Time Stamp issue

We seem to be having an issue with Outlook in all versions. We get emails from our mainframe in the middle of the night. When we receive them in Outlook the pointer in the inbox shows for example, 12am. When we open the message it shows sent as being 1am. This is the only emails that we are

RE: Time Stamp issue

Time is set by the sender side. Your mainframe's clock and/or timezone are set incorrectly. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex

RE: Time Stamp issue

Both locations are set by the mainframe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Time is set by the sender side. Your mainframe's clock and/or timezone are set

RE: Time Stamp issue

Hmmm.. Didn't catch that. The inside time stamp (ie the one embedded in the message) definitely is but the received envelope stamp is based on the mail server's time, adjusted by the client's timezone setting. -- Roger D. Seielstad -

RE: Time Stamp issue

And that's what's not making sense. Like I said all other external email is normal just from this sender. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hmmm.. Didn't

SIS ?

If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to other users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST efectively removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the forwarded email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the

Re: Time Stamp issue

Sure its just not something screwy within whatever app is generating those emails? As an example, in Veritas Backup Exec, the job status email notifications are sometimes off by an hour. Its a bug within BE itself. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: SIS ?

The .pst file would get a copy of the attachment from Exchange. The rest of the users who received a forwarded copy will still reference the single instance storage for the attachment on the Exchange server. Exchange will still retain a copy (SIS) for the other users who remain on the Exchange

RE: Time Stamp issue

That's what I think it is but my bosses won't just believe my feelings. I have to prove it... it's a whole OT post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sure its just

RE: SIS ?

That's what I thought. Thanks for verifying for me. Because other messages refer to an object it never gets truly deleted from the DB. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SIS ? Date:

RE: Time Stamp issue

We have sort of the same problem here due to daylight savings time and our AS/400's. The time is set correctly on each of them, the zones are the same, however our Windows systems use DST and the 400's could give a rip about that. So what happens is that the systems that support DST offset the

RE: Time Stamp issue

Run through the headers (or post them if you want a second opinion). That might help -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Time Stamp issue

I'll post them because I need the second opionion. SYH9 is the mainframe. Show's right here and on the pointer but when you open the email it shows 1:52 Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from troy-exch2.handleman.com ([172.21.101.69]) by troy-exch1.handleman.com with

RE: connecting 2 different org. via x400 to route emials

Using IMC does not mean that you must use Internet Also X400 connector is designed with other X400 systems in mind, not necessarily Exchange systems. -Original Message- From: stooge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: SIS ?

Well, it will eventually get deleted from the database, if all of the folks who received a copy either delete the message or move it to a PST. But the original object in the store will remain until ALL instances of it are removed. Make sense? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse

Two GAL's for two groups

We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you make a particular GAL the default for a group of users? Thanks Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Two GAL's for two groups

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;182902 -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two GAL's for two groups We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How

RE: Two GAL's for two groups

Permissions. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two GAL's for two groups We want to split our users

RE: Two GAL's for two groups

That would be ACLs on the GAL? Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Two GAL's for two groups Permissions. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging

Outlook XP

NT4sp6a Exchange 5.5 Is there any problem with running Outlook XP with Exchange 5.5? Our Sale guy just bought a HP PDA and it came with Outlook XP. He installed Outlook XP and now when he try to open Outlook it say that Your Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable Option button are Retry, Work

RE: Outlook XP

Seeing how any version of Outlook is specifically designed to work with any version of Exchange, and this relationship has been historically proven, I would bet that the problem is not with Outlook. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original

RE: Outlook XP

Sounds like a dns or name resolution problem. I've had to install a little add-on for WINS on PDAs. What OS is the PDA using? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP NT4sp6a

RE: Outlook XP

Make sure that his Outlook XP has the Windows Messenger component unchecked. Tools, Options, Other - uncheck the Messenger thing. See if that helps. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Time Stamp issue

Well, I see that your mainframe is living in EST time (equal to a -0500 offset), while your MS SMTPSVCs are using a -0400 time offset. Can you set the mainframe to use EDT time instead? Or wait three more Sundays and the problem will resolve itself, no? Jim Becker Manager of LAN Services

RE: Outlook Today calendar problem

Ran the cleanviews switch from shortcut and believe it worked...it took 15 seconds extra to bring up Outlook. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web

RE: Time Stamp issue

Dude you're the man None of us here even thought of that. Even our ex military guy. Thanks, Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Becker, Jim Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Well, I see that your

RE: Outlook XP

I'm using Outlook XP with Exchange 5.5 right now as I type. No problems at all...Except if you count that my Exchange server version is as old as dirt! -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

Spam: False Positives

I'm curious how people on the list are address the issues of falso positives. Our CIO under pressure actually came down and forced us to turn off our spam filter cause of false positive complaints. Of course perception and reality are two different things in these cases. Any feedback is greatly

RE: Spam: False Positives

What are you using as your spam filter app? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam: False Positives I'm curious how people on the list are address the

HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be

RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

Pst = bad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be

RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

Scumbag Spammer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

We use MMS and I have yet to get any of these spam. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody

RE: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server?

Yes this will work, while not reccomended, is perfectly doable in small offices. Truthfully I wouldn't do RPC over HTTP especially since this is your DC also. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL

RE: connecting 2 different org. via x400 to route emials

Actually SMTP would probably be a better option, though you could probably make X.400 work, because X.400 is difficult to configure as an external connector. You'd need an Internet Mail Service on a separate box in each of the two organizations. In the abc.com site, the new IMS would have only

RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

There are seldom good technological solutions to theological problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: