Bekritsky Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
I have a PST larger than 2GB FWIW
www.slipstick.com
www.outlookcode.com
www.cdolive.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:21 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Electronic Forms
Subject: Electronic Forms
All,
We extensively use MS Electronic Forms/Forms
Exchange not configured to not permanently delete mailboxes when the
associated AD account is deleted. Wow, that kinda sucks. Someone might
want to change that setting back to the way it was out of the box.
-Original Message-
From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
It's not simply a question of access to the file if one wants to open it
offline using Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:53 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Converting OST to PST
Subject: RE: Converting OST to
Sounds like folder replication was not yet complete for the folder(s) in
question. PF replication is a lazy operation IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:33 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Public Folder
That's one of the reasons the FAQ recommends subscribing a public
folder...
PIMPCBO
-Original Message-
From: Reasoner, Bob (PHES) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:54 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: doubletake
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want
I have a PST larger than 2GB FWIW. Seems to work fine.
Yes, I'm mostly just being difficult.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:47 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003
IIRC there is no direct upgrade path from 5.5 to E2K3 and since SBS is a
single server version of Exchange, your upgrade path may be a tad bit
hairy ok, it seems at first blush your upgrade path will be
extremely hairy. See this doc for additional details:
Several of my customers who have users with lots of data (law firms and
financial services companies primarily, who also often have regulatory
reasons for keeping data as well) use products like Enterprise Vault
from KVS for long term archival storage. The cost of discovery against a
network share
Takes about 6 seconds to strip a password from a PST file which renders
them laughably insecure rather than useless. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:56 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
My retention policies and mailbox size limits are based on what I feel
are best for my organization (based on a lot of discussions and my mail
nazi instincts). Ask around, get input and feedback from users and
management and then make a proposal on storage and retention along with
projected growth
My general design plan (which may not be applicable here) is to worry
more about the storage group level. I'd design a SG with 4 private
information stores and create those databases at the outset. Then
through day to day operations, I distribute users over those storage
groups. I'd rather have 4
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Posted At: 07 January 2004 16:46
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2k3 store configs
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs
My general design plan (which may not be applicable here) is to worry
more
All other things being equal? The former.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, December 27, 2003 8:43 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
What is
Not hearsay, but long term experience with enterprise e-mail systems.
There is no QoS associated with e-mail. Upper management and business
process analysts don't like to think about that, or even admit that it
might be true.
When a DSN (Delivery status notification) or MDN (Message Delivery
www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: AS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Automatically update Calendars of users in Organisation?
Subject: Automatically update Calendars of users in Organisation?
Hi there
I
Unplugging your server from the internet works, and the results are
uniform, as opposed to the haphazard loss of legitimate mail one gets
with an RBL. Given corporate penchant for conformity, I can't imagine
why that option wouldn't go over well. Quack!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
This was an explicit design decision based on client feedback during the
beta. The overwhelming response was, that if I have rules touching my
mail, it is for a reason, don't treat it as spam. Unfortunately it
appears that you are in the minority on this one, it's unlikely that the
behavior you
www.slipstick.com has several suggestions including a custom form that
can be used.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Adding Calendar Dates
Subject: Adding Calendar Dates
I
Just to be semantically correct, POP servers don't receive mail, they
listen for client requests related to retrieving mail via a POP3 enabled
client. SMTP servers receive mail, they then either deliver it locally
or forward it to another host.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha
Send it on, I'll return it at my own expense once I am done lest one
consider that I took compensation in form of a free book and tainted my
review as a result.
Chris Scharff
9420 Research Blvd
Suite 330
Austin, TX 78759
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Are there 7 messages in the folder which are marked private?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:39 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 0 items, 7 unread
Subject: 0 items, 7 unread
My turn to ask stupid questions :)
If you right-click the folder and choose mark all as read, what happens?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:14 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 0 items, 7 unread
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
MDBVUE does not
I generally change the display name to reflect the new name, add an SMTP
address for the new name and then set it as the primary. Occassionally I
will change the alias as well, but generally only if I am renaming the
NT account (4.0) name.
-Original Message-
From: Pouncey, Mark
Really?
220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Serv
ice 5.5.2653.13) ready
ehlo foo.bar
250-postoffice02.aruplab.com Hello [216.30.136.98]
250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
250-ETRN
250-DSN
250-SIZE 5140480
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 AUTH=LOGIN
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK
Did you check the little box which says that this server normally
accepts mail for your domain? It's not an open relay if you use your
e-mail address and your mail server accepts mail for it... that is what
it is supposed to do. Your server 'fails' test 6, and as the testing
data indicates that
Between internal recipients or to/from the internet?
-Original Message-
From: Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:31 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Multiple Emails
Subject: Multiple Emails
Question:
We are on exchange 5.5 sp4/Nt 40. sp6, and we
Tried rebooting the box?
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:50:43 -0600
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Relaying On when Set to Off?
