RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page

Cheers, but unfortunately, this doesn't appear to exist. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: 05 December 2003 03:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page You should be able to create

SV: Dumb question - why OWA cannot get to public folder contacts?

I dit have the same prob and ?, I know use RPC over HTTP, and the solution is far better than OWA solution. That is in my point of view :-) Troels Majlandt Systemconstructor -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Ron Jameson Sendt: 5.

RE: Backup rituals

I finally found the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper Erik was talking about. I will stop asking questions about DR methods. Eric Fretz Could you post the URL? I'm always interested in finding better ways to provide disaster recovery. By the way, we do a full NTBACKUP every night to hard drive.

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

Almost identical to our field server specification! Although, I'd consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar amounts of memory. It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory in a different

RE: Exchange client or mapi

If it's BrightStor Arcserve 9, use the native Arcserve SMTP service. (Remember to patch it otherwise the alert.exe process gobbles more CPU cycles and memory than store.exe!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: 04

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16 Posted To:

SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003

Hi, Does anyone know if the in place upgrade of SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003 uses Exmerge(don't really want this as the SIS will be lost and the database would go over 16GB) or does it action a proper database to database upgrade? the documentation just seems to dodge exactly how it's going to deal with

RE: SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003

AFAIK there is no in-place upgrade from SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx For an in-place upgrade you could probably do an interim upgrade to SBS 2K, but don't know how good the dual upgrade could be. I'm in your same situation and

RE: Backup rituals

This is our plan as well. Fulls every day plus the transaction logs has worked well for us. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Full plus

What rights to Exchange do Domain Admins have by default?

Let's say that a Domain Admin sits down at an Exchange server and launches Exchange System Manager. Let's also assume that this user has NOT been granted any Exchange administrative roles through the Exchange Delegation Wizard. What can he do? Can he install a new Exchange server? Dismount

RE: Backup rituals

Go check out -- http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp If you haven't already seen it, go check out Ed's Exchange Administration guide at: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm (That's just the disaster recovery page. The whole guide is

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel:

RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector

He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000

RE: Backup rituals

Here's the link to download the DR whitepaper from Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=df586628-3abe-40c3- 8e8f-beb4122de3d7displaylang=en Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to

Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server

I getting this message when I try to access OWA. I find something about this in TechNet, but it's only for ISS V.4 in NT 4.0 and not for IIS v.5.0 in Windows 2000. ** Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

IMAP is fine if you don't care about contacts, calendar or tasks. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange

RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server

You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server I getting this

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

What is the cost of the client? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to

Mulit-GAL Filter Rule

Does anyone know how to setup a GAL filter that will show both a Group and User filter. I am running a hosted exchange enviroment in E2K. It seems that when I setup a new GAL for the hosted client, I can only filter either by User or by Group. When I filter by user, the distribution groups do not

RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5

Have people stored any new info in the public folders since then? No. This is not a concern. If you slide the old pub.edb in there, the new work will be gone. You probably will be better off restoring that old pub.edb to another server (in a separate Exchange organization) and then

RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule

Stuff a custom LDAP query in the GAL's filter. That's what I did when I worked for iNNERHOST. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov. Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jason Hendricks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05,

RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule

You can use (|(objectclass=user)(objectclass=group)) syntax in that LDAP query. | means OR. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule Stuff a custom LDAP query in the GAL's filter.

RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5

By another server I meant - build a new Exchange server in a separate Exchange org. -Original Message- From: Willem Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5 Have people

RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector

I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual server has everything that is necessary. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05,

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page

That's odd. I did the exact same thing in my lab when I was testing Ex2003 and a reinstall brought it back. - Peter -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA default home

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

Just thought I would throw in my 2c. I recently took on the charge of moving a company that is running all UNIX mailhosts (Sendmail\Qpopper)...and moving them to Exchange 2000 (and then to 2003...this month..yah). Natually they have a large amount of *NIX clientsso I had this problem as

RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule

I tried your idea, but I still cannot find the correct syntax. How would you write one from the current example; ((objectCategory=user)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) ((objectCategory=group)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) Each on there own displays, but I try combine them to see both nothing happens. Thanks, Jason

Changing web server - OWA OMA

I need some suggestions on how to best configure my IIS / exchange. We have had a very insecure setup with exchange running on our IIS server, but this allowed OWA and OMA to work for us. We are now moving our IIS server to a seperate box and placing it in our DMZ. We are not ready to add an

RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule

Do I have to give away all my Exchange hosting secrets? :) (|((objectCategory=user)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) ((objectCategory=group)([EMAIL PROTECTED]))) (the text above is one long line that may have wrapped around) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and

Exchange 2K

We are running Exchnage 5.5 right now with a planned upgrade to E2K before the end of the year. I am told that in E2k environment you can not have same active directory account associated with multiple exchange mailboxes? Is this correct? Thanks Davinder

RE: Exchange 2K

Wow, I totally misread this phrase at first and thought that it was now instead of not. You can still hset permissions in Eexchange 2000 so that people can access someone else's mailbox. Hey why are you planning to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and not 2003? -Original Message- From: Davinder

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

FYI - Any variety of 2003 server can use the /3GB switch -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM,

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

They meant Windows 2000 Advanced Server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? FYI - Any variety of 2003 server can use the /3GB switch -Original

RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

So outlook 2003 doesn't use OST files, only PST? I believe there is a slight difference between the formats of OST and PST. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on

Configuring LDAP with exchange 200

I have had it up to my neck with OWA, and I have decided it is time to phase it out of our organization. So far I have been testing IMAP and the method I really prefer is to connect to my VPN and open up outlook. However to be practical (not saying the a VPN is not the best way), I am looking at

RE: S/MIME

Since HHS is a federal agency, you should be using the Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) to connect to other Federal Agencies. Currently, use of the FBCA requires certain proprietary APIs to do certificate validation. Here is a link to more information about the Federal bridge:

RE: Exchange on a SAN

Not most I've run across. Most I've run across buy the disks as each application comes up. Therefore their SANs are just very expensive equivalents of external direct-attach storage. Snapshots won't be available until the SAN providers complete their integration with Windows 2003. (Are any

RE: Resource free/Busy time issues with AutoAccept script

Log into the resource mailbox with Outlook using the /cleanfreebusy switch. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex

RE: Converting w2k DNS to BIND

Why are you doing this? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pham, Tuan Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Why are you asking here? We're all just Microsoft vendor whores. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday,

RE: What rights to Exchange do Domain Admins have by default?

Not much. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Race between client rules and BES server

Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

Last I checked the Ximian connector did not work on Exchange 5.5 (it requires exchange 2000 or newer). -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well...

RE: Backup rituals

I could change my spark plugs weekly, but I don't. What kind of failure would take out both the store and the logs? An extremely rare and weird event. There's nothing wrong with what you're doing, my point is just that you're not getting much extra protection. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP

RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5

Take a full online backup. Shut down the Information Store cleanly. Take a full offline backup (so you have a backup copy in case you do something stupid again--Sorry, I couldn't resist) of the full Information Store, both private and public stores. Take another if you want to be really sure.

RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector

Or if you have separate routing groups that route SMTP mail through one another's connectors. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

The legacy OST and PST are essentially the same format and hence subject to the same limitation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: Configuring LDAP with exchange 200

Your domain controller is an LDAP server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry, Christopher M. Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003

RE: Race between client rules and BES server

That sounds like the stupidest corporate policy imaginable. Well, I guess I can imagine worse, but you get my drift. I have a trick for you. Stop doing that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original