RE: 70-224 Study Materials
Of course, posting questions there from the exam would be in direct violation of the NDA signed (clicked) at the time of taking the exam. William -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials And don't forget to browse thru 90% of the actual test questions/answers at http://www.mcsebraindumps.com/ (sad to say this). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials When I read the Sybex 70-224 book last year, I noticed quite a few errors. Not all massive errors, but some confusing ones nonetheless. Sybex themselves couldn't even get a response from the author! You might like to check out their web site and look under the Errata section for that book, as hopefully they might have updated things by now. Personally I quite like the MS Press books for both 70-224 and 225. Neil -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 January 2002 19:42 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: 70-224 Study Materials Subject: 70-224 Study Materials I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later this year. I have already purchased the Sybex Study Guide (ISBN 078212898X). If it is as good as the Exchange 5.5 Study Guide was, then that may be all I really need. However, I wondered if anyone might point me toward anything else they found exceptionally beneficial. I am keenly interested in something which, although geared toward the exam, will provide total knowledge and be a valuable resource afterwards. I have no interest in a paper certification (like one might get using Exam Cram type materials). Thank you. Steven A. Christensen Network Engineer MCSE on Windows 2000 MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0 Server+, i-Net+, Network+, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 70-224 Study Materials
The same way that alt.binaries.transcender.exams does I guess? I don't see many people using their real name or email address in this forum. I would rather trust the fine folks in this forum with some questions. Some of the people here were involved in writing the questions and testing the betas for the exam. Who are you going to trust? Some guy named 'darthvader2'? The link 'submit a dump' does make me laugh... William -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials So how does a site like that stay active? I would think Microsoft or someone would be able to shut them down. It seems like it devalues certification. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials Of course, posting questions there from the exam would be in direct violation of the NDA signed (clicked) at the time of taking the exam. William -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials And don't forget to browse thru 90% of the actual test questions/answers at http://www.mcsebraindumps.com/ (sad to say this). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials When I read the Sybex 70-224 book last year, I noticed quite a few errors. Not all massive errors, but some confusing ones nonetheless. Sybex themselves couldn't even get a response from the author! You might like to check out their web site and look under the Errata section for that book, as hopefully they might have updated things by now. Personally I quite like the MS Press books for both 70-224 and 225. Neil -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 January 2002 19:42 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: 70-224 Study Materials Subject: 70-224 Study Materials I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later this year. I have already purchased the Sybex Study Guide (ISBN 078212898X). If it is as good as the Exchange 5.5 Study Guide was, then that may be all I really need. However, I wondered if anyone might point me toward anything else they found exceptionally beneficial. I am keenly interested in something which, although geared toward the exam, will provide total knowledge and be a valuable resource afterwards. I have no interest in a paper certification (like one might get using Exam Cram type materials). Thank you. Steven A. Christensen Network Engineer MCSE on Windows 2000 MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0 Server+, i-Net+, Network+, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
Still depends. Number of users? Number of servers? Locations (different cities?)? Connectivity between servers? Etc... I think it is a two step process. AD, then E2K. AD should have a disaster recovery plan in place and tested before the next step. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
As others have intimated, it is not an easy assessment through a forum like this. As Ed stopped short of saying, perhaps a call to Compaq might be in order. Do they do estimates? I will almost always favour the patient, methodical, testing and retesting, documenting mode. I would deploy a two-step strategy there. The AD deployment first. Connecting Exchange5.5 using ADC. Then plan E2K. But that's me. There's that axiom about: Cheap, Fast, Well done: You get to choose two. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition William, We are looking at roughly 100 total servers in the domain. Right now in our current NT 4.0 domain, we have our server room with the majority of our servers, about a dozen servers 45 miles away, connected by a fiber backbone. Approximately a dozen T-1's terminate in our server room for various locations on this site and we have (I believe) 3 microwave connections coming off of the end of the backbone, 45 miles away. All connections between servers is either fiber or 100 mbps switched. Couple of Linux print servers with a dozen people on them, sitting at the end of a couple of T-1's. Jim -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Still depends. Number of users? Number of servers? Locations (different cities?)? Connectivity between servers? Etc... I think it is a two step process. AD, then E2K. AD should have a disaster recovery plan in place and tested before the next step. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess it might be helpful.
But does it need its own KB article? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 70-224 Study Materials
The MSPress book isn't bad. Bill English and Linda Vittori. William -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 70-224 Study Materials I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later this year. I have already purchased the Sybex Study Guide (ISBN 078212898X). If it is as good as the Exchange 5.5 Study Guide was, then that may be all I really need. However, I wondered if anyone might point me toward anything else they found exceptionally beneficial. I am keenly interested in something which, although geared toward the exam, will provide total knowledge and be a valuable resource afterwards. I have no interest in a paper certification (like one might get using Exam Cram type materials). Thank you. Steven A. Christensen Network Engineer MCSE on Windows 2000 MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0 Server+, i-Net+, Network+, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard
Assuming we are in Corporate/workgroup mode, it really depends on the rule. Certain parameters within rules may require client-side information to fire, and therefor reside client-side and depend on Outlook to be open. I have many rules that are based on header information and are server-side and do not require the client. There is a limit of 32k for server side rules (limited to one RDP packet) after which subsequent rules will be client-side as well. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard Hello, Please pardon my ignorance, but when rules are created using the Rules Wizard, and mail comes in fitting a rule, does this take place directly on the server - whether or not the user is logged on via Outlook 2000? Or is this performed on the Client Side, when the user fires up their Outlook 2000, and they go to check their e-mail? The present configuration I am referring to, is only Exchange Support and no Internet. Thank you for any information offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
I believe you still get the error, but it will install. I am certainly open to correction. William -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
That doesn't stop me from wondering. I think my server would pass out from exhaustion. (Your post is another keeper, I'd say) William -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MDBDATA Log Files The issue is not compressing; it is assumed this would be a lengthy job and would be done off-hours. The problem is with manipulating the compressed file. When a request to open a file is passed to NTFS and the file system finds that the file is compressed it will decompress as much of that file as possible into memory. This is all well and good if you're working on a Word document that will get some changes (usually to the end of the file) and be saved back to looked at another time for a total size of maybe a few megs. But for a 12G database that is constantly being read and written to at many different locations, and constantly, this unraveling of the compressed file will kill performance as the CPU gets maxed out uncompressing multiple locations of this file into memory(1). The disks get thrashed as well while the system asks for more and more free physical memory forcing page faults(2)(3). Overall, compressing a database file being accessed hundreds, of not thousands, of times a minute with a file size well beyond physical memory (if you're uncompressing the file into VM you're losing even more time) is just not a good idea. The log files, on the other hand, are a different story. Each one exists in memory being written to an address with a pre-allocated size of 5M(4). As that memory allocation is used up, the entire chunk is written to a file and the file handle is closed(5). Exchange will not read this file again except in certain circumstances(6) so once closed the file will stay closed. Thus one would think that compressing the log files would be a good move to save disk space. Or would it? Most organizations I know who do backups(7) do them nightly. Since this wipes the logs off the drive we need only look at some numbers for a single day's worth of transactions. Assume an organization that moves, say, ten thousand messages a day through a given server. Each message has an average size of 50K. Allowing 5% for overhead (which is a number I picked just to keep the numbers even) this yields an average of 1,075,253,760 or just a bit over 1gig. The NTFS encryption algorithm is relatively efficient(8) and will largely depend on the data being compressed (9) A file of nothing but 01010101 repeating over and over will compress wonderfully (10) but although it is possible for there to be blocks of such patterns overall the file's data structure will be complex and somewhat random. At best I'd say expect 30% compression. Even giving it the benefit of the doubt and saying 40% yields a diskspace savings of about 400M. And brother, if you're sweating 400M on your server, you need to add another drive to the array or increase your budget. (1) unless you have a server with 12G, that is (2) writing pages of memory to the swapfile (3) disk access is high overhead, reading the file into memory such that more disk access is forced doubles the overhead resulting in a noticeably performance hit (4) I don't know why 5M was chosen; I guess it was just as good as 4 or 6 megs (5) for the purists: the current edb.log file is renamed to edbthe next sequential hex number and the new log file is named edb.log (6) all of them having to do with disaster recovery and, at that point, diskspaceis the least of your worries (7) ahem (8) it's a trade-off between efficiency and performance (9) if you are curious you may wish to run your own tests since each installation and deployment will have its own traffic flow characteristics (10) like PKZip the algorithm largely depends on repeating pattern substitution(11) (11) meaning the software attempts to find repeating pattersn of multiple subpatterns (12) and replace it with a single pattern (12) such as the word the which can be replaced with one character resulting in savings of 66.6%(13) (13) this is a purposely simple example to illustrate the mechanism(14) (14) Hi Sherry! - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:31 PM Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wonder how long it would take to compress say a 12GB priv.edb? William -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MDBDATA Log Files compress log files, yes. compress databases, no. Just clarifying - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:00 PM Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files You could, in an emergency, compress some of the log files with NTFS compression
