RE: Public Folder Replication

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yeah that's what I was beginning to think.  I just checked the actual
pub.edb and the modified date goes back to Nov of 2003, but the pub.stm
has a modified date of today.  If I go to a PF and post content on it
from Outlook, should it not modify the modified date on the pub.edb? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication

Sounds like folder replication was not yet complete for the folder(s) in
question. PF replication is a lazy operation IIRC.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Monday, January 12, 2004 1:33 PM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Public Folder Replication
Subject: Public Folder Replication

I am trying to move PFs to from and exchange 2000 server (SP3) to a
exchange 2003 server.  I added the new server as a replica to all pfs.
Here is what is weird.  Before I replicated the folders over, I could
see the contents fine(my mailbox is on the new server).  When the new
server was added as a replica, I could no longer see the contents?
Replication is set to always and permissions are correct.  If I remove
the new server from the replicas I will be able to see the contents
again.  Both servers are in the same routing group.  No errors in the
event log.  I open ESM on the new server, go to the PF tree and select a
PF that has been replicated over and the status window gives me 0 for
size and 0 for items when I know in fact that is wrong.  I can even
initialize a synchronization with no luck.  What's the deal?  Thanks.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Public Folder Replication

[Woodruff, Michael]

I am trying to move PFs to from and exchange 2000 server (SP3) to a
exchange 2003 server.  I added the new server as a replica to all pfs.
Here is what is weird.  Before I replicated the folders over, I could
see the contents fine(my mailbox is on the new server).  When the new
server was added as a replica, I could no longer see the contents?
Replication is set to always and permissions are correct.  If I remove
the new server from the replicas I will be able to see the contents
again.  Both servers are in the same routing group.  No errors in the
event log.  I open ESM on the new server, go to the PF tree and select a
PF that has been replicated over and the status window gives me 0 for
size and 0 for items when I know in fact that is wrong.  I can even
initialize a synchronization with no luck.  What's the deal?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Mailbox Manager Report Customization

[Woodruff, Michael]

Here is a good link

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF012.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager Report Customization


Can anyone point me to resources covering this topic?  Specifically, I'd
like to include information like:
Your current mailbox size is X
The size of your Y folder is Z
etc.

-Yanek.




This electronic message transmission contains information that may be
confidential or privileged.  The information contained herein is
intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not
authorized.  If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise
authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the
information is prohibited.  If you have received this electronic message
transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and
delete all copies of this message.  Cigital, Inc. accepts no
responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly
from the use of this email or its contents.
Thank You.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: unhold

[Woodruff, Michael]

DePlane 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold

DePlane


From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: unhold
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:01 -0800

DeFlowers

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold

DePants

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold

DeThong


-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unhold

Unhold


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
Expand your wine savvy - and get some great new recipes - at MSN Wine. 
http://wine.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

[Woodruff, Michael]

Not a hard limit, I just want to cut off creating users on that store
when I reach that limit to keep the DB size down. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

AM I missing something here. Are you saying you want to limit your DB's
to a certain size. Maybe I am crazy but you can only limit indvidual
mailboxes sizes via property settings or policies, right?



From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:04 -0500

At the current place, we have a separate DB for execs. It was not my
idea. I am not sure if I would do it this way - put all execs in one
basket... that's an easy way to piss off all the execs at once if
something happens.


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

That's what my 20GB was set for.  I was just wondering as far as how you
split up your DBs if you do at all.  Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds
and base the DB size on that.


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs

I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config.  Currently
we have 3 DBs.  1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB).
The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB.
I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that
idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who
shuffle around a lot here.  What are larger orgs like some of you doing
with your config?  I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit.  After
the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same
company DB2 and so on for all of our companies.  Just looking for some
input an recommendations of what is the best practice.  Thanks.

Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications Inc.
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited
visibility
614.543.6405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

___

RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

[Woodruff, Michael]

That's what my 20GB was set for.  I was just wondering as far as how you
split up your DBs if you do at all.  Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds
and base the DB size on that.


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs

I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config.  Currently
we have 3 DBs.  1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB).
The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB.
I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that
idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who
shuffle around a lot here.  What are larger orgs like some of you doing
with your config?  I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit.  After
the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same
company DB2 and so on for all of our companies.  Just looking for some
input an recommendations of what is the best practice.  Thanks.

Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications Inc. 
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited
visibility
614.543.6405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Exchange 2k3 store configs

[Woodruff, Michael]

I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config.  Currently
we have 3 DBs.  1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB).
The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB.
I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that
idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who
shuffle around a lot here.  What are larger orgs like some of you doing
with your config?  I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit.  After
the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same
company DB2 and so on for all of our companies.  Just looking for some
input an recommendations of what is the best practice.  Thanks.

Michael Woodruff
System Administrator 
inChord Communications Inc. 
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited
visibility
614.543.6405 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Powercontrols

[Woodruff, Michael]

It depends on db size.  It will take quite a while.   Are you running
2.0? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Powercontrols

Ontracks support is useless for powercontrols.

How long does it take the people using Ontrack to catalog the tapes?

Nathan

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Powercontrols

Have you actually loaded the tape in the drive?  It needs to be in the
drive instead of an open slot.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Powercontrols

I need to restore 5 mailboxes over three different periods of time.  The
Exchange restore server was recently taken away for a different project,
so rather than recreating the restore environment I thought it a good
time to try Powercontrols.  I have used it before and liked it.

Ok long introduction over.

I have installed Extract Wizard on Backup Exec Server.

I have installed Powercontrols on member server.

I have placed first tape in Slot 1.

Extract Wizard sees the drives but does not see the tape inside.

The problem, according to ontrack (powercontrols), is we need the
Windows drivers, rather than Veritas Drivers.  They are telling me to
install the windows drivers, as the product does not use the veritas
drivers; I don't need to call Veritas to know this will be bad for our
production backups.


What do those who use Powercontrol in the same environment do?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

[Woodruff, Michael]

I've had to deal with it a few times.  I would just use O2k3 (or a
client called GWClient in the 4.5 Backoffice Kit) and move all items out
of his calendar to a new folder (which would allow you to use the
calendar again).  Then I would move all the older items back to the
calendar since the problem just started occurring I figures something
new must have caused it.  The never items I would move in small clumps
either by date or some other category until it locked up again.  That
would let you know what was causing the problem.  It's a pain in the
arse way, but it worked for me. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T.
Slater
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

Greetings!

