RE: Recipient Policies
Restarting the System Attendant Service might help. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policies E2K SP3 W2K SP3 Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org? I am trying to add it to the default policy then apply the ppolicy, and it isn't working.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. The information contained in this transmission is attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: unhold
Defile -Original Message- From: Kevin Wilkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeFrag -Original Message- From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeCrypt -Original Message- From: Marty Gavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeRail -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePlane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePlane From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: unhold Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:01 -0800 DeFlowers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePants -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeThong -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unhold Unhold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Expand your wine savvy - and get some great new recipes - at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016
Help
Hey All! I am a network consultant with 4 years of network, infrastructure, desktop, exchange 55 and 2000 experience( the last 3 years in legal environment) looking for employment in the Chicago land area. Any leads or assistance will be really appreciated. Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
Yes Sir, Mr. Crackhoe. -Original Message- From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Vicodin, pain medication available I'm not sure about this one... This is almost on topic. Ever met an Exchange Admin that didn't need a good dose of Vicodin to make it through the day? j/k Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding another smtp address and making it primary
Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary
Thanks, that was easy :-). If you are ever in chicago, look me up, I'll buy you a beer. Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Modify your Recipient Policy :-) See, that wasn't too hard. In your recip. Policy properties, you have the e-mail addresses defined. Add the second address, and choose Set as Primary. It will update all the users automagically. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:31 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Subject: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic
Hi Guys, Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain under a master NT4 domain? thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic
Thanks, that's what I thought. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off topic Subject: Off topic Hi Guys, Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain under a master NT4 domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
We have used Postini for a couple of months now. Looks good so far, we are only using it for spam control on inbound mail. I would highly recommend it, Tech support is good as well. Raj -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't believe they offer an outbound solution. Aaron -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
When I set up the account,the settings are set to maximum security. But the users have control of their own settings. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Thanks for the reply, Raj. Are you letting your users control their own spam settings (I believe that Postini offers this), or do you control it company-wide? Thanks again, Steve -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We have used Postini for a couple of months now. Looks good so far, we are only using it for spam control on inbound mail. I would highly recommend it, Tech support is good as well. Raj -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't believe they offer an outbound solution. Aaron -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We have 4 layers, call us paranoid... Gateway(IMSS), Servers(ServerProtect), Scanmail for Exchange, OfficeScan for Desktops. All Trend micro products. Raj -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Ben: Sounds like you may have a corrupted database. Have you thought about running maintenance on the server? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:28 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We had been running 3 layers until it seems that Symantec's product for Exchange 2000 (coupled with Corp Ed as file level) locked up the server a couple of times. I can't prove it was Symantec, but I removed all AV off our Exchange server, and it hasn't had a problem since. And yes, I'm not stupid enough to scan the Exchsrvr directories with file-based scanners. Now, we are only running 2. SAV for SMTP Gateways, and Desktop. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Whoa, tough crowd this morning. Well, you can't learn to become an exchange admin just by subscribing to this list, however you can become a better administrator by listenig to what the experts in this list have to say about exchange issues. Also, the advice and opinions are free, unless you want to buy them beer :-) My 2 cents worth. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server indeed -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server Pst!! Wrong list! Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sanderson Townend Gilbert -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2003 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server This crap stops now. Take it offline or STFU. Martin doesn't want this list degenerating into flame wars. Gary, you're just as likely to get moderated as Samantha at this point. Don't make me log into yahoo and baby-sit this morning, I've got too much else to do. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server See, this is what I am talking about. You are a real classy guy..probably some geek, nerd with no friends! LOL -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server We care because you're a time wasting, freebie wanting, idiot. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2003 10:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server Thanks Tony for your advice. Why do you care what I ask on this listserv? I thought this list was for questions. Maybe the questions asked by people in this list seem stupid to you, but they are not. Who made you the judge of what questions are good/helpful and which ones are not? If you are too good for the questions being asked on this list then don't answer. I don't know if all you do all day is work on an Exchange servers but I wear many hats here in the name of special education children and I don't have time during or after work everyday/and every minute to read books on Exchange server. I have picked up a few good books in the past few weeks and they are helpful and hopefully I won't have to bother this list.I wish for nothing more. But until I become a pro like yourself, I will look to people like yourself who know this stuff backwards and forwards to give some direction. I take great offense to your undeserved comments and wish that you could remember the days when you were learning. I was given this project and am doing the best I can. This list is for getting help, not a social event for buddies. It is a shame that you are not more patient. Thanks and I have appreciated your help in the past. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server You really really need to get trained on Exchange or start reading books on it as oppossed to asking this list for every thing you do. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:45:35 -0400 Why is it there though? Will services run without it? Why would M:icrosoft put that there? Thanks Sam -Original Message- From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server Are you being funny? There is definitely a M: drive! What is that He's saying IGNORE the M: drive. Don't use it for anything. Don't virus scan it! Don't back it up! -kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: OWA Problems
Have them try [EMAIL PROTECTED] and password, check your IIS server for the domain name settings.. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems When I try from inside, I am able to loginno problem. Only when accessing from outside or from home is when the login fails. ??? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems Yah...that seems to be so far. Everyone who is complaining are located outside or are trying from home. Thanks for the replies. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems Then you are saying they can use OWa when internal but not externally? From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA Problems Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:18:09 -0400 Yes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Problems Are they able to logon to their mailboxes via Outlook? - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:05 PM Subject: OWA Problems Hello All. Having problems with users logging into OWA/Exchange 2000. They put in their username and password and domain name. When they click OK, the window stays and the password box is highlighted. I verified that the accounts are not locked out and have even reset their passwords. This is happening to users who are accessing the OWA from home or other locations. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
I am not doing BLB. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
You can add a disclaimer/default signature with a lot of the Anti-virus products that are available. I use Trendmicro's IMSS. Other alternative is to add an SMTP event sync. Search the Microsoft KB for the article. Raj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Renaming E2K server
You cannot rename exchange 2000 server... -Original Message- From: Oliver Tann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Renaming E2K server I have to rename my E2K server as it doesn't match its hostname and uses an underscore (so I can't just change the hostname). Some external mail recipients reject mail as the servername and hostnames don't match. It's also a DC so I'll have to demote it first My question is simply are there any problems in changing the name of a mailserver? Should I stop all the services first? And do I need to do anything to the AD once I've demoted it to a member server. Any help greatly appreciated. Oliver _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exmerge?