RE: adding exchange
On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
When you run setup on the new box, AND the first exchange server is available, you have the options of: -creating a new org and site -joining an org in a new site -joining an org and site. Follow the steps. William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange no with another server -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
My favourite cluster deployment is single-node - Ed Crowley I assume that to be an active cluster. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange Pro: Con: Tener is thinking of clustering as well. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: address generators
Exchange Admin Configuration--SiteAddressing--SiteAddressing Deselect cc: mail William -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: address generators How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5? Bill Klosa SC Electric Company Chicago,IL. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT
listserve for Active Directory: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm William -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT Has anybody seen an error like this? The assignment of application Microsoft Visio Professional 2002 [English] from policy Corporate-Visio-2002-Assigned failed. The error was : The group policy framework should call the extension in the synchronous foreground policy refresh And does anyone know of a good List Serve for Active Directory? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
It is *probably* normal. Possibly not though. Do not 'move' them. Do another online backup. William -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
You could, in an emergency, compress some of the log files with NTFS compression. They compress fairly well. This should not be the practice though. William -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Thanks for the vote of confidence. I planned on using PerfWiz to make the move, circular logging is Not enabled and I schedule a full backup every night. I missed one day of backing up due to a failed tape causing the drive to fill. I don't have much room for error because of the small partition. Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1]. Especially since when perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to the database anyways. But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order. I don't recommend deleting the logfiles until a good backup [2]. S. [1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant move the logfiles he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP* -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Forward to an external pop account
Do you mean like section 3.32: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm William -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward to an external pop account Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how to do the following: All mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the best way to do this. I want all mail sent from the outside world and internally to go to the outside pop account. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder limits
Certainly. From the public folder properties tab in Exchange admin, select the limits tab. Here you can control the maximum size of the folder, when you are warned about the size. You also can set the deleted item retention and the age limit for items within the folder. Have a boo. Ya. William -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how does it work ?. Thanks in advance. Jaspal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I wonder how long it would take to compress say a 12GB priv.edb? William -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MDBDATA Log Files compress log files, yes. compress databases, no. Just clarifying - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:00 PM Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files You could, in an emergency, compress some of the log files with NTFS compression. They compress fairly well. This should not be the practice though. William -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Thanks for the vote of confidence. I planned on using PerfWiz to make the move, circular logging is Not enabled and I schedule a full backup every night. I missed one day of backing up due to a failed tape causing the drive to fill. I don't have much room for error because of the small partition. Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1]. Especially since when perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to the database anyways. But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order. I don't recommend deleting the logfiles until a good backup [2]. S. [1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant move the logfiles he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP* -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder limits
Yes, you will have to act on the warnings, sorry. :o( (I probably wasn't clear there). William -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits William, Thanks for your reply. I am trying to set up a public folder hierarchy for a Department in our company but want to ensure that they do not go overboard by creating large folders and sending huge mails that will have an adverse impact on the WAN. Therefore I am trying to restrict the size of public folder hierarchy and also the size of an individual message that can be posted on the public folder. Though I have set the limits on the public folder, all that it does is send a warning message and that too is not a correct one!. It does not do anything else. To restrict the size of messages I have created a rule using the public folder assistant that restricts any message that exceeds a particular limit to be posted to the public folder. Is this the best way to achieve this or is there any other way ?. Will the limits apply only to the top level folder or to all folders below that ?. Jaspal -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits Certainly. From the public folder properties tab in Exchange admin, select the limits tab. Here you can control the maximum size of the folder, when you are warned about the size. You also can set the deleted item retention and the age limit for items within the folder. Have a boo. Ya. William -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how does it work ?. Thanks in advance. Jaspal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user
Conversion at the server can add up to 40% (approx) to the message size. William -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The message being sent exceeds the message size established for t his user Hi All, I am getting the bellow error when trying to attach a 1.4 mb Excel sheet to an email in outlook 98. Both the Sender and reviver have a mail limit size of 2100KB on your exchange server (NT4.0 EXCHsvr 5.5 SP'd). The message being sent exceeds the message size established for this user Why is the message popping up? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on
Why would you ask privately offline if you were going to take the responses back to a public forum? William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Mr. Lefkovics / Dr. Dogg, When I send an e-mail to an address I know to be on the DL in question, it should just disappear, without any notification to me or the postmaster, correct? Instead, when I send to an address on that DL, I get the following error message from the System Administrator account: From: System Administrator Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:09 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Undeliverable: Test Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:Test Sent: 1/15/2002 11:09 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/15/2002 11:09 AM Unable to complete the expansion of a distribution list The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=HANFORD;l=ERCEX06-020115190847Z-31857 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:ERC:ERCEX06 1. The name of the DL is DL-ERC-Deleted Accounts 2. The DL has no SMTP addy of its own. 3. The DL is hidden from the GAL. 4. It is set to expand on any server in the site. 5. It is set to accept from all and not reject anyone. 6. No one but me has permissions to it. 7. It's not on any other DL's. 8. There are no members in this DL. 9. It only has 10 SMTP addys associated with it. 10. None of the addy's exist anywhere else. Thanks for the help. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:12 PM To: Blunt, James H (Jim); '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization LOL! How did I get in there? No NDR should be returned if the SMTP alias is typed correctly. And no error message should be returned. At least not in my Exchange5.5 experience regarding this. I haven't read this thread (sorry) but I'd log into hotmail or something and send to this person and review the NDR. Praise be to Allah. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:09 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Hey Dr. Dogg, Got a question on that little NDR thingee... I implemented that little DL tip as well, when I saw that on the list...and it IS hidden. Since then, I have gotten an NDR for an employee that left. In that NDR, directly in the To... list was the name of the new, hidden DL. The DL has no SMTP addy of it's own now, thanks to Chris Scharff's tip yesterday and it has NEVER been used to send an e-mail out. However, is it POSSIBLE (maybe not probable) that when the message comes in for the SMTP addy in the DL and it tries to send to the blank list, that at that point it sends an error (not an NDR) message back to the originator, with the DL name in the e-mail??? To read the full thread yesterday, look under OWA Enumeration Question. TIA, James H (Jim) Blunt Network / Microsoft Exchange Admin. Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization The box is a Dual Xeon 550 Compaq server with an External RAID array. I get that too. Takes me a few minutes to load the admin mail box. Then there are about 2000 new NDR'S and such in there every day when I load it. That box hates me. But thanks to Mr. Lefkovics that is getting better. paste NDR's By William Lefkovics The black hole is to create a DL that has multiple SMTP addresses of ex-employees, but make sure there's no members in the DL. Messages sent to the relevant SMTP addresses simply vanish. Shame you can't put a few selected people into the DL as well. :-) /paste Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saul Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange Box? I am running 1gMhz, with 1g Ram, for about 200 users, and I still get Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Share your secret on how you do that? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: E2K SP2