We have 4 Exchange Servers (E2K Enterprise) and 4 Enterprise Blackberry
Servers (2.6). Over the last few months, we have had our Blackberry
users complain of their Exchange Calendar's locking up when they attempt
to access them. If another user (their assistant) attempts to open their
calendar remotely, it locks that persons machine up as well. We have
tried troubleshooting this to no avail and am hoping someone else has
run in to this. Both MSFT and Blackberry have been useless, pointing the
finger at the other companies software.

Some interesting notes:

* Affected calendar can be opened with Outlook 2003 and with OWA, but
with no other versions of the Outlook client

I am desperate... any ideas?

Thanks,
Jeremy

---
Jeremy T. Slater
Network Administrator
MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com
727.373.8153  -  Direct
727.461.4801  -  Receptionist
727.443.6067  -  Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Powercontrols

[Woodruff, Michael]

Have you actually loaded the tape in the drive?  It needs to be in the
drive instead of an open slot.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Powercontrols

I need to restore 5 mailboxes over three different periods of time.  The
Exchange restore server was recently taken away for a different project,
so rather than recreating the restore environment I thought it a good
time to try Powercontrols.  I have used it before and liked it.

Ok long introduction over.

I have installed Extract Wizard on Backup Exec Server.

I have installed Powercontrols on member server.

I have placed first tape in Slot 1.

Extract Wizard sees the drives but does not see the tape inside.

The problem, according to ontrack (powercontrols), is we need the
Windows drivers, rather than Veritas Drivers.  They are telling me to
install the windows drivers, as the product does not use the veritas
drivers; I don't need to call Veritas to know this will be bad for our
production backups.


What do those who use Powercontrol in the same environment do?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exam 70-284

[Woodruff, Michael]

Well, I passed 70-224 so I guess my next step would be 284.  Did anyone
find 284 to be easier/same/harder than 224?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

[Woodruff, Michael]

Where's the conflict if Ed consults on Microsoft products?  They come to
him for MS products!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

You can be offended all you want, it does not change the FACT that
accepting a direct gift from a vendor creates an obvious problem with
basic conflict of interest rules. I don't make these rules up all I have
stated is that a real or perceived conflict exists. If the argument held
no water, then there would be no reason to be offended.

> It's not exactly a gift.  It's a recognition for a contribution
pefrormed.
> There are, admittedly, strings attached, although there are none that 
> I consider to be ethical issues.
> 
> I completely resent your entire assertion that I am somehow unethical 
> because I accept the title and gifts associated with being an MVP.  I 
> will defend my standards of ethics against anyone's, including your 
> poorly defined and indefensible set.  In fact, I was nearly fired from

> my current job because I defended ethical behavior, but the system 
> worked and I am still here.  (This was completely unrelated to 
> anything surrounding Microsoft or MVP.)
> 
> So, let's get back to the real argument.  Please either (1) prove how 
> being an MVP is unethical, or (2) go away and let this thread rest.  I

> tire of your repeated extrapolations, digressions, and 
> less-than-brilliant treatises.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
> 
> The flaw here is that that "Cisco Certified" has clearly defined 
> things that must be met and requires a payment to the vendor to 
> achieve. You must PAY to get the required material. You must PAY to 
> take the tests. You must PAY for the certification.
> 
> MVP is a gift. There are no explicit requirements and there is no 
> exchange of currency.
> 
> This is the CLEAR difference between certifications and gifts like
MVP.
> 
> > Titles based on criteria that has been successfully met, as in MVP 
> > or Cisco Certified, etc., has no ethical issues. It is an earned 
> > title that denotes an area of expertise. It is up to those who view 
> > the title to determine if the criteria for getting the title 
> > warrants a level of trust and respect.
> > 
> > Personal gifts from vendors that you make purchasing decisions 
> > regarding is unethical.
> > 
> > Rules of ethics are necessary in this business.
> > 
> > Ceaselessly arguing in order to have the last word is poor use of 
> > brain power, poor use of this list and poor use of ethics. Anyone 
> > whose priority is to *always* win the "fight" must sacrifice the 
> > truth and good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics.
> > 
> > Just another opinion :-)
> > 
> > Best Regards,=20
> > 
> > Dan Bartley
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
> > 
> > I got to the first paragraph in your post and pretty much quit 
> > reading.=20
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

[Woodruff, Michael]

Eds response was obvious.  If you didn't like his answer, you could
always pay PSS to answer it for you?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

I disagree. I presented a scenario and asked a "yes" or "no" question. I
supplied enough information for a "yes" or "no" answer.

I did not ask for assistance with a design or a solution, just a simple
question about whether or not Exchange has the capability to do what I
asked. 

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

I think Ed's answer was appropriate given the amount of information you
gave out in your first post.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Posted At: 22 December 2003 15:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


The document management suggestion was inappropriate because we have a
single document that 2 people have modify rights to and another dozen or
so people can read. So deploying a DMS is an expensive solution when the
problem boils down to preventing 2 people from modifying one particular
file at the same time. Especially if there is an inherent method within
Exchange to prevent the problem from happening in the first place, which
is really all I wanted to know.

Thank you for your answer though.

Jason 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

The answer was correct.  What Ed left out was the "No." at the front in
answer to your question of whether there is any way to prevent multiple
editors of an attachment to a public folder.

Did you go look at the 80-20 web site and see what features there
product offers?  What exactly makes the suggestion of a product which
may solve your problem inappropriate?  There are also lots of others
with different feature sets as Ed alluded.

As for little value to the thread, complaining because you didn't get
the answer you wanted regardless of the veracity of the answer really
has low value.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

"Deploy a real document management system"? Not only does this
suggestion not asnwer the question I asked, it is completely
inappropriate for my particular situation, and adds little value to this
thread.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

Deploy a real document management system, one that has the capability to
check out and check in documents.

http://www.80-20.com is one that integrates with Exchange.  There are
many others that may or may not integrate with Exchange.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also
open the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent
this? For example, to force the document to open as read-only when
someone else has it open?

Jason



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:  

RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

[Woodruff, Michael]

Let me get this right.  Digital IDs only let the recipient know that the
email came from a trusted source.  You shouldn't need anything to open
correct? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

No, I just get an email from him and the little icon on the left has an
envelope with a little red ribbon on it.  It will not let me see
anything in the email.  I can however open it up in webmail.  I'm lost. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Gotcha.  So he was not sending you a .id file, right?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-----
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


I had a client send me his contact info in a .vcf.  In this is a digital
certificate.  It says I can use it to read his mail.  I installed the
cert., but still no go. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Why are they sending you Digital IDs?  In Lotus Notes speak, the .id
file is an encrypted file that contains all of the configuration
information and user information about you.  Therefore you can take this
.id file to another machine and use it to do 80% of the setup on the new
Notes client.  As far as I know, Outlook knows nothing about these .id
files and frankly has no use for them.  