I have to use the exmerge utility to create PST files of mailboxes for about 3 users who are leaving the firm. Their mailbox sizes are really huge (about 1GB each). I have never had the opportunity to use Exmerge, so I want to get an idea. Can this be done online or do I need to take the Exchange Server offline to do this? I know it affects the SIS, will it really increase my database size drastically? I only have 4GB of space left on a 36Gb partition where the Information store resides. Will this retain the folder tree structure for OL client. If it requires exchange downtime, I'd rather export to PST files using the Outlook client. Thanks for all your input Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge?
Thanks everyone :) -Original Message- From: Michelle Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exmerge? You can't use Exmerge at all if you take the store offline, since the information store is the home of the information you'll be extracting. :) It won't increase your database size at all if you're merely exporting the mail to PST - the only way it would have a chance to increase the store size would be if you were importing a PST into the information store. And...yes, it will retain your folder tree structure that the user created, as long as they created the folder structure for their Exchange mailbox folders and not a personal folder. Hope this helps. -Michelle -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge? I have to use the exmerge utility to create PST files of mailboxes for about 3 users who are leaving the firm. Their mailbox sizes are really huge (about 1GB each). I have never had the opportunity to use Exmerge, so I want to get an idea. Can this be done online or do I need to take the Exchange Server offline to do this? I know it affects the SIS, will it really increase my database size drastically? I only have 4GB of space left on a 36Gb partition where the Information store resides. Will this retain the folder tree structure for OL client. If it requires exchange downtime, I'd rather export to PST files using the Outlook client. Thanks for all your input Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE
How about resetting the outlook folders. Open Outlook from the command line with /resetfolders Switch? -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE Yes I have tried those things. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE Does just about everything include, logging in as the user on another machine and trying to send to the same address? Or creating a new profile (named my_new_profile) for the user? Or sending to a different recipient on the same domain? What were the results of those actions? On 3/20/03 11:48, Reed, Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EXCHANGE 5.5 sp4 OUTLOOK 2000 NORTON ANTI VIRUS Server 8.0 So far I have seen from this person's account that attachments in general will not go out for him. I have tried just about everything. It only seems to be to a specific address though. Planter.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE Exchange version. Outlook version. Antivirus version. Internal Address? External Address? File type(s) effected? Message tracking data? On 3/20/03 10:23, Reed, Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It just hangs in his outbox here. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE Is he getting a specific NDR? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WEIRD PROBLEM WITH EXCHANGE We have a user who cannot send attachments to an address. He can send text but not attachments. I can send to this same address with attachments but he cannot from our server. Any ideas on why I could send to the same address but he cannot? Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serbian premier assassinated
I don't think there is a problem with sharing important world news. Better than the test or hello, is this thing working? Just my 2 cents worth!! Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated I'd much rather ask a dumb question and use the list for what it intended for!! -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated Is this still the exchange list? -Original Message- From: Aamir Hanif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated the only difference being that this time north america wants to attack everyone and europe does not. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Serbian premier assassinated This is how the first world war started... From BBC newswire Serbian premier assassinated The Serbian Prime Minister, Zoran Djindjic, has been assassinated in the capital, Belgrade. He was shot in front of government offices at around 1300 (1200 gmt) on Wednesday. He was taken to hospital for emergency surgery but a government minister told the BBC's Serbian section that he had died of his wounds. Mr Djindjic, a former mayor of the Serbian capital, was a prominent reformist opposition leader until Slobodan Milosevic was ousted from power in 2000. Unconfirmed Serbian media reports say that two people were arrested at the scene of the shooting. A police source told Reuters news agency that he had been hit twice by large-calibre sniper rifle bullets. The editor of the Fonet news agency, Zoran Sekulich, told BBC World television Mr Djindjic had been shot once in the stomach and once in the back. Enemies On 21 February Mr Djindjic survived what he said was an assassination bid when a lorry swung into the path of his motorcade as he was travelling to Belgrade airport. He later dismissed the incident as a futile effort which could not stop democratic reforms. Correspondents say that Mr Djindjic, 50, made many enemies over his career as a pro-democracy campaigner and then as Serbia's prime minister. He was pivotal in arresting and handing Mr Milosevic over to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague in June 2001. The move opened the way to international aid to the then Yugoslavia. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with new 2k Exchange Server
Active Directory Sites and Services, Open the NTDS settings of your DC. On the RHS you will see the current instance, right click and replicate now. All changes will replicate immediately. Raj -Original Message- From: Andy Gee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with new 2k Exchange Server Well I actually figured it out. I appreciate the help though. One other question not exactly exchange oriented though. My AD changes are taking forever to replicate between 2 dc's. Both DC's are local but they just don't seem to make the changes quickly. When someone changes their password it takes 10-15 minutes before they can fully operate because of authenication problems. Can anyone give me some hints on speeding that process up? Thanks, Andy -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with new 2k Exchange Server All things depend on How you set up ADC. Care to share a bit? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Gee Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with new 2k Exchange Server I have a problem with a newly installed Exchange Server. My site started as an Exchange 5.5 site and then when we starting converting to Exch2k we started a new site. So I had one 5.5 site and one 2000 site with all mail passing through the one 2000 server and if the receipient wasn't found it would send it through to the 5.5 site. Now today I have brought a second 2000 Exchange Server online and moved one mailbox to it. I can send to all receipients from that box but no one can reply to it. They can reply but it never gets received. Does Exch2k not work similar to 5.5 in the sense that it should know that the mailbox is on the 2nd exchange server and then route it there? Thanks, Andy The information contained in this electronic message from Universal Tax Systems, Inc., and any attachments, contains information that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Universal Tax Systems, Inc., immediately by e-mail or by telephone at 706/625-7757, and destroy this communication. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this electronic message from Universal Tax Systems, Inc., and any attachments, contains information that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Universal Tax Systems, Inc., immediately by e-mail or by telephone at 706/625-7757, and destroy this communication. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting
RE: Are they trying to tell me something?
