I did a booboo on someone's Outlook and I am looking for help. I swapped his
blackberry for a different device and sync'd someone else's calendar and contacts with
his. Now both of them are in his folders. My question is what views do I have to
change to be able to tell whose contacts and
Change to an event's view in the calendar or a phone list view in contacts.
Then, through the Field Chooser, add the Modified field (you'll have to
scroll down to All Calendar/Contact Fields), and sort by that. You'll find a
group that were all modified consecutively, which is the result of the
Thank you very much for your help!
Paula
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Please help - Calendaring issue!!
I assume that this is regarding Exchange 5.5, no? Set up public
Make sure you have Integrated Authentication turned on on the Exadmin
folder under the default website in IIS.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shields,
Anthony D.
Posted At: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:58 AM
Posted To: Exchange
As posted before, you need to go to Advanced Options, Add-In Manager and
check Server Scripting.
This should give you the Agents tab.
Did you get this utility from CDOlive website? Is it working for you? I
downloaded the Auto Reply
from them and went through the whole setup, but it's not working
I just managed to restore via the remote backup. I kept getting errors
in the event log but eventually one of them led me to a knowledgebase
article that mentioned needing to have NetBIOS over TCP/IP turned on on
the servers. Having done that then it worked. However, the Information
Store won't
I have had TLs on a very active server grow to a total of more than 2GB
in a course of a day, on average.
One more thing to consider - what if your backup fails for some reason.
What if it fails for a couple of days? It would be nice to have enough
disk space to accommodate a couple of extra days
did you run isinteg with the patch option? Also what was the exact error
message you get in the event log. Search on that as it may have to do with
changing the restore in progress setting.
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Recommended:
OS: A RAID-1 physical volume.
Transaction logs: One RAID-1 physical volume for each storage group.
Databases: One or more RAID-5 physical volumes for each storage group.
If you don't have a lot of users, you might be able to combine the OS and
logs onto a single physical volume,
Hi there
I have been looking into this for a while and could do with some help. Is
there a way to automatically update caledars of multiple users in
Exchange? from Server side?.
Many thanks
Sye
_
List posting FAQ:
Does anyone know what the required maximum size that Microsoft recommends
an Exchange 5.5 Mail database should be?
I've heard anything over 100 gigs requires another Mail server. Is that
true?
_
List posting FAQ:
Actually, I tried all of those... Isinteg... Esutil... And changing
the restore in progress setting... One thing I saw said to delete that
registry key. Nothing so far has worked... At this point the problem
now appears to be that the Directory Service won't start, but the system
says it is
What was the exact error msg. in the event log. If you do not follow the
steps to correct verbatium then you have to restore from the beginning. This
is especially true in the case of correcting the restore in-progress error.
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
Is this an online or offline restore?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Actually, I tried all of those... Isinteg... Esutil... And
Matt, one thing you may want to become familiar with is the Disaster
Recovery Whitepaper. I'll post the link. It should describe for you
exactly what you need to do in order to restore to an alternate server.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enfamilyid=
I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file
and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am
trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup
completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It
appears
Do you want to personally handle something that's 100 GB or larger?
Imagine doing a repair on that thing. Even things like backup and
restore could be quite painful.
-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:50 AM
To:
Create a separate, distinct, backup job for the Exch store and it should
work.
- Original Message -
From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
I am a
It's an online restore, and was an online full backup. I've been
following the Whitepaper as noted in another post. I've had this sucker
for a while, but since things didn't seem to be working as described, I
needed the information you guys could provide. I've been hacking at
this for a while
Ok, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 09:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Create a separate, distinct, backup job for the Exch store and it should
work.
-
Is your file-level backup locking up some Exchange DB files?
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
I am a little too use to Veritas and
Be sure to restore only the Info Store, not the directory.
Redirect it to the recovery server. *Do not* run any utilities on the
database. Let it try to start on its own.
With an online restore, there is no need to run isinteg and the only time
you should have to run eseutil is if you screwed up
Yup. That's what I'm using. I only tried those other utils based on
articles that I had read after the original procedure had not worked.
This is, and should be, a relatively simple process, especially since we
did normal, rather than differential, backups. But I must have screwed
something up
Thanks I got it straightened out now. And it was my CEO so I guess I got you beat.
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Change to an event's
www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: AS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Automatically update Calendars of users in Organisation?
Subject: Automatically update Calendars of users in Organisation?
Hi there
I
If you use the standard edition of MS Exchange 5.5 the max is:
PRIV.EDB16GB
PUB.EDB 16GB
Period.
If you use the Enterprise edition of MS Exchange 5.5 then your only real
limit is capability of your hardware. I have seen plenty
of databases over 100GB and
Did you check out this article??
