Event Service won't start
EX 5.5, NT4 SP6a Event service won't start and displays the following error message: Could not start the Microsoft Exchange Event Service service on \\s-mail Error 2140: An internal Windows NT error occured. The only entry related in EV is Event ID 5 with the following description: An unexpected MAPI error occured. Error returned was [0x80040154] This happened right after all EX 5.5 services and the Server service one day shut down and the server couldn't log on to the domain. Installing an NT Hotfix and some WINS tweaking resolved all the problems, except for the Event Service stoppage. --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange Event service will not start
The account associated with Event Service is the same as the one used to install Exchange, however Event service won't still start. -Original Message- From: M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Event service will not start I found the resolution. The Exchange Event Service needs to run as the Exchange service account that was used to install exchange...not localsystem. Thanks for everyone's help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Event Service won't start
Since this most likely means stopping EX, running Optimizer and re-applying the SP, it'll have to wait for an off-peak time. In the mean time, can you point me to those articles? Thanks -Original Message- From: M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Event Service won't start I've seen various articles on this. One states to re-install the event service portion on 5.5 by using the add/remove. The issue I had was on Exch2000 and was that the service needed to run as the exchange service account. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
EX2K DNS Stuff
Does EX2K caches the DNS data? If so, what is the default settings and where/how it can be changed? Also can EX2K be configured to use an IP address, instead of the host name in DNS? If so, where/how it can be configured? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sporadic Email Problem
We have 2 domains: my mail server hosts the visionics domain and the other one (PS08) the Identix's. Any email sent to my user's Identix addresses get forwarded by PS08 to my mail server. --Alex -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sporadic Email Problem Whose server is identixps08.identix.com? It doesn't resolve to anything in DNS using several online lookup tools and it doesn't appear as an MX record for visionics.com. regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2003 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sporadic Email Problem From time to time users cannot receive emails from outside. The messages bounce with the SMTP 550 relaying error message. The server is up and all the services are running fine. Below is a copy of one message sent from Yahoo: +++ Message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;identixps08.identix.com Received-From-MTA: dns;web20303.mail.yahoo.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:28:29 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied X-Display-Name: John Smith + EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a There is not much free space to turn SMTP logging on. What could be the possible culprits? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sporadic Email Problem
That's what I had suspected too. Now I have also noticed that the spam load has increased tremendously and that kind of coincides with these kind of problems. Every day I have to go to IMS's Queue and delte blank originator emails manually. Does that mean the server gets so overloaded that it cannot handle anymore SMTP requests, so it rejects the emails and it bounces the message or it just goes to the next MX record server that is not available and that one rejects the emails? How can I find out which server is bouncing the emails? As for the lowest cost server, I thought that was always the case. So does it depends on the DNS server's cache that the sending mail server is using? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sporadic Email Problem It looks like you have 6 different MX records. Verify that each one can receive email for that domain. You may have one that's messed up and is rejecting. Remember, just because one has the lowest cost, doesn't mean its always going to receive the mail. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sporadic Email Problem From time to time users cannot receive emails from outside. The messages bounce with the SMTP 550 relaying error message. The server is up and all the services are running fine. Below is a copy of one message sent from Yahoo: +++ Message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;identixps08.identix.com Received-From-MTA: dns;web20303.mail.yahoo.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:28:29 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied X-Display-Name: John Smith + EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a There is not much free space to turn SMTP logging on. What could be the possible culprits? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sporadic Email Problem
From time to time users cannot receive emails from outside. The messages bounce with the SMTP 550 relaying error message. The server is up and all the services are running fine. Below is a copy of one message sent from Yahoo: +++ Message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;identixps08.identix.com Received-From-MTA: dns;web20303.mail.yahoo.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:28:29 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied X-Display-Name: John Smith + EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a There is not much free space to turn SMTP logging on. What could be the possible culprits? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
High Memory Usage for Store.exe
EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a Store.exe is showing a high memory usage. The box has 512MB of memory, of which between 396-400MB are being used by Store.exe. Isn't this too high? Besides the obvious (adding more memory), what can be done to improve the EX performance. With other EX services, AV software and other misc. services, there is not much Available Memory: between 4-18MB. This has created problems in sending and receiving, as the server sometimes doesn't respond in time and just times out. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook
As posted before, you need to go to Advanced Options, Add-In Manager and check Server Scripting. This should give you the Agents tab. Did you get this utility from CDOlive website? Is it working for you? I downloaded the Auto Reply from them and went through the whole setup, but it's not working for me. --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Agent Tabs In Outlook Greetings, I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept it works properly? I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots; eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the account is the same in all resources. Still I am perplexed and need your assistance. Thanks!!! Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cleaning up EXCHSRV folder