INAE and I could be totally wrong.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-----
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


We have a client running Notes (not sure what version) who is sending us
email with attached Digital IDs.  When we try to open the message we get
this error.   "Can't open this item.  Your Digital ID name can not be
found by the underlying security system."


I am not familiar with digital signatures on Lotus Notes or on Exchange
for that matter.   I am assuming the sender is supposed to send a public
key for the recipient to use to open the message?  Is anyone familiar
with this that can give me some advice?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

[Woodruff, Michael]

No, I just get an email from him and the little icon on the left has an
envelope with a little red ribbon on it.  It will not let me see
anything in the email.  I can however open it up in webmail.  I'm lost. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Gotcha.  So he was not sending you a .id file, right?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


I had a client send me his contact info in a .vcf.  In this is a digital
certificate.  It says I can use it to read his mail.  I installed the
cert.,
but still no go. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Why are they sending you Digital IDs?  In Lotus Notes speak, the .id
file is
an encrypted file that contains all of the configuration information and
user information about you.  Therefore you can take this .id file to
another
machine and use it to do 80% of the setup on the new Notes client.  As
far
as I know, Outlook knows nothing about these .id files and frankly has
no
use for them.  

INAE and I could be totally wrong.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


We have a client running Notes (not sure what version) who is sending us
email with attached Digital IDs.  When we try to open the message we get
this error.   "Can't open this item.  Your Digital ID name can not be
found by the underlying security system."


I am not familiar with digital signatures on Lotus Notes or on Exchange
for that matter.   I am assuming the sender is supposed to send a public
key for the recipient to use to open the message?  Is anyone familiar
with
this that can give me some advice?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

[Woodruff, Michael]

Forgot to say, we have an Outlook user here who can read this same
email. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Why are they sending you Digital IDs?  In Lotus Notes speak, the .id
file is an encrypted file that contains all of the configuration
information and user information about you.  Therefore you can take this
.id file to another machine and use it to do 80% of the setup on the new
Notes client.  As far as I know, Outlook knows nothing about these .id
files and frankly has no use for them.  

INAE and I could be totally wrong.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


We have a client running Notes (not sure what version) who is sending us
email with attached Digital IDs.  When we try to open the message we get
this error.   "Can't open this item.  Your Digital ID name can not be
found by the underlying security system."


I am not familiar with digital signatures on Lotus Notes or on Exchange
for that matter.   I am assuming the sender is supposed to send a public
key for the recipient to use to open the message?  Is anyone familiar
with
this that can give me some advice?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

[Woodruff, Michael]

I had a client send me his contact info in a .vcf.  In this is a digital
certificate.  It says I can use it to read his mail.  I installed the
cert., but still no go. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

Why are they sending you Digital IDs?  In Lotus Notes speak, the .id
file is an encrypted file that contains all of the configuration
information and user information about you.  Therefore you can take this
.id file to another machine and use it to do 80% of the setup on the new
Notes client.  As far as I know, Outlook knows nothing about these .id
files and frankly has no use for them.  

INAE and I could be totally wrong.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook


We have a client running Notes (not sure what version) who is sending us
email with attached Digital IDs.  When we try to open the message we get
this error.   "Can't open this item.  Your Digital ID name can not be
found by the underlying security system."


I am not familiar with digital signatures on Lotus Notes or on Exchange
for that matter.   I am assuming the sender is supposed to send a public
key for the recipient to use to open the message?  Is anyone familiar
with
this that can give me some advice?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lotus Notes Digital ID opening in Outlook

[Woodruff, Michael]

We have a client running Notes (not sure what version) who is sending us
email with attached Digital IDs.  When we try to open the message we get
this error.   "Can't open this item.  Your Digital ID name can not be
found by the underlying security system."


I am not familiar with digital signatures on Lotus Notes or on Exchange
for that matter.   I am assuming the sender is supposed to send a public
key for the recipient to use to open the message?  Is anyone familiar
with this that can give me some advice?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Automating email via Exchange

[Woodruff, Michael]

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange

You're welcome.

> That worked like a charm.  Thanks a lot for the tip.
> 
> 
> Damian Scoles
> Senior Technical Analyst
> MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Automating email via Exchange
> 
> 
> You could probably do it in an Outlook form or whatever the current 
> Outlook development flavor is from Microsoft. It changes too often to 
> really keep track.
> 
> You could also do it with API calls to AD and CDO.
> 
> However, the easiest way may be to just export your users to a CSV 
> file or an Access database and use Microsoft Word to perform a mail 
> merge. I have used this successfully in the past and while a little 
> kludgy, it saves you from writing code.
> 
> > Hello all.  I need help with automating an email to 140 users on 
> >our=20  Exchange system. The email contains a generic message for 
> >all, and=20  then some personal information like user name and 
> >password.  Is there=20  a good way to automate this with 
> >Exchange/Outlook? (By automate I=20  mean, send an individual email 
> >to each user with the generic message=20  and then insert their 
> >personal info.) Or do I need to go get a third=20  party utility to
do this?  Thanks for any help you can provide.
> >=20
> >=20
> > Damian Scoles
> > Senior Technical Analyst
> > MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchange&text_mo
> de=3D=
> &
> lang=3Denglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Woodruff, Michael]

I used to work for a MS partner and they definitely got freebies! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get any freebies?

 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Alright, this is a good question. Bottom line is that if, as the hiring
body, you don't care then ethics are irrelevant in your decision and you
do what you want. Ethics do not have to be the end all, be all of
decision making. And, it is also absolutely not the case that MVP's will
always recommend Microsoft software for their own personal gain.

You are exactly correct, you have final say about what you feel is and
is not relevant about your hiring decisions. But, this does not change
the situation that the MVP title is a real or perceived conflict of
interest.
Of course it is, but whether or not you care is up to you.

> My company, Consolidated Widgets, Inc., has previously decided to = 
> standardize on MS software at all levels.  When it comes time to make 
> hiring = decisions, whether for FTEs or for conslutants, how should I 
> proceed?  Let's take = the example of an Exchange deployment project.
> =20
> 
> First thing to be decided:=20
> Do I want a generic technologist?
> Do I want an unrelated technology guru?
> Do I want a Windows/Exchange guru?
> 
> Assuming I choose the last option:
> Do I want someone who has heard of Exchange and may be able to help 
> with = my deployment after reading some books?
> Do I want someone who is an expert, and can demonstrate their 
> expertise somehow?
> 
> The demonstration of the expertise is all that the MVP status is, IMO.