Very very odd. Before today we could have relay test sites
sobig.f
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:15:49 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mail relay
I have a few users that are being used as a mail relay. They get returned
mail from sites and other
Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add | mailbox
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook 2003) or Add to Outlook
bar in previous versions.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday,
: Shortcuts to other users folders
But make sure you have at least review rights to their mailbox or you won't
be able to browse it ;)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts
Journaling.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Staub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:03 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 questions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder?
Adam
Insufficient data.
-Original Message-
From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:13 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
Start | Settings | Control Panel | Add/Remove Programs | Microsoft
Outlook/Office | Select Outlook | Select CDO component | Click Next.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:54 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: install
The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and
slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings
Exchange will tell you in the tracking logs, if you have message tracking
enabled. Connecting from the Exchange server as James suggested is generally
faster than looking in logs.
From: Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003
Like most ISPs, apparently this one wouldn't know an RFC if it bit them in
the ass. The relevant portion of RFC821 is included below. If the box in
question was not supposed to accept inbound mail, it should issue a 500
series error. Likewise, listing as an Mx record a server which is not
intended
prezactly
From: Dean Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:41:18 +1200
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows
Is that quoted error message translated from Portuguese? Because a search on
that exact phrase on Google results in 0 hits and isn't one I've ever seen
with Exchange. If it is a translation, what was the original error message?
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange
I tried doing it briefly here on a dev machine, encountered some error,
got distracted and reburned the box...
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT: OfficeScan on Windows Server
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off topic
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain
under a master NT4 domain?
All Exchange servers are a member of a routing group. With only one
server you only have 1 routing group, so the server directly
communicates with all other servers in the routing group (e.g. itself).
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday,
MCS has a tool to do that I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:46 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Hey Guys,
Does anyone know if you can
Try uninstalling the AV software.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:06 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Been there, done that, disabled A/V on the server
-
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Try uninstalling the AV software.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday
Yeah, so I was thinking about what RFCs might be violated when I saw
your initial post... I'm not sure that any are violated by your SMTP
banner saying whatever the heck you want it to say There might be an
RFC that's violated y you saying helo foo.invalid.domain.com in an SMTP
conversation,
And in 5.5 IIRC this is built from the DNS suffix of the Exchange
server. I'm going to assume this is 5.5 on W2K and I believe that simply
by going to my computer | computer name | change | more - you can change
the DNS name to be whatever externally valid one you'd like.
But I'm going to go out
What's the best AV software?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
Those aren't relay failures, there's nothing to fix. They are (exclusively I
think) tests for other mail servers which at one point used to incorrectly
relay mail formatted like that. Exchange does not. My server 'fails' the
same tests. If you crank up logging on the SMTP conversation what
[1]I've sent such things though Exchange before... no problems in terms
of volume, but you may consider a majordomo or mailman (or similar) box
and a sub-domain of @lists.sanantonio.gov to manage such mailings.
[1] Hi Chris!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL
It's the city of San Antonio... they've got a couple of people
interested in what certain divisions of the city do. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:05 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mass Mailings
See if from your machine you can telnet on port 25 to any external mail
server (e.g. telnet mail.messageone.com 25). If you can't then see if
you can configure your Exchange server to forward to your ISP's mail
server. If you can... well, then we need to troubleshoot some more.
BTW, you can run
to avoid being blacklisted or
are there any other ways to get around this?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass Mailings
[1]I've sent such things though Exchange before
is delivering it. But isn't this a security breach, is there any patch or
something to control this by default.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
He's not relaying
Mailings
I wouldn't be so sure of that. I just received a rather unkind note from
my
ISP for a UCE blast that was sent out from here without my prior
knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange
-
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: Mass Mailings
No offense, you're not the city of San Antonio. The city of San Antonio
might send out unwanted mail admittedly[1], but UCE might
] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
#1 refers to Outlook 2000 SR2 or later. If you just install Outlook (run
all from my computer) from the Office 2000 CD you're good to go. #2 is
indeed in the SDK, I believe it is compiled though.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney (old) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday,
The mailbox management feature in 5.5 will allow you to set retention
policies, archiving of important e-mails is a quandary that may require
3rd party software.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:12
Grab a baseball bat and pay the user a visit.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:27 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mdeamon on my Network!
Subject: Mdeamon on my Network!
Hello there, I have E2k and W2k
I'm not exactly sure what those are, but if those contacts don't live in
your mailbox or a public folder there's no way for OWA to render them.
The Plus Pack 2000 product from MessageWare offers more contact related
functionality than any other 3rd party product I'm aware of.
Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from
subscribers to lists I post to. Not.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I don't think the problem was adding members to a DL, but rather getting
the appointment onto the calendars of new members automagically.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:25 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: reocurring
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from
subscribers to lists I post
Sorry, is mail backing up in the outbound queue or in the inbound queue?