I had initially installed EXCH on C: (system partition), and had all the services on that drive. Later I added more drives and moved some of the EXCH services to other partitions. Now C: hosts only DSADATA (Directory Working Path) and MDBDATA (IS Working Path). I'm running out of space on C: and was wondering if I can remove some of the EXCHSRV folders that perhaps are no longer needed, without breaking EXCH. Do I have no choice but to re-install EXCH? On a related note, is there a utility (on resource kit, etc.) that will automate reporting of the space on the hard drives? EX 5.5, NT 4, SP6 Thanks --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although the condition is met, nothing happens. I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either. I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Nope - you want to use IP all the time.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would you not want to use RPC? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2003 14:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Actually, remove everything but ncacn_ip_tcp That is, unless your'e running IPX/SPX or VNS across your dial up. Named pipes and RPC are pretty horrific, too. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange provider\rpc_binding_order To ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first. Move it along a bit. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2003 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Does anyone know any reg hacks to speed up RPC over dialup? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions What? From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400 Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other than IP over it so I don't think it's that. We can try it though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. We have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients to an OST over dialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it over broadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it over dialup even after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or lan line, it takes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know the connection is faster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anything to sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck. Is there like a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. We need to stick to OST files because we have public folders and calendars that need to be online. We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but I think this is more Outlook than Exchange. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
No there's only 1 rule. This is a brand new mailbox. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard It's not the size of one rule but all of them. Is there more than one rule setup? From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:23:53 -0400 I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although the condition is met, nothing happens. I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either. I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Nope - you want to use IP all the time.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would you not want to use RPC? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2003 14:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Actually, remove everything but ncacn_ip_tcp That is, unless your'e running IPX/SPX or VNS across your dial up. Named pipes and RPC are pretty horrific, too. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange provider\rpc_binding_order To ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first. Moveit along a bit. Regards, Rob EllisIT ManagerSamsara Group plcTel 023 9224 7979Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message-From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2003 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup Does anyone know any reg hacks to speed up RPC over dialup? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony HlabseSent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:29 AMTo: Exchange Discussions What? From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialupDate: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400 Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other thanIP over it so Idon't think it's that. We can try it though. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AMTo: Exchange Discussions RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob EllisIT ManagerSamsara Group plcTel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message-From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any responses. Wehave reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clientsto an OST overdialup. For some reason it is very slow. Now when they sync it overbroadband it takes about 30 seconds. When they sync it overdialup evenafter a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband orlan line, ittakes about 2 hours. This doesn't make sense. I know theconnection isfaster but I don't think that's it. They don't have anythingto sync. I have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck.Is there likea reg key or something that I can change
RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
No but I enabled it, restarted IMS and still not getting the reply. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your server? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although the condition is met, nothing happens. I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either. I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
Got the reply just now. Apparently there was some delay with Yahoo. Thanks for your help! Btw the server-side script is still not working. --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your server? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although the condition is met, nothing happens. I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either. I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with OOO messages
EX 5.5, SP4 - NT4 SP6 Out of office message works for one user but not for at another user. Both users are on the same server, but in different recipient containsers. Any ideas why? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to remote access to Exchange. But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up. I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC over HTTP. Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead? What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Viewing Error
When I try to access email via OWA, after entering the mailbox name And then domain\user name and password, I get the Unable to get renderer error. When I click on OK, it loads the OWA mailbox page but without showing the emails and It displays this header: Page cannot be displayed. There is a problem within the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed The strange thing is that it doesn't happen when you load a new browser window, but if you log out and log back in, you'll get the error message. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
QMQP protocol
One of our vendors received an email infected with BugBear virus coming from an address from our domain. However it's a bogus address. After checking out the header and the path, I found the sender's IP address and found out that it's running QMQP on port 628. I found a link through Google that it says it's a faster protocol than SMTP and it's used to centralize mail queue for cluster of hosts. Apparently it runs on Unix. Does anyone know whether the protocol is legitimate and/or could be used for spamming or spreading virus? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
One of our depts is looking to send mail to an Exchange 5.5 server via Secure SMTP and I'm wondering if 5.5 supports it INCOMING. I know you can force Exchange to send outgoing, but do not know if Exchange - by default - will accept mail at port 465. Any Ideas? -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Well you could probably format the link to let you track the clicks. But as we know, noone reads these things anyway so it really shouldn't matter - not that that will placate your legals, of course. Perhaps some good might come of this - if It was in a language I couldn't understand. becomes an accepted legal defence then the work of the Plain English Campaign (http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/) and similar bodies might become a lot easier. Back on the original point though, if you need a language targeted disclaimer you might be able to use a custom field on a mail form to set the language, add it to the mail header and add the disclaimer based on the content of this. It would mean the people sending the mails would have to remember to set the language field but at least it'd mean you wouldn't get a German disclaimer every time you wrote Schadenfreude. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . Web links are unacceptable since there is no way of checking whether the recipient clicked the link, or they might not be online when they read the message. . . . The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX 5.5 Secure SMTP