How about if you log in to the PC as Administrator and log into OL. Open your mailbox by following FileOpen...other user'setc Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are they trying to tell me something? Sorry, I didn't read your original message clearly enough. Some of our users, especially on older OS like Win98, would see similar behavior if they mistyped their password the first time they tried to log in; it rejected and asked them to reenter so they'd reenter their password correctly the second time and everything would log in fine. Except Outlook would give errors similar to (but not the same as) what you saw -- as if it was caching the first, incorrectly typed, password for some reason. A logout/login and careful typing of the password the first time resolved the issue. John's suggestion about hidden mailboxes is an interesting one. Did I read your message correctly that you're not even able to open your own mailbox? I didn't notice if you answered Ed's message - did you try recreating the profile? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions yes. I have booted.. An I know I entered my password and UID correct because I have access to the system. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are they trying to tell me something? Sounds to me like the domain doesn't recognize you. Have you tried rebooting and carefully typing in your username/password at the login? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I am receiving the following error messages when trying to access a inbox or calendar using File; Open ; Other user's folders... Unable to display the folder. Cannot open the mailbox for this user because the user does not have a server mailbox. I cannot even open my mailbox. I am an eMAIL administrator. Other people can open folders using the same commands just fine. I looked in the DB and didn't find a hit. Please help me.. Thanks Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. **
RE: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory Connector
You should find it packaged along with the Windows 2000 CD and/or Exchange 2000 CD.Installing it on your DC is straight forward. It is essentally used to migrate Ex 5.5 to ex 2000. It is not clear as to why you need to connect Exchange 5.5 to Active Directory, maybe I am missing something, never mind. Raj -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory Connector I actuall installed a new BDC on the network. Pulled the BDC off of the network and upgraded the newer BDC to PDC. Once I promoted the BDC to PDC, I then installed Windows 2000 and ran DCPROMO to installed Active Directory. Installed DNS and configured properly. I ran the tests and its working properly. Current Forest Root has DHCP, DNS, Wins and all the FSMO roles on the same server. Now I am trying to connect my Exchange 5.5 to this Active Directory. I hope this is clear. By the way, the reason for me doing this way is because, we want to keep the same domain name as before and very little downtime. Rama Arumugam Network Administrator Wire DynamiX (253) 395-4527 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory Connector Lets see you deployed AD already? Is this a additional server or did you upgarde an exsisting NT 4.0 Controller. Not enough info. Sounds like you didn't plan well. From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory Connector Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:33:18 -0800 Hello everyone! Can some one tell me where I can find a step by step instruction on how to connect my Exchange 5.5 SP4 server to my new Active Directory? I am primarily looking fot the Active Directory Connector and where to find and how to install it and how to make the two work together. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
Ben, It is not enabled (check box---unchecked) by default for all groups. If OOO is enabled globally,it over-rides all other parameters and is effective for all. Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Option to send OoO to the internet You might try turning it on for everybody, then disabling it for the groups you don't want to have it using distribution groups. Just a thought. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, directive from the directors). I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the Allow out of office responses in Global Settings. But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that is not desirable. Any comments or ideas? Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
Thank you for all your input, guys. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 I don't know about the 515 but a PIX can do PAT. I have done this a few time and always put the FE Server inside with the BE Servers. FE/BE is only useful to load balance protocols. Has no security benefit. For that use the PIX and ISA(s). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Front end Server
Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may
RE: Front end Server
512MB. Thanks Ed. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server I would give it a try. You didn't say how much memory is in it, however. Be sure that there's enough. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
OK, Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server through the firewall? I have been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option? Thanks for all the ideas. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List
RE: Front end Server
I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and point to the exchange server directly. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server You are getting into the deep end now but simply: Yes, put ISA in a DMZ. Use FE Servers for protocol load balancing and put them inside with the Exchange Servers. Use ISA to publish Exchange resources for controlled access from outside. This architecture involves much more than Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server OK, Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server through the firewall? I have been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option? Thanks for all the ideas. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
RE: Front end Server
Thanks for all the info. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Read Ken's post a few back on that. I agree with him and have taken that approach on several projects. It can be a little tricky. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and point to the exchange server directly. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server You are getting into the deep end now but simply: Yes, put ISA in a DMZ. Use FE Servers for protocol load balancing and put them inside with the Exchange Servers. Use ISA to publish Exchange resources for controlled access from outside. This architecture involves much more than Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server OK, Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server through the firewall? I have been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option? Thanks for all the ideas. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Icy grip on the US
Its 10 degrees in Chicago, feels like 1 below -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see in the news? Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first January in Utah history that is hasn't snowed. I was at the park in shorts. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
About 25gbs(200 users), Using Benchmark DLT1 backup device with native Microsoft Windows 2000 backup module (NTBackup). Raj -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions problem
Using ESM:On the information store,Everyone should only have Create named properties in information store permission. Using ADUC: On individual mailbox level, Everyone should not have anything checked. After you make any changes to any of these permissions, I think you need to dismount and mount the Information store, and restart the MSEXCHANGE Information store to make the change effective. Raj -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problem Neither allowed or denied are checked Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions problem Look at the IS object.. Receive as is the right you are looking for. On 1/16/03 15:56, Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On an individual users mailbox rights, Everyone has permission to read. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problem That's not entirely acurate. Everyone has rights to Create named properties.. Blah blah, but that's it. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problem Looking through ESM and the mailbox store Everyone has no rights but also no denies. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions problem Users can only do what they have permissions to do. Since a version of Exchange is not listed, I'll just toss out a WAG and suggest you look at the permissions the everyone group has in the Exchange Admin. On 1/16/03 15:12, Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help!! Users seem to be able to open everyone else's mailboxes with full permissions. Users are able to set up additional profiles in Outlook and specify a different user and they are not prompted for a password. I had noticed it on my machine and I just chaulked it up to being logged in as administrator, but it seems that everyone can do it. I haven't found anything blantantly obvious so I figured I send it out to you folks and see what you came back with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k
Interscan message security suite from TrendMicro does a fine job. -Original Message- From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k Came across the post last week about the MS VBS Article. I need to find a product to do this. Does anyone have any suggestions on the best/most user friendly 3rd party software package to add an email disclaimer to all email? Any thoughts/experience would be appreciated. TIA, Steve Iadarola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-Mail disclaimers; exch2000
I tried to make the VB Script work a while ago without success. Finally
went a different route and procured the IMSS suite from TrendMicro,
which works beautifully.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-Mail disclaimers; exch2000
Following KB articles:
317680 - Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Messages in Visual Basic
Script
288756 - SMTP Transport Event OnArrival Does Not Fire For MAPI Messages
I've followed the procedures in the above two articles and can't seem to
get
a disclaimer working. If I telnet to my secondary server's port 26
simulate an SMTP conversation the message does get to its destination
with
the disclaimer... but no disclaimer under MAPI.
I'm confident Virtual Server 1 is listening on 25 sending to the same
server on port 26. The secondary virtual server is listening on 26
sending to the external mail relay. The SMTP Event sink is registered
on
the secondary virtual server.
Did I miss something?
cscript smtpreg.vbs /enum yields:
Source {1B3C0666-E470-11D0-AA67-80C04FA345F6} {
DisplayName = smtpsvc 1
OnArrival Sinks {
}
Source {1B3C0666-E470-11D3-AA67-80C04FA345F6} {
DisplayName = smtpsvc 2
OnArrival Sinks {
Binding {388E9019-0868-47BE-8C96-A2FA975CA970} {
DisplayName = SMTPScriptingHost
SinkClass = CDO.SS_SMTPOnArrivalSink
Status = Enabled
SourceProperties {
Priority = 0
Rule = mail from=*
}
SinkProperties {
ScriptName = D:\EventSink\EventSinkScript.vbs
}
}
Binding {10F2AD29-5256-4B36-A5CA-EAB34079419B} {
DisplayName = SampleOnArrivalEvent
SinkClass = SampleSMTPEvent.TransportEventInterface
Status = Enabled
SourceProperties {
Rule = mail from=*
Priority = 10
}
SinkProperties {
}
}
}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-Yanek.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is
confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this
message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction
of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of
any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Thank you for your cooperation.
