Re: IBM's Tivoli Storage Manager

2003-05-27 Thread Murray Alexander
We've been using it for several years to back up our Exchange databases, the associated file systems on NT 4.0, as well as our Novell NetWare 4.x and 5.x servers, our AIX servers...everything EXCEPT our mainframe. Exchange database backups have been wonderfully trouble-free, and sometimes managed

Re: E-mail clients

2003-03-13 Thread Murray Alexander
More importantly, why in the world do you want to talk to MS Mail? That really limits your choices. Besides, as one of the last sites to migrate off that system, I can firmly advise David that his site ought to do the same grin. But seriously, folks...David, I think you'll have a tough time

Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection

2003-01-02 Thread Murray Alexander
If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack

Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client

2002-12-17 Thread Murray Alexander
We use something called Contivity by Nortel; their client does work through a NAT device, using a UDP-based application protocol to find the server. Works great through my Linux-based firewall, and my colleague's LinkSys router. Did _not_ work through my boss's new (bargain-priced) D-Link router;

MEC 2002 comments?

2002-10-15 Thread Murray Alexander
Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

2002-09-18 Thread Murray Alexander
: Multiple updaters for a DL Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind. I guess Chris is right and I'm wrong. My bad. M - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

2002-09-16 Thread Murray Alexander
and reassigning them to *unique* accounts. (Remember that there is a one-to-one association between AD accounts mailboxes in E2K, so no account can be the primary NT account for 1 mailbox.) Missy - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

2002-09-16 Thread Murray Alexander
of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said

Multiple updaters for a DL

2002-09-12 Thread Murray Alexander
In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former.

Re: Messages delayed by black hole queue?

2002-08-20 Thread Murray Alexander
? I was actually referring to telnetting [1] directly to the servers you are trying to send email to from the mail server itself. Anything else installed on the Exchange Server? Changes made recently etc etc... [1] Les, is that a word? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander

Messages delayed by black hole queue?

2002-08-19 Thread Murray Alexander
EX5.5, SP3, NT4, SP6a, OL98 and OL2K: A few dozen users (out of 3,500) - including me! - have been complaining that e-mails sent to external addresses never arrive. They don't even get off the Exchange Server(s), but are not in any queue that I can see. In desperation, I moved my own account to

Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-06-03 Thread Murray Alexander
You broke a nail, too? How? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:07 PM Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I had a similar experience with Compaq. Made my company a

Re: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org

2002-05-30 Thread Murray Alexander
Now, now, isn't that just a bit of an over-reaction? Let's just take a deep breath and think about...Microsoft Mail 3.5. I'll just leave that with you... - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002

Re: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail

2002-05-06 Thread Murray Alexander
- Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:15 AM The client definitely wants to implement dir sync, and we're going to rearchitect it so that the Exchange server becomes the dirsync server and that the 4 MS Mail PO's are requestors.

Re: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail

2002-05-04 Thread Murray Alexander
The MS Mail Interchange service is not new for E2K; it exists in EX5.5, too. Any idea on how it got set to Manual startup? When I installed the EX5.5 version, it got set to Automatic. Do you plan to implement Directory Synchronization, the service that will trade addresses between MS Mail and

Re: MS Mail to Exchange 2000 migration

2002-05-01 Thread Murray Alexander
- Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:53 PM Unfortunately, the subject line does not lie. I am on a project doing an MS Mail 3.5 to Exchange 2000 migration. I am having trouble with the MS Mail Connector and wanted some

Re: Query but not view GAL

2002-05-01 Thread Murray Alexander
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:23 AM We want this feature to deter users from using the GAL as a mass distribution point. We don't want to advertise everyone's email address in the organization, but we want users to be able to query for the

Re: MEC this year

2001-09-01 Thread Murray Alexander
Tourists recently arrived from Australia would be lining up to pet them while someone else operated the video camera. Apparently, someone was concerned about safety. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,