One of our depts is looking to send mail to an Exchange 5.5 server via Secure SMTP and I'm wondering if 5.5 supports it INCOMING. I know you can force Exchange to send outgoing, but do not know if Exchange - by default - will accept mail at port 465. Any Ideas? P.S. Sorry I sent this earlier under a reply to another topic. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:38 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers One of our depts is looking to send mail to an Exchange 5.5 server via Secure SMTP and I'm wondering if 5.5 supports it INCOMING. I know you can force Exchange to send outgoing, but do not know if Exchange - by default - will accept mail at port 465. Any Ideas? -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Well you could probably format the link to let you track the clicks. But as we know, noone reads these things anyway so it really shouldn't matter - not that that will placate your legals, of course. Perhaps some good might come of this - if It was in a language I couldn't understand. becomes an accepted legal defence then the work of the Plain English Campaign (http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/) and similar bodies might become a lot easier. Back on the original point though, if you need a language targeted disclaimer you might be able to use a custom field on a mail form to set the language, add it to the mail header and add the disclaimer based on the content of this. It would mean the people sending the mails would have to remember to set the language field but at least it'd mean you wouldn't get a German disclaimer every time you wrote Schadenfreude. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . Web links are unacceptable since there is no way of checking whether the recipient clicked the link, or they might not be online when they read the message. . . . The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mysterious bounced message
EX 5.5 SP4 on NT SP6a Messages sent to users at certain domain in Europe (Italy) from our Exchange mailbox bounce back undelivered as User unknown: However when they are sent from a Yahoo account, they get delivered without a problem. I verified connectivity to recipient's mail server by pinging and telnetting to port 25 successfully. I even specified the recipient's mail server IP address instead of relying on DNS, but the problem still persisted. I turned on the SMTP Protocol Logging on IMC. Here's the result: 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : A connection to 195.120.145.5 was established. 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : 220 addon.it ESMTP MDaemon 6.0.3; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:47:16 +0100 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : EHLO s-mail.visionics.com 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-addon.it Hello s-mail.visionics.com, pleased to meet you 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-ETRN 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 250-8BITMIME 250 SIZE 0 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3830 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sender ok 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Recipient unknown 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : QUIT + Also we have been having similar problems with other european recipients. Any ideas what could be causing this? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mysterious bounced message
Not that I'm aware of. How would I find out for sure? I know that we're connected to Internet via a Frame Relay to our HQ, so our incoming and outgoing traffic has to go through the HQ network and their firewall. I also know that they added a 2nd line, which has a different public IP address. But that was not supposed to affect us, because we're still hanging off the old line (and router). Also our mail server's public IP address never changed and we are able to send/receive email as before. --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message Do you have a host between the Internet and the internal network that is readdressing mail? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mysterious bounced message EX 5.5 SP4 on NT SP6a Messages sent to users at certain domain in Europe (Italy) from our Exchange mailbox bounce back undelivered as User unknown: However when they are sent from a Yahoo account, they get delivered without a problem. I verified connectivity to recipient's mail server by pinging and telnetting to port 25 successfully. I even specified the recipient's mail server IP address instead of relying on DNS, but the problem still persisted. I turned on the SMTP Protocol Logging on IMC. Here's the result: 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : A connection to 195.120.145.5 was established. 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : 220 addon.it ESMTP MDaemon 6.0.3; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:47:16 +0100 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : EHLO s-mail.visionics.com 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-addon.it Hello s-mail.visionics.com, pleased to meet you 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-ETRN 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 250-8BITMIME 250 SIZE 0 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3830 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sender ok 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Recipient unknown 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : QUIT + Also we have been having similar problems with other european recipients. Any ideas what could be causing this? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mysterious bounced message
Actually I emailed 2 other valid users on that domain, all with the same result, so I don't think the problem is user-specific. I'm suspecting the problem to be the reverse DNS lookup too. As I said before I'm having problem with some other European domains as well. With this one, I don't get the bounce back, but he never even receives the email, although again if I send it from Yahoo, he'll get it fine and reply back. Here's the SMTP log on that: + A connection to 194.109.6.48 was established. 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : 220 mxzilla4.xs4all.nl ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.3/8.12.3; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:56:41 +0100 (CET) 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : EHLO s-mail.visionics.com 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : 250-mxzilla4.xs4all.nl Hello [63.122.164.131], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 1500 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=4229 RET=FULL 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sender ok 2/5/03 1:51:11 PM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Recipient ok 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : DATA 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : 250 2.0.0 h15IufMR063553 Message accepted for delivery 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : QUIT 2/5/03 1:51:12 PM : 221 2.0.0 mxzilla4.xs4all.nl closing connection ++ Is there anything I can do on my end to get rid of the reverse DNS problem? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message I wandered off in the wrong direction, sorry. I just tried pretty much the same thing your server tried and the recipient is ok. From the transcript you provided, either: - The recipient wasn't there when the mail was originally sent, - The server was momentarily screwed up, - It's doing some kind of reverse DNS lookup test that your sending server doesn't pass and it's giving you the wrong error message, or - Something else I haven't thought of. I don't think the problem is on your end. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message Not that I'm aware of. How would I find out for sure? I know that we're connected to Internet via a Frame Relay to our HQ, so our incoming and outgoing traffic has to go through the HQ network and their firewall. I also know that they added a 2nd line, which has a different public IP address. But that was not supposed to affect us, because we're still hanging off the old line (and router). Also our mail server's public IP address never changed and we are able to send/receive email as before. --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message Do you have a host between the Internet and the internal network that is readdressing mail? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mysterious bounced message EX 5.5 SP4 on NT SP6a Messages sent to users at certain domain in Europe (Italy) from our Exchange mailbox bounce back undelivered as User unknown: However when they are sent from a Yahoo account, they get delivered without a problem. I verified connectivity to recipient's mail server by pinging and telnetting to port 25 successfully. I even specified the recipient's mail server IP address instead of relying on DNS, but the problem still persisted. I turned on the SMTP Protocol Logging on IMC. Here's the result: 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : A connection to 195.120.145.5 was established. 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : 220 addon.it ESMTP MDaemon 6.0.3; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:47:16 +0100 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : EHLO s-mail.visionics.com 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-addon.it Hello s-mail.visionics.com, pleased to meet you 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-ETRN 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 250-8BITMIME 250 SIZE 0 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3830 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sender ok 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/03 11:49:33
RE: Mysterious bounced message
I did some testing on dnsstuff.com and it told me that my mail server doesn't have a reverse DNS entry, so some mail servers won't accept email from it. I have to contact my ISP to get that set up, since our DNS is hosted by them. Once that's propagated (24-48 hours), I'll try sending emails again to see if the problem was resolved. --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message I wandered off in the wrong direction, sorry. I just tried pretty much the same thing your server tried and the recipient is ok. From the transcript you provided, either: - The recipient wasn't there when the mail was originally sent, - The server was momentarily screwed up, - It's doing some kind of reverse DNS lookup test that your sending server doesn't pass and it's giving you the wrong error message, or - Something else I haven't thought of. I don't think the problem is on your end. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message Not that I'm aware of. How would I find out for sure? I know that we're connected to Internet via a Frame Relay to our HQ, so our incoming and outgoing traffic has to go through the HQ network and their firewall. I also know that they added a 2nd line, which has a different public IP address. But that was not supposed to affect us, because we're still hanging off the old line (and router). Also our mail server's public IP address never changed and we are able to send/receive email as before. --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mysterious bounced message Do you have a host between the Internet and the internal network that is readdressing mail? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mysterious bounced message EX 5.5 SP4 on NT SP6a Messages sent to users at certain domain in Europe (Italy) from our Exchange mailbox bounce back undelivered as User unknown: However when they are sent from a Yahoo account, they get delivered without a problem. I verified connectivity to recipient's mail server by pinging and telnetting to port 25 successfully. I even specified the recipient's mail server IP address instead of relying on DNS, but the problem still persisted. I turned on the SMTP Protocol Logging on IMC. Here's the result: 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : A connection to 195.120.145.5 was established. 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : 220 addon.it ESMTP MDaemon 6.0.3; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:47:16 +0100 2/5/03 11:49:31 AM : EHLO s-mail.visionics.com 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-addon.it Hello s-mail.visionics.com, pleased to meet you 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250-ETRN 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 250-8BITMIME 250 SIZE 0 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3830 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sender ok 2/5/03 11:49:32 AM : RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Recipient unknown 2/5/03 11:49:33 AM : QUIT + Also we have been having similar problems with other european recipients. Any ideas what could be causing this? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCISP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Greg, I'm not sure if you got the email I sent you yesterday, but I want to clarify one more thing: One EX55 box will be moved physically to another location, where its contents will be moved using EXMERGE. Therefore there'll be no chance to get the message flowing between the 2 Exchange boxes. Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution Looks like a plan. I'll assume from 9. that this is talking about your Exchange Organization A, which you are doing a Typical Migration on (put E2K servers into your E55 org and move users). As for the Exchange Ogranization B, which you have selected to use EXMERGE, this is a Foreign Mail System Migration and EXMERGE is a decent tool for this. To explain more about redirection, here goes. There is a SINGLE, proper method of migrating from foreign email systems. This is the ONLY method that ensure that no messages are lost. If anyone tells you that there is another method, they are wrong. Here is the overview: 1. Get both systems up and running 2. Get message flow going between the two systems either via SMTP or a proprietary connector 3. Syncrhonize directories between the two systems so that mailboxes from system SOURCE show up in System TARGET's address book as foreign mail entries (i.e. contacts). Again, this can be done a number of different ways depending on the systems involved. 4. To migrate a mailbox, first, convert the foreign mail entry in the TARGET system to a mailbox, preserving all addresses 5. Now, perform email redirection on the other systems to point them to the newly created mailbox in the TARGET system. 6. Once redirection is complete, export the SOURCE mailbox and import it into the TARGET mailbox What this does is completely eliminate any problems with missing messages during migrations. If performed correctly, you will never lose an email or get a bounced message during migration. Now, to be more specific about email redirection; since you asked. The issue that email redirection attempts to solve is preserving address fidelity, or the ability for users to address or respond to email during the migration process. A typical scenario that can occur is the following: 1. User A sends an email to User B 2. User A migrates to the new system 3. User B responds to message and it bounces Now, why does this occur? Well, for the most part it occurs because people that write email systems are apparently brain dead. For example, E55 stamps an internal X500 FROM address on every message an Exchange user sends out. This is actually a hold-over from MS Mail which used the ever popular 10/10/10 format. If you simply delete the Exchange mailbox and create a contact pointing to the new system, you have broken address fidelity because the new contact has a different X500 address than the old mailbox. Bad. The slickest way to solve this problem that I have found is to create a contact in the SOURCE system pointing to the new mailbox in the TARGET system. Then, use Exchange's handy dandy alternate recipient to define an alternate recipient of that contact. You can then export the mailbox info and import it to the new system and you will never break address fidelity. An alternate approach is to record all of the various email addresses and X500 address from the SOURCE mailbox and add them to your contact. You can preserve address fidelity in that manner as well, but if you do it this way you will have a gap in your migration process where you might miss a message. Now, you also have this problem: 1. User A sends a message to User B 2. User A migrates to new system 3. User B migrates to new system 4. User B responds to User A's message and it bounces. What is going on here? Well, that sweet, loveable X500 address is still sitting there stamped on that message. Unless you have that X500 address associated with a mailbox on the new system, your messages will bounce in this scenario. So again, you have to move all of your addresses from the legacy system, including the X500 address to the new system. Now, all of this is really not difficult, especially with the proper automation tools and techniques. However, email redirection is by far the most over-looked aspect of email migrations. And it can get pretty complicated when multiple systems are involved. It works out to something like n! scenarios that you have to take a look at. However, most of those scenarios typically end up being invalid. For some reason, people have reached the conclusion that email migrations mean missed messages and bounced email, but that does not have to be the case. With proper planning, design and engineering, email migrations can be flawless. I've been doing flawless email migrations for a long time now. This process works and is the ONLY thing that works. Greg, Thanks for your thorough response! Here are some
