,
is there any way that you can delete all items in people's mailboxes from the Exchange
System Manager 2000? if you cant in the exchange system manager, what is the best way
to do this?
thanks for the help...
Bob C.
I hope it doesn't get corrupted though...
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level
Yup - PST files will almost always be much larger than the size reported
on the Exchange store.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level
I'm hitting the MSKB as I speak, but I wondered if there's a quick 'n' dirty
answer to this.
Long story short I need to get pub.edb back from last nights backup,
someones outlook crashed doing a move of a load of contacts, the contacts
appear to have mysteriously lost all their category
It's all or nothing based on what you have indicated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm hitting the MSKB as I speak, but I wondered if there's a quick
That should be doable as I have a spare drive large enough to put in the
recovery server, I'm just a little surprised that ntbackup for Windows 2000
doesn't give the option of restoring either/or database?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378,
Hey Guys
Running Exchange 5.5 SP4, on WIN2K server w/ SP3. When looking at my
Queues, I noticed that I've been getting a load of messages with no
originators? Maybe around 30 a day. Any ideas, suggestions on where
they're coming from? Any way to stop them?
Thanks,
Paulie
-Original
In an effort to sound stupid... What durn patch? For the recent RPC
vulns? Yeah, done. Now, to lock RPC to one port, do I need to do that
for all win2k servers or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange back-end
servers?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why the need to do this?
- Original Message -
From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
In an effort to sound stupid... What durn patch? For the recent RPC
vulns?
Unless I'm mistaken, in order to let a front-end server communicate to
back-end server servers (exchange and ad), a variety of ports are
needed... Including one negotiated port for RPC. Usually this ends up
being 1026 on my server, but it's possible to lock it down to one high
port and allow that
Those are called NDRs - non delivery reports. That's the way they're
supposed to work
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL
IMO, it might make more sense to simply have the FE behind the firewall as
well.
There are some Exchange specific technet articles on how to configure this
however.
- Original Message -
From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Yes there is a KB article on how to do this. Search using Accessing Exchange
through firewall or something of the like.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Locking down RPC;
I always get errors in the exmerge log that I assume were due to antivirus
(NAV for exchange 5.5) slowing things down. Do you have to stop AV to run
this?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:47 PM
To: Exchange
Hello All.
Windows XP defaults to blocking level 1 attachments. I did my
homework on the issue and have found out that this can be changed at
either the client or the Exchange server.
I was wondering how other Exchange Administrators handle attachment
blocking and what your theory on the
There is an article at MS which forces the client to use the Public Folder
Outlook Security Settings or Outlook 10 Security Settings (for XP) setup
for security. Using that, they can't over ride.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
I block at the Gateway using a Dell.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:09 PM
Subject: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server
Hello All.
Windows XP defaults to
Jason,
When was the last time you got a spam from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] When was the last time you got a spam
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only spaking from personal
experience, but the number of spam messages sent from a non-existant domain
is tiny.
-Walden
PS. Having said that, I think what Verisign
We are running Exchange 2000 SP3. We have some Public Folders that are
mail enabled. For some reason external people are unable to send mail
to it. We have given Default and Anonymous Contributor rights but still
nothing. Can someone point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Alex
I'd argue with you all the way to the IMS server with you on that point!
;0)
Seriously...we get ~100k-150k (This is a conservative estimate) spams/month
on our system. Probably 60-75% of those are from non-existant domains...and
that's just the stuff that gets through.
We get ~250k NDRs/month
My mistyped domain resulted in versigns page.What a travesty.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
From Wired.com
We get ~250k NDRs/month from people trying to brute-force spam us. 90% of
that is from non-existant domains.
Fair enough, guess I'm just lucky. I withdraw my comment. G
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, the travesty is that your company is so far behind in the
hardware/software options available when spec'ing out and building a new
computer from your web page.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange
I think the travesty is in your flaming post, but that is my opinion and I
am entitled to one. What does his company's website have to do with Verisign
hijacking unregistered domains? Absolutely nothing and is unrelated to the
list. Your comments are unnecessary and directed as a personal attack.
Im not one to usually post, and have been on the list for only about a
year now. Within that year I have learned town things: 1) there are a
handful of people on this list who REALLY know their stuff AND actively
post here(and me thinks James is one of them) and 2)this list is one of
the funniest
oh yeesh. is it thursday again already?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:00 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now
Greetings,
Can anyone tell me if there is way to make a folder in a users mailbox that
they cant delete?
Any way at all?
Thanks,
-K-
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it?
What is / are the most reliable list to use?
Thanks
Jason
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Hello,
Since you're quoting Q numbers in other posts, I'm guessing you did the
steps in Q307917.
This isn't going to help you recover, but I've been moving to a new
server myself and although the entire Public Hierarchy came across just
fine, some Public Folder content didn't. From ESM I'd
Ok I can except that
But how do you schedule it?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation
It's not scheduled?
I've had this happen before. A reboot has fixed it.
Russ
--- Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Server Exchange 5.5 Sp4 that when I look in
the Log File I do not
show the online defrag of the Priv. however I show
the Pub.
Any ideas on why this would not be
I don't know...maybe just create the mailbox?