> = You don't attain MVP status by sending in a bunch of cereal box 
> tops, as one = can do to get an MCSE. =20
> 
> You whole premise is that an employee/conslutant with an MVP will 
> automatically recommend technology from their masters *for their own =

> personal gain*.  I don't see this being the case.  If I'm hiring Ed 
> (to use him = as an
> example) to help with my Exchange migration, I've already made the = 
> decision to use that MS technology.  At that point, I want the best 
> person I can = find and afford.  Why hire a consultant, if not for 
> their knowledge?
> 
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

[Woodruff, Michael]

You do too?  I thought I was the only one. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Sometimes I feel funny when I climb the rope in Gym class.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000


My brain tickles when I pick my nose 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

My cat's breath smells like cat food.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
> 
> 
> Tl;dr. Will everyone just drop this discussion? We don't need another
> 75 e-mails on this today.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
> 
> You do not know the specifics of their situation so I am not sure why
> you are so certain that the project was severly underscoped and 
> underbid.
> Rushed, yes. Underscoped and underbid, no. The scope is to get them 
> from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000 and that is what is being 
> delivered.
> Underbid, again no. I can get a client of this size and much larger 
> migrated with only spending 5 days or less on sight. I bring all my 
> own software and tools, set them up, configure them and train them on 
> their use. I can actually install all the software and have all the 
> processes up and running in about a day. Once you've done as many 
> email migrations as I have, you tend to get your process worked out 
> pretty thoroughly. So no, I would not characterize this project as 
> underscoped or underbid. It's a public school system and so yes, they 
> are concerned about costs, but I can deliver everything they need, 
> cover my costs with an acceptable profit and they get everything they 
> asked for, so it has been scoped and bid correctly.
> 
> As for the rest. Yes, everything that I say is my opinion.
> And no, I do not
> say that everyone that is an MVP is unethical. What I say is that the 
> act of being an MVP is accepting compensation from a vendor and hence 
> not something that professional IT people should engage in. MCSE? 
> First, I am not an MCSE and would not advertise that fact if I were 
> one. Yes, I do hold certain vendor certifications. The difference is 
> that I PAY for these certifications. I PAY Microsoft to take the test 
> and then I PAY Microsoft to get their software. It is at a discount, 
> but I still have to pay for it.
> With the MVP, you are not doing any PAYING. Microsoft is PAYING you 
> with a title and gifts, not the other way around. I fail to see how 
> you can miss this obvious distinction, but hey, whatever man.
> 
> Yes, we disagree on this point. I am not sure why you feel that I am
> being closed-minded. I am close-minded because you cannot convince me 
> to believe in your point of view? No, I have my point of view and I am

> quite open-minded enough to understand your point of view. I do not 
> have any "bile" towards vendors although I do believe that they CAN 
> have a corrupting influence. That's why the AMA is concerned over 
> vendors (drug
> companies) paying for clinical studies, etc. The AMA does not want 
> doctors being paid to recommend particular prescriptions because it is

> a conflict of interest. The doctor is supposed to be looking out for 
> the patient's best interests, not their own or the interests of a drug

> company that is paying them. This is all basic stuff.
> 
> What I cannot understand is why people keep bringing this up.
> My position on
> this subject is well known and not likely to change. I have given this

> issue a lot of thought and this is my position on it. And we all know 
> the positions involved and all know who thinks what and all of this 
> conversation is simply a rehash of the six or seven other times this 
> subject has come up.
> So why keep bringing it up? Seems odd to me that a bunch of people 
> would continually bring up the subject and then get mad at ME and 
> blame ME for bringing it up. My position on this is well known and 
> hasn't changed in 8 years. We disagree, great. No big thang. Let it 
> go.
> > If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then
> the project
> > was severely

RE: Public Folder Emails

[Woodruff, Michael]

Replication?  Do you have other instances?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
(OIG/OMP)
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Emails

All,

Is it common for public folder emails to take a bit of time for the
email to be delivered to the destination public folder from the
internet?  I've sent a few test messages from various internet accounts
and it takes about 5-8mins for the emails to be delivered.

Exchange 2000
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
W. 202.690.6342
C.  202.327.1377
F.  202.690.7446
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup rituals

[Woodruff, Michael]

With a full all you need is one tape and the transaction logs and you
will be able to restore to the point of failure.  It doesn't get any
closer or easier than that. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Wouldn't doing a diff/incremental + weekly full give you a tighter
restore point window (restore to the hour instead of to the day)?

Eric Holliday 

- "PST's?  We don't need no stinkin' PST's!!"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Why bother?  The only value I would see in that would be if you were
backing up off-site.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or
incremental during the day?  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto
re.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will
what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server
to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has
enough disk space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles
on Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good
backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and
then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz


The information contained in this message is confidential and is
intended for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message
in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of
this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
result of any virus being passed on.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup rituals

[Woodruff, Michael]

If you have the space and time, do a full every night.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles
on Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good
backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and
then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RUS problems.

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yes, but the only users using that are on Exchange 2003. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RUS problems.

You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached mode would you?

> Exchange 2k sp3
> 
> 
> I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS.  When I create a new

> Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing, the group doesn't 
> show up in the default GAL.  Even though the RUS stamped it with all 
> the correct attributes that the Default GAL is looking for.  There is 
> a flip side to that.  I have custom address lists under the default 
> GAL with custom LDAP queries on them to pull groups and users.  If I 
> go to that specific address list it shows up there, but again, not in 
> the default GAL.  Another thing, if I do a preview of the GAL in ESM, 
> the group shows up there.  It finally shows up if I go back and edit 
> any part of the group.  Any help is greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RUS problems.

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exchange 2k sp3


I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS.  When I create a new
Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing, the group doesn't show
up in the default GAL.  Even though the RUS stamped it with all the
correct attributes that the Default GAL is looking for.  There is a flip
side to that.  I have custom address lists under the default GAL with
custom LDAP queries on them to pull groups and users.  If I go to that
specific address list it shows up there, but again, not in the default
GAL.  Another thing, if I do a preview of the GAL in ESM, the group
shows up there.  It finally shows up if I go back and edit any part of
the group.  Any help is greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Woodruff, Michael]

Not that I am aware of.  My boss just passed it on to me.  I'm not a
participate in that list.  I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.  

I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs
have no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.  

Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM.  Some guy had to shut off 
> OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > 
> > So you have seen this? 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not 
> > have a fix yet".  
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not heard of it... 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ben Winzenz
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Gardner & White
> > > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM
> > > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > Matthew Johnson
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and 
> > noticed a
> > > severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own
> > > credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> > > random and
> > > has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of 
> > > the issue but
> > > does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others have 
> > > seen this
> > > issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft.
> > > 
> > > This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to 
> > shut off OWA
> > > indefinitely because of the issue. 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Matthew Johnson CCNA
> > > 
> > > Network Administrator
> > > 
> > > Investment Scorecard, Inc. 
> > > 
> > > 615.301.7611
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > www.investmentscorecard.com <http://www.investmentscorecard.com/> 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is 
> now out and
> > is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
> > review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how 
> > the problem
> > is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how special
> > interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to 
> > derail any
> > chance of making progress.
> > -
> > 
> > 
> > __

Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Woodruff, Michael]

Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?


-Original Message-
From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw

 

We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and noticed a
severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own
credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at random and
has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of the issue but
does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others have seen this
issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft.

This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to shut off OWA
indefinitely because of the issue. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew Johnson CCNA

Network Administrator

Investment Scorecard, Inc. 

615.301.7611

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.investmentscorecard.com  

 


-
Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is now out and
is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the problem
is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how special
interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to derail any
chance of making progress.
-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 'Requesting Data' again...

[Woodruff, Michael]

You don't fix it.  Outlook XP just sucks. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Bond
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 'Requesting Data' again...

Mail Server :Exchange 5.5 SP4, Server OS Win2K SP4.

Client OS WinXP, Office XP SP2

We are about to start a major XP rollout at work to approximately 3000
users and the pilots have all been going well apart from a nagging
problem with Outlook and the 'requesting data' message. The server
cards, ports and general I/O have been extensively tested on the servers
and there are no dodgy eventlog messages. We are also running the latest
Trend antivirus solutions on the servers with McAffee 7.0 on the WinXP
client machines.
I'm convinced the problem doesn't lie with the servers (but still open
to suggestion).In fact all apparently seems to be well apart from the
fact Outlook hangs all the time. Can anyone who has experienced this
give me any pointers as to how they fixed the issue? It's driving me mad
and could well delay the rollout.

All help greatly appreciated, thanx

Simon

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange IM

[Woodruff, Michael]

I think 5.0 is the latest to work with Exchange. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange IM

Is the chat/IM client that comes with Outlook 2003 the same one that
comes with Outlook 2000? Or is it the version of Exchange that
determines the version of the IM client?

I'm thinking about rolling out an IM system, but we're going to be
moving to Outlook 2003 before the year is up, so I don't want to invest
in user training if it the versions are different.

Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ontrack PowerControls

[Woodruff, Michael]

The new version is out and I know some of you said the earlier one was
buggy and wouldn't open up stores some of the time.  I have already used
the new one and it will open up stores that the older version will not.
I think the error before was "Invalid Data".  Just FYI.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

[Woodruff, Michael]

What are you running for those services now if you don't mind me asking?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

We're a small organization (90 bed rural hospital) and our dept is, of
course, small, too.  Their's just 7 of us and that includes director and
supervisor.  But because of other duties I'm pretty much in charge of
servers, email admin, patch mgmt, firewall, etc.  So, part of me, said
hey that's not too bad; let somebody else handle that burden.  

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


I thought the same at first,  but they do let you manage a great deal of
config.   We just wanted to get a feel for what this kind of service
offered.  We stuck with in house. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that.  It means
that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am
relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses.  I don't like doing
either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options.  It
may mean a little more work for me, but it also means that everything is
customized to my environment.  I doubt that there is much flexibility
from them in changing the options that are already set up... 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday,
November 07, 2003 3:10 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line.  For the whole shebang
(a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back
online), it came to around $5K per year.  Heck, the way Trend's been
upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


Get your wallet ready...  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service?
We had them in for a meeting today.  They offer both an anti-spam and an
anti-virus service.  MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers
where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

[Woodruff, Michael]

I thought the same at first,  but they do let you manage a great deal of
config.   We just wanted to get a feel for what this kind of service
offered.  We stuck with in house. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that.  It means
that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am
relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses.  I don't like doing
either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options.  It
may mean a little more work for me, but it also means that everything is
customized to my environment.  I doubt that there is much flexibility
from them in changing the options that are already set up... 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday,
November 07, 2003 3:10 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line.  For the whole shebang
(a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back
online), it came to around $5K per year.  Heck, the way Trend's been
upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


Get your wallet ready...  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service?
We had them in for a meeting today.  They offer both an anti-spam and an
anti-virus service.  MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers
where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

[Woodruff, Michael]

They must have dropped their price since we looked at them.  5k per
year?  They based our price on throughput.It came to 40k a year I
think.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line.  For the whole shebang
(a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back
online), it came to around $5K per year.  Heck, the way Trend's been
upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-----
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus


Get your wallet ready...  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service?
We had them in for a meeting today.  They offer both an anti-spam and an
anti-virus service.  MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers
where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

[Woodruff, Michael]

Seriously though, I hear it is a pretty good service, but the price is
outrageous.  We met with them and quickly shot that option down. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service?
We had them in for a meeting today.  They offer both an anti-spam and an
anti-virus service.  MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers
where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

[Woodruff, Michael]

Get your wallet ready...  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus

Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service?
We had them in for a meeting today.  They offer both an anti-spam and an
anti-virus service.  MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers
where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?

[Woodruff, Michael]

What happens when you send a test message to an ex employee address on
the DL? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hilda De
Nigris
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?

Hi Ronni,

I'm having difficulty understanding what you mean by "alternate".  I
created a DL called "DEPARTURES", then under the EMAIL ADDRESSES tab of
the DL I added all the SMTP addresses of the employees that have left
the firm.  Under the GENERAL tab, there is no one listed because there
is no physical mailbox.  But, when I look at my relay server, I still
see messages held in the queue of the addresses I listed in this DL
list. The Relay should be sending these emails to the Exchange Server
since the addresses are valid even though they don't belong to anyone.

Is there any way I can monitor on the Exchange Server as to which emails
got sent to the Black-hole?