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Greg, Thanks for your thorough response! Here are some clarifications and comments on your response. As far as I can understand it, this is how they want to do this: 1. Install a new server w/ NT 4 as a BDC. 2. Install a 2nd server w/ NT 4 as a BDC. Keep it as a backup. 3. Replicate new BDC and promote it to PDC. Make sure existing PDC is demoted. 4. Replicate new PDC. 5. Upgrade PDC to WIN2K OS and make sure it communicates with location A's DC 8. Install AD and give it a child domain name of child.newdomain.com. 9. Make sure the new PDC can pass AD back and forth with other locations which already have EX2K/W2K/AD 10. Install ADC on EX55 and create a one-way from 55 EX2K server. 11. Use EXMERGE to move mail from 55s to EX2K. 12. Once it's tested thoroughly the EX55 boxes in A B will be abondoned. Also one thing in your response I didn't quite understand was redirection. How and where is it done exactly? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Interesting EX2K migration solution Alex, I have performed these types of migrations before. In particular for a large 12,000 seat fast-food restaurant system composed of a number of different email systems including 2 E55, 1 cc:Mail and 1 MS Mail systems. Here are the main issues with these types of migrations (between 2 disparate Exchange organizations): 1. It sounds like you will be integrating E2K servers into one of your existing E55 organizations. I call this a Typical Exchange 2000 Migration. Depending on how many sites you have, you will want to put anE2K server in each of those sites. Once this is done you can move the users from the E55 servers to your E2K servers. You can do this via the admin tools, but it is a pain selecting and migrating them manually. Because I have done this before, I actually have a tool that will batch-automate this process that we have used with a lot of success. 2. The second E55 system will be migrated as a Foreign Mail System. This is referred to as a Foreign Mail System Exchange 2000 Migration. More on this in a minute as this raises a number of issues you will need to be concerned about. 3. Before you do anything, you will want to upgrade your NT4 PDC to Windows 2000 and integrate it with your AD design. This is the NT4 domain where you will be performing the Typical Exchange Migration. You will also want to install the ADC into this domain. Then, you can install your first E2K server and join it to your E55 organization. 4. Because you are joining your E2K system into your existing E55 system, you have solved most/all of your coexistence problems, GAL, messaging connectivity, Free/Busy information and public folders. 5. Because you are joining your E2K system into your existing E55 system, you have solved most/all of your migration problems in terms of getting the mailbox and other data to your new E2K environment. The only issue here is if you want to do this all manually or automate the process. 6. Because your other E55 system is being treated as a Foreign Mail System, you have coexistence and migration issues with this system. Luckily, the migration issues can be addressed through the use of the Exchange Migration Wizard which semi-supports E55. The reason for the semi-support is that unlike every other mail system that the Migration Wizard supports, E55 migrations are implemented by using a PST file for its export medium instead of the standard PRI, PKL, SEC files used for all other migrations. This is a pain because the migration wizard puts a random password on all of those PST's. Again, this can be a real pain to do manually. And again, I have tools, Rocket, to help automate this process. Also, more on migration issues below... 7. Now, coexistence is an issue for the foreign E55 system. You will probably want to think about some type of coexistence between the two systems. Not sure what you have in place today in terms of coexistence, but the main things you will want to be concerned with are a GAL, Messaging connectivity, Free/Busy connectivity and Public Folder synchronization. There are various, largely unsupported tools on various resource kits and other locations that can aid in this effort. However, in all honesty, they are not the greatest tools in the world. Again, since we have run into this before, we created Furnace, which allows one to easily exchange directory, free/busy and public folder information between two disparate Exchange systems (E55 and E2K). This gives you a GAL in each system that contains everything from both systems. 8. Once you get all of your Typical Migration complete, you can switch to Native Mode in Exchange and consolidate your Administrative Groups to simplify your life and no longer be bound by your E55 site definitions. 9. As far as the user logon and access piece of this, depending on how you are configured,
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Yes EXMERGE but I don't think they're planning to create ADC in NT4 location B, only in location A, which will eventually will be EX2K. Will this create a problem? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:kaneE;kanenetworks.com] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 12:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Interesting EX2K migration solution It is possible. You don't need a GC in the location that has no win2k/e2k, all you need is a proper dns or a wins entry on your nt4 location dns server for the e2k server on the other side and your users will be able to connect with their outlook to that e2k server. I am just wondering what your plan is to move the mailboxes from NT 4 location to E2K server in the other location. Are you guys planning on dropping a ADC and do it that way or do you just plan to use EXMERGE and do it that way. Thx -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution I'm sorry. I was asleep all morning. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution How come no one has bothered to post a response to my question? Is that too stupid or trivial a question/topic to warrant a response?!! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Yes Roger you guessed right!!! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution Its not the performance issue - it's the fact that you're consolidating Exchange but not domains. I'm guessing politics is playing into it. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution Thanks for the response Roger. So what are the possible pitfalls of this design; e.g performance, etc.? By DNS configured correctly you mean the public DNS MX records, right or are you talking about internal one too? --Alex -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution That would work, yes. Its not a good design, but assuming you have DNS configured correctly, it should work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Thanks for the response Roger. So what are the possible pitfalls of this design; e.g performance, etc.? By DNS configured correctly you mean the public DNS MX records, right or are you talking about internal one too? --Alex -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution That would work, yes. Its not a good design, but assuming you have DNS configured correctly, it should work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Thanks Ed, I just wanted to know if it would work. If by headaches you mean performance issues, they already know and willing to accept it. Unless there'll be other issues as well. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution This is a consulting engagement question. That is, it's really the kind of question that deserves more consideration than this kind of forum allows. Having said that, the scheme you describe could possibly work. It's even possible that you could make it work with your users logging in to the NT4 domain. But to tell you anything more than it's possible, I'd need to know a lot more. You really ought to pay for a good design. It'd probably save you a lot of headaches in the end. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting EX2K migration solution
Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
How come no one has bothered to post a response to my question? Is that too stupid or trivial a question/topic to warrant a response?!! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard;VISIONICS.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations NT domains, as well as 2 separate locations. To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate to EX2K/W2K/AD in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other location there. The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however these users will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access EX2K, across a Frame Relay (1024kbps). I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for this work, but obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain. So I'm just wondering, will this work?! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird bounced message
EX5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6 Messages to a specific vendor (and their ISP) bounces back, when it's sent from our mail server. They can receive from any other place. Contacted their ISP and they said they're not gonna check their logs they get a proof that it is actually being blocked or bounced by their Unix mail server. Below is the bounced message we get: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 10/8/2002 3:13 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-021008191227Z-31529 There's nothing in the Event Viewer. Messages go out the IMC without a problem. Exchange can connect to port 25 on all of ISP's mail server. Would message tracking help figuring out the problem? If so where's the default directory/files to look at? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird bounced message
I looked into tracking.log folder and the log files in there, but I can't find any useful information in there. Any ideas? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA questions
Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sort of OWA Problem
I had couple of questions regarding this software: 1- Are you really happy with it? No major problems or anything? 2- Does it work with both Palm or Windows CE(PocketPC) PDAs or just one? I tried emailing the address posted on the website, but it bounced back! Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sort of OWA Problem Never mind. A simple re-install of SP4 fixed it. Should have been the first thing I tried, but I wasn't thinking. Chuck -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sort of OWA Problem I just completed a reinstallation of our server that hosts OWA for us. OWA is working fine. We also use a application called OWA for PDA we purchased from http://www.leederbyshire.com/OWA-PDA.asp. This was working fine before the server reinstallation. Now I am getting this message: Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01b6' Object doesn't support this property or method: 'objSession.GetDefaultFolder' /pda/Include.inc, line 19 I am working with the developer on this issue and I realize it may be beyond the scope of this list, but if anyone has seen this before and has any advice I would apprecaite it. Thanks! --- Chuck Parkey Creative Teaching Press _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shortcut for Public Folders
EX 55/SP4 Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not the full path. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcut for Public Folders
This works but I'd rather type the UNC path. Sorry I should've been more specific! --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcut for Public Folders This may be client dependant.. But this works for OL 2000 and 2002. From the folder list drag and drop the folder into an email body and it will create a file with the extension xnk. Aaron -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders EX 55/SP4 Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not the full path. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcut for Public Folders
Yes that's what I was looking for. Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcut for Public Folders After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a public folders. It would take the format of outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername Aaron -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders EX 55/SP4 Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not the full path. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Account suspended, again
I've had the same problem 3-4 times in the last week. When I request unhold, I don't get a response, but I start getting the messages. --Alex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Account suspended, again I haven't seen any problems .. well besides the fact that the amount of posts has drastically gone down on this list at least. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:20 PM Subject: Account suspended, again Anyone know if we are making any progress at all on the list gremlin that randomly suspends accounts? Happened twice over the weekend. David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] We have enough youth -- how about a fountain of smart? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Always happy to chip in. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Thanks Tony you were great help!!! -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! --Alex -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. You have BTFM first. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And RTFM. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. STFW -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yeah exactly! Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header program? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Go figure??? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain account successfully. --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And the EV says the import completed successfully? If so, I don't have a resolution to that problem. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yup done that and that, no go! Weird, huh?! --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ahhh, did you refresh the screen? If so, take out the CRs and try it just with the Mailbox/Delete line. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yes in the same file. I tried this first on a dummy container I created with mailbox CR in it and it worked fine. But when I did it on the real container, only CRs were deleted. There are no errors in EV and import said the deletion was successful, but the object is still there. I even added the Home Server value, but it didn't make any difference. --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Did you have CRs and Mailboxes together in one document? And what is the error code in EV say? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions
OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop start this service for Exchange send receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop start this service for Exchange send receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
