RE: Problem with accessing a PF
Here's my WAG... Is there another list granting lesser access to the folder that this user may be a part of? We have seen instances where a user is in a group with owner permissions but then also in a group with read permissions and they only end up getting read permissions. We've found that removing the list with owner access from the acl list and then adding it back in fixed the problem. Not 100% sure why. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the contents of the folder. Also, he does not get the error message about not having permission, just, Unable to display the folder. He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!) The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately that hasn't been working either. Also, giving him reviewer rights by name to the folder does not work. To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA. So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth user on a different folder. Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCH2000: Inserting Calendar Events into User Calendars
Hey Dean, This one is not automatic but it will allow someone to send the message to the users to get them to add the holidays. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm Scott Perley Team Lead, Enterprise Messaging TELUS Mobility mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dean Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXCH2000: Inserting Calendar Events into User Calendars Hi!, I am not sure whether this issue should be treated the same as sync'ing a shared public folder to a users calendar, but I was wondering whether somebody might be able to tell me how a nominated user or the Exchange system (EXCH:2000) itself is able to place events into ALL users personal calendars. Basically I would like the ability to insert public holidays into the system so that the end-users can see them in their personal calendar (all clients are operating in corporate mode using Outlook 2000). I know that one approach would be to manipulate the outlook.txt file for each Outlook client or to establish a public calendar folder, however I have seen this functionality achieved via another method which doesn't require the user of any third party programs (I just don't know how it is done). Is it possible that this functionality can be achieved via a globalevent or is there some other way of doing it. I know another way would be to send the holidays out to everyone and have them add it to their own personal calendar, but I am trying to avoid that as well. Any information would be appreciated. See ya Dean Thompson -- +++ | Dean Thompson | E-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Bach. Computing (Hons) | ICQ - 45191180 | | PhD Student| Office - Off-Campus | | School Comp.Sci Soft.Eng | Phone - +61 3 9903 2787 (Gen. Office)| | MONASH (Caulfield Campus) | Fax - +61 3 9903 1077 | | Melbourne, Australia || +++ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
I haven't had any problem with this. We have about 80 forms used from our Org Forms library. There are about another 20-30 used strictly from public folders. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How Organizational Forms Work? Our environment consists of Exchange 5.5/SP4 servers with OL2000 and we have approximately 25,000 users. We currently do not allow forms to be published to the Organizational Forms Library because of a fear of the impact it will have on Outlook response time if there are too many forms. Is this a legitimate fear? I can not find any Microsoft Documentation that states why we shouldn't publish forms to the Organizational Forms Library. And currently, this policy is stifling Outlook/Exchange development projects. Can anyone provide me with some advice on this issue? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Character Trait #263
Hey Tim, We make use of folders in the way you describe. The way we get around it is to setup a default view that is grouped by Flag Status This way the users ignore the read/unread information and use the flags to determine if someone else has already worked on a certain issue. Some depts need to keep all the items they've received even after they are completed so the CSRs working on the email queue are granted edit access with no delete permissions. We then set the folder retention time to keep things cleaned up. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Character Trait #263 Mark as read/unread status does not convey within a public folder view seen by two or more mailboxes. Anyone ever notice this? If so, did you come up with a solution (other that moving to a mailbox) that you'd like to share? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Form Radio Buttons
You can also use a different type of field on the read page. Use the radio buttons on the compose page but use a label control on the read page. It shows the information but enforces that the user cannot make any changes. (Easier than coding or marking the fields as read-only.) Scott -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Form Radio Buttons Ok, I have all the needed frames setup. I have another issue. say I choose a particular selection, how do I get the three I didn't select to be grayed out when I send the form. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Form Radio Buttons Use groups property of the radio buttons. Alternatively you can put the related radio buttons into frames. The frames one worked better here where we still have the dreadful Outlook 98 clients. S. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Form Radio Buttons Ok, I am creating an Outlook Form that has quite a few radio buttons, but it will only let me choose one on the whole page. I have different categories, and I need to choose one for each category, how do I get this broken up so that I can choose more than one radio button on the form? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
We strongly our users to use Public Folders. Instead of the users posting to them, however, we just set an address on it and let them email to it. Most users aren't aware of whether they are sending to a mailbox or PF anyway. When we create the folders we don't grant the users access to create sub-folders so that they don't get out of hand. We also ensure that all folders have a retention time set (even if it is a year or more) so that if the folder is abandoned, it will clean itself out. The other thing that PFs help with is that users can see the folder in the structure or they can get to it with a URL on their web pages. With the mailbox, I need to show each user monitoring the address how to add it to their profile. We found that with DLs, the more people on the list the less each person takes action. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox For DLs, you just create the name of the DL and assign the person who requested the DL Ownership. They then add/delete as needed and you don't need to be involved. For something like your request, I would think that a shared mailbox would fit best but of course it all depends on how your users work. I don't much care for public folders because they do get out of hand and there is that bit about the limits don't actually limit anything. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't forward meeting requests.