I'm a Domain Admin / Exchange Admin with full Admin rights on my local
machine, and I couldn't delete one of the standard folders (Inbox, Sent,
Outbox, etc) if I wanted to. If your users can, I would look into the
security settings of the local
I'm not sure that's completely correct.. I believe you can delete these
folders via an IMAP client... like Eudora for example I believe that
Outlook itself is what prevents you from deleted the standard folders...
not the server...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could write a global store event sink that implements onsyncsave and
cancels any deletion or rename of the folder in question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kevin
C.
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange
Also my be of note It defrags the Pub like 3 times and I get an Event
ID of 183 at about 6:59am noting this:
MSExchangeIS (289) Online defragmentation of database
'E:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB'
was interrupted and terminated. The next time online defragmentation is
started on
this
If you can't risk the data getting out, then break
your Internet connection.
Ed
--- Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We talked about this exact scenario. We decided that
given how easy it is to install a key logger, and
other malware, on public systems we decided it was
too risky. We
I don't see how that would stop key-logging.
Ed
--- Greg Marr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have set up our OWA to require two-factor
authentication (SecurID)
which eliminates any key-logging concerns but this
system is not cheap
at approx $300 AU ($160 US) per user.
The upside is that
It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing credentials. At least I
believe that's the posters point.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA front
You don't have an online backup? That you could
restore to a box with a different name.
Ed
--- Paul Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting the MSKB as I speak, but I wondered if
there's a quick 'n' dirty
answer to this.
Long story short I need to get pub.edb back from
last nights
Define unable to send mail.
Ed
--- Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are running Exchange 2000 SP3. We have some
Public Folders that are
mail enabled. For some reason external people are
unable to send mail
to it. We have given Default and Anonymous
Contributor rights but
Sure:
We have Public Folders that are mail enabled. When we send mail to them
from External Addresses mail never gets there. Funny thing is that no
one ever receives an NDR either.
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
The plot thickens I think I'd be doing some offline testing soon.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 14:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
Also my be of note It defrags
You might be able revoke a user's ownership
permissions on his mailbox and then assign him
individual permissions on folders therein, but I
strongly suspect that Outlook wouldn't function
properly in that case. Even if you could, I think it
would probably be a waste of time. It would probably
be
Set a block of time on the weekend so it can run for
48 hours unimpeded and see what happens.
Ed
--- Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also my be of note It defrags the Pub like 3
times and I get an Event
ID of 183 at about 6:59am noting this:
MSExchangeIS (289)
Have you tried tracking the message?
Have you turned up logging to verify that the message
is even making it to the Exchange server?
You aren't filtering based on address at the
perimeter, are you? Some companies do that.
Ed
--- Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sure:
We have Public
Also, are your SMTP virtual servers configured to
forward unresolved addresses somewhere else?
Ed
--- Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sure:
We have Public Folders that are mail enabled. When
we send mail to them
from External Addresses mail never gets there.
Funny thing is that
Perhaps, but that's not what he said.
Ed
--- Steve Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing
credentials. At least I
believe that's the posters point.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Due to a mistake on my part, I've lost the OAB and Free/Busy public folders. I need to
recreate these folders. I found a good MS document (Q152960) that states how to do
this for Exchange 5.5, but I'm running 2000. Does anyone have a reference or know how
to recreate the OAB and F/B public
Ed,
I have online backups done nightly using ntbackup on Windows 2000, the
online backup is done to a dedicated disk, the file on disk is then streamed
to tape later on when the normal filesever backups are done.
Problem I'm seeing is that when you load the online backup file into
ntbackup it
RBL's are not a good thing. They tend to jam legit users/companies in
with the spammers. A couple of them just went poof here recently and
marked the world as spammers. Do you really want to trash your
communications link that way?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta,
Oooo hard crowd tonight, anyone would think this was the Swnyk Exchange
list. hang on it is!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/09/2003 1:09:59 a.m.
yes
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:39 AM
To:
Yes to this one and they aren't. I am checking the tracking now. Which
logging should I be turning up?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Also, are your SMTP
I did the tracking. It shows the internal messages but not the external
messages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes to this one and they aren't. I am
You should also check the SMTP queues on the Exchange server. Is there
anything sitting in the Unreachable destination queue?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Good afternoon,
I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We
are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed
I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on
the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even
Where does AD say the mailbox is? Has c run on the old database lately?
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Duncan Scott
Subject: Mailbox moves completed,
I thought that default mailbox folders such as deleted item and others are
not able to be deleted. If other just recover them as long as retention is
set and possible setting Dumpster always on just in case. I have found that
user can delete mailbox folders using the OWa interface. The only way
Responding to my post for the purpose of the archive. I figured out how to
reset/recreate the public folders. The key is in Q275171, and basically involves
resetting the GUID that represents the site.
Erick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So power down the old exchange server and see if they can still access
their mailbox
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Evans
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed,
Windows 2000 Server
Exchange 2000 Server
I recently got a Cisco PIX and I need to know what ports are absolutely
necessary to allow inbound traffic through the firewall for people to be
able to send mail in, access OWA, etc. I am reading that port 135 needs
to be allowed inbound but due to all
Anonymous must be set to contributor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unable to send mail to Public Folder from External Address
Also, are your SMTP
Setup a VPN with the PIX. There is no reason to waste all the money on one
if you are just going to turn it into swiss cheese to access Exchange.
Yes, RDP is necessary if you are trying to allow users to use Outlook at
home, but since a large number of consumer ISP's block it since MSBlast,
it's a
Thanks for your reply, how can we do that?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion
yes
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL
72 matches
Mail list logo