DUDE!!! That did it, thanks! On a related note, is it possible to get do away w. domain\ part when logging into OWA? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. You need to. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop start this service for Exchange send receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Create Mailboxes on Command Line
Is there a utility out there to create mailboxes, custom recipients, DLs etc. on command line? Thanks Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent email sits in outbox
I did rebuild the profile, but the problem still persists. I can't remove the Internet Email Service, because the user is on the road a lot. As for the upgrade to OL2002 we don't have the license or the $$ for the upgrade. Any other ideas? -Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent email sits in outbox Rebuilding the profile is easy. I would also remove the Internet E-Mail service or upgrade to 2002. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent email sits in outbox I have the same problem under EX5.5. User had moved his My Documents files, now messages are sent but are still stuck in Outbox. He's using OL 2000, with 2 profiles, one w. Exchange Service, one with Internet Email. Any ideas besides rebuilding the profile? --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent email sits in outbox Hi All, Just set up Exchange 2000 Server on Windows 2000 SBS. Everything seemed to be working fine for several employees, however, one employee has a problem sending mail. Any email that the person sends just sits in their outbox. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: testing relay
What is the MS article number? Thanks ALEX Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: testing relay I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders Mailing Lists
Where is this article exactly, cause I couldn't find it on Technet site? --ALEX ALBORZFARD Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Mailing Lists No one but you guys see the folder names, unless your folders start bouncing mail, but you would never let that happen. I call mine whatever they are: Exchange, WinNT, Scripting, etc. There's a very thorough Technet article called How to subscribe a public folder to an internet mailing list. May want to have a read of that one straight-away. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Mailing Lists I have had little success searching the archives -- too little comes up (using the link at the bottom of the E-Mail). I don't see anything relevant in the faq. I guess it's the setup I'm interested in. As I create folders, names are assigned to them. What's the reccommended way to subscribe to these mailing lists? Set my smtp address to the name of the mailing list for subscription and subsequently create the folder to catch future E-Mails? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Mailing Lists Yay!!! You rock. This is the Best Way to manage this. My comments are below inline. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders Mailing Lists As with many companies, we have a number of users who all subscribe to similar mailing lists. I'd like to bring some of these lists under one umbrella by subscribing public folders to the lists instead of the individual users. This is a reccomended strategy, correct? I seem to remember reading about it on this list a while back. Several questions, however: 1. Where can I get more information about setting this up? Archives, FAQ 2. If the folders are subscribed, do the users need to subscribe anyway to post to those lists? Yes. The folder collects the mail; people post as themselves. The PF subs with some sort of get the mail option; the people sub as no mail. 3. Is there no way to have a (#) printed next to public folders for new messages? But of course. Right click the PF, choose Add to Outlook bar. Set your view to Unread messages. The number in parens is the number of messages you personally have not read. Your view is your view. 4. What are the real benefits to this approach? You already know. 5. Anything else I should know? I set mine to have an age limit of about 6 months so they never get out of hand. If I see something go by that I want, I put it in my Exchange (or whatever) PST for posterity. -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO Messages
I know this has been done to death, but are there security or other issues (such as creating loops) with turning it on IMS? I couldn't find anything on the archivea list, or maybe I just didn't know where to look. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Network Errand Boy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving Mailboxes
Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in the other container? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Mailboxes
Yes. Then I have to delete create new ones? Alex Alborzfard MCSE -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't move them. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Mailboxes Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in the other container? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Mailboxes
After saving their data, I deleted the old mailboxes and put them in a new recipient container, but now neither regular SMTP or POP or OWA work. Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes And then realise that address book views do what they wanted in the first place. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes Here is a better statement... This is a perfect reason WHY recipient containers are a bad idea. Lots of people think they would be cool to do by departments or whatever, then later find they have created a nightmare. There are of course good uses for a recipient container, but they should always be static mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes Here's a question: Why bother? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes Yes. Then I have to delete create new ones? Alex Alborzfard MCSE -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't move them. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Mailboxes Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in the other container? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Happy Holidays
...and what was that...turning it off on the IMS?! Is it true that they are not secure and reveal everything about the Exchange server?!! Alex A. Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Happy Holidays Russ Cooper took countermeasures about those OOFs :) Happy Holidays to you all!! -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:56 PM Subject: RE: Happy Holidays I was just thinking about that... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Happy Holidays It's Christmas season Inbox becomes cluttered with Out of office mail (c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r) Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Survey/Voting
Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Yes it says it works with OL97. Do you know if it works with OL2000 as well? Thanks ALEX P.S. - Martin, don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Not valid in certain Western Democracies. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! What this country needs is someone who knows what this country needs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Typically voting works like this: There can be a number of choices. At least 2. Then people choose which one they like best. That is the vote. Then the votes are counted, and the one with the most votes wins. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Well just let me know when you're coming to NJ area, so I can skip town!!! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Too late! Drew and I are taking our act on the road. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Yes it says it works with OL97. Do you know if it works with OL2000 as well? Thanks ALEX P.S. - Martin, don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Thanks is it possible to make it anonymous? -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting OL2000: (CW) Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q197420) -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Yes it says it works with OL97. Do you know if it works with OL2000 as well? Thanks ALEX P.S. - Martin, don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best solution for merging EX servers??