Since you severed the thread and my memory sucks, I say just read the sp2 deployment whitepaper and just dew it! I give sp2, two thumbs up. William -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K SP2 Does any one have any final comments on upgrading to SP2? I figure I'll just do it, no need for backups or more importantly a disaster recovery plan. Thnaks, -John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
eChrist! -Original Message- From: Fabrig, Amado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I'm using emanger from trend. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15-Jan-02 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
I have not had this eXPerience. The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs. I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no Are you sure? question. William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
Mr Dogg. Is Nate your son? http://www.dogg-foundation.fr.st/ -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance. You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once every 3 days. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have not had this eXPerience. The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs. I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no Are you sure? question. William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional
Absolutely. William -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional A customer is asking me if IIS of W2K pro can handle OWA ??? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond
Digital Press. ISBN # 1-8-224-9 William -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond Dear DL Members, All I need is a part number and I am getting the book. What is the part number for Tony's book (see history below)? Publisher / ISBN Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam software
If you purchase the two year license of Antigen, you get all the upgrades in that period. Now, I get a couple of filter replies to posts (probably from not removing Andy David's comments from the thread first) each day it seems. I am now setting up an Antigen and Scanmail rule to toast these. They are worse than SPAM! William -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software The next version of Antigen will have content filtering in it. You may want to just wait and spend money on the UG (if it isn't free) -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection. I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you know, it's pretty inefficient. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help on getting user's .pst files into the Exchange Server
Either exmerge or a document telling users how to drag and drop. William -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help on getting user's .pst files into the Exchange Server Hello, I searched Technet quite extensively, and I am swimming in the ocean of information that came up. Everything I find, seems just short of what I need. I even searched the archives with no avail. Up to this point, our POP3 clients have been retrieving their mail from the server, and storing everything in their personal .pst file on their workstations. My goal is to move / import all of their .pst files, into the message store on the Exchange 2000 Server. We are under the gun to centrally store everyone's mail, in order to get the collaboration stuff working. Is there a built-in utility (either GUI based or command line) that I can use to accomplish this? Thank you in advance for any information offered. Mike P.S. If this post appears twice, I am sorry - I didn't see my own post last night - so I am resending it this morning. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Top 10 Swynk Exchange quotes for 2001
I have a list of about 200+ quotes from 2001. Many are taken out of context. Some were amusing to me at the time I read them. None are intended to offend. All are part of a public forum. I will put the rest on a website later. 10) What does your email administrator say about this? - Kim Cameron, January 17, 2001 9) It's funny how pissy everyone gets on this list. I'm loving it!! - John Bowles, July 24, 2001 8) I'll blow that horn, Daniel!! - Michèle Sharik, September 18, 2001 7) For the record, I said nothing quotable this year, and I specifically didn't say anything quotable about any 'valued and respected Microsoft partners'. - Chris Scharff, December 28, 2001 6) What is wrong with being a smartass? - Milton R Dogg, December 14, 2001 5) Your server is suffering from the Broke A$$ $hit syndrome... - Don Ely, November 30, 2001 4) I love you all - Missy Koslosky, September 13, 2001 3) Just say no to FAT. - Andy Webb, January 22, 2001 2) Do you use Outlook? - Vicki Ewart, August 22, 2001 and the number one 1) SMTP is EVERYTHING - Ed Crowley, July 27, 2001 Happy New Year. William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken.
Hehe -Original Message- From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:18 AM To: 'Lefkovics, William' Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Lefkovics, William Subject = Top 10 Swynk Exchange quotes for 2001 Delivery Time = January 09, 2002 (Wednesday) 12:17:43 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pst2gb.exe - does anybody have this?
RE: in another language. William -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pst2gb.exe - does anybody have this? what is this AW in front of the message subjects? does anyone know? -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: pst2gb.exe - does anybody have this? Download at: http://www.metrocast.net/~scott/pst2gb/ Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 16:15 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: pst2gb.exe - does anybody have this? If anyone has this utility for cropping pst files I would greatly appreciate it. I don't know why you have to contact Microsoft support to get this thing - I imagine its free. If anyone could sen it to me that would be great. If anyone has any suggestions concerning how to uncorrupt a corrupted pst file that would be great too! Thanks in advance, John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC originator
Yes. Yes, you are missing something. Section 3.39: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm and RFC2822 William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC originator I believe I have closed my mail server: smtp.actv.com from relaying, however whenever I go into the IMS queues, I am still seeing messages with originator with destination another host. What is up with this, am I missing something? Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
I did find a photo of Ed on the can. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Should I be concerned that photos of the lovely Kelly belly dancing led to this question?[1] ;-) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com [1] I too have met Ed.[2] [2] He wasn't belly dancing at the time.[3] [3] Neither was I.[4] [4] Kelly's whereabouts at the time are unaccounted for. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Anyone ever wondered what Ed Crowley looks like? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2002 10:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: fix monitor That would be her... - Original Message - From: Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:01 AM Subject: RE: fix monitor Is this pictures of you Kelly? http://kellyborndale.homestead.com/photo.html Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC originator
They will still appear for standard, valid NDR's as well. William -Original Message- From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC originator So I should ignore those if they are not causing any other problem? I have followed all the suggested reccomendations regarding relaying. Rich -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC originator That is your server NDRing the attempted relays back to the spammers. Since spammers tend to use bogus addresses those messages will likely timeout after three days as undeliverable. - Original Message - From: Siegel, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:18 PM Subject: IMC originator I believe I have closed my mail server: smtp.actv.com from relaying, however whenever I go into the IMS queues, I am still seeing messages with originator with destination another host. What is up with this, am I missing something? Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC originator
Then Andy David's practice applies. :o) Delete. William -Original Message- From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC originator Ok, but they should not be sending ndr's in response to notification messages is my point. If relaying disabled, messages that are 'spoofed' should not generate an NDR in my opinion. I mean, why should it send and fail send and fail to hosts that don't exist just to say, 'invalid host' or relaying prohibited or am I missing something? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC originator They will still appear for standard, valid NDR's as well. William -Original Message- From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC originator So I should ignore those if they are not causing any other problem? I have followed all the suggested reccomendations regarding relaying. Rich -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC originator That is your server NDRing the attempted relays back to the spammers. Since spammers tend to use bogus addresses those messages will likely timeout after three days as undeliverable. - Original Message - From: Siegel, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:18 PM Subject: IMC originator I believe I have closed my mail server: smtp.actv.com from relaying, however whenever I go into the IMS queues, I am still seeing messages with originator with destination another host. What is up with this, am I missing something? Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