> I think you misread/misunderstood. You want to list all the e-mail 
> addresses that you want to go poof as alternate internet addresses 
> _for_ the DL. The dl has no addresses in it. So when it is expanded it
expands to nothing.
> Hence the black hole.
> 
> 
> Ronni
> 
> *
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in

> practice, there is.
> -
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
> > 
> > 
> > We have a relay system that holds so much unwanted emails from users

> > who have changed their SMTP addresses as well as those that have 
> > left the firm.  I read a TID that says if you create a DL 
> > (distribution list) on the Exchange (5.5) Server and list all the 
> > SMTP addresses inside the DL, that the Exchange server will just 
> > drop all these unwanted emails into a black hole.  Well, I tried 
> > this and obviously it does not seem to work.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: webmail

[Woodruff, Michael]

That's great! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: webmail

when i access my webmail i recieve only the parent directory 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam

[Woodruff, Michael]

Thanks, I'll run through those.  After all the practice tests and stuff
I am right at 80% which is passing.  I am pressed to take the test at
the end of the month and I am trying to cram as much as possible, so
we'll see how it goes. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AliAdmin
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam

Run through the test questions from http://www.transcender.com or other
test sites. Gives you the enviroment to expenct and usually 40 - 50% of
the questions too. Worked for me :)

Ali
- Original Message -----
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam


Any advice before I take this exam?  This is my first MCP test so I'm
kind of nervous.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 70-224 Exam

[Woodruff, Michael]

Any advice before I take this exam?  This is my first MCP test so I'm
kind of nervous.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Duplicate Meeting Events

[Woodruff, Michael]

I have a user who is a delegate to another.  When she creates a meeting
request and sends it to that user and then accepts it for him, the
meeting request shows up twice in his calendar.  Once Tentative and once
Busy.  When I send a meeting request to him she accepts and it works
fine.  She is using Outlook 2003 and he is on XP.  Both on Exch2k SP3
server.  Looks on KB and Google, but no luck.  Any ideas?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Woodruff, Michael]

Well, we have had 3 of the products listed and its pretty accurate for
those. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm[MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad
imput.. 

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html


Here is how well they work in production.  Not sure about pricing
though, call em.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Plahtinsky
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget

Hello list,
I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm
having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not
going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's
out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  Any help with
my product search would be great.  

Thanks

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Woodruff, Michael]

http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html


Here is how well they work in production.  Not sure about pricing
though, call em.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Plahtinsky
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget

Hello list,
I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm
having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not
going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's
out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  Any help with
my product search would be great.  

Thanks

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending email via a batch file

[Woodruff, Michael]

I can write something that will send email using CDO well under 100k. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich III
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file

If echo to a telnet session is almost good enough I would use blat
(http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/blat.html) I use it all the time in
batch
(.cmd) files for notifications purposes (backup complete/failed,
transfer this completed, update that done, etc)

As others have mentioned, there are some better, fuller-featured,
solutions out there, but at under 100K and a single .exe you can't beat
blat for sending simple e-mails. 

-Walden


Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending email via a batch file

We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a
batch file.  Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is
that he should use?  It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out
from there.  We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out
how to do a return command.  If you know of something different please
let me know.  We are trying to stay away from buying anything third
party.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending email via a batch file

[Woodruff, Michael]

Well, you could use batch files to call something else also. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file

I agree.  However, this person wanted to send e-mail from a batch file.
I interpret that to mean .BAT or .CMD files, for which BLAT is well
suited and ready to go.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file


You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should
have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. 

-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file

BLAT.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending email via a batch file


We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a
batch file.  Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is
that he should use?  It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out
from there.  We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out
how to do a return command.  If you know of something different please
let me know.  We are trying to stay away from buying anything third
party.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending email via a batch file

[Woodruff, Michael]

CDO with VB...

www.Cdolive.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending email via a batch file

We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a
batch file.  Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is
that he should use?  It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out
from there.  We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out
how to do a return command.  If you know of something different please
let me know.  We are trying to stay away from buying anything third
party.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Error I had not seen before

[Woodruff, Michael]

I simple search on KB and I found this...

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;266330 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rosales, Mario
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error I had not seen before

 
Has anyone seen this error before:

An Interface error has occurred. An MTABINDBACK over RPC has failed.
Locality Table (LTAB) index: 92, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error
1722.
Bind error 0, Remote Server Name

Servername, protocol String ncacn_ip_tcp:servername.lexgen.com[2069]
[Base IL INCOMING RPC 36 507] (14)

This is a weird error that I had not seen.  Does anyone know where to
start troubleshooting this?  Message floww seems to be running properly.

Any help would be appreciate it.

Thanks,
Mario



***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed
by it.  

*** 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Attachments

[Woodruff, Michael]

Is it stripped or is Outlook blocking access to it?  Internal or
external recipients? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments

I have some users that when they send an attachment, the attachment is
stripped before the recipient can view it.Have anyone has this problem
before.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Direct Reports

[Woodruff, Michael]

Add that user as a manager to the direct reports.  Or use ADSI. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milt Atkinson
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Direct Reports

W2K3 and E2K3 ... how do you add Direct Reports to an AD account under
the Organization tab?

Can add/clear/modify Manager, but not Direct Reports.

_
Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month
(depending on the local service providers in your area).  
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Multiple Time Zones (More than 2)

[Woodruff, Michael]

Anyone know of an App that will display more than 2 times zones for
Outlook?   Searched around with no clues.  Nothing on Slipstick.
Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drives almost at capacity

[Woodruff, Michael]

180? Wow. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Drives almost at capacity



That "Clown" may have just been enforcing some management decision or
being just plain prudent. A 90 day retention is the minimum that I would
have on my server. 180 days is more like it. It has saved my company
thousands of dollars in revenue because we were able to recover a
seemingly irrelevant email conversation that became the basis of a
dispute later on.

Henry Schlarb

"Most people, when they stumble across truth, merely pick themselves up,
dust themselves off and walk away as if nothing happened."
  With acknowledgment to Winston Churchill



-Original Message-
From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 26, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drives almost at capacity


The clown who worked before me had 90 day retention of deleted items. So
I will be taking care of that tonight!

Thanks so much. Again you guys rule a whole bunch! If you are ever in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin call me for a free dinner!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Messages View on Inbox

[Woodruff, Michael]

This happens internal and external.  We don't have a proxy server.
Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges,
Samantha
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Messages View on Inbox

I had problems with that with users who were accessing from an AOL
windows.  For instance, when they connected to AOL and tried using the
current window to go to OWA, things like you are explaining happened.
The user had to open another instance of IE to get OWA to display
properly.  

Also, I saw this with a Proxy being the culprit.  Had to make changes on
the proxy.  

Hope this helps.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Messages View on Inbox


Exch2k3/Win2k3

When I open OWA the view I like to use is the messages view.  When I use
this view all I get is "Loading" in the message pane.  If I switch to
another view it works fine.  This is happening to all other users on
different browsers, so I am assuming its server side.  Searched on KB
with no luck.  One article was talking about Netscape, but we are using
IE.  Anyone else experiencing this?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA Messages View on Inbox

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exch2k3/Win2k3

When I open OWA the view I like to use is the messages view.  When I use
this view all I get is "Loading" in the message pane.  If I switch to
another view it works fine.  This is happening to all other users on
different browsers, so I am assuming its server side.  Searched on KB
with no luck.  One article was talking about Netscape, but we are using
IE.  Anyone else experiencing this?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....