**
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration Wizard Question
It took approximately 20-30 minutes for a 100mb mailbox in our network here. I did most of my mailbox moves off peak hours on my production boxes. Raj -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration Wizard Question On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and on others it seems to go on for hours. In fact, one did take 6 hours. One mailbox, which seemed to be relatively small in size - about 150 mgs, took about 30 minutes to migrate Anybody have any clues on what the norm on this migration process should be? I'm trying to find a trend here, but I'm at a lost. Dot Harris Exchange Administrator William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inbound emails.
Greetings All, Exchange 2000 SP3 (Enterprise). Is there a way to figure out how many emails came thru' our gateway for a certain period of time? Say for the last 7 days. Thanks for any ideas. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbound emails.
Thank you, Chris. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbound emails. The information is contained in the tracking logs. You could write a script to pull the information from them (sample scripts just might be found at www.swinc.com) or you could use a 3rd party tool like.. oh, MessageView to collect that information among other things. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Greetings All, Exchange 2000 SP3 (Enterprise). Is there a way to figure out how many emails came thru' our gateway for a certain period of time? Say for the last 7 days. Thanks for any ideas. Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday?
What's your beef with Ed?!! -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday? Are we still doing this? HP has a man His full name is Ed Crowley He pimps Exchange out! Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eoo.log files
These are transaction log files, not recommended to be deleted manually .You can use Native NT Backup Full or incremental to remove them safely. You can also enable circular logging (not recommended either) Raj -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eoo.log files My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir. These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server. I know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work. I cannot find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files. any help would be nice. Example log file name: EA3E.log Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup hardware
www.benchmarktape.com Valusmart www.veritas.com Backupexec for 2000 8.6 -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup hardware For those on the Yahoogroups list, my apologies for the duplicate... For those that are running E2K (or SPS or SQL2K or W2K, etc...) on your home or small business network... What are you using for hardware? I have 2 dedicated servers running W2K, E2K, SQL2K, ISA, SPS among other things as well as 8 workstation/servers that dual-boot. I have an OnStream ADR 15/30 drive but the drive is too small now and I am finding I am not backing up rather than fool with it. I have set my Exchange logs to circular and have realized I need to find a new tape drive for backup. I presently backup both local and across the wire for all 10 computers to one computer with the ADR 15/30 tape drive. What is the best/most reliable 60/120 hardware (and software you are using for it if it is not NTBackup) for those on a budget out there now? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Nope, I am using Trend's Interscan Message Security Suite(Viruswall), it has a module which can achieve the same result. See my disclaimer below. Raj -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. have you gotten this to work? I don't even see the file smtpreg.vbs in the SDK folder.. I tracked one down off the web but that errors out. Wilson -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't delete email
I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000 sp3. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't delete email
Will have to wait till March,2003 to order the steaks. In-laws visiting from out of town, vegetarians, don't want to hurt religious sentiments ;-) Shift and delete worked, thanks. Happy Thanksgiving to all. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't delete email Order the steaks. They are excellent. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000 sp3. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't delete email
Nope. Didn't try that.it worked by doing shift + del. Thanks -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't delete email Does it show up in OWA? And did you try deleting it through OWA? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't delete email I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000 sp3. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxj.htm Thanks to Martin. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Email me offline, I can send you a step by step..cookbook style..if you like,else, if you do a google search, you will find a boatload of info. Raj -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation (if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing extra-ordinary. I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use EXEMERGE to get all the mail boxes back in to the new box (???). Or what is the best way to do this since most of you experts have completed this task in your environment and I am looking for some good advice. Please HELP! Any advice is welcome! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 9302, 9551
Dear All, I get these errors on my exchange server ( exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 sp2, Native mode-both ). Rebooted the Global catalog Server as per one of the MS KB Q articles, did not do any good...Any one has come across this warning? Any suggestions? Any ideas? Thanks *** Event 9302 (about 4 instances every minute) The transport configuration type 4 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=DEXCH2000,CN=SERVERS,CN=DANCONA,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=DANCONA AND PFLAUM,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=DANCONA,DC=COM is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 24 217] (8) For more information, click .. *** event 9551 (about 4 instances every hour) An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Flores, Eloisa]/Contacts/Attorneys located on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (DEXCH2000). The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=D'ANCONA PFLAUM/OU=DANCONA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BKING into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x47b. For more information, click ... The user-'BKing' does not exist in Active Directory---Raj Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contacts view:
Thanks Chris, I kinda tweaked it using the Q article 305361 and my users are satisfied with the result. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Contacts view: Add them all to the To line and remove the ones they don't need. Or hack the outlib(?) dll to add the functionality back. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:RPILLAI;dancona.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contacts view: Hi Guys, We recently migrated to Exchange 2000 sp3 (enterprise) and OL-XP on the client side. In Outlook 98 when you create a new message, click To: and change to Contacts, all the contacts are listed with e-mail, business fax and the Like listed to the side of the name. Is there a way to make that happen in Outlook XP. Currently all the user is seeing is the name listed 5 times And they are having to guess which one is the one they need, or they have to scroll way over to the right. I looked at Q305361, but is there a better way? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contacts view:
Hi Guys, We recently migrated to Exchange 2000 sp3 (enterprise) and OL-XP on the client side. In Outlook 98 when you create a new message, click To: and change to Contacts, all the contacts are listed with e-mail, business fax and the Like listed to the side of the name. Is there a way to make that happen in Outlook XP. Currently all the user is seeing is the name listed 5 times And they are having to guess which one is the one they need, or they have to scroll way over to the right. I looked at Q305361, but is there a better way? Thanks, Raj - ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail loop
I have a user who has got 15 mail delivery receipts for an email which she sent out yesterday. Even though this delivery notification is sent by my exchange server, I am assuming that this is triggered by a mail loop in the recipient side. Am I right or is this being triggered on our side? The recipient claims that he has received the message 15 times as well. I checked the log on my virus wall server, it only sent out the message once. /// Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed Thanks, Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail loop
I have a user who has got 15 mail delivery receipts for an email which she sent out yesterday. Even though this delivery notification is sent by my exchange server, I am assuming that this is triggered by a mail loop in the recipient side. Am I right or is this being triggered on our side? The recipient claims that he has received the message 15 times as well. I checked the log on my virus wall server, it only sent out the message once. /// Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed Thanks, Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC and mixed mode
Dear All I need to take my exchange 55 server offline to re install a backup device, how will this affect the ADC replication, will this affect synchronisation, do I need to bring both servers offline to do this? Can I just stop the ADC services on the Exchange 2000 Server? Also, is this a good time to test the actual native mode without actually going native? Exchange 2000 SP3 enterprise edition. exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!)