The only workaround is to send a new meeting request or get the originator to add the person you are forwarding to. When you forward a meeting request Exchange DOES send the message on the originator's behalf. I'm not sure the gory details but the way I understand it, if Fred invites Barney to a meeting and Barney forwards the meeting to Joe Rockhead the meeting request shows up in Joe's inbox as being from Barney sent on Fred's behalf. When Joe accepts or declines the response goes back to Fred. If Barney and Fred are in different Exchange Org's it can't grant the temporary Send on behalf of permissions. Scott -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Chabot, Cliff Subject: Can't forward meeting requests. We are a large user of Exchange. There are several individual Exchange 5.5 organizations. If a meeting request comes from one particular organization, the user can't forward it. They get the error, You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user Of course, we are not trying to send on behalf, we are trying to forward the meeting request. This problem happens with one organization with meeting requests going both ways. This organization is in a domain that does not have any trust relationship with ours. Does anybody have a suggestion on how to work around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dumb Public Folder Question
I've also found that it is not based on the received date but the last modified date. If an item comes in and it is modified 2 days later, the countdown starts again. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dumb Public Folder Question How much older? I've found that it calculates the days by minutes or hours, not full days, so even if something is dated 8 days ago, if it came in at 11 pm, it won't delete until 11pm, or thereabouts. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dumb Public Folder Question OK. This is probably a dumb question, but how can I set up a public folder to automatically delete contents older than 7 days. I've set the age limit for replicas to 7 but still seem to have several items older than a week in a folder I subscribed to this mailing list. Technical details: I'm using Exchange 5.5, sp4, OL2K as client. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder
Is there some code on the form that is setting this? In design mode go to Form, View code. The other way may be that the Defer Until field is added on a hidden tab and it has the initial value set. Scott -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 7, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never look at the copy in Org Forms Library. It'll always read the one in your Personal Forms Library. S. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder I have a form that I made some time ago. It had been working fine for some time and now when someone fills out the form and clicks send it goes to there drafts folder. I found that in the options for the email the option Do not deliver before: was checked with a date in the box. This had never been checked previously and I am the only one with publish ability. The strang this is I just made a copy of the form, deleted the one from the Organizational library, edited the saved form the orignal format without the options checked and republished it. Every time i publish it, it adds the date for some reason. I must be missing something, I just don't know if it is client or server side. Any ideas, Thanks, Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailboxes
True, but we just get one day (second Mon in Oct) when you have columbus day when we have Thanksgiving. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 25, 2001 8:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailboxes You already had your thanksgiving holiday because of the earlier harvest. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Perley-TM Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailboxes Do they show up in Exchange Admin if you connect to the directory on different servers? If so, could be replication. Not sure about the sorting if it's just replication... (no holiday here in Canada either. Damn yanks with a 4 day weekend... :o) -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailboxes Sometimes when i create a user mailbox, it doesn't show in the GAL and the mailbox names dosen't line up alphabeticlly sometimes in Exchange Administrator. Is it something i am doing wrong? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailboxes
Do they show up in Exchange Admin if you connect to the directory on different servers? If so, could be replication. Not sure about the sorting if it's just replication... (no holiday here in Canada either. Damn yanks with a 4 day weekend... :o) -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailboxes Sometimes when i create a user mailbox, it doesn't show in the GAL and the mailbox names dosen't line up alphabeticlly sometimes in Exchange Administrator. Is it something i am doing wrong? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Happy Thanksgiving To our American friends from Canada my first Haiku, hope it works. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Vivino, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday We post anyway Rather work than go shopping Stores are too crowded -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Few Americans Will see what you post today Too much bird - ¡Suerte! -- be - MOS If you learn one useless thing every day, in a single year you'll learn 365 useless things. -Original Message- From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday My last day in job I'm moving to Unisys Hoping see you more ~~~ J. Javier Gonzalez, mcse 2000/nt4 mcp+i IT Dept Data-Set, s.l. Madrid (España) (Spain) Doctor Castelo, 10-3ºd +34 915 738 002 / 03 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: www.dataset.es ~~~ El contenido de esta comunicación debe considerarse privado y confidencial. Si Vd. no es el destinatario y la hubiere recibido por error, se le informa que cualquier divulgación, distribución o copia de esta comunicación está estrictamente prohibida; por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente y elimine este mensaje. This Email is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use the contents nor disclose them to any other person and you should immediately notify the sender and delete the Email. ~~~ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000)