Scenario --- Company X has merged with company Y. Company X has 2 locations: East Coast - 1 EX 5.5 SP4 on NT 4, responsible for X.com domain's mail UK - NONE (Using East coast mail server via Internet) Company Y has 2 locations: West Coast - 1 EX 5.5 SP4 on NT 4, responsible for Y-west.com domain's mail East Coast - 2 EX 5.5 SP4 on NT 4, responsible for Y-east.com domain's mail Following is the connections between these sites: X - Y(East) : 512kbps (FR) Y(West) - Y(East) : 256kbps (FR) Y(East) - FR Cloud :512kbps (FR) X and Y(West) have to go through Y(East) to connect to Internet. (There are additional/backup Internet connections as follows:) X - Internet(backup): 384kbps (DSL) X(UK) - Internet: 128kbps (ISDN) Y(East) - Internet: 768kbps (T1) Needs 1- The new company has taken the name X and wants all employees in all 3 locations to receive email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. This should be done without any or minimum email service interruption. 2- Provide a fault-tolerant solution, in case one of the EX servers goes down or loses it's Internet connection. 3- Company wants to move EX2K at some point in the future. Should it wait to merge first and then migrate or migrate first and then merge? Solutions --- 1- What type of connector and why? 2- How should the DNS MX records be arranged? 3- What are pluses minuses for each merge now versus migrate now scenarios? Let me know if you need more information. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite your bigshot attitude! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Thank you Andy! His email is about as clear as the Potomac River! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox? P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. You stated : It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space, not: I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email.(Which you stated later) Andy -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I don't have time for this kinda BS. Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either! Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to. Maybe you should try there... Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself. However, we've been around here for quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with. I wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!? My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a GB. Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. Item #6: Apparently not. Not likely. Waaahh... Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator 1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think of me what you may... Fact still remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients. I more than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to dignify. Configure your sh!t properly and then come
Weird message from System Administrator
EX5.5 SP4 - NT4 Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message back from System Administrator: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test#2 Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst, but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server. There are limits, but the user is not over. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around. I must be the only Exchange admin who has never worked with them. What's happening on that client? Delivery to store or PST? Limits? Is he over? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird message from System Administrator EX5.5 SP4 - NT4 Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message back from System Administrator: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test#2 Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator. It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! I'm looking to find out why is this happening? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server? And why oh why is it DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server? Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst, but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server. There are limits, but the user is not over. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around. I must be the only Exchange admin who has never worked with them. What's happening on that client? Delivery to store or PST? Limits? Is he over? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird message from System Administrator EX5.5 SP4 - NT4 Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message back from System Administrator: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test#2 Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!! If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get it!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again JackA$$!! If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to a PST file for? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator. It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! I'm looking to find out why is this happening? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server? And why oh why is it DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server? Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst, but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server. There are limits, but the user is not over. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around. I must be the only Exchange admin who has never worked with them. What's happening on that client? Delivery to store or PST? Limits? Is he over? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird message from System Administrator EX5.5 SP4 - NT4 Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message back from System Administrator: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test#2 Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think of me what you may... Fact still remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients. I more than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to dignify. Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash. Til then... PEACE OUT! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!! If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get it!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again JackA$$!! If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to a PST file for? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator. It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! I'm looking to find out why is this happening? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server? And why oh why is it DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server? Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst, but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server. There are limits, but the user is not over. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around. I must be the only Exchange admin who has never worked with them. What's happening on that client? Delivery to store or PST? Limits? Is he over? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
I don't have time for this kinda BS. Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either! Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to. Maybe you should try there... Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself. However, we've been around here for quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with. I wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!? My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a GB. Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. Item #6: Apparently not. Not likely. Waaahh... Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator 1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think of me what you may... Fact still remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients. I more than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to dignify. Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash. Til then... PEACE OUT! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!! If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get it!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again JackA$$!! If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to a PST file for? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator. It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal
RE: Newbie
I'm a newbie as well. I have the following problem: I'm trying to set up the following: Setup the public folders so that users can access it anonymously through their browser. I've seen this work on one of our vendor's website like this: http://servername/exchange/root.asp?acs=anon But when I do this on our Exchange 5.5 SP4, it gives me this error message: Unable to render folder There are no published folders. I have searched Technet and newsgroups for a solution, but with no success. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Newbie Welcome aboard! It can get pretty wild here sometimes, but you will learn a lot. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Newbie Hi all, my name is Elizabeth and @ time of posting, I am the newbie on the list. I have worked as a software engineer for three years now and have a pretty competent crosses fingers knowledge of MS products, a splash of Solaris and a bit of Netscape programming and now having moved into a house which is firmly trapped in modem-only connection territory, I am an ISP WAN girl well it is the price I pay for my house in the country :) Anyway that is all about me, I look forward to supporting and being supported by this list. Regards E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