By memory, no doubt. ;) William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I can think of worse things to have thrown in my face. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Whenever I go there folks look at my name and I get a slew of cajun thrown in my face. - Original Message - From: K. Triona Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) At 10:39 AM 1/9/2002 -0600, WILLIAMS,JESSICA D wrote: Having just moved to Louisiana three years ago I quickly discovered that nothing here is pronounced as it is spelled. They also like to think the word go is spell geaux. Geaux figure. I'm Louisianan by marriage (Midwesterner by birth)... Guidrys and Landrys are about as common down there as cypress trees. You can tell people who really live there because they can correctly pronounce things like Natchitoches. It's taken years but I'm finally to the point where I don't sound like a tourist when I visit. Fortunately I took years of French in school or phrases like mais yeah would throw me. Also, verb conjugation is weird... y'all is singular, all y'all is plural, and they have a host of special words and phrases all their own (like lagniappe). - K. Triona Guidry Guidry Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.guidryconsulting.com A girl's gotta have her standards. -- Real Genius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4
You might consider just installing the Exchange admin on the remote workstation. Or perhaps ADSI can return the data required. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Hi all. I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with? I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the attachments. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Book
I have some Exchange books clustered on my bookshelf. The whitepapers on the Microsoft site are not bad. What consulting service have you chosen to use for this deployment? If unselected, may I recommend Scharff and Associates? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Book Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I tried it January 1999. But I didn't inhale. William -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recipients
LOL! William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP --- 101 Uses for a Titanium Seatpost? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients It depends. http://www.google.com/search?num=50hl=enq=exchange+%22maximum+number+of+re cipients%22 Paul Oooh, Titanium! A New StIcK, thanks to William's Lefkovics' sig... http://www.airborne.net/eready/janette/store/compdetail.asp?sku=AB-SP-RD-300 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recipients Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is it unlimited. My impression is that the max is 254 is this true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions
1) Exchange2000 is 'self-tuning' (Is that Scharff laughing?). There is no performance optimiser, though third parties may be testing something similar. 2) Exchange5.x uses its own directory services. The directory database was stored in a file called dir.edb. Exchange2000 does not maintain its own directory, but rather leverages the power and benefits of Active Directory. Exchange information is now across all domain controllers and accessible using ADSI or GUIs for AD. 3) Exchange2000 seems to believe the admin/installer is capable of assessing drive optimisation. Standard database and transaction log location follow setups as they were in 5.x. 4) The M:\ drive is there for IFS. However, I think it should not be visible by default as this has caused more problems than benefit. It also may not be there in future releases. Not many people are using IFS correctly. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_es dk_arch_win2k_ntfsifs.asp William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Basic Exchange 2K questions Hello, Are there any articles out there that explain why there are such radical changes since Exchange 5.x - 2000? For example, maybe all of you can shed some light on 3 questions: 1. In 5.x - part of the install was a performance test of the system and all the hard drives - and it would suggest or let you specify where the message store and log files should go. 2. Why is Active Directory such a huge component of Exchange 2000 functioning? 3. Why the heck does most of the data reside on a single drive by default? This question sort of reverts back to question #1 - and it just seems silly for the install process to not want to take advantage of multiple volumes, for performance reasons. 4. What's up with this M Drive? I know it's a virtual drive, but it's just such an odd way for storing data. Especially when you are trying to view the contents of the M Drive - you can only do it inside of Explorer, or Browsing through Folders. If you try to expand the tree inside of the IIS Utility, it gives an error of not being able to list all the subdirectories. It's just plain weird. Thank you ALL so much for your answers - Best Regards, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions
Several of the people here have written or contributed to those books. This forum will compliment your reading. William -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions Thanks everyone for your input - I just ordered every book under the sun for EX2K from Amazon - so I hope once I read through all of them, I will have a deeper understanding of how this whole thing works. Most of the issues, is me being out of the Exchange loop for so long, but I always admired Exchange - but was always scared off by it's complexity. But now, I simply cannot ignore it's wonderful features any longer - and it's time to jump back on the wagon once again. I am still getting nothing but 'Access Denied' through the OWA and am ready to bash my head into a wall soon - if I can't get this crazy thing working soon. Are there any articles that cover this topic in depth? Arghh! Thanks - Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions 1) Exchange2000 is 'self-tuning' (Is that Scharff laughing?). There is no performance optimiser, though third parties may be testing something similar. 2) Exchange5.x uses its own directory services. The directory database was stored in a file called dir.edb. Exchange2000 does not maintain its own directory, but rather leverages the power and benefits of Active Directory. Exchange information is now across all domain controllers and accessible using ADSI or GUIs for AD. 3) Exchange2000 seems to believe the admin/installer is capable of assessing drive optimisation. Standard database and transaction log location follow setups as they were in 5.x. 4) The M:\ drive is there for IFS. However, I think it should not be visible by default as this has caused more problems than benefit. It also may not be there in future releases. Not many people are using IFS correctly. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_es dk_arch_win2k_ntfsifs.asp William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Basic Exchange 2K questions Hello, Are there any articles out there that explain why there are such radical changes since Exchange 5.x - 2000? For example, maybe all of you can shed some light on 3 questions: 1. In 5.x - part of the install was a performance test of the system and all the hard drives - and it would suggest or let you specify where the message store and log files should go. 2. Why is Active Directory such a huge component of Exchange 2000 functioning? 3. Why the heck does most of the data reside on a single drive by default? This question sort of reverts back to question #1 - and it just seems silly for the install process to not want to take advantage of multiple volumes, for performance reasons. 4. What's up with this M Drive? I know it's a virtual drive, but it's just such an odd way for storing data. Especially when you are trying to view the contents of the M Drive - you can only do it inside of Explorer, or Browsing through Folders. If you try to expand the tree inside of the IIS Utility, it gives an error of not being able to list all the subdirectories. It's just plain weird. Thank you ALL so much for your answers - Best Regards, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recipients
Did you find a picture of Chris canoeing through his living room? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients I was just doing a search on google for max recipients and I found Chris Scharff name. Ben: For those of you feeling a bit disoriented, please sit down, have a sip of water, and meet Jim McBee, our new Exchange Pro. Chris Scharff had other obligations taking up his time so he had to step away, and Jim's been good enough to slide into his seat. http://www.devx.com/premier/mgznarch/exchange/2001/10oct01/ap0110/ap0110.asp -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Yes, there is a theoritical maximum. It exceeds 254 by just a tad unless the server has been modified to set that as the maximum limit. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recipients Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is it unlimited. My impression is that the max is 254 is this true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recipients
Yes. Yes he does. He specialises in tings. You will do well to read every single Chris Scharff post to this forum. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Who is Chris Scharff? Must know alot of tings -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Did you find a picture of Chris canoeing through his living room? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients I was just doing a search on google for max recipients and I found Chris Scharff name. Ben: For those of you feeling a bit disoriented, please sit down, have a sip of water, and meet Jim McBee, our new Exchange Pro. Chris Scharff had other obligations taking up his time so he had to step away, and Jim's been good enough to slide into his seat. http://www.devx.com/premier/mgznarch/exchange/2001/10oct01/ap0110/ap0110.asp -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Yes, there is a theoritical maximum. It exceeds 254 by just a tad unless the server has been modified to set that as the maximum limit. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recipients Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is it unlimited. My impression is that the max is 254 is this true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recipients
Do they make ties that compliment floral Hawaiian shirts? William -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Great, he quotes me and praises Chris. No respect at all, I tell ya. adjusting tie -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients I was just doing a search on google for max recipients and I found Chris Scharff name. Ben: For those of you feeling a bit disoriented, please sit down, have a sip of water, and meet Jim McBee, our new Exchange Pro. Chris Scharff had other obligations taking up his time so he had to step away, and Jim's been good enough to slide into his seat. http://www.devx.com/premier/mgznarch/exchange/2001/10oct01/ap0 110/ap0110.asp -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recipients Yes, there is a theoritical maximum. It exceeds 254 by just a tad unless the server has been modified to set that as the maximum limit. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recipients Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is it unlimited. My impression is that the max is 254 is this true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 - POP IMAP banners?