In exchange admin, go to the Permissions Tab for the user and add his secretary with user permissions. On the secretary's profile add her boss's mailbox. The secretary gets more than just this one folder but in my experience, they usually request the others later... Scott -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 18, 2001 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000) Gurus, We run Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with NT4.0 clients running Outlook 2000. I have a user who wants to share an e-mail folder OTHER than his inbox with his secretary. He already has his inbox shared with her (right-click, permissions, blah blah blah). We can share this folder accordingly, but the other user has no way to connect to it. When the secretary goes to open (File, open, other user's folder) all she has is a list of inbox, calendar, etc... and there is no way to stipulate the other folder (path or otherwise). Can you suggest a way for her to access this folder? All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\themolk. [Steve Molkentin] [IT Trainer/HelpDesk] [Forest Lake College The Springfield College] [D/Dial - 07 3372 0819] [Mobile - 0410 680 018] Visit our Colleges on the Internet: http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au http://www.extraordinarykids.com.au _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Better alternative than Move Server Wizard?
The first one we did was merging one org/site (1500 mailboxes) into an existing site (1500 mailboxes) in another org (20,000 mailboxes) and it went ok. The one we are doing now is merging 7 sites (1500 mailboxes) in one org into another org (30,000 mailboxes) and so far all has been fine. As for public folders, we've been using InterOrg Rep very successfully long before we started the MSW. We have about 30 folders (plus free/busy) that we sync this way and it's working great. Scott -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 8, 2001 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better alternative than Move Server Wizard? I've found that there's a huge difference between merging two sites within the same org into one, and merging two organziations together. Merging separate orgs can get ugly with MSW, because you lose PFs, and its a destructive process. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Scott Perley-TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better alternative than Move Server Wizard? We've had good luck with MSW. We merged 2 1500 mailbox sites into one last year and this year we've done 4 with 2 more to go. The only issues we had to deal with were users needing help to re-add PSTs to their profiles (I'm working on them... most of their users have at least 300MB PSTs) It's been fairly painless... Scott -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Better alternative than Move Server Wizard? Hello, I am researching the Move Server Wizard to merge 2 Exchange organizations and was hoping to find out if anyone has found a different method that would be preferable/safer. Better alternative than Move Server Wizard? Thanks for your time. Ken Jasa Messaging Administrator Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contacts Sorted Order
Try tools, services, Outlook Address book and change the setting between First, Last and File As. There are no other options I know of. Scott -Original Message- From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 21, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contacts Sorted Order Can anyone tell me how to get my Contacts List to show up sorted by Last Name when I am trying to select To:.. addresses for an email in Outlook. They currently list sorted by First Name when I go to Contacts. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Organizatinal forms
You should be able to try this: Login to the exchange 5.5 org and add a PST to your profile. Use the Custom forms button on the Advanced dialog on Tools, Options, Other to copy the forms from the Org Forms Library or other folder to a folder on the PST. Then login to exchange 2K and do it again in the reverse... Scott -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 19, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Organizatinal forms Is there any way to retrieve Organizational Forms that were published on my 5.5 server and put them on the new Exchange 2000 box. I have already removed the old server from the site and removed the Active Directory Connector. Any ideas? Marty Y. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Office Assistant
You must use a custom form to change it. On the actions tab (in design mode) you can change the behaviour of the default actions. Scott -Original Message- From: Raul Rivera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 17, 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Office Assistant Is there a way a changing the autoreply text sent within the SUBJECT field of an automatic reply. I would like to change the default text. Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Form not updating.