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:29 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Subject: What causes mail to
Pfinfo and pfadmin from BORK will give you the information you are
looking for and more.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:02 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: How to retreive client permission on public folder
Subject:
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
restrictanonymous from 0 to 2
- disabled parent paths in IIS
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made
Ah outbound. OK, it's probably a problem with your McCrappy box then if
I understand your configuration correctly. Your IMS is configured to
forward all mail to a specific host and that host is the McCrappy box
correct? If that's the case, I believe that if you enable some verbose
logging you'll
OST isn't a service, it's a setting. When you enable offline folders it
asks for the location of the OST. When you click OK it checks for the
existence of the file and if it doesn't exist it asks if you want to
create it. Course that all changes with O2K3. :)
-Original Message-
From: Tony
Outlook will attempt to resolve through all lists provided as address lists,
but it will stop trying to resolve in the first address book that it finds a
match for (though it may report ambiguous resolution for names in other
lists). If the GAL is set as the first address book to be searched, it
A 3rd party product to sync a public contact folder to a personal folder
might meet the required objective. Personally, when my CEO tells me we have
a recurring meeting I add the event to my calendar so that I don't
double-book the timeslot.
:: Checks calendar :: Yep, it's still there.
One could
Hmm... Works fine for me. Did you substitute an actual mailbox name for
/mailbox/? What does one do once they look up a name in the GAL to actually
set the OOF?
Considered http://www.selisoft.com/en/oof/ ? Seems like a lot less work than
reinventing the wheel.
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL
to the OOO option. I'll probably just end up
making my own GAL find. Still cant figure out why its not working?
Thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:35 AM
]
Subject: RE: Calendar items show in OWA but not Outlook
Yes they do. I know that because I am one of them.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Do the users have mail delivery configured
Makes laptop use a little tough though.
From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Definitely more costly but it really works
Unless that font is plain text good luck. insert Ed truism here
From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:57:41 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Locking down exchange
This may sound
Eric is that you? If so, have you checked the 3+ years worth of archives you
have from this list?
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:05:07 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
need
to
work on to your local drive on the laptop.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Makes laptop use a little tough though
Do the users have mail delivery configured for the Exchange server?
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:31:42 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Calendar items show in OWA but not Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Items moving to deleted items folder
Uncheck the automatically process read receipts box.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto
Uncheck the automatically process read receipts box.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 2:23 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Items moving to deleted items folder
Subject: Items moving to deleted items folder
Outlook
Could have been a corrupt message in the conversion process which caused
the service to enter a bad state. Although if they are currently in the
MTA and not the IMS queue that precedes the conversion process hmm,
I imagine distribution list expansion was not working either (though you
may not
Use the terms anyways or irregardless in my presence and I'll
correct you once. Do it again and I'll just mock you.
And no, outside of a boxing ring, I haven't been punched in 15 years.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 19,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Use the terms anyways or irregardless in my presence and I'll
correct you once. Do it again and I'll
There is no M: drive.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:38 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Subject: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Hello All.
I
There is no M: drive.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:46 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Why is it there
This crap stops now. Take it offline or STFU. Martin doesn't want this
list degenerating into flame wars. Gary, you're just as likely to get
moderated as Samantha at this point. Don't make me log into yahoo and
baby-sit this morning, I've got too much else to do.
-Original Message-
From:
Oh wait... this is the swynk list. Nevermind. Carry on.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:29 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
This crap
Yes, you did get an answer on the M: drive. There isn't one. Ignore it.
There's absolutely nothing useful you could do or learn from it with
regards to troubleshooting. The only things you could do with the M:
drive would be to break things even further.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges,
File based AV software snagging Exchange logs?
-Original Message-
From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:20 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: problem w/ an incremental backup
Subject: problem w/ an incremental backup
EventID: 0x01CB (459) -
If it were at all possible, I'd try to do an upgrade in the existing
organization to avoid this problem altogether. Barring that,
Slipstick[1] has the best compiled set of resources on the subject of
profile modification. Modprof might be a good tool for you if you are
running O2K.
[1]
You're just jealous.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: special question for you
Subject: Re: special question for you
a very special question for you and 4000 of your friends...
-
MessageLabs
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:49 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)
Subject: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)
Do you know
IIRC the reroute via store option may have some effect on the ability to
scan bridgehead traffic. For my org, pricing for most Exchange AV
products has historically been per seat rather than per server. YMMV
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday,
]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:59:10 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14
?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
VPN works just great here.
From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a
compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari
Antigen implementation to coincide with our next infrastructure upgrade.
IMO FWIW YMMV
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange
Probably not... Extending the schema well ahead of time is actually a good
idea as it will allow for replication to complete prior to installation. I'd
recommend going to E2K3 though at this point if at all possible.
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to ask that a fresh install of a supported OS, fully patched
using their supported methods, would allow me to install their flagship office
productivity tools in a straightforward manner.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Wednesday
1 - 100 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
