Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Build a specific signature that look for the
Sounds like you need bigger drives! Not sure why you want to run eseutil.
How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K
Do you need to look in message bodies or in subject lines?
I think you could use ExMerge to find all messages with matching subject lines.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do the job?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange
On track's product is very much like Exmerge. Not sure you may want to check
it out to see if it searches text. Big thing it allows you to seach DB's
without them being online.
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Be advised that you cannot use the new biggie sized PST files (unicode)
for cache mode one Exchange 5.5 (It won't let you). The result of this is
that it will create a 2g limited pst file, and if your mailbox is over about
1.5g (pst's take more space to save the messages) it will die and you will
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at
their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it
works that sound very reasonable.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a
lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The
selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and
the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via
a web interface.
Sorry but if I understood correctly, so the problem is on their end ? Why is
it then that they claim that this only affects emails we send them ?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It does work, we've used it for a year or so. I've not used the bayes
filtering but the rest is very flexible, also it's written by a small
company (I suspect it's one guy) and I've found him really quick with
replies to questions, and very amenable to adding sensible features to later
versions.
Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out
to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit.
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
True. Something I've noticed too - recently upgraded to Outlook XP on the
client side with the server side still hosting Exchange 5.5 SP4 - seems like
it takes longer to read and send emails now using Outlook XP - certainly
some delays.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
short answer is no. You could ask PSS if they have a routine to change but
they will tell you that it is not recommended
From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin
I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2
days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart.
Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I
upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and
mail but the public
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:55:55 -0500
I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2
days maxes out the cpu. I
I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go
by.
We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28%
at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent
bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It
We're using Outlook XP on the workstations on a hosted MS Exchange 2K
backend. I'm the owner of a public contacts list with a customized master
categories list. I'd like for everyone on the system to see the same
categories to choose from - and it isn't happening. Any and all help is
appreciated!
I have a W2K domain domain.local
I will add a SBS2000 to it with exchange 2000
This exchange 2000 should be the mail server for domain.com
1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local
2- should SBS be a member server or a controller
Thanks for your help
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local
Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the primary address.
2- should
We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated
black/whitelisting and already have a constant 20-30% blockage of spam. Next
week I will enable the Bayesian filter next week. I highly recommend the GFI
Products...
Bryce Weathersby
Network Specialist I
Lamar Institute of
You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the
one and only domain controller.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The bayesian filtering in GFI MailEssentials is quite impressive. To give you
an idea of the figures, on Wednesday we had 2336 blocked by the bayesian
filter, 369 blocked by my keyword list, 206 remote images and 199 blocked by
ordb open relay database. This totals approx 26% of our incoming mail.
If you can't add SBS to a domain
Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS
If it's only one controller there is no redundancy
If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Hi All,
We have experienced a vast increase in the amount of spam our employees have
been getting (in the region of 3-400% increase) over the last 6 months.
Prior to this, our MailSweeper was coping quite well with the problem, but
is having significant problems with HTML based email ( the ones
It is a pricey solution. I suppose if you were to add up the cost of each
solution it provides from different vendors as well as the system itself, it
would be close. Have you looked at MXtreme solution from Borderware?
Peter Blouin
Head, Messaging Systems
National Research Council
Ottawa, ON
I restrict all kinds of mail attachments - HTML, .exe, .vbs., .vcf...all
kinds of things. I only let about five attachment types through at all.
I get a lot of complaints about it, but there's usually a workaround, and
our incidence of email-borne viruses has decreased dramatically.
Geni
This is getting stranger.
When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get -
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com
Found this link in NTSysadmin archives
http://www.microsoft.com/netherlands/download/files/partner/gtm/Adding_Serve
rs_to_Your_SBS2000_Network.doc
In it you can find the following
Configuring an Additional Server
Joining the Small Business Server 2000 Domain
Configuring a File and Print Server
We are also evaluating the solution. It offers the SLS (statistical
lookup service) where messages are analyzed and then compared against an
external dbase to see if they have gone out to large numbers of users
(spam). This appears to be a very quick and efficient process. They
are of course
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?
He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to
yes we can do that...
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Ok then does he need another server/group or can it be done via his current
setup with only one site/group that has mutiple servers already? I think he
needs another group and server to set routing restrictions the address book
put is pretty easy
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time.
We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you
dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status
message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at
Ok, thanks. So according to mine, it looks like I have the redundancy.
There's two entries for each site but I just noticed that the MTA Properties
on my server show to 'Only use least cost routes'. With that enabled, it
wouldn't even try the other connector if our link was down now would it? I
Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could you send me a link to
this apge where the network status message appears so I can forward it to
this person ?
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange
Hi there !
I have my own profile with my own accounts and the I have a profile that
uses my Exchange mailbox (RPC over HTTP)
Is it possible to run 2 Outlook at the same time - one witch uses my
homeprofile and the other my exchange profile
(My prob is that I cant use my home accounts and
Microsoft Outlook Categories
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/olcat.htm
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Contact Lists
We're using Outlook XP on the workstations
I guess if you use a server as a client and it has Terminal Services on
it, then you can run multiple Outlooks in separate Terminal Server
sessions.
Or Windows XP Home Edition and Windows XP Pro - it allows you to switch
to another user profile without logging off. It does not kill the
previous
We love and use the setup described here:
http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html
It can be daunting for someone unfamiliar with nix type os's. But it's free
software and runs great on old hardware. For us, it filters out 1200-1500
spams per day with about a %94 success rate.
-Wayne
http://www.help.rr.com/getpage.asp?/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could
Neil Andy (and anyone else interested!),
Firstly thanks for your replies - every bit helps when you have a
conundrum.
I managed to increase the size of the exchange drive, and then last
night dismounted the store and ran eseutil /d. *.stm file went from
approx 9GB to 1.5 GB (what I was
This is not true...you CAN add DC's to an SBS domain. Obviously those
DC's cannot be SBS servers.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
What version of Exchange?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange
E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group
created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question from
You'd have to do it with different address lists. I don't have the number
handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists. Through
permissions you can control which ones users see. You would need a group to
effectively assign the permissions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of
internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through
the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what he means
by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet.
Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if
its a bit newbie.
I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4)
Yeah, the routing thing may be tricky, but one would have to wonder the
reasoning behind it. Seems to me you could only make such a guarantee with
a completely separate infrastructure.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent:
Would you know a good one?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question
That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?
Ed
I know a lot of them!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange
People that know Exchange?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question
I know a lot of them!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Them too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
53 matches
Mail list logo