Can you try just saving the form as an OFT and delete the forms from the org forms library? Then if you have some items based on the form, try to open them, if they open with the old form, it is still in the cache or is published on the folder or personal forms library (I know you've cleared that one but I've added it to the instructions anyway.) The only other place I would check is to see if it was published somewhere for replies only it actually then marks the form as hidden but Outlook still reads them. Scott -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 18, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Please, walk us through how you are OPENING the form that does not have the changes. ---Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Have you confirmed that this is only a problem on your workstation? Have you replaced the Frmcache.dat file with a known good one? (Sometimes clearing the cache does not cut it.) -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Yes it has been removed from my personal forms folder -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Have you removed it from your Personal Forms Library like Serdar mentioned? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. I followed the procedures for clearing my forms cache, but when I opened the form after again changing it. It was still the same as before the change. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Do a search on Technet for Forms Cache Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Form not updating. We have a form that resides in our Organizational Forms Library that we are constantly updating, but for some reason everytime I make a change and then subsequently re-publish the form, the next time I open up the form it is the same as before I made any changes. It has happened several times now, and there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason in which it would do this. Does anyone have any suggestions on why this would happen. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Public folder permissions for DL
Nope that works too. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 14, 2001 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though they are removed they still have the permissions. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 14:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL Far be it from me to disagree with a Great Old One such as yourself, CJ, but I beg to differ with you on this one. I just tested this, and adding a test account to a group with permissions to a Public Folder (that is restricted only to that group) resulted in me having access to that Public Folder. Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are saying here. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL As they exist now, yes. If you add people to the DL, they will not get permissions. The DL is expanded at the time the permissions are granted. The permissions are then handed out on a mailbox by mailbox basis. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder permissions for DL I know I should know this, but my brain isn't working today. If I create a Distribution List and grant the list permissions to a public folder does that mean that all the members of that list get that permission (Author in this case)? This is EX5.5SP4 on W2K. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony. (03) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable ability to reply
We create a mailbox with a heafty restriction on it that it won't receive mail from anyone. When someone needs to send a message such as you describe, we have them put this mailbox in the have replies sent to field and if any disregards the do not reply message, they get a failure. Scott -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 14, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability to reply Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the message they receive. I did not think that this was possible. I used the help in Outlook 2000 and performed a couple of searches in Tech Net on the Web. Our user community has both Outlook 97 and 2000, and we are Exchange 5.5 with SP3. Please help or point in the correct direction. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent
While we are on the subject it's really been bugging me recently about: then than and effect affect. Scott -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent Augh! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynne July Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent What about loose and lose? Another favorite :-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent Also mix up there, they're and their. Throw in a few misplaced apostrophes and I'll have a stroke! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent Yeah. To get Ed's attention, use all caps. In the subject and in the message text. Unless. of course, you want a useful reply. In that case, DON'T SHOUT.[1] ...Joel [1]Actually, we haven't see all caps shouting on this list for some time. It's been quite nice. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent You're welcome, but I'm still not springing into action because of an urgent request. And don't try that exclamation point button, either. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nathan Boyd Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Staff Mail Lists Urgent Ed, I have only recently built our Exchange 2000 server and appreciate any help I can get while I learn. I do know a fair bit about others systems and having answered forum questions for many people in lists before I stick to these rules; If people are polite, I know the answer and have the time I will help. In terms of forum eticate I read books and postings before I submit a question. If a system is down I will call Microsoft and spend the $245. Thanks for the lesson. Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Favourites