I don't think that is accessible in Exchange5.x. William -Original Message- From: Ed Smits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 - POP IMAP banners? Is it possible to change the default banners in Exchange 5.5? A search through MS turns up zip, but with Exch. 2000 there are a few solutions, including How to Modify the POP or IMAP Banner (Q303513). However, this article does state that it is for 2000 only and contains the fateful words If necessary, you can now change this banner, i.e. you couldn't before... Anyone have any ideas on this or actually done it on 5.5? Many thanks. Ed Smits _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Keep mail in server
If by 'useing (sic) Exchange in PST mode' you mean using POP3 to access email, then there still might be a setting on the POP client allowing for a copy of said email to remain on the server. William -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Keep mail in server Maybe he's useing Exchange in PST mode... -- Drew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Winzenz Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Keep mail in server Can you rephrase what you are wanting to do? You don't keep a copy of a mailbox on the server. It's either there, or it isn't. However, you can set up clients to use offline folders, which will download a copy of the contents of their mailbox, or whatever you specify, to a local folder. But as others will probably say, we need more information. Speak up, man! Say exactly what you are trying to accomplish. Specifics. The more the merrier. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: James Liao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Keep mail in server I have a question. How can I keep a copy of each user's mailbox,and not allowed user to download mail but look it on the web(keep in server)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda
You're kidding, right? I am so glad I'm not Yoda. William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from a troll to a Yoda Can any Yoda tell me what this error or NDR means. I have seen about 8 of them today. 1.) A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Too many recipients in the mail, should less than 100 The message that caused this notification was: 2.) A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 12107454 bytes exceeds server limit of 512 The message that caused this notification was: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: getting data from priv.edb
An I concur with the cabin-dwelling northwesterner famous for adminning exchange from his PDA whilst immersed in bubbling hot tub behind his cabin in the woods. William -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: getting data from priv.edb I second what the Californian git says. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: getting data from priv.edb That was a little quick, but that is what you should do. You are in serious trouble right now. The best thing you could do is put up the $250 and get this done right. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: getting data from priv.edb Call PSS -Original Message- From: Lewis Kapell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: getting data from priv.edb Sorry if this message is a duplicate; I tried sending it before but I'm not sure if it went through. My company uses Exchange 5.5 with less than 100 users. One of the drives on the server went down and the directory (dir.edb) was lost. We have no backups (yes, I know, shame on us). My question is, can the data (the users' saved messages) be extracted from priv.edb? I ran isinteg -pri -dump, and the result contained a section titled Dump of the mailbox table, with entries for each mailbox in our site. For each mailbox there are about 14 lines of information, followed by a line saying: Error: 1 database retrieve error on current record. Can anyone tell me what this error means? Should I be seeing individual mail messages in this dump file? Is there any other way I can extract my user's messages from this file? Thanks for any help. Lewis Kapell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greetings All
Ask on any version. There are people here that supported 4.0. William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP, WLKMMAS, etc. --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Greetings All Hello, I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for several years now, on the Swynk website. Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange? Is that true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K? Thanks in advance, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another CA Problem
Hopefully they'll improve that pathetic, lame interface. William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP, WLKMMAS, etc. --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Cause Antigen scans with multiple engines :) In response to the why anything but Trend thing. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Bowles, John L. | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/02/2002 12:24 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Another CA Problem | --- -| I don't get it, and I'm hoping someone would fill me in, why would anyone use anything other than ScanMail on their Exchange systems? ScanMail has been nothing but a lifesaver for me and my company. Is there something out there that's even better than that product? I know this isn't the response you wanted to hear but I would toss that CA software right in the garbage and go out and purchase TrendMicro ScanMail. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation point. It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually install any CA product on your systems. They function best if the shrink wrap is left unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed any CA products on your systems, I've found that reformatting your system is the only way to truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall processes never works. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another CA Problem Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT. After I apply one of their Signature updates. I do all required steps to install the patch. I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services. Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu. Am I doing something wrong. Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually doing something. I have check my event log and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use. I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: User Information
You mean like Galmod from the resource kit? William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: User Information Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own Mailbox info? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
A couple of holes? Why not just the one needed? IMAP: POP done right. - Paul Robichaux -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
I coulda sent Test ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year 2½ months behind in your reading, William? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mad at My Exchange Server
You could delete mad.exe... William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mad at My Exchange Server I cannot find where my users deleted items are and it still shows that there is 256,000 k in the Private information store under the deleted items K column. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
I think I'll add that one to the other 12 or so I have from you. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 2:21 PM Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 For the record, I said nothing quotable this year, and I specifically didn't say anything quotable about any valued and respected Microsoft partners. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 Dear DL Members, What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy. I could go on. Yes, please go on. William -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Hmmm...neither are good. IMAP w/SSL w/b much better. OWA on IIS, ewww. Nimda, Code Red, RDS exploits, I could go on. Even SSL won't save you much. My .02 - Original Message - From: WebMeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
Lazy to have had a problem with it, mostly. I assume there are exceptions. Yes, I'd enjoy your OWA/IIS rant, I'm certain. -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Unless you are lazy Meaning you need to be lazy to use OWA? Please do. Sure about that? - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy. I could go on. Yes, please go on. William -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Hmmm...neither are good. IMAP w/SSL w/b much better. OWA on IIS, ewww. Nimda, Code Red, RDS exploits, I could go on. Even SSL won't save you much. My .02 - Original Message - From: WebMeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA. If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993). And is WebMeister your real name? ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [SPONSOR] FREE Guide to the strongest available encryption
I don't mind since they are nice enough to include a filterable subject. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Dempsey, Jennifer Subject: RE: [SPONSOR] FREE Guide to the strongest available encryption Since when was this list a target for advertisements? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: List Sponsor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Dempsey, Jennifer Subject: [SPONSOR] FREE Guide to the strongest available encryption Are your client's browsers 128-bit enabled? Even if you have adequate encryption, your clients' browsers may not be 128-bit enabled. That means your business link is dictated by the highest encryption their browser is capable of. If your clients' browser isn't 128-bit enabled by default (a large number of non US browsers are not 128-bit enabled), a Thawte SGC SuperCert will automatically correct the deficiency. Not only will a Thawte SuperCert secure your website, but it will boost the encryption power of your customers' weaker browsers to a full, 128-bit encryption strength to match. This step-up functionality means that a SuperCert can fully protect both you and your customers with the strongest available encryption while they are on your site! Find out more about Thawte SuperCerts. Download our FREE Guide toThawte's 128-bit Strong Encryption SuperCerts go to: http://www.thawte.com/ucgi/gothawte.cgi?a=e168957210061000 Regards The Thawte Knowledge Team Tel: 27 21 917 8902 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: We invite you to test drive a FREE SSL certificate from Thawte and see for yourself how 128-bit encryption protects your online business! To download your free trial certificate go to: http://www.thawte.com/ucgi/gothawte.cgi?a=e168957210061000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring email
