They might be temporarily loosing the network connection which would cause them no
longer to be correctly authenticated. OWA probably has a solid connection to that
server. But re-logging to the NT domain should fix that. Are the users that
experience this problem in the same network
Are you specifying domain name when logging it?
as in
domain\login
From: Kumar Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:51:12 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OWA login problem
Hi Gurus
I have a problem with my OWA login. The environment is Exchange
You should look into the difference in cost for upgrade to e2k versus purchase of a
new license for e2k. Eventually you will have to upgrade as MS will stop supporting
E5.5
The deadline for buying an e2k upgrade is 07/31/2002. After that you'll be paying the
full price.
Talk to your MS
Use an internal domain that is not internet routable(for example
PREMUSAinternal.com) and use e-mail addresses for this domain to achieve your goal
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/17 Fri PM 01:51:46 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Restrict an
Must have :=(
And it's not even Friday.
Gary, relax, it's ok, go for a smoke or something. Lay off the coffee :=)
Jerzy
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/16 Thu AM 10:15:42 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Virus Attack ??
Did
Not sure what we are missing so I thought I would ask the group.
Test environment:
Exchange 5.5 sp4
E2K SP2
2 way trust
We used E2K ADC to populate AD. The W2K users created cannot access the mailboxes in
E5.5
When we move the mailboxes to E2K the NT users can access the maibox on the E2K
Give us info:
Source IP
Destination IP
So we can cross check it
From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Telnet troubleshooting
In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail
privateconsulting.com's mail server was rejecting some
of their messages.
David
-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Telnet troubleshooting
Give us info:
Source IP
873 - but my chopper was sputtering smoke all the way - busted...
Jerzy
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 10:28:28 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
950 HA ha!!!
the simple games are always the
Got a super easy course. 1861. Chopper still smoking...
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 11:55:09 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt
-Original Message-
or, add yourself to them and see if you get any mail...notify the owner that
you're doing this
From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 02:12:27 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DL usage
I guess you could export them to a csv file and
I think he was just asking you if you experience the issue he was describing.
Basicaly if you can see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM .
.. I think..but I wasn't following the thread.
From: M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:16:21 EDT
To: Exchange
If all you want is a look like
http://www.topfun.co.uk/gonmadmail/
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:50:32 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Delegate access for a remote user
What does his email administrator say?
Sounds like they're blocking you.
Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives.
Jerzy
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/06 Mon AM 10:58:22 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMTP 550 Error
I am getting this error sending to one domain:
The
would this help?
http://www.wickett.net/WNMailKeeper/
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri AM 11:15:36 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re Personal Mail Archiving
Hi all,
Guys, I got a lot of technical/knowledgebase type messages I
Why not use OWA?
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 03:07:42 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000
Hoping I don't get flamed for this, but here goes.
I've got a shop with numerous Linux users, but we also use exchange.
I'm
Lovely,
I was wondering what was the delay, Expected someone to start around lunch :=)
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 04:04:47 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Haiku Friday
Friday blues, once more...
Nice day, no
My point is that having a cert can't hurt you.
It might help you put your foot in a door that could be closed otherwise.
Now, Why the door could be closed is another issue altogether, and I agree with you
there.
I am looking at it from the employee perspective.
Jerzy Setmajer
From: Andy
I agree,
Make a list of technical limitations based on your environment (hardware) and send it
to legal/HR so they can convert it to something only they will understand :=)
Items you want to have some sort of limits on:
Mailbox Max Size
Internal Message max Size
External Message max Size
This only looks so simple
Read the warning on the bottom of this q article.
it says WARNING: When you click to select the Propagate these properties to all
subfolders check box, and then click Apply, any existing permissions in the
subfolders are lost.
He has thousands of Public Folders, this
Sound, must have sound
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/23 Tue PM 12:57:18 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mailflow chart
Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely shaped envelopes
flying through gateways and such. Please
Yes to both questions
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/18 Thu AM 10:52:01 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Calendar cleansing
Is there any way to wipe your calendar clean using Outlook 98? Or better
yet,
create a second non populated
Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means
From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000
I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange
that an NT 4.0 client can't be part of a
native mode domain . . . Pardon me if I misread your comment.
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11
Was the consistency adjuster run after the restore to alternate server?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Assuming the email was going to the Internet - did you check your IMS
queues?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Did you try putting an actual e-mail through the telnet to that server?
If not - telnet to the remote server on port 25
You should get a 220 - server ready
Type in: helo yourdomain.com
Server will reply with a 250 ok
Type in: mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will get another 250
Type in: rcpt
You are correct - the message is confusing. The Subject refers to CR's
but the body to Hidden Receipients (which could be mailboxes ). But if
it's just the CR's then restoring IS will not get them back.
_
List posting FAQ:
Well, first - do not give disgruntled employees permission to post
Organizational forms. Second, password protect all the forms before you
post. Keep the password list safe so you can unlock the form.
Usually, the developers want to password protect their own forms - don't
let them. You need
From my experience, if Outlook forms are put together by a responsible
person with basic knowledge of vbscripting, the forms can simplify a lot
of tasks and be used in variety of productive ways.
I do not believe they have a high impact on processing other than being
usually larger than regular
Does anyone know of a solution that would allow for store replication
accross WAN?
I have 2 data centers in different states and need to create a no delay
failover in case of a disaster where basicaly the secondary location takes
over 'on the fly' or at least withing few minutes if primary
31 matches
Mail list logo