on the soap box I am no expert but me think you need to do a lot of planning,testing and detailed documenting on a test environment befor you attempt this.It is possible that you may be able to do it in a weekend ideally if you follow Microsoft's instructions but you never know what could go wrong because every setup is unique and there may be issues that need to iron out first or during the process. off the soap box Raj -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!) Hello, This weekend, we have to accomplish a pretty serious task - upgrading a Exchange 5.5 Server on one Domain, and somehow convert/migrate it to Exchange 2000 on another domain. What would be the best way to attack this problem? Create a Trust Relationship so the 2 domains can talk to each other first? -or- Temporarily have the 5.5 Server (or vice versa) join the other Domain temporarily? I think that may break the server however - because the Admin Authentication would get screwed up as the service starts using the Domain Administrator login account right? I need a bulletproof way to accomplish this task, as there is no room for screw ups right now. One thing in our favor, is that we are not upgrading the server itself - so the original data files will always be intact - with no chance of corruption. But still my Monday, we have to have all the users moved over to the new domain, and working off of Exchange 2000. If the experts on the list could jump in briefly, and offer some really good advice on this topic, I would greatly be in your debt. Thank you in advance for any help you can offer to me. Mike - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution lists and ADC
Hi, Currently in mixed mode with Exch 5.5 sp4 and Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3. I have a couple of new users whose mailboxes were set up in Exchange 2000 (not migrated from exch55)they are in a few distribution lists (_everyone, _attorneys, _corporate etc), they can get mails send to all distribution lists except _everyone group( the _everyone group is different than the AD everyone group, starts with an underscore). I have an ADC connector with 2 way replication. On the Exchange 55 GAL, I do not see their names, on the Exchange 2000 default GAL I do see their names. I manually replicate ADC, did not seem to work. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Oh,no, not another test!!! -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test - is this getting through yet Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any benefits to multiple NICs in Ex5.5?
Load balancing and /or redundancy ? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any benefits to multiple NICs in Ex5.5? Scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 10/100 NIC ATM NIC I've got two NICs in every exchange server and would like to put them to good use. I initially thought I would try to route all replication traffic through the Ethernet nic that's connected to all the other exchange servers via a switch. Then allow all other traffic to flow through the ATM NIC. However, I've found no documentation on how to make this happen. So having said all that, my question again; would there be any benefits to using both NICs? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although the q article does not say so? TIA. Raj -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
I will give it another whirl tonite before heading out the door. The one thing I did not do was restart the SMTP service from services. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked). -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although the q article does not say so? TIA. Raj -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Services Ex. 5.5 Ex2000
Yes you have to manually create the smtp conector on the 2000 server and configure it,if you want to route your internet mail thru' this server. You can either remove the smtp address space on the exchange 55 IMC or give it a higher value than the Exchange 2000 Server(lower the value, higher the priority) . Choose the exch2000 server as the routing server and recalculate. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Services Ex. 5.5 Ex2000 I'm following Q316886 article page 7.. on Rerouting Outgoing Internel E-Mail through the Ex2000 Server. Say to remove the SMTP Address Space and then Recalculate Routing. When I remove the SMTP Address on the 5.5 server.. Do I need to manually configure the SMTP Connector in Ex.2000 (ie, Q265293)?At the current time, in the Routing Group container under ex2000 it shows the Internet Email connector from Ex5.5. If I do need to configure a new smtp connector in ex.2000, Do I use one of my front-end servers as Local Bridgeheads or since I'm using a virtual server for load balancing, do I use that instead? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Thanks -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Last modified version is 5/31/2002 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
This article does not mention about configuring the smtp connector on the 2000 Server.Do I need to create a new smtp connector on my 2000 Server? My 2 exchange servers(5.5 and 2000) are sitting behind an smtp server(Interscan viruswall)which sends and receives mail from the Internet and a PIX firewall. Currently the smtp server bounces the mail to port 6000 of the exchange 5.5 server. Can I use the same port for the exchange 2000 server also? Thanks for any help. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Last modified version is 5/31/2002 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
RE: Users have unlimited permissions(was: Never seen this....)
Thanks for all your replies..Ed..Jennifer... Ok, if some one can throw some light on what is wrong with this picture, I will really appreciate that. Here is how the permissions are assigned on each of these components: Exchange Server 2000 Enterprise, Sp3 C:--O/S-Everyone (Full Control)? D:---Exchange Everyone (Full Control)? E:mdb DatabaseEveryone (Full Control)? ADUC: Everyone has full access in any users Mailbox Rights Authenticated users has full access in any users Mailbox Rights Domain Users has full access in any users Mailbox Rights (Where is this getting inherited from? I cannot remove these permissions at this level) ESM(Server level): Authenticated users--READ,WRITE,EXECUTE,READ PERMISSIONS,LISTCONTENTS,READ PROPERTIES, WRITE PROPERTIES. Domain Users--All permissions except Full Everyone--READ,WRITE,EXECUTE,READ PERMISSIONS,LIST CONTENTS,READ PROPERTIES, WRITE PROPERTIEs ESM(Mailbox Store level): Everyone Group--Read,Execute, Read permissions, List contents, Read Properties, write properties,list object,Recieve as, send as. Domain Users--All permissions except Full Authenticated users--- same as everyone group. * TIA Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 8:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Users have unlimited permissions(was: Never seen this) What you're seeing could only have happened by someone futzing with the permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users have unlimited permissions(was: Never seen this) I think I have a similar issue here, except it is Exchange 2000 sp3 . I can see that a delegateA with minimum permission has unlimited access to userA's mailbox. In AD users and computers,when I look at the mailbox rights of userA the everyone group has full access, I don't know how this happened, it states that it is inherited from the parent container. UserA is sitting inside this hierarchy: AD Users and Computers --Dancona.com All Dancona users Attorneys In the parent containers Everyone does not have full control rights. However in ESM if I look at properties of Mailbox store in the security tab the everyone group has all kinds of rights except Full control. Is the Full access for everyone group being inherited from here. Can some one advice how much permission everyone group should have. TIA. Raj BTW: I just learned the hard way that Standard version of exchange does not support 16GB on the Information store.Had to do an emergency upgrade to the enterprise edition of exchange. Just an FYI. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I've never seen this Understood, that is the way it is suppose to work. It wasn't working that way. A user simply went through the steps, added another mailbox and didn't have to setup delegate access and we didn't even have to give them permissions to the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I've never seen this Tools-Services-Advanced allows to connect to another mailbox, but first you have to be given permissions to that mailbox. That is normally done in the Exchange Admin program (mailbox Properties-Security-Add-set up additional NT account as a User) and that normally gives full mailbox access. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I've never seen this AWESOME! Thank you. Dot -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: I've never seen this Q183674: How to Find What User Is Deleting or Editing Objects in Administrator -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange
Files to be excluded
I am planning to install Scanmail for Exchange 2000 on my exchange 2000 server. When configuring the software other than the M: drive, what other directories should be excluded? Thanks Win2k Sp2, E2k(enterprise) sp3. Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Files to be excluded
Thanks, makes sense ScanMail. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Files to be excluded Scanmail doesn't do directory scanning. It scans email. There is nothing to exclude. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Files to be excluded I am planning to install Scanmail for Exchange 2000 on my exchange 2000 server. When configuring the software other than the M: drive, what other directories should be excluded? Thanks Win2k Sp2, E2k(enterprise) sp3. Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar issues in E2K
Hello everyone, E2k(sp2) and Ex55(sp4) in mixed mode in NT and 2000 domain with 2 way trust. I am facing an issue here with seeing others calendar. Since I have Admin rights I can see others calendar without any issues. As a domain user with regular permissions I CANNOT see other users calendar when I am logged in to the 2000 domain. If logged in to the NT domain as a user I CAN see others calendars!!. Here is what I have done so far: -Assign Read write permissions to domain users group in Mailbox store and Public folder store, which in turn propogates additional relevant permissions. - Assign Read write permission for Domain users on the Exchsrvr folder. I have tried adding the everyone group and assigning permissions, but does not seem to be working, Did not find anything in Msknowledgebase except Q282964 which was not too helpful Anyone has faced this situation before? Any ideas or suggestions? My next stop would be PSS. Thanks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issues in E2K
Give full access to all? -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K I think you will find the same issue with other mailbox folders such as tasks, notes, etc. Two different security schemas. It's all or nothing. Best to get everybody on 2K to resolve. My experience. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issues in E2K Hello everyone, E2k(sp2) and Ex55(sp4) in mixed mode in NT and 2000 domain with 2 way trust. I am facing an issue here with seeing others calendar. Since I have Admin rights I can see others calendar without any issues. As a domain user with regular permissions I CANNOT see other users calendar when I am logged in to the 2000 domain. If logged in to the NT domain as a user I CAN see others calendars!!. Here is what I have done so far: -Assign Read write permissions to domain users group in Mailbox store and Public folder store, which in turn propogates additional relevant permissions. - Assign Read write permission for Domain users on the Exchsrvr folder. I have tried adding the everyone group and assigning permissions, but does not seem to be working, Did not find anything in Msknowledgebase except Q282964 which was not too helpful Anyone has faced this situation before? Any ideas or suggestions? My next stop would be PSS. Thanks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issues in E2K
Chris, In my case NT accounts can see the folders, AD accounts CANNOT.In any case,tell me exactly what you did, if you can.It will give me some leads, if not anything. I am currently assigning permissions up everybody's ying/yang(everything is documented,as and when required it will be restored back to what it should be), it is still not working. Like I said: Next stop is PSS, if I cannot resolve it. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K I had the same issue. Follow Tony's advise. I couldn't find any decent work-around. All my users are now on 2000, permissions are working fine. I had the same kind of issue with PF that were replicated to the E2K server. AD domain accounts could read folders, but NT accounts could not, regardless of which Exchange server their mailbox was on. BTW, the only way I found to solve the problem for either issue was to set the default permissions to at least reviewer, but that was not acceptable for my setup. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K I think you will find the same issue with other mailbox folders such as tasks, notes, etc. Two different security schemas. It's all or nothing. Best to get everybody on 2K to resolve. My experience. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issues in E2K Hello everyone, E2k(sp2) and Ex55(sp4) in mixed mode in NT and 2000 domain with 2 way trust. I am facing an issue here with seeing others calendar. Since I have Admin rights I can see others calendar without any issues. As a domain user with regular permissions I CANNOT see other users calendar when I am logged in to the 2000 domain. If logged in to the NT domain as a user I CAN see others calendars!!. Here is what I have done so far: -Assign Read write permissions to domain users group in Mailbox store and Public folder store, which in turn propogates additional relevant permissions. - Assign Read write permission for Domain users on the Exchsrvr folder. I have tried adding the everyone group and assigning permissions, but does not seem to be working, Did not find anything in Msknowledgebase except Q282964 which was not too helpful Anyone has faced this situation before? Any ideas or suggestions? My next stop would be PSS. Thanks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
RE: Calendar issues in E2K
Users in the AD domain were manually created, not migrated(Network Admins' decision, not mine). I migrated users, using ADC: CA's and merged the 2 accounts using ADCleanup wizard and then moved the mailboxes to E2K. Currently I just have the pilot group (MIS team) in AD and E2K and some test user accounts ( people who have left the firm). Since the MIS accounts have Admin rights we have no issues We are also migrating from Win NT domain and Win 98 machines to Win XP and AD domain. So you think it is a good idea to wait and move the mailboxes to E2K after all the users are in AD? Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K How did you migrate you accounts into AD? On which Exchange server does the desired mailboxes reside? Doesn't sound like the same scenario, but.. After I moved 2 mailboxes over to E2K, user2 could not read user1 mailbox, to which user2 had delegate permissions. No matter what permissions I assigned to user2, could not get access. Unless I granted 'Default' role to reviewer. Of course, this gave everyone the same access to user1 mailbox. All users were logging in using NT4 accounts. Was able to fix this by moving user2 mailbox back to 5.5 server. After all users were logging in with AD account, moved user2 mailbox back to E2k, everything worked fine. Again, if you haven't already, I would suggest getting your users utilizing their AD accounts first before moving ahead with any Exchange tasks. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K Chris, In my case NT accounts can see the folders, AD accounts CANNOT.In any case,tell me exactly what you did, if you can.It will give me some leads, if not anything. I am currently assigning permissions up everybody's ying/yang(everything is documented,as and when required it will be restored back to what it should be), it is still not working. Like I said: Next stop is PSS, if I cannot resolve it. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K I had the same issue. Follow Tony's advise. I couldn't find any decent work-around. All my users are now on 2000, permissions are working fine. I had the same kind of issue with PF that were replicated to the E2K server. AD domain accounts could read folders, but NT accounts could not, regardless of which Exchange server their mailbox was on. BTW, the only way I found to solve the problem for either issue was to set the default permissions to at least reviewer, but that was not acceptable for my setup. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issues in E2K I think you will find the same issue with other mailbox folders such as tasks, notes, etc. Two different security schemas. It's all or nothing. Best to get everybody on 2K to resolve. My experience. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issues in E2K Hello everyone, E2k(sp2) and Ex55(sp4) in mixed mode in NT and 2000 domain with 2 way trust. I am facing an issue here with seeing others calendar. Since I have Admin rights I can see others calendar without any issues. As a domain user with regular permissions I CANNOT see other users calendar when I am logged in to the 2000 domain. If logged in to the NT domain as a user I CAN see others calendars!!. Here is what I have done so far: -Assign Read write permissions to domain users group in Mailbox store and Public folder store, which in turn propogates additional relevant permissions. - Assign Read write permission for Domain users on the Exchsrvr folder. I have tried adding the everyone group and assigning permissions, but does not seem to be working, Did not find anything in Msknowledgebase except Q282964 which was not too helpful Anyone has faced this situation before? Any ideas or suggestions? My next stop would be PSS. Thanks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
