I'd at least be tempted to open the exe in a text editor (isolated machine
preferably) and see if it had anything interesting in it.
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Virus
Has anyone
And then SSL SMTP for outbound (to allow for forced authentication)?
I'm going through the same thing right now trying to beef up security while
moving some servers.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:44 PM
To:
I've got a similar issue affecting a 2K client that is not a domain member
and connects through RAS or VPN. Server is NT 4.0 SP6A w/ 5.5 SP4
Previous server was a BDC and as long as the workstation was logged on using
the same credentials as used on the network, member of a workgroup that had
Those users were more than likely delegates of someone (or something) that
was invited to the meeting. Check delegate assignments for each person that
was invited.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange
CDOLive has a couple of things that might fit the bill.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: calendar for Resources items
well, i did all that when i set up the mailboxes. and
Suggested change does not seem to be working for Version 3.8 or 3.7. Am I
missing something, another check box maybe? (on the phone to Trend now BTW)
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
2000 Attachment blocking
Well, it worked for me. I put a *. In front of every attachment type I had
and boom it started blocking. You are using the same scan engine right?
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:25 PM
;.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fix from Trend for Exchange 2000 Attachment blocking
On Exch 5.5 with Scanmail 3.8 and Scan engine 5.630-1025. *. is in place
] Specified attachments
Attachments with specified extensions:
ade;adp;bas;.
Attachments with specified names:
*.ade;*.adp;*.bas;.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange
Discussions
Subject: RE: Fix from Trend for Exchange 2000 Attachment blocking
I guess I lucked out then. Good luck to you buddy. Hopefully Trend will
address this pretty soon.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Exchange
Me too, and never been to a MEC
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at
And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file
thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of
longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do).
I always work better with big pretty pictures.
circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each night
after they are backed up? Correct?
- Original Message -
From: Mood, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist
And a cool PPT
://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Ook. - The Librarian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mood, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist
The point would be that if the priv
MELIA will do this, I've just started to play with it myself. Sunbelt
software has a 30 day demo you can download.
-Original Message-
From: Kalligonis, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Analyzer Software
Does
Probably just a hacker using one of the many known IIS holes to hack your
system. It's been thoroughly violated. The cmd.exe exploit (i'd bet
ftp1.exe is cmd renamed) and use of nc.exe are kind of outlined in this
short article http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Papers/DS19981129.html.
Good
Something like Double Take
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=111
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange replication or Imge
Importance: High
Hi Folks,
We are
In OL2K you could do this manually by using a meeting request to expand the
DL. In 98 I don't think it's available.
Why no OL2K?
The manual way.
Set up a bogus meeting request
Go to attendee availability tab
Expand DL (click on the plus sign)
Switch back to the appointment tab
Copy out
I don't know of anything for free but a burn in app can be had pretty
cheaply if your looking for potential hardware problems.
Something from here maybe
http://www.passmark.com/download/
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
If it's a WAN/LAN connection and you do indeed still receive a ping
response, I have found that the BORK tool, shutdown.exe will sometimes
recover from this situation.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange
Open up the mailbox with the old Exchange client and delete the entire
folder. Open it up with Outlook and the folder will be recreated empty.
Alternatively try smaller blocks, say 500-1000 at a time.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
What if you just switch the encoding on the clients to Western European -
ISO. Is this just a few clients at a specific site or all users at a single
site?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sysprep and Imagecast.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ghosting WIN 2K PC's
I like Riprep and RIS.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Older one?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Chevy Suburban.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 -
Server 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6a
Workstations W2K SP2 Outlook 2K
A user had a message that was sent but never received by someone within the
site (same server as well). I typically track these down as misaddressed,
deleted, delegated, or processed by a rule so it does not appear where it
would be
trace of it going through the system.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Mood, Steve
Subject: RE: Sent Item not really sent?
Can you think of another way to make the sent folder message count
-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
And please stop yelling or fix your shift key.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:17 PM
To: Exchange
List member with wacky antivirus situation from what I can tell. I've got 4
of them from this morning.
It does confirm that CA Inoculate IT itself is really a virus though. Much
as I've suspected in the past.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You can go on a fishing expedition using mdbvue32 utility which is always
fun. Would have been a piece of cake after you exported everything else to
find and eliminate the bad appointment. I had to go digging through one
that would only get about a third of the way through an export before
Partition Magic?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange Problems
Oh I forgot to tell you guys the best part about what the old admin did.
He had an 18 gig hard
Outlook, Tools, Options, Other, Advanced Options, Add In Manger, Install,
dumpster.ecf and make sure the deleted item recover is checked.
You'll also want to add the dumpsteralways on reg hack to your machine at
least.
Menu item should be available regardless of whether or not there are items
You could also set a reoccurring appointment on their calendar that goes on
forever (24-7-365) and set Outlook to automatically process appointment
requests and decline conflicting requests.
When the meeting is requested/composed this person's free busy information
will appear to always be
I have a strange problem with OOO that started a few months back. Layout is
Exchange 5.5sp4 servers (3 in the main site 1 each in 2 other sites).
Clients are all Outlook 2K SP1. Single mailbox server, single utility
server, single unified messaging server (voicemail).
User will setup OOO as
Does the Pop3 account name = Exchange alias ?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3
connection.
I
Or if you haven't patched OWA up on 5.5
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
bulletin/MS01-047.asp
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global
Also now referenced in lieu of the W2K SRP (kind of) in some KB articles but
links still point to the rollup. Seems a bit sloppy for MS
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q301625
references this link
Download Q301625_W2K_SP3_x86_en.exe now
-Original Message-
36 matches
Mail list logo