Why couldn't you implement Journaling first thing tomorrow morning? Diagnostic Logging can also capture email content, but sorting through it isn't so much fun and you will need some drive space. Other big brother style methods may be appropriate (*ugh*) like shadowing the desktop. Or perhaps reaffirming policy and suggest that you have the ability and do monitor email. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email Hi, Thanks for the suggestion, but short of that, what could I do first thing tomorrow morning? What kind of logging is Exchange capable of? -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email Journaling. It is probably best to build a monitoring server and enable journaling on that server. Move the mailboxes in question to that server. Take a look at Q239427 Tom. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring email I need to monitor emails for 4 people in the company. Both incoming and outgoing. We think they are giving out trade secrets. What is the best method for doing this? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp3 NT4.0 sp6 Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Administrative share on the M:\ drive. Duh. ;) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Who is M$? D Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the street. -Elbert Hubbard -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address. This is as per M$. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server? Also... How many valid static IP's to you have? Is your DNS hosted external or internal? When you upgraded did you change any of the static IP information? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help please I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information. I have a setup as follows: Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and are now having a problem connecting with owa 2000. When going to the owa site a login box comes up to log into exchange BUT it comes up three times then says access denied. I have the IIS/proxy web publishing set to redirect my MX record exchange server address to the server but can never log in. If anyone got ANY ideas I would greatly appreciate it. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
LOL! Is it too much to ask, that when you click on something, something happens? [1] - Chris Scharff William [1] or close. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Who fsking cares? When there E2K product gets out of beta, perhaps it might be relevant on an Exchange list. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig For some odd reason SOPHOS was just voted number 1 AV product? Why is that? Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig I stand corrected. That sounds like a $wonderful idea. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig The solution would be not to use any AV products on a production exchange server. Use an SMTP gateway AV and client AV. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Sophos doesn't appear to have an Exchange 5.5 aware AV product, so I don't know how great of a solution it would be for poor Thomas' Exchange server. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Being from the UK I would think you would use SOPHOS. Sophos is by far the greatest Anti Virus Software. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig I am running NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI and it seems to work fine IF the background scanning option is enabled. The only drawback is that every time the definitions are updated it must rescan the whole IS in the background (about 24 hours for our 20G store). In version 2.14 the added an option to inhibit the automatic rescanning when new definitions are installed. How did you get version 2.17? We paid extra for a year of updates and had to call and bug them to get the corporate 7.6 update but they sent no navmse update. Tom -Original Message- From: Halliday S (ISELS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 5:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig If you check the archives, I had and still have the same problem here with NAV and users not being able to move attachments. I had MS look at it and Symantec and both blamed each other. I ran optimiser and that didn't cure it. The next stage (which I still haven't got round to yet) is checking the IS for corruption. What I have found is that when I upgrade to a new version of NAV (uninstall/reinstall) it starts of working fine and then gradually performance becomes a real issue with alot of stuff being quarantined (when quarantining is disabled!) and users start to get mail sitting in the outbox for a while. I am running NAV 2.17 Build 75 in MAPI/VAPI. Ex 5.5 SP4.0, NT4.0 SP5a. Stephanie. University of Glamorgan. UK -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2001 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Exactly. Well almost, I'm at the background part. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:10 AM
RE: Haiku Friday
LOL! I AppreciateIT. William De-Unicentered Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday That's not a limerick! A limerick goes something like... There once was an Admin name William Who hated CA-IT so much he could kill 'em... He posted his rants (and he invented pants) So they sent him an upgrade and billed him. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Each time a person stands up for an idea, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, (s)he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance. --Robert F. Kennedy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Tullis Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I prefer the limerick myself... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Nazi
Whatever works for you. If you have the tools, block *.* except what you need. William -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Nazi I will only be allowing these attachment types through our gateway starting the end of January. No attachment for you! BMP;DOC;GIF;GZ;JPEG;JPG:HTM;HTML;MSG;PDF;PPT;RTF;TAR;TXT;XLS;Z;ZIP; Any comments from The List? (Except for Mr. Seielstad...) Jennifer Baker http://www.fluke.com http://www.flukenetworks.com Keeping your world up and running. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does anyone know...
This is one of a kind. But there are other exchange lists, yes. public.microsoft.exchange.* public.microsoft.exchange2000.* www.groups.yahoo.com/group/exchange2000 www.groups.yahoo.com/group/MSExchange Among others. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Does anyone know... If there is another Exchange list like this? Thanks. Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Block attachment
Hi Carine. No, it can not be done server-side without third party applications, such as Antigen from www.sybari.com. However, client security can be increased to keep attachents off of the desktops. (Outlook Security Patch) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Carine Lim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Block attachment Dear All, Our management suggested that we should block certain file types by Grouping (eg only Mgr members can receive JPEG and JIF files and all others cannot). Can this be done??? Thank you Carine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
Optimiser does many things. It is generally a good thing to do after an sp install. http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/perfopt.as p William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig No I didn't run optimizer. My impression has been that if you have only one volume on the system optimizer isn't really needed. Perhaps I am wrong? Hasn't been ongoing, only the in last month. Guess it depends what you call ongoing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Did you run the performance optimizer after installing the latest service pack, et al or has this been an ongoing problem? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig A while back I submitted a item about getting errors(access denied errors) when moving emails to and from mailboxes and someone suggested it may be related to VAPI mode in my antivirus, something to do with a scan time or something. Does anyone have the vaguest clue what I'm talking about? I looked back but I cant seem to find it. Recap Single site, single domain. Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/hots, NT4 sp6 Users trying to move large emails or lots of emails get a cant move access denied errors. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ORB UK to close down
guilty?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ORB UK to close down With regret (and many heaving of sighs, I can hear you all) I have to inform you all that ORB UK is closing with immediate effect. This is because the bills for the bandwidth used during the recent attacks on ORB UK exceed $6000, just for the last 2 weeks. I can't afford to carry on this sort of damage, especially as this is only really a hobby. Anyone who can find a way of avoiding this, please feel free to contact me, but as it stands, as of 12.00 on 11 December 2001, ORB UK servers will be permanently switched off. Anyone who feels guilty, or even just generous or charitable, could make a paypal payment to [EMAIL PROTECTED], all funds will go towards the costs of operating ORB UK for the last 6 months, and maybe go some way towards putting something more permanent up in future. Regards to all, Especially those with whom I have crossed swords. And, if someone could copy this across to news.admin.net-abuse.email, I'd be grateful :-) -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: +44 1256 322629 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: moving exchange
