If you have more than one Exchange server, you can set it at the MTA. But if
you only have one, you cant do anything for internal mail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pouncey, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:05 AM
To: Exchange
Increase the disk space and thus the limits on the Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST Alternative?
I am looking for alternate
DeFlowers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DePants
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
What kind of database is it? I think if you are pulling from a DB, you would
really want a product that could interface with that DB and do all the
mailings, etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holstrom, Don J.
Sent: Thursday, January
Crista, Could you please include the message you are replying too? It makes
it quite difficult for the rest of us to know what you are talking about.
Thx!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004
Oops. TO, not too
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Crista, Could you please include the message you are replying too
Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy
you will ever meet. He is nothing but love.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
And just to be clear, I said meet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
Cool. A dog thread.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Are you using some kind of dynamic DNS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues
I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP
Isscan may help. Its free.
http://www.softlookup.com/download/down10498.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 5:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing/Deleting Message
Question: Is
How unethical of you to waste your work time reading these.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
I've lost
RPC over HTTP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange
List Server
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD
Hi all,
What do you think are the features I
Update your resume
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no backups. What
should I do
We have a love connection!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and
Or is it...
The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
We have a love connection
. Stubin? :p
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU...
-Original Message
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
the same hairline and legs as you.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr.
-Original
remember no Charo!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You want to complain? Fine, your Charo.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
forehead and chicken legs... Who are
you to talk? :P
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You and Don should not be talking about hairlines
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I think what is at issue here is that in the past you have spent time in
this group bashing on the major posters, a number of which are MS MVP's. You
insult us by calling us unethical as we have accepted small gifts from MS as
part of our MVP status. And though you may not believe it, most of us
I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP and the
internal interface has a private IP and you are attempting to NAT you
connection.
In the Sonicwall, under the advanced setting, you should have it setup under
one-to-one NAT the public/private translation for your Exchange
They will if you crank up the logging
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
They don't show errors, just blocked
Go into Log, Log Settings, at the bottom check on Dropped TCP Connections
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Concur
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday,
I heard you have operating privileges at the local bath house.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Im Dr. Love.
?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: 11 December 2003 15:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP
You mean to say that in your opinion you are right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I didn't bring the subject up.
Be sure to tell exmerge to recover items from dumpster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping
Do'h! Sorry, brain freeze. I knew better.
Eric
Yes they can.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I have seen it screw up rules, and at
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
You are officially black listed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange
Funny you should say that. I love my CA
Its more like Screech from Saved by the Bell VS Danny Partridge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I can hear the
I don't know of any easy way to do that. But I have to admit, 2 MB is pretty
tight. With the encoding overhead, that only allows for about a 1.5 MB file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:33
Its much more extensive than that when putting the FE in the DMZ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
80(HTTP), 443(SSL) and a few others.
Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
Its much more extensive than that when putting the FE
?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
I couldn't have said it better myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
of the character Yogourt in Spaceballs the Movie, It's all
about the merchandising.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
They work for me
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi
Links are dead off the site. I also noted that windows messaging is
You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server
I getting this
Do you have 2 spare slots to put those drives in? If so do that. Then use
the performance optimizer to move the stores.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
HTTP: 80
Or
HTTPS: 443
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rsamman
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What ports to open
My OWA is working from within ( locally ), but I can't access it from home
No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange.
I believe E2K3 is optimized for it, but it works with any flavor.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that.
In addition, you will want to familiarize
How can you waste tape space? Isn't that what you bought them for? The waste
is in not using the space.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
not.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups
Totally valid question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Agreed. Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily
Ok, but what is BLB going to do for you? If you backup the whole store at
once the normal way, you are going to be back up and running a heck of a lot
faster than if you had to restore mailboxes one by one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
servers that provide messaging. The paper also provides detailed information
about the hardware, software, cluster configuration and best practices for
using server clusters.
To participate go to
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/chats/default.mspx
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information
I put 691 on my Exchange server on Sat. So far so good, but I haven't seen
any of these new virus's yet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete
(pfeffepe)
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/40021/40021.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook
http://www.swinc.com/erm/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Repost, Make a Calender where users can book meetingroom ?
Is there not anyone who can
You upgrade to enterprise!!
