Hi
Been asked to look at this for someone
Server is Exch 5.5 SP3 running on NT4 SP6a
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via
another IMS at another company
The Edu.TW domain is nothing to do with us, and mail should go direct from
ourdomain.co.uk to
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
Upon examining logs
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet mail taking
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
What do the event logs say?
On 3/4/03 9:38, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending
only, DNS servers for
internet access are at our ISP
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
Roger
Sorry about that, just sent another email and generated
correctly configured relay
restrictions)
Michel
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
I think I'm on to something
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki
Blowfield
- Exchange
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello
Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS
Exchange Server 5.5
Thanks in advance
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software
What, you wanted to give away software that was free?
On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield
products for Exchange,
none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry.
On 1/17/03 8:55, Niki Blowfield - Exchange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have
had enough of
yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run
is what gets you 'free' lists right?
On 1/17/03 9:08, Niki Blowfield - Exchange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and
'web beacons'
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January
No-one have any ideas? :(
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 02 January 2003 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Authentication Problem
Hello
Have a frustrating problem that's greeted me back to work
Running Exchange Server 5.5 on NT Server 4 with SP6a
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 00:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA Error after deleting server
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
- Exchange
Sent
We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central server
at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange Administrator
However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10 mins
on the central server where the mailboxes are now located
Event ID: 9318
Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this
phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user
Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this
phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user
Thanks for that info, Greg
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 18:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 contacts
If you are talking about looking at the public folder, switch to Address
Card view OR use View |
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this
phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full
I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter
(for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox
sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic
backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk]
Sent: 06
Dear All,
We have several public folders used as address books
User are complaining that they only get to see the name of the contact, and
not the
associated email address, or their company. (sounds like an MCP question)
Is there a way of automatically changing the contacts to display the name
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Working Offline
Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange
servers, and they worked online. We've
Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment
creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to
mark that folder to be synchronized?
Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in
synchronization
Thanks
...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder'
Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Working Offline
Am I
, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to
other users' folders, they will have to work online.
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit
(which we don't have)
Thanks
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Ok, I've found it on ftppss.microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 24 October 2002 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EXMerge
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit
(which we don't have)
Thanks
Nik
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to
-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working
check
box at the top and select all inconsistencies at the bottom. Do NOT touch
anything to do with the public folders. This should recreate the directory
object for the mailbox listed in the information store.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist
: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as
opposed to POP3 retrieval?
Our ADSL is capped at 256k
I've had these on all my Win2k and XP machines at home
Its titled WEBPOPUP but is actually the messenger service dialog, as if a
net send command was received
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 15:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
on infrastructure design
Niki,
If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just
EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or
post.
Regards,
Mike Scott
EPS Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Dear All,
I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask,
but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a
consultant.
Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using
Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities.
connector, but I find
x.400 easier to
use
for connector purposes.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield
Reminds me of a call I got from an engineer from site once, he was
installing some software into one of our old clone machines I'd sent to
site, and was groaning because it was ...that old system, NT4. I think its
got a virus because the system idle process is hogging all the CPU once I'd
stopped
Dear All,
We use public folders for enterprise wide address books
However, when someone wants to send an email to someone contained in one of
these public folders, they have to go into it, right click the contact, and
select new message
I have been asked if it is possible to have these public
as an email address book box.
When they compose a new message and click To... they'll be able to select
the public folder as an address book from the drop-down list.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 September 2002 09:56
Posted
Dear All,
We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name
24/7
This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a
single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works
until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on
]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing Outlook
er, lock the workstation?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Securing Outlook
Dear All,
We
client up and running?
- Original Message -
From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: Securing Outlook
Dear All,
We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists
name
24
: Securing Outlook
Based on the operational conditions, the desired objective cannot be
achieved. Since security is not a concern for the machine or network as a
whole, one portion thereof cannot be protected.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
42 matches
Mail list logo