The FAQ AppendixA applies better. Whether it is a DC or not. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: moving exchange I will be performing an exchange 5.5 move to a new server, just wanted to know if the technet article Q155216 also applies if I want to make the new exchange server be a stand-alone server instead of a PDC. Presently it was originally set up as a PDC, I think it's better as a stand alone doing nothing but Exchange stuff instead of as a PDC, file server, and print as it is presently. Any thoughts. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Nick Field [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR when sending mail to PF Hi All, Am probably overlooking something simple here, does anyone know what I am doing wrong? Exch 5.5 SP4 I am trying to send a mail to a public folder from a source external to the organisation. On each attempt I get an NDR containing the following text:- The message could not be delivered because you do not have create permissions on this folder or it is only available to folder owners at this time I have looked at Q193926, which does not apply. I suspect it is a permissions problem as the NDR suggests, but I am now stumped as to where to look from here. The anonymous permissions on the folder is Contributor. Thanks Nick Field Comino PLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: moving exchange
Do they know the server by name? To answer your question, the Q article for migrating to a server with the same name still applies if its not a DC (as long as a DC is available to it). William -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange I need this server to have the same name in order to be as transparent a move as possible to the users when they come in on monday. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange The FAQ AppendixA applies better. Whether it is a DC or not. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: moving exchange I will be performing an exchange 5.5 move to a new server, just wanted to know if the technet article Q155216 also applies if I want to make the new exchange server be a stand-alone server instead of a PDC. Presently it was originally set up as a PDC, I think it's better as a stand alone doing nothing but Exchange stuff instead of as a PDC, file server, and print as it is presently. Any thoughts. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Nick Field [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR when sending mail to PF Hi All, Am probably overlooking something simple here, does anyone know what I am doing wrong? Exch 5.5 SP4 I am trying to send a mail to a public folder from a source external to the organisation. On each attempt I get an NDR containing the following text:- The message could not be delivered because you do not have create permissions on this folder or it is only available to folder owners at this time I have looked at Q193926, which does not apply. I suspect it is a permissions problem as the NDR suggests, but I am now stumped as to where to look from here. The anonymous permissions on the folder is Contributor. Thanks Nick Field Comino PLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: moving exchange
I'd still follow the appendix at swinc.com. Make the destination a BDC until complete, then promote it to PDC. William -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange presently it is a PDC we are moving domain duties to another machine that will act as a PDC. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange Do they know the server by name? To answer your question, the Q article for migrating to a server with the same name still applies if its not a DC (as long as a DC is available to it). William -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange I need this server to have the same name in order to be as transparent a move as possible to the users when they come in on monday. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving exchange The FAQ AppendixA applies better. Whether it is a DC or not. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: moving exchange I will be performing an exchange 5.5 move to a new server, just wanted to know if the technet article Q155216 also applies if I want to make the new exchange server be a stand-alone server instead of a PDC. Presently it was originally set up as a PDC, I think it's better as a stand alone doing nothing but Exchange stuff instead of as a PDC, file server, and print as it is presently. Any thoughts. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Nick Field [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR when sending mail to PF Hi All, Am probably overlooking something simple here, does anyone know what I am doing wrong? Exch 5.5 SP4 I am trying to send a mail to a public folder from a source external to the organisation. On each attempt I get an NDR containing the following text:- The message could not be delivered because you do not have create permissions on this folder or it is only available to folder owners at this time I have looked at Q193926, which does not apply. I suspect it is a permissions problem as the NDR suggests, but I am now stumped as to where to look from here. The anonymous permissions on the folder is Contributor. Thanks Nick Field Comino PLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K SP2
There are applications that will continue downloads where they got interrupted. I've downloaded it over HTTP successfully twice without issue. 193,633kb if I recall. William -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K SP2 I get the same thing. Downloads 189MB but size of file is 58MB. -Original Message- From: Tea, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K SP2 IE Claimed to downloaded successfully, but size doesn't match! Guess size does matter and IE can't tell!!! Thanks... I'll try again later... Anyone know the ftp site MS off their head? -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K SP2 Yes, the first attempt I tried was interrupted and died. Worked ok the 2nd time. I just put it down to the sheer numbers of people downloading from the servers. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: E2K SP2 Is it just me or anyone else experience corrupted download of the SP2 file? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: E2K SP2 1. The logoff button doesn't really log you off it justs reminds you to close your browser session. 2. The Notification for new email is on the slow side . If you send a message to someone who has OWA open it will not show up for about 30-45 seconds. But if the person was to hit the send/recieve button before that time the message shows up? I tested this from two client hooked up internally. Anybody else see this? I was just wondering specifically about the new OWA features. Neil posted a link which lists the OWA changes and here they are: Navigation enhancements Deployment improvements Notifications and reminders Enhanced printing support Contact-based distribution lists Logoff page Rich search Selectable provisioning Catalan language support New Calendar controls Tom -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: E2K SP2 Thomas, Best approach is to suck it and see! - on a test network, unless anyone has pummelled SP2 enough to have confidence in it going 'live' I haven't There have been enough links posted in here in the past 50~ hours. So to answer your question: You can read about the differences, Install and verify if the differences exist (and work!) Install and don't verify (although that would be a bit controversial), Install and get frustrated that the new feature(s) don't make an appearance. It's just all soo exciting and the fun is endless! Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: E2K SP2 What is different? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: E2K SP2 I've played with OWA SP2 and it rocks. I really love OWA, maybe since I'm almost never in the office and always on the road :) Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Here Goes. Exch2k
Define 'good stuff'... The whitepapers at www.microsoft.com/exchange are excellent for the most part. Also, be patient. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Here Goes. Exch2k Ok everyone. Getting ready to install Exc2k on a test system. I am downloading the eval. Installing on Windows 2000 Server running active directory. Anyone want to point me to some good stuff before I start? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how do i uninstall exchange 5.5 SP4
One doesn't. One restores from the backup one did prior to one applying sp4. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how do i uninstall exchange 5.5 SP4 hi!..how does one remove exchange SP 4? Rajeev Krishnan Tata Technologies, Mumbai Phone: 5837585 Fax: 5804021 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Here Goes. Exch2k
How do you know? http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html http://www.swinc.com/resource/books.asp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Here Goes. Exch2k yes. That's what I'm looking for. I need some good books to read. Good recommendations. Some of the books currently published are a waste of my time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Here Goes. Exch2k Buy any one of the excellent books. then start your playtime. Jim Mcbee's Exchange 2000 24/7 is excellent to refer once you have it up. - Original Message - From: Joel Musheno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:05 PM Subject: RE: Here Goes. Exch2k eh, its a test server, look throught the faq's, then give it a shot and see where you get to. If somthing breaks, you will have all the more motivation to read through whitepapers and faqs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Here Goes. Exch2k Ok everyone. Getting ready to install Exc2k on a test system. I am downloading the eval. Installing on Windows 2000 Server running active directory. Anyone want to point me to some good stuff before I start? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Would you install Outlook and Visual basic on your exchange s erve r?
