Replaying logs is not THAT time consuming. But you have to restore the
entire information store and all the logs for the storage group.
No you can't replay logs just for one user.
Have you explored the possibility that your boss was using a POP3 client
from home (or wherever he may have been)
I guess my help was not needed anymore. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: replay log files for one user?
Replaying logs is not THAT time consuming. But you have to restore the
entire
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224493
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 8:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing/Deleting Message
Question:
Hi,
I am a independent consultant hired to investigate an administrator who
the CEO belives he is accessing sensative email from others mailbox.
While it is NOT possible to configure anything on the exchange server, is
there anything I can do a spot-check or any tools like sniffer, so that I
can
The event logs will show you who's accessing what mailboxes. One way is to check the
logs on the server and see who's doing what. The proof is in the pudding.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
The only way I know of is to increase the logging for the info store to
medium and then look for event 1016 in the application log on the
exchange server. This is generated every time an account accesses a
mailbox that is not its primary mailbox. No amount of permission
granting will stop it from
Are there any tricks for adding OWA to a new website on an existing
IIS/Exchange 2000 server? I think i sort of have it working by
creating the website from within Exchange administrator - but that set
up OWA as the root of the web - ideally i'd like OWA to work from a
virtual web /exchange as
Unfortunately, 1016s are poor indicators and are generated regardless of
logging level. Increasing the logging level in the IS to max -( Logons or
something similar) cant remember the specific category name off the top of
my head )) should yield better info.
-Original Message-
From: Dan
I have a very strange issue. All of our users use OWA 2000 without
problems, except one. He is at a third-party location (customer site)
which apparently has a firewall (no one knows what kind). When this user
sends mail from OWA, Symantec Antivirus for Exchange detects that the
message has an
Is his version of IE the same as yours?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: looking for a scientific explanation
I have a very strange issue. All of
According the info I was able to get out of him, yes.
When I check the IS Logons in ESM when the user is logged on, I can see
two lines for him. One says HTTP and the other one says Win32. I only
expected to see HTTP, I wonder what Win32 means in this context.
-Original Message-
From:
I was doing this on Friday for a client and it took me a couple of hours
to work out.
The way I did it was to create the site in Exchange System Manager, then
create a new virtual directory for Exchange and Public.
Then, once created and seen in Internet Services Manager, I went in to
the
All,
Quick question...how do you install S/MIME support for OWA on Exchange 2000? I have
it setup for the client side. But I'm having some problems getting it to work through
OWA.
Thanks,
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S/MIME for Exchange 2000 OWA is not supported - that is, there is no
option to digitally encrypt or sign using OWA. Exchange 2003 allows you
to download and install the S/MIME control for IE, but Exchange 2000
does not have this feature. By you having it set up for the client
side, I assume you
Ok cool, I knew in 2003 it did support it. Just didn't know if it was supported or
not in 2000. I was just making sure I wasn't going insane here. Thanks for the quick
response.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And yes, that is correct.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello. Is it possible to archive/auto-archive your Contacts folder? If
so, how?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Exchange 2000 SP3
Windows 2000 SP4
I am trying to grant our Help Desk Users the abilty to Change/Add/Delete
E-mail Addresses on all users. They do not have Account Operators or
anything like that. I have granted them Exchange View Only rights in
Exchange 2000. I am attempting to use
What are you trying to accomplish?
From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Archiving Contacts Folder
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:20:22 -0800
Hello. Is it possible to archive/auto-archive your
I have a user who is trying to add her contacts to her archive folder.
There isn't an archive option under the properties for Contacts. Manually
archiving didn't work either. I just wanted to verify that archiving
Contacts wasn't possible. You would either have to do an export or manual
copy.
The quick answer is no. Ask yourself what criteria would you use? Archiving
is by size date etc.
From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Archiving Contacts Folder
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004
Does the user have a signature they use? If so maybe something in it causes
it to trip.
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004
Nice idea! I didn't think about that. Thanks!
It does look like he has a signature, but it looks like it's just plain
text. Maybe he pasted something funky there that can't even be seen...
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
Wait... OWA 2000 doesn't have an option for automatic signature.
But most of his sent messages end with the same exact words.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Nice
You are correct. Some cut and paste to achieve a signature type effect.
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:23:53 -0500
They'd need the permission to change that attribute, which, I believe, you
would have to confer in the Schema. Really, I think it's a whole lot of
trouble to do that. Why not make them Account Operators? Don't they have
to reset passwords and the like as well?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
I was able to modify the DSSEC.DAT file and reveal the attributes I
needed to delegate.
I agree with you Ed but I am low on the Totem Pole here and no one up
top understands the sweet sweet language of Common Sense.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed, thanks for your response. Getting spams on my
exchange is a daily retual to me, however, not as much
as 4000 or more spam emails withing the hour.
Last time, when i had such a high volume of spam, we
had a look at \\exchange server\tracking.log and
figured out that one of the exchange
Sounds like you in need of a spam solution.
From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Ed, thanks for your response. Getting spams on my
What is your opinion on gfi?
many thanks
--- Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you in need of a spam solution.
From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams
Only have experience with Trend Micro and Symantec products.
From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:29:55 -0800 (PST)
What is your opinion on gfi?
many
Being open for relay won't get you more spam, but it will enable others to
send spam using your machine. There's an important difference. If you're
receiving lots of spam then you might want to look at an antispam product to
install on your Exchange server, or between it and the Internet, or
gfi . . . good product. .. . bad support.
Trend = restful sleep every night.
- Original Message -
From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams
What is your opinion on gfi?
many
let me see if i can explain my issue better this time!
I am using Trend Micro ScanMail E manager which has
content filtering enabled, also running real-time
scanner on exchange server.
The problem is that all these exchange servers within
the enterprise (located different regions of the world
Thanks. I tried it both ways (creating the web from Internet Services
Manager and creating it from Exchange Systems Manager). At first I
tried it in Internet Services Manager, and it was not working - I had
missed the step of adding davex.dll - I had to hit the create button to
get to the
An open relay shouldn't get you spammed any more than usual. It allows you
to be used to spam everyone else in the world, though. Perhaps you don't
really understand what you're saying about being an open relay.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from
36 matches
Mail list logo