[Woodruff, Michael]

That would be the Exchange System Manager.  The same thing you probably
used to move the mailboxes. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but

I am sorry.  What is ESM? I do not believe I have every used it?

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but


Go to ESM, browse to information store/Mailboxes, right click on the
Maiboxes and select "Run Cleanup Agent". Better now?


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Duncan Scott
Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but

Good afternoon,

I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We
are
using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000.  After the moves were completed
I
have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated
on
the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on
the
correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K.

I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will
delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that.  We could dump the
mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that
would
cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be
severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in
the
mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled.

What a quandary.  What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it
off..
I don't think so.

Thanks for any help you might have.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211

"Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get
when
you don't!" - Pete Seeger 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extracting to pst

[Woodruff, Michael]

What version do you have?  We have the latest version which is not
limited to 250 users. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Shimmons
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Extracting to pst

I thought the software would only read mailbox stores of up to 250
users!  

 
 
Regards
Aaron Shimmons
Network Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2003 12:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Extracting to pst

Why not do increments of 250? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Extracting to pst

Vitamin Fortified Power Control ?

- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Shimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM
Subject: Extracting to pst


Hi all

I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary.
But my version only works up to 250 mailboxes.  What would you recommend
for 250+ mailboxes?




Regards
Aaron Shimmons
Network Administrator

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extracting to pst

[Woodruff, Michael]

Why not do increments of 250? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Extracting to pst

Vitamin Fortified Power Control ?

- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Shimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM
Subject: Extracting to pst


Hi all

I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary.
But my version only works up to 250 mailboxes.  What would you recommend
for 250+ mailboxes?




Regards
Aaron Shimmons
Network Administrator

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Suspened email account.

[Woodruff, Michael]

I remember when I was in the USAF and had some USMC buddies and they
always made fun of me for being an Exchange Admin in the military since
of course they were all grunts.  At that time (1998) they didn't have
email accounts.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington,
Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Suspened email account.

eh... even the grunts get occasional access... sparse, but they get it.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Suspened email account.


I'm sure whever he's going on TDY, he access to webmail right?  Not
unless hes a grunt. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Suspened email account.

I have a user that is going to go TDY for six months and i would like to
know if there is a way in Exchange 5.5., that i can put a hold on his
email .

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Suspened email account.

[Woodruff, Michael]

I'm sure whever he's going on TDY, he access to webmail right?  Not
unless hes a grunt. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Suspened email account.

I have a user that is going to go TDY for six months and i would like to
know if there is a way in Exchange 5.5., that i can put a hold on his
email .

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Brick Level Backup

[Woodruff, Michael]

You can purchase something like Power Controls which allows you to
restore data directly from your backup tapes.  You can restore
individual mailboxes with it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup

We are being forced to re-evaluate arcserve by our development team
because it's the only product they've found that they can properly
interface with via CLI or API. This isn't for exchange backups, but I
still feel a bit sick about the idea of arcserve being installed on any
of our servers.

We're told that the latest version is stable, but I'm skeptical.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 September 2003 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup

You won't find many recommendations to perform brick-level backups here.
At least not from competent Exchange Admins.  Do a full online backup,
implement deleted items retention and deleted mailbox retention and go
eat some cookies.

As for your comment about Arkanserve crashing, well I'll be!  I NEVER
had a problem with it when I used it (grin).  Truthfully, Arggserver
is the biggest piece of crap software that I have ever come across.  It
doesn't surprise me that brick-backups/restores fail using it.  I
couldn't even get a good restore from an ONLINE backup using it. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM Posted To: Exchange
(Swynk)
Conversation: Brick Level Backup
Subject: Brick Level Backup


Hi all

What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have
gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores.

Any advice welcome.


Regards
Aaron Shimmons
Network Administrator

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Brick Level Backup

[Woodruff, Michael]

Arcserve crash?  I don't believe that! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Shimmons
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Brick Level Backup

Hi all

What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have
gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores.

Any advice welcome.


Regards
Aaron Shimmons
Network Administrator

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

[Woodruff, Michael]

I said Mailfrontier not Matador. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from
subscribers to lists I post to. Not.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

Use Mailfrontier.   I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.


There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft
finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted
everyone.  The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended
to stop using relays.osirusoft.com 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange
(Swynk)
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.


No problem but thought I would post.  One of out Affiliate Hospitals was
rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world.
Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this.  We currently don't
run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=thread&tid=111&;
tid=
126

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

[Woodruff, Michael]

Use Mailfrontier.   I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.

Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.


There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft
finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted
everyone.  The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended
to stop using relays.osirusoft.com 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.


No problem but thought I would post.  One of out Affiliate Hospitals was
rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world.
Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this.  We currently don't
run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=thread&tid=111&;
tid=
126

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9

[Woodruff, Michael]

Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall?  Just a thought...


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9

Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the
beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place?



Thanks...Ray

Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job
still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational
error.
--Dennis Miller 



-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9


We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers.  The
Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it
fail.  Backup rate is SWEET! As well.  Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min
with Exchange.  Love that SDLT tape drive! 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9


Yea, we went through all that as well.
I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck.
Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds..

- Original Message -
From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9


Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the
changes
to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is
that,
communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail
from
that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers
backup
successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and
doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail...



Thanks...Ray

Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job
still
requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error.
--Dennis Miller



-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9


Maybe just changing the order would work

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with
> Backup Exec 9
>
>
> No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no
> problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem
> seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers
> in one job.
>
> Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a
> separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will
> update the list with results.
>
>
>
> Thanks...Ray
>
> Thought for the day:
> A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and
> your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a
> serious vocational error.
> --Dennis Miller
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with
> Backup Exec 9
>
>
> Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you
> looked to see that
> the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights?
>
> SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match
> Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network
> permissions. Windows 2000 & .Net magazine had a web article
> about it not too
> long ago, which I stumbled across the other day.
> http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534
>
> From the article:
> "One end result is that some programs, plus services not
> under control of
> svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon
> with an account
> that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after
> authentication' right. "
>
> I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue.
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EM

RE: Forwarding Email

[Woodruff, Michael]

Create a mail enabled contact with his internet smtp address then
forward all internal mail to that contact. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forwarding Email

Hey all...