If you use permissions on the folders instead of default or anonymous the replicated folder structure won't even show up. We are 1 of 7 subsidiaries and encountered the same problem. Once we setup one of our global lists with folder visible access and removed default and anonymous, it helped clean up the structure. You only need to do it at the top of each struture. A little tougher if there is no hierarchy. (ie all our folders are within our sub's structure - public folders\all public folders\sub\folders...) Scott -Original Message- From: Ellis, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 31, 2001 6:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Favourites Hi Group, Is it possible to force certain public folders into peoples PF Favourites? We are a large international corporation with many EX sites in the organisations this makes the public folder hierarchy quite crowded and not easy to manage as most of the public folders are only relevant to their parent sites, but even though I cancel the replication of incoming non-relevant PF's I still get an empty folder showing up. I would like to be able to 'force' certain folders into the favourites whilst allowing people to choose any other relevant folders for themselves. Any help or ideas would be appreciated. Steve Ellis IT Technician [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saia-Burgess Gateshead Ltd, Dukesway, Team Valley Trading Estate Gateshead, Tyne Wear NE11 0UB Tel: +44 (0) 191 401 6133 Fax: +44 (0) 191 401 6101 www.saia-burgess.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders
I was lucky enough to be able to completely plan our pub folder structure before implementation. The only Top-level folders refer to our subsidiary names beneath that are only 5 folders: Depts, Groups, Projects, General, Admin. No one but our exchange admins DL is granted owner access on the folders (no individuals are granted access to the folders - too messy) When someone requests a PF we don't usually create it as requested, I find out how they plan to make use of it and can generally make suggestions for how to best use them. (For example most people create subfolders when they really just want the items categorized.) We spend a lot of time showing people how to customize the views so they can filter or sort the info in the ways that they want to see things. It helps to show them that sub folders are not searchable from the parent. This method does require more work on the admin's part but creates a very usable (not just manageable) structure and we now have the trust of the rest of the business to create something that will work the way they want. Sorry for the long answer... Here are my specific answers: 1. No only admins - and the admins are always granted owner rights on the folders 2. Yes 3. No, we only grant our Line-of-Business DLs with access. 4. Nope. We use the line-of-business DLs for all permissions. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 28, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders allow only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb concerning Public folders? 1. Do you let anyone create them as will? 2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests? 3. Do all folders under Public Folders let all employees in? 4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions on who access it? I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with subfolders like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main folder called Business related or something and have sub folders that only certain folks can get to. Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder hierarchy? Thanks!! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Apologies
Rather than having hundreds (thousands?) of people change their client config, why can't you subscribe a folder to the list. (1 person makes one change vs 100 people make 100 changes - which way makes more sense?) -Original Message- From: Joshua M. Folcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Apologies It takes 2 minutes to make this rule, and then you never get another OOO again. Apply this rule after the message arrives With Out of Office AutoReply in the subject Move it to the Deleted Items folder Rather than posting to this list to complain about the inconsiderate people who send them out, make the rule. - -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Apologies I'd have been understanding about the OOO (I seldom reply to them), but I'm less understanding about the half-assed apology. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Gilbert Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Apologies I totally understand Jon and I think others should be a bit more understanding too. Jason -Original Message- From: Jon.Tout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Apologies As I've explained in a private message to the person below. I had a death in the family, I didn't have time to change my OOA or unsub from the list, please feel free to keep the shity emails flowwing, just do it off list eh? Jon -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 August 2001 14:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Apologies Sure, I'll be more than happy to take responsibility for your laziness/sloppy administration. Anything else you do, that I should undo for you? I mean, if you're a lousy driver, maybe they should close the roads during your commute. -Original Message- From: Jon.Tout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 20, 2001 03:04 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Apologies Subject: Apologies Apologies to anyone who may have been pissed off by the Out of Office reply, hit the delete button next time. ** *** DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 916 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. ** *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMS Limits incorrect?
Hi All, Have any of encountered issues where the limits through an IMS is different than what is actually set? We have a limit of 10MB (1Kb) set on both our IMS boxes but we cannot send anything larger than 7.5 Mb. If we bump up the limit to 20Mb we are able to send our 10Mb messages. I didn't find anything obvious in technet and wanted to check with you all before calling MS support. We are running Exchange 5.5 Enterprise Edition with SP4. Thanks, Scott Perley TELUS Mobility _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Limits incorrect?
Ahh. Thanks very much everyone. I'm not going nuts. (at least not in this instance.) Scott -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect? Remember that the 10MB limit refers to the message size AFTER conversion to SMTP formatting. Hence, if you have a 10MB file BEFORE conversion it will be over your IMS limit AFTER conversion. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Scott Perley-TM Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS Limits incorrect? Hi All, Have any of encountered issues where the limits through an IMS is different than what is actually set? We have a limit of 10MB (1Kb) set on both our IMS boxes but we cannot send anything larger than 7.5 Mb. If we bump up the limit to 20Mb we are able to send our 10Mb messages. I didn't find anything obvious in technet and wanted to check with you all before calling MS support. We are running Exchange 5.5 Enterprise Edition with SP4. Thanks, Scott Perley TELUS Mobility _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