If you cant get the limits in place to stay below 16GB, well, then you cant
get below 16GB. Short of upgrading, there is no magic bullet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, November
What Exchange version?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
OK, I know the majority of this list is against
this as more of a general discussion as opposed to tied to
a specific version, but for the sake of argument lets says Exchange
2003.
JC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:13 PM
To: Exchange
Stays in the store. You have to manually save it locally if you wish.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Paul Natola
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Default save outlook 2002
that is Ideal
to shut off
OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
So you have seen this?
-Original
is enabled, which is the default configuration,
Microsoft said in a statement Friday.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw
So you have seen this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix
I'm thinking the same thing.
I imagine this guy managed to flub up his install some way or another and
now it's a bug to him
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
So you have seen this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Probably the same...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold
You mean you want to know what the minimum space requirement is
Exchange version please.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Web outlook woes
Hey all...
I am experiencing some Web outlook issues.
When my users log into web outlook, the will get
/vd8s
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls
I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years.
I don't even want a landline anymore, but until
*I* missing something? ;0)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls
But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret
The same thing they all expect. To save money.
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource!?
What is the CIO expecting to get out of this??
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
staff and practices?
All kinds of reasons. One would need to know what they are in order to be
best show them as wrong.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7
I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years.
I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a
way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck.
Also, one can request an international dialing block on their lines. You
then enter a code to make an
Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one.
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with OWA
I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT
4.0
.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one.
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
, what can I do resolve latency issue for Outlook2k clients. Is there
any utility I can run to make my exchange perform better faster? Thanks
again.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Natively, no.
There may be a 3rd party tool out there for this, but I cant think of any.
-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How do I set up a system-wide rule?
Hello again. Here's
The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you
sent.
There read receipt is a little tougher as read can have a lot of meanings.
Lets say I send you an email with a read receipt. You look at it in the
preview pane and then delete it. You then empty your deleted folders.
notifications at all!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification
The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you
sent
That's not going to do anything. The mail will just queue on the senders
side and then hit you like bat when you turn on the IMS.
-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service
Quite common.
A combination of good AV and a nice spyware destroyer like Spybot should
help aliviate the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Your PC seized, modem used
If it moves it to a PST, then it is a client side rule and OL has to be
running.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
Well, I guess the article is
Yea, you had something covering your eyes, but it wasn't beer.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
Excellent. I thought I remembered something through
You need to ask yourself a couple of questions.
Why are you using PST files? Obviously you are using Exchange, so where is
the benefit in using PST files? Is keeping them on a file server cheaper
than keeping them on an Exchange server? Disk space costs the same on both.
If it's a standard vs.
You're welcome!
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question
Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in
the MSKB and used
You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why?
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature
Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature
Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
wide signature
How would you do an event sink?
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature
If they want internal signatures
That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop
everything else.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Server
Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0
I'm using
Do an scan at http://housecall.trendmicro.com/
Then download Spybot Search Destroy and run that (don't forget to run the
update before scanning)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus with XP
What is the name of this file and where is it location?
-Original Message-
From: David,
Rather than use cable, switch to a business DSL provider that gives you a
static IP. Then you can use real DNS and you will probably see this issue go
away.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Exchange
It looks like you have 6 different MX records. Verify that each one can
receive email for that domain. You may have one that's messed up and is
rejecting.
Remember, just because one has the lowest cost, doesn't mean its always
going to receive the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Alex
Right. Is this an email virus (infected store), or a file system virus?
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Issues
Depends entirely on which virus. Is it running around
http://tinyurl.com/txx0
Or
http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=a
9jPCSDgp_lva=p_faqid=59p_created=995655179p_sp=cF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY
250PTg3JnBfc2VhcmNoX3RleHQ9JnBfcHJvZF9sdmwxPTImcF9wYWdlPTE*p_li=
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz
IIS logs
-Original Message-
From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Capturing users' access to OWA
Hello folks:
Our environment: native E2k, FE/BE for OWA.
What is the best, most efficient way to track
Oh yea
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: internet.com
anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?
We just recently went over this. The short answer was no.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Is anyone familiar with a backup package for
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using that same domain
name?
-Original Message-
From: norbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using
Personal or standard Day0?
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
Other than 0! g
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The correct work around would be to not put OWA in the DMZ
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
1 - 100 of 2003 matches
Mail list logo