Missing past appointments
We are in a mixed mode environment( Exchange 5.5 sp4 and 2000 ,sp2). Some of the user mailboxes are still resident in Ex55 and they are having issues with their Calendar. One person has complained that all her appts from May and back have disappeared. Any Clues where to start looking. I have backups on tape as a last resort, did some research on the MS knowldgebase without success. Thanks **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing past appointments
Dates are not bold, Appts disappeared too. Auto archive feature is disabled due to an issue with Imanage(Document management software. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Disappeared or the dates don't appear as bold? Did she autoarchive them? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing past appointments We are in a mixed mode environment( Exchange 5.5 sp4 and 2000 ,sp2). Some of the user mailboxes are still resident in Ex55 and they are having issues with their Calendar. One person has complained that all her appts from May and back have disappeared. Any Clues where to start looking. I have backups on tape as a last resort, did some research on the MS knowldgebase without success. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing past appointments
No -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Are you cleaning mailboxes with something like Mailbox Manager? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Dates are not bold, Appts disappeared too. Auto archive feature is disabled due to an issue with Imanage(Document management software. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Disappeared or the dates don't appear as bold? Did she autoarchive them? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing past appointments We are in a mixed mode environment( Exchange 5.5 sp4 and 2000 ,sp2). Some of the user mailboxes are still resident in Ex55 and they are having issues with their Calendar. One person has complained that all her appts from May and back have disappeared. Any Clues where to start looking. I have backups on tape as a last resort, did some research on the MS knowldgebase without success. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backup
-local DLT drive. -Online Normal or Differntial of the Microsoft Information Store. -Backup of OS (C: drive works fine).This is only done once a week as a normal backup on a separate session. Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Backup How are you performing the backup? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backup Hi Guys I am backing up my Exchange 2000 Server using Ntbackup. However once the backup is complete if I attempt to restore a file there is no data to be found, the no entries found message is displayed under all folders. The only error I see is event ID 8001 which does not throw any light at all, Any ideas , TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backup
Ed, So, is Normal and incremental a better b/up strategy than normal and differntial? That still doesn't solve the mystery of no entry found :-) Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Backup Don't bother with differentials. They only back up the logs and will make your restoration more difficult. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Backup -local DLT drive. -Online Normal or Differntial of the Microsoft Information Store. -Backup of OS (C: drive works fine).This is only done once a week as a normal backup on a separate session. Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Backup How are you performing the backup? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backup Hi Guys I am backing up my Exchange 2000 Server using Ntbackup. However once the backup is complete if I attempt to restore a file there is no data to be found, the no entries found message is displayed under all folders. The only error I see is event ID 8001 which does not throw any light at all, Any ideas , TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Free/Busy
I had a similar issue in mixed mode exch2k and exch55. Run:c:/.../.../.../ outlook.exe/cleanfreebusy on the client,which took care of it. In some cases I also had to run the /resetfolders switch. raj -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy I am getting more and more people that are unable to update their Free/Busy schedule. Is that anyway for me to do maintenance on this?!?! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Backup
Hi Guys I am backing up my Exchange 2000 Server using Ntbackup. However once the backup is complete if I attempt to restore a file there is no data to be found, the no entries found message is displayed under all folders. The only error I see is event ID 8001 which does not throw any light at all, Any ideas , TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar issue
Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;mixed mode. Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem ? TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issue
Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server, XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the time zone in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight enabled, but is ahead by an hour) Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issue
I did that, also with the resetfolders switch. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server, XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the time zone in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight enabled, but is ahead by an hour) Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed
RE: Migration and new domain, organization and site
Plan your install,assess your network topology...etc, there are a lot of little stuff you should know and do before you get to the actual install of Exchange 2000 software itself. I have some documentation, I can send them to you, just email me offline. Raj. -Original Message- From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration and new domain, organization and site I know I have posted here before, but I have wiped my slate clean and am starting over. Right now I have an exchange 5.5 server in domain OLD. I have a 2000 server in domain NEW that I am going to put exchange 2k on. I will be using a different organization and site name from the 5.5 server. There is a trust between domains OLD and NEW. I have tried many different things to get this done but run into security or permission problems here and there. So now, what would be the best way to install exchange 2k in the new server in the NEW domain to prepare for this? I figure to just install with the new org and site. Also is there anything I must or should do before or after the initial installation of exchange 2k? Just looking for a little guidance since going on my own and learning as I do is not working out the best so far. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrong display name shown in TO field
You may want to check your recipient policy: Filter rules. -Original Message- From: Bini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Wrong display name shown in TO field Exchange 2000 with service pack 2.Mail client is outlook 2000/2002 Recently received lot of calls regarding mails bouncing. On investigation found that the diplay name of the person addressed in the TO field in the mail was shown as /O=INFOTRACH/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VENK77585396 The GAL (address book ) shows the proper name and email id. Any suggestions ? Regards, Bini _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log in problems
Hi Guys, Exchange 5.5 sp4, win nt sp6 Ex 2k Sp2 , win2k sp2. two way trust between domains. User X has accounts in both the domains. User X mail box resides in Exch 2K Server(moved from NT domain). X can log in to the NT domain and access his email using OLXP from the AD domain, Exchange 2000 server (Trusted). the same user logs into the AD domain but cannot access his email from Exchange 2000 Server. error: Unable to open your default e-mail folders. You do not have permission to log on. No error message on the Server or the XP client I did not find any relevent info on the technet site, any ideas? Thanks for your help. Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log in problems