(2KSrv/EX2K Fully Spacked)

one of my users would like me to forward all of his mail to his personal
email acct.
All I can find is to forward to an address in the gal, and the only
other thing I have found wanted me to delete his mailbox and create a
mail enabled contact.

Just curious if there is an easier way to do this.


Thanks.


John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ?cmd=galfind

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yes I am using the actual mailbox name.  Why spend money on something
when you can do it for free?  I was just trying to see what the galfind
option looked like on its own and to see if maybe there was some way to
pass the click of a user to the OOO option.   I'll probably just end up
making my own GAL find.  Still cant figure out why its not working?
Thanks for the info. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ?cmd=galfind

Hmm... Works fine for me. Did you substitute an actual mailbox name for
/mailbox/? What does one do once they look up a name in the GAL to
actually set the OOF?

Considered http://www.selisoft.com/en/oof/ ? Seems like a lot less work
than reinventing the wheel.

> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:06:26 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ?cmd=galfind
> 
> I'm trying to create a web app that will allow the helpdesk to set OOO

> messages for our users.  My one problem right now is this cmd option 
> "galfind" just brings up an empty page with this as the source?  I am 
> using this path http://server/exchange/mailbox/?cmd=galfind
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> This cmd was taken straight from the OWA customization doc.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> mike
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

?cmd=galfind

[Woodruff, Michael]

I'm trying to create a web app that will allow the helpdesk to set OOO
messages for our users.  My one problem right now is this cmd option
"galfind" just brings up an empty page with this as the source?  I am
using this path http://server/exchange/mailbox/?cmd=galfind




  



This cmd was taken straight from the OWA customization doc.


Thanks,
mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Default Global Address List issues

[Woodruff, Michael]

Can anyone confirm that this is working for them?  Open you address book
and see if any new users are showing up in the default list...  I have
narrowed it down to the client as Outlook 2000 works just fine.  Thanks.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Default Global Address List issues

Exchange 2k3/Win2k3 with Outlook 2k3...

Scenario..  I create a new mail enabled user.  An outlook XP user on an
Exchange 2k server can see the user show up just fine in the GAL.
Myself, (being on the new Exchange 2k3 server with Outlook 2k3) I cannot
see the user in the Default Global Address List, but I can see them
under the custom made lists...  (example: All Users and custom Company
list).  This seems kind of weird as it only happens to the users who are
running on the new server and are running outlook 2k3.  Permissions are
correct on the list and the allow anonymous registry key is set to 0
(per Q?) I don't remember the article, but it had something to do with a
security patch for windows 2k.  All the older users show up just fine,
its just newly created ones.  The accounts are also stamped by the RUS
as I have checked the showaddressbook attribute using ADSI.  ???
Thanks.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Default Global Address List issues

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exchange 2k3/Win2k3 with Outlook 2k3...

Scenario..  I create a new mail enabled user.  An outlook XP user on an
Exchange 2k server can see the user show up just fine in the GAL.
Myself, (being on the new Exchange 2k3 server with Outlook 2k3) I cannot
see the user in the Default Global Address List, but I can see them
under the custom made lists...  (example: All Users and custom Company
list).  This seems kind of weird as it only happens to the users who are
running on the new server and are running outlook 2k3.  Permissions are
correct on the list and the allow anonymous registry key is set to 0
(per Q?) I don't remember the article, but it had something to do with a
security patch for windows 2k.  All the older users show up just fine,
its just newly created ones.  The accounts are also stamped by the RUS
as I have checked the showaddressbook attribute using ADSI.  ???
Thanks.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sobig.F alert

[Woodruff, Michael]

China is down  Now is the time to hit them!

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert

Can we blame this virus for the big jump in gas prices today?

-Original Message-
From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


Me too. Oh well, now we can still go the bar after work instead of
staying and fighting viruses all nite. 

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


This is the most anti climactic virus ever. I want my money back

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


Looks like my upstream has killed routes the all of theseway to go
ISP.

-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


68.38.159.161 and 65.95.193.138 seem to be the last two standing unless
ICMP is turned off on some of the other servers/pc's.


> Because that really wouldn't matter, the theory is that the infect 
> machines are going to get their instructions from these 20 masters 
> servers and then launch a distributed attack on the root DNS
> servers..1 minute left
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> well's that where My q came inChris even put up a piece which said

> they new about 20 servers ..18 OFFL, 2 ONL
> 
> so then they have ID'd these things right? why not publish the IP 
> and/or the domain names ..so people could block these too... it just 
> say's about UDP port ..couldnt that also change on the fly?
> 
> bill
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> wouldve been nice for them to publish the IP list so we could block it

> from our firewalls.  Incoming and outgoing.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> If only Arnold wasn't running for governor. We could send him back in 
> time to stop Skynet.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> As if we all didn't have enough to do?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> T-minus 10 minutes .   Its the end of the world run for your
> lives...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for 
> the new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than 
> sorry.
> 
> T-minus 20 minutes.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the 
> internet.
> 
> T-Minus 30 minutes
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt 
> Plahtinsky
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon.
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html
> 
> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1211&e=1&u=/nm/200308
> 22
> /tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dc&sid=95573372
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Sobig.F alert
> 
> 
> FYI...
> 
> http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Sobig.F alert

[Woodruff, Michael]

Nice... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert

If only Arnold wasn't running for governor. We could send him back in
time to stop Skynet.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


As if we all didn't have enough to do?

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


T-minus 10 minutes .   Its the end of the world run for your
lives...

-Original Message-
From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for the
new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than sorry. 

T-minus 20 minutes.

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the
internet.

T-Minus 30 minutes

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert


Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1211&e=1&u=/nm/20030822
/tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dc&sid=95573372

-Original Message-
From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sobig.F alert


FYI...

http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential
and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from all computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.

RE: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yeah we have seen this as well.  Not that many times though.  They also
told us it would be fixed in the next version.  It has definitely paid
for itself in the data we have recovered.  Once the bug is fixed, it
will be a very solid/useful product. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...

Michael,

How useful do you find Power Controls? We purchased it and have used it
on a few occasions with about a 50:50 success rate. On the times that it
fails it said that the edb is unreadable. Ontrack says this can occur
when a lot of transaction logs haven't been committed to the database.
Apparently version 2, due out in September I think, will reduce this
problem.

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2003 18:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...


Exact same thing as Power Controls, which is what we use.  Nice products
for DR. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...

Not sure how many of you have seen this...most I would imagine:

http://www.aelita.com/products/ARMEx.htm

For all of you folks that *insist* on doing BLB's, I would think this
product would make you a hero, if it works as advertised.

Regardless of your policy