Derrick,
just mention in your next conversation, in your most somber engineer voice,
that the databases should be fluffy with white space rather than dense and
defragged. fluffy is the word you're looking for. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
i appreciate that Thomas Paine has subbed to the list and is dispensing
wisdom, but can we cut the monotheistic references, referrals, and
submissions? i find it unintellectual to invoke the names of deities to
avert the calamities of man. perhaps there is a monotheist discussion list
well, i heard a lot of references to the effects of frigid air on body parts
(nipples, mostly), and Andy heard that one thing that Missy won't let me
repeat, and there was much whining and sniveling about snacks and mean
penguin people. nothing quotable, Dougie. sorry.
next year, perhaps the
regarding tacos
you have plumbed the depths
of my disinterest
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Yeah but all of the Taco Del Mar's here is Seattle are
Thuzar,
are you using Exchange 5.5? if so, it is not difficult to set up Address Book Views.
See Q182902 (http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182902)
for details.
Kim Cameron
Messaging and Directory Resources
SAS Institute Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
well, I would just ask the Exchange administrator to change it to something else. Did
you try that?
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Password
hi,
Derrick,
you have auto-replies to the internet disabled on your IMS. of course, you didn't say
whether it works for anyone else.
Kim Cameron
Messaging and Directory Resources
SAS Institute Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Derrick D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
any member of the Continuum can reboot the internet while Al is growing his beard,
Dougie. and a politician could do worse than looking like J. Frakes - they could look
like a Ferengi from Austin, Texas, for instance.
slipstick.com is up, btw.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire
i have no idea what you're talking about, because you didn't include the link to the Q
article, but if you don't know to replace SERVER_NAME with your actual server name,
you should probably wait to do whatever it is you're doing, dearie.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000
i have no idea what you're talking about, because you didn't include the
link to the Q article
is there a Config CA in the second domain? i think one is needed per domain.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Problem
All,
Currently I have W2K w/AD running I have two
let's keep this on the list - you'll get much more good information than I have the
time to provide.
you didn't list the steps you took to set this up. Did you run domainprep, for
instance? Are you following a setup whitepaper like the one at
i wouldn't have stood up, either. i don't do command performances for total
strangers. and i'm a spooky chick.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/
nor me...
fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation
elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could
commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject
line.
i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron
Sent: 09 November 2001 07:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation
elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you
oh, pul-leeze. you don't know anything about me, and you've only been on
the list a couple of weeks. i'm not uptight, quite possibly scads more
*fun* than you might imagine. you really don't need to worry about
embarrassing me on the exchange list. i'm not exactly quaking in my boots
at the
eff-why-aye:
autumn: Jim McBee
pens new e2k book called
24seven
http://www1.fatbrain.com/asp/bookinfo/bookinfo.asp?theisbn=0782127975vm=
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782127975/qid=1005091741/sr=8-1/ref=
sr_8_3_1/002-2534583-1266469 (link may wrap).
Wilson,
as i recall, we first did the schema modifications by running setup.exe with
the /schemaonly switch. this stretched the schema and lessened the work
to be done by forestprep. it took about a half-hour in our forest.
forestprep also took about a half hour from the time we completed the
oh dear. it seems you have a bigger problem, Bill. your email message is
infested with misplaced apostrophes and someone has stolen your commas.
[cow's = belonging to the cow. cows = plural form of cow. there is no
such word as see's.]
i think you can take a look at control panel/phone
dear Mike,
just for kicks, you might want to read a book about Exchange before you go
trying to administer it. here are some recommendations:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm
you didn't stage a coup and oust the real Exchange admin, did you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
no. yes. and could you explain why you'd want to do this? then we'll know
where to tell you to read up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: POP3
the attribute is called msExchPoliciesExcluded. you'd have to
programatically set that attribute to get the box to be unchecked.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WebMeister
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Exchange
doesn't have the tab and doesn't have the option doesn't tell us much.
can you provide more information, perhaps enumerate what's already been
tried? (like updating to the latest service packs, re-installing the IMS,
etc.)? i'm saving my immense imaginative powers for the sugarplums.
k
|;)
It
also, use the PF tools on the resource kit to set the permissions.
k
|;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert
B.
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Setting Permissions on Public
you have the person in your address book or Contacts and the name is resolving to that
entry. Simple.
Kim Cameron
Messaging and Directory Resources
SAS Institute Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:34 PM
It shouldn't be that difficult, Michael. I've seen the problem with the threads, but
it's been fixed for a while. I do wonder, since you said you're running this on a
Win2K pro machine, how you expected that workstation to act as a server? Did you
boost the priority of background
the MS KB is now USELESS. I am, at present, seeking a channel to report this, but
they really don't seem to care. The premier website is even worse - I can't even get
in because the friggin' passport thing is broken.
Since they made the www.exinternals.com website go away, there are now NO
Thanks, Chuck. This is a trip - they seem to have put the KB website back the way it
was, weeks ago, when it worked. Does anyone else see that? Wow, they actually fixed
it.
The premier site is still unreachable, but I never use that one except as a last
resort.
-Original
if you're only using it as an archive, it's probably fine. you won't, however, be
able to open or run the file from the CD, as it will be read-only. See
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm for abundant detail.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL
this is where that lovely Patsy Cline quote comes in so handy: People in hell want
ice water.
your client may want a lot of things, but they can't really have them all at once, can
they? If they don't want to upgrade their domain to 2000 yet, and only want to buy
one new server, and can't
forward your reply to: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Some of you may recall MEC '99 in Atlanta, when we organized a gathering for
members of the Exchange list. Richard Ku of TrendMicro volunteered to
sponsor the gathering, about 150 people showed up, and icy beverages were
consumed.
I think we
. (or synched up an old *ost in reverse, perhaps? i
think i've seen that, too.)
test by deleting another message and recovering. test on another mailbox. go do it,
man!
Kim Cameron
Messaging and Directory Resources
SAS Institute Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Blunt
in e2k, you *do* have to set anonymous to contributor in order to get external
messages. Just another one of the Plethora of Sinister Surprises that abound in e2k.
-Original Message-
From: Reiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:04 PM
Posted
you cannot even set it on an administrative group basis. OOF and autoreply capability
is set at the Org level. yeah, it's stoopid.
-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Forum
Conversation:
do a mailbox cleanup to delete the voice mail attachments before you run the backup.
Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to voice mail right away,
they lose it.
You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy
35 matches
Mail list logo