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;820852
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
In theory, it is measured in terabytes. In reality, its something smaller
than the maximum usable size of your backup tapes.
For instance, with DLT7000 tapes, I get ~65GB on a tape when backing up the
databases, so I won't go over that number.
That's exactly how I limit it as well. It cant be bigger than a single tape
can backup.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5
In
Hello all,
I am re-posting this (with my fingers crossed) in the hope that someone
out there can help me with this issue.
I am having an issue in Exchange 2k SP3. I have size restrictions in
place on the Public Folders at the store level. There is a sub-folder in
the default PF tree that has
Folders under the default tree I beleive inherent not only permissions but
also limits.
From: Bennett, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Public Folder issue
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:52:49 -0400
Hello all,
You backup to a tape can?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5
That's exactly how I limit it as well. It cant be
Every body has a tape can in their back pocket.
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:25:37 -0400
You backup to a tape can?
Hi all.
We have recently finished migrating from 5.5 to 2000 and switched to
native mode.
Right away we noticed that a large number of public folders lost their
mail-enabled status. I thought that only newly created PFs in native
Exchange 2000 are supposed to be mail-disabled, but the old ones
OK, this is pretty stupid. I had everything else right... But here's
the kicker: my assistant recently upgraded the restore server to W2K
SP4. The original 5.5 server was W2K SP3. That was it right there, and
I didn't bother to check because, at least in my mind, we hadn't
upgraded any of our
Yep, running in it's own backup job is the thing to do, thanks all.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Did you check out this
Running:
Exchange 5.5 Enterprise w/SP4
Windows 2000 Sp4
Is there a size limit on how big a mailbox can be within the Exchange
server?
TIA
Joshua
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
In terabytes maybe, but for practical purposes, no.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Size Limits
Running:
Exchange 5.5 Enterprise w/SP4
Windows 2000 Sp4
Is
Nope. It will get a tad unwieldy when it gets REAL big though.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Size Limits
Running:
Exchange 5.5 Enterprise w/SP4
Windows
Have a few questions:
We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5
Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a
Windows 2000 Box due to limitation on the Old Hardware. After our AD
Migration we are going to upgrade to Exchange 2000 I
1. Yes
2. No
3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep
Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then
upgrade 5.5 to 2000, then upgrade 2003 to 2003, the upgrade the OS to 2003
if you choose.
The better solution would be to get a new
Martin,
Thanks for your response. Another Question: When you say build the
new Exchange Server Install 2003 and move the Mailboxes, are you saying
install Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 box? But will that work in an NT
4.0 Domain Environment? Remember, we are still on a NT 4.0 Domain
Let me restate this
3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep
Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then
upgrade 5.5 to 2000, then upgrade Exchange 2000 to 2003, then upgrade the OS
to 2003
if you choose.
-Original Message-
You are going to need to get your AD infrastructure in place before you
think about upgrading your Exchange server to anything other than 5.5.
So the simple answer is no. You must have AD.
As for your other question, Exchange 2003 will install on W2K or W2K3, but
to take advantage of features
I have a user who received the followiing error.
I can not determine why. Any help? odd thing is the mailboxes are all
located on mail02. So why was the msg directe dto mail03?
Thanks,
John Q Jr.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail03.domain.ad ([10.10.220.27]) by
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
select 2003 faq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 26/09/2003 9:14:49 a.m.
Have a few questions:
We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5
Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a
Windows 2000 Box due
Martin,
I guess I didn't phrase it right. If I install Exchange 5.5 on a Windows
2003 Server will that work in an NT 4.0 Domain Architecture? Thank again.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:31 PM
To:
Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if
it would work.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
Martin,
I guess I
It won't. You can't even run the install for OWA 5.5 on a Win2k3 server,
much less the full Exchange 5.5 install. So in this case, not supported =
won't work.
I'd take Martin's advice. Wait until you upgrade your NT4 domain to AD,
then buy a new server, install Win2003 as a member, install
FROM DESK OF:MR.JERRY JOSEPH.
NIGERIA NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION(NNPC)
FALOMO OFFICE COMPLEX
IKOYI, LAGOS NIGERIA.
DEAR SIR,
EXTREMELY BUSINESS TRANSACTION
RE: REMITTANCE OF US28,500,000.00 MILLION DOLLARS INTO PRIVATE/COMPANY
ACCOUNT BASED ON A RECENT RECOMMENDATION OF YOUR COMPANY FROM A
I'm a big fan of the fact that it is an EXTREMELY BUSINESS
TRANSACTION. ;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 10:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: forward for a transaction
FROM DESK OF:MR.JERRY JOSEPH.
51 matches
Mail list logo