Test lab. Test lab. Test lab. I wouldn't attempt this. Yes, I have run Outlook2000 on my Exchange2000 lab server for a year as the dedicated MAPI client. If you can afford Visual Basic developer and Exchange2000 then you can afford the lab. As always, just my thoughts. William -Original Message- From: Harmon, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Would you install Outlook and Visual basic on your exchange serve r? I've just received a proposal to install some calendaring software on one of our exchange servers that requires a lot of things I'm pretty uncomfortable with without divulging too much about the software (I'm not under non-disclosure--but I'm not under disclosure either!). This software requires: Installing Outlook 2000 client on server Installing Visual Basic (yes the development platform--why not just the dll type libraries? I don't know) Setting up a profile on Outlook using the administrator inbox for security purposes A dll COM object that has a sink to catch calendar items All this goes on the server--and this isn't just throw-away server. This is a critical box with 2000 users and a 55 gig store. It will be Ex2k at install--so I may split the store at that point. I can see maybe installing a com object--if you want to use object event sinks that seems logical but the other stuff just makes me question the whole project and the knowledge behind the development... but I'm not a developer. Any thoughts? I've read that putting outlook on your exchange server isn't a great idea because they share dll's. But I've done it and test before and never seen a real problem... Installing VB on a production exchange box, though, just seems silly! I'm uncomfortable installing in VB dlls on the box--as many unstable VB apps as I've seen, but I'm looking around for a little more teeth to my argument. Josh Harmon Server Admin and now external program analyst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Scanners
Does it duplicate emails, too? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Email Scanners For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper www.marshalsoftware.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners It's not the sig. It's the (gasp) Notes Client :( ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Doug Hampshire | || doug.hampshire@peregrine| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:22 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Scanners
Not 6.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Sybari (www.sybari.com) Antigen 6.2. New build should be out soon that allows the content filtering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Does it duplicate emails, too? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Email Scanners For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper www.marshalsoftware.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners It's not the sig. It's the (gasp) Notes Client :( ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Doug Hampshire | || doug.hampshire@peregrine| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:22 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 2k Prep
Yes. It's awesome. In fact, it is gone. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2k Prep Just wondering... Does the Internet Mail connector get any better in Exchange 2000. Every frikin change I make in Exch 5.5 I have to restart the service which jacks which causes other problems for my A/V software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 2k Prep
And who here doesn't like a good rub now and again? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 23:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exch 2k Prep Not physically just virtually but there's the rub - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes there is, don't lie! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 21:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Their is no M drive.. I repeat their NO M drive.. And there dam well aren't 17 of them -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep But you do get an M: drive! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes. It's awesome. In fact, it is gone. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2k Prep Just wondering... Does the Internet Mail connector get any better in Exchange 2000. Every frikin change I make in Exch 5.5 I have to restart the service which jacks which causes other problems for my A/V software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ban Outlook
Your average users apparently aren't ours. We have in house Outlook classes and we actually USE the product. Outlook with Exchange is a potent combination, functionally unattainable with another email client. For POP (ew!) or IMAP (much better) clients, sure another email package is fine, but you'll have to learn that, too, if you intend on supporting it. If you like pretty pictures, try www.incredimail.com If you have your hands full maintaining patches, it might be time for a management product. Perhaps www.altiris.com or SMS. Just my thoughts. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook I'm wondering why everyone is so resistant to the notion of using a different email client. I administer a network with only 500 workstations and I still have my hands full maintaining patches for Win2k, Outlook2k, etc Considering the fact that very little of Outlook's functionality is used on a day-to day basis by the average user, what is the downside? chicken scratches snipped _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO
I wanted this as well, but I believe it was Siegfried Weber who told me CDO to tasks is not supported. :o( William Lekfovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Bhuvan.Dasari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO Hi friends , I Want to Access the all Users TASK ITEMS from MY EXCHANGE SERVER by using CDO .. Accessing Details of TASK Items will be :- 1) Subject 2) Due date 3) Start Date 4)Status 5) Priority 6)%Complete .. How can i get the above ... Can u help me in this REGARD. i am waiting for ur Reply.. (Note :-- I know CDO does not support TASK items much ... But for accessing Calender ,Cantacts i used CDO. so i want to use this).. If any body Retrieving the above TASK details by using CDO ...Can U send me a Sample Code Please Thanks in Advance .. Bhuvan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO
www.cdolive.com William -Original Message- From: Bhuvan.Dasari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO hi , Thanks for ur Reply.. Do i get more dtls from any where . Can u tell me good web sites please .. Thanks Bhuvan -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO I wanted this as well, but I believe it was Siegfried Weber who told me CDO to tasks is not supported. :o( William Lekfovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Bhuvan.Dasari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I have Problem with accessing the TASK ITEMS in CDO Hi friends , I Want to Access the all Users TASK ITEMS from MY EXCHANGE SERVER by using CDO .. Accessing Details of TASK Items will be :- 1) Subject 2) Due date 3) Start Date 4)Status 5) Priority 6)%Complete .. How can i get the above ... Can u help me in this REGARD. i am waiting for ur Reply.. (Note :-- I know CDO does not support TASK items much ... But for accessing Calender ,Cantacts i used CDO. so i want to use this).. If any body Retrieving the above TASK details by using CDO ...Can U send me a Sample Code Please Thanks in Advance .. Bhuvan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirroring Exchange server
simple and low coast solution for mirroring It doesn't exist. William -Original Message- From: may [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 4:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mirroring Exchange server Hello, i have a windows 2k server with service pack2 .with an exchange 2000 i also have configured recently an additional domain controller . i am looking for a simple and low coast solution for mirroring my exchange server to this additional domain controller can any one guide me thanks may _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirroring Exchange server
A Netherlands-based solution? William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server mm Low Coasts... -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server simple and low coast solution for mirroring It doesn't exist. William -Original Message- From: may [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 4:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mirroring Exchange server Hello, i have a windows 2k server with service pack2 .with an exchange 2000 i also have configured recently an additional domain controller . i am looking for a simple and low coast solution for mirroring my exchange server to this additional domain controller can any one guide me thanks may _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Documentation
Mine is the best. SCOTT SCHNOLL/ Mine is the best. TONY REDMOND/ Mine is the best. JIM MCBEE/ Mine is the best. PAUL ROBICHAUX/ Mine is the best... if only someone would publish the thing! http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html What the heck am I doing up at 3:30am? -Original Message- From: Fryer, Daniel M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Documentation Hi, I would be interested in hearing peoples opinions on the 'best' Exchange 2000 books that you have read, both in terms of technical reference and general design and support. regards Dan Fryer Project Manager GlaxoSmithKline Plc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: manual
http://quick-study.com/chartDetails.asp?sku=381-2 William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: manual Where can I find an easy to use manual for Outlook 2000 and 98 to hand out to users? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tracking.log
By default Exchange5.5 will keep tracking logs for seven days, I believe. You can change the tracking log retention in the general tab of the system attendant properties applet in Exchange administrator. Message tracking had to be enabled. It is not on by default. See this page for the abbreviated, expurgated version. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm And here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/Exchange/en/55 /help/documents/server/XMT04027.HTM http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/Exchange/en/55 /help/documents/server/XMT04027.HTM You can purge these files, but I'd leave the current day. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: tracking.log I stumbled on these files which seem to track all incoming and outgoing mails on a SBS. How/where are they generated, and is it necessary? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
I'm all over that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! Ellison derided Microsoft's Exchange e-mail servers as unreliable and insecure. Huh? What?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s _e-m ail_crown_1.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7854525.html?tag=pt.ne.key3.last6.78545 25 At the time I posted this, at the bottom of the page: Microsoft shares up 1.17 Oracle shares down 0.26 I'll be at the Oracle booth in about 2 hours. William -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s_e-m ail_crown_1.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