The user accounts were manually created (Network Admin designed and deployed the AD structure). I used ADC to replicate exchange objects, and then merged the replicated user object x-1 to the manually created user x, using AD cleanup wizard. -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Log in problems How were the accounts migrated into 2000? I have been testing this same scenario for awhile. Did you migrate the SID from the NT domain? Did you change the account assigned to the mailbox in 5.5 admin (not sure if this is necessary or not, haven't gotten that far yet in my testing)? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Log in problems Hi Guys, Exchange 5.5 sp4, win nt sp6 Ex 2k Sp2 , win2k sp2. two way trust between domains. User X has accounts in both the domains. User X mail box resides in Exch 2K Server(moved from NT domain). X can log in to the NT domain and access his email using OLXP from the AD domain, Exchange 2000 server (Trusted). the same user logs into the AD domain but cannot access his email from Exchange 2000 Server. error: Unable to open your default e-mail folders. You do not have permission to log on. No error message on the Server or the XP client I did not find any relevent info on the technet site, any ideas? Thanks for your help. Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
Emanager for Viruswall/Scanmail by trendmicro does a reasonably good job -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes, however, they are planning on coming out with their Gold Version 6.0 in October that WILL scan the message body as well. Geoff -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering But remember the Antigen only does Subject and HeaderI do not believe it does the message body yet. Better then nothing..but not the same as say a Mimesweeper or other such type of software... I find the selection depends on what you are trying to filter... .02 bill -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen v6.5 for Exchange 5.5/2000 for the best. Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Content Filtering Any recommendation on software for content filtering? Environment of WK2 Adv NT 4.0 w/ Ex 5.5 sp4. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
Emanager for InterScan Virus wall which we use here is an easy product to install and configure. Tech support is really good. Administration is a different ballgame altogether, till the time you and your users are accustomed to the content filter management,you will be spending a good amount of time tinkering with the filters. It will be good to have an approved policy in place before you do any kind of filtering. Raj -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Raj..is that product easy to configure and setup? does it require much daily administration? we are getting spammed to death and I am tired of saying there is nothing that can be done. I have not heard much praise on any content filtering software yet...was waiting for the next generation, whenever that may be. dave -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Emanager for Viruswall/Scanmail by trendmicro does a reasonably good job -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes, however, they are planning on coming out with their Gold Version 6.0 in October that WILL scan the message body as well. Geoff -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering But remember the Antigen only does Subject and HeaderI do not believe it does the message body yet. Better then nothing..but not the same as say a Mimesweeper or other such type of software... I find the selection depends on what you are trying to filter... .02 bill -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen v6.5 for Exchange 5.5/2000 for the best. Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Content Filtering Any recommendation on software for content filtering? Environment of WK2 Adv NT 4.0 w/ Ex 5.5 sp4. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
DCDiag
While doing dcdiag my root server (DC) it failed MachineAccount test and the error message says not trusted for Account delegation. My other DC passed this test. Should I be doing a repair machine account routine on the root DC? What are the concerns? Any ideas? Sorry for the stupid Q Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DCDiag
The root server is also the Primary DNS server(Standard Primary type). The error IS: /- Starting test: MachineAccount DADMIN2 is not trusted for account delegation ..DADMIN2 failed test MAchineAccount -/ -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Post the entire error please. And verify that you are pointed to a good DNS server. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DCDiag While doing dcdiag my root server (DC) it failed MachineAccount test and the error message says not trusted for Account delegation. My other DC passed this test. Should I be doing a repair machine account routine on the root DC? What are the concerns? Any ideas? Sorry for the stupid Q Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DCDiag
Thanks, I figured out the problem myself. Needed to enable trust computer for delegation in the properties of Domain controller. The reason I followed up was because I thought Kevin had an answer for me.Always grateful for all the good stuff I learn here. Sorry if I pissed anyone off. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag For $200 and hour, that follow-up might actually spur me to action. As it stands, I'll just go grab a beer from the fridge. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Well?? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag The root server is also the Primary DNS server(Standard Primary type). The error IS: /- Starting test: MachineAccount DADMIN2 is not trusted for account delegation ..DADMIN2 failed test MAchineAccount -/ -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Post the entire error please. And verify that you are pointed to a good DNS server. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DCDiag While doing dcdiag my root server (DC) it failed MachineAccount test and the error message says not trusted for Account delegation. My other DC passed this test. Should I be doing a repair machine account routine on the root DC? What are the concerns? Any ideas? Sorry for the stupid Q Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended
RE: DCDiag
Thanks Kevin, Problem resolved, on my may to Exchange 2000 till I hit another snag. raj -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag I would have but I had to interview replacements... --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Thanks, I figured out the problem myself. Needed to enable trust computer for delegation in the properties of Domain controller. The reason I followed up was because I thought Kevin had an answer for me.Always grateful for all the good stuff I learn here. Sorry if I pissed anyone off. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag For $200 and hour, that follow-up might actually spur me to action. As it stands, I'll just go grab a beer from the fridge. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Well?? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag The root server is also the Primary DNS server(Standard Primary type). The error IS: /- Starting test: MachineAccount DADMIN2 is not trusted for account delegation ..DADMIN2 failed test MAchineAccount -/ -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DCDiag Post the entire error please. And verify that you are pointed to a good DNS server. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DCDiag While doing dcdiag my root server (DC) it failed MachineAccount test and the error message says not trusted for Account delegation. My other DC passed this test. Should I be doing a repair machine account routine on the root DC? What are the concerns? Any ideas? Sorry for the stupid Q Raj ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation
Active directory cleanup wizard
Dear all, I have a test environment (NT and W2K), exchange 5.5 and exchange 2000 with all the required latest service packs. The users were manually created in AD to simulate the actual scenario in production(Network Admin manually created the disabled users in AD). I did not use ADMT. Did use ADC. Users are still in the NT domain.Successfully moved mailboxes and point to the Exchange 2000 server, can send and receive mails. When I try to use the cleanup wizard to merge the twin accounts, e.g jsmith(manually created) and jsmith-1(created by ADC as per the connection agreement, there is no option to merge accounts, however I can manually select an account and merge with its twin account (only if it is active). Any thoughts on this from anyone? Tks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail Filtering
Scanmail emanager from trendmicro? www.trendmicro.com -Original Message- From: Abdul Quyyom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail Filtering Currently we are using exchange 2000 sp2. I need to setup message filtering on my exchange2K server for internal messages based on certain words and Phrases. Is anyone knows how to setup this using Exchange2K or any third party utility? It is rather urgent. Thanks in advance. Regards Abby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
