To address Steven's question far below...
Thoughts, ideas?
Put the logs and database on different physical drives. Makes a hell of
a difference under load.
All the best,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5. august 2003 23:23
Some observations:
I now get 550Mb/min using BackupExec 8.6 against Exchange 2K (store backup,
not BLB) - perhaps the limiting factor is the 100MBit net card.
The Exchange server has 16Gb of stores on a PIII 600 with 768Mb RAM and Raid
1 data disks. The backup server is a PIII 450.
When we
Exchange 2000 SP3 on W2K SP3
Upgraded a number of Mac clients to the new Entourage.
Now when doing a send/receive, we get the following annoying dialogue
showing up as it gets roughly to the middle of the Public Folders. Never
saw it before with plain IMAP with Entourage 10.1.3 on the same
Mine've always been like that...
And all the other servers I ever looked at.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: OWA and the M:
Hi,
I stopped my IIS services recently on and
I'd think you'll have to solve this one with an attachment of some sort.
All the best,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5. juni 2003 15:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending emails that can not be altered
Due to Martha's
Neil have you tried exporting the Sellafield folder to a .pst, deleting
it from the PF tree and then letting Arcserver restore the whole folder?
All the best,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. juni 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Dunno why this bounced before... Here we go again.
Fwd:
No idea if it works, but it might be cheaper than hours spent setting up
a new server and recovering, depending on your environment and how
recoverable it is.
$850-$950
http://www.ontrack.com/special/0602pc1exchangead.asp
Set the speed of the adaptors and switches as described. If they don't
work at 100MBit try setting them to 10Mbit and see if that works for
reference sake.
If 100MBit doesn't work but 10MBit does, check the cabling and
associated wiring stuff (patch leads, sockets etc.) the *whole* way from
the
Requests to mail.bondyweb.com on port 25 just time out.
telnet mail.bondyweb.com 25
Connecting To mail.bondyweb.com...Could not open connection to the host
on port 25: Connect failed
Check your firewall, and any other things which could cause the
appropriate port to be blocked... Check also
Jonathan you don't mention it, but I assume you have set up the
appropriate recipient policies in Exchange System Manager i.e. added the
public domains which the Exchange server is hosting?
If the public email domains are different to the Exchange Server's
domain, it needs to know about it. If
I take my last post back.
Your DNS records are all screwed up.
Titaniumcouncil address goes nowhere, spectore.com goes to an iMail
server at colony1.net, which I presume isn't an Exchange server hacked
to look like an iMail server?
Making DNS work properly first would be a really good start...
I don't know if its any help, but the default install of Windows 2000 Server SP2
(International English) with a default install of Exchange 2000 Server SP2
(International English) results in OWA correctly displaying Danish, Swedish and
Norwegian special characters. You do not need the
Jerry first is replication. Depending on the size of your network and
your patience this can be a problem.
Have you tried domain/user or domain\user or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the
login?
One thing I was not aware of is that for a mailbox to be displayed, the
user has to have an email address
James writes;
But then they talk about how the IT guy is a dick etc.
Already had that happen.
If anyone finds a surefire way to avoid this happening, then they could be Very Rich
Very Quick (put me on the DL)...
All the best,
Andéjà vudy
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick,
James I guess it depends on your situation as well as best practices.
I've noticed no particular performance degredation with people having 1+ messages
in their inbox, or another folder [a là my Exchange List Archive folder...] when they
are running on a fast (LAN/10Mbit+) link.
Users
You are trolling, right?
Read this
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm
..any other questions, see the archives...
Leave it there, guys? Please?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 8. juli 2002 23:05
To: Exchange
Long shot, but...
Have had users with this or similar problems when running apps (SETI command line
comes to mind) which consmue 100% CPU at normal priority.
Not exactly sure why it happens [you can guess at my advised solution to this one
and the amount of time I haven't spent fixing it],
I have a problem which relates to some kind of Exchange/IIS/AD issues, and I was
wondering if anyone can help. Long post which might eliminate a bunch of have you
tried this questions or its a security issue statements.
The symptoms of the problem only appear when using OWA but I don't think
Mark asks:
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had
snip
on an FE server)
Mark we created a new organisation and did a mailbox migration.
The exchange orgs never knew about each other.
Now with one Front-end OWA box, all your users will need to
have at least one SMTP
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was
actually sent out...
where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into
it...)
Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre
You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh?
All the best,
Andy
PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get.
A
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton
Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was
actually sent out
: Andy Grafton
Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
Mark asks:
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had
snip
on an FE server)
Mark we created a new organisation and did a mailbox
migration
Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
We have a number of the x series that support that
configuration. Their RAID controllers are very unpredictable
and I can't believe the rate of disk failures.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton
Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound
messages. It is a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K
total size.
How about telling them that the in-flight magazine was wrong, and it
can't be done cheaply? It may be the future, but the future will upset
a lot of people
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes;
Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom of all list
posts instead of...Huh?...what's that?...Oh, I see... Never
mind then...
... Aha! but then it has to slip in between the most recent post and all
the other long posts alluding to, but not actually saying,
Ed asks;
Please share what RAID5e is.
More info:
http://www-5.ibm.com/pl/eserver/xseries/ulotki/psref-raidtech.pdf
Mind the wrap, mind the .pdf.
Andy
Creuna Danmark A/S
Snaregade 10
1205 København K
Denmark
Tel : +45 22 68 58 23
Fax : +45 70 20 72 42
Raid 5e AFAIK incorporates a hot spare into the array by striping unused
white space across the disks.
Makes for faster access times than a raid 5 array + hot spare as the
data is on more live spindles.
IBM proprietary.
Evil, evil, IBM.
All the best,
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
27 matches
Mail list logo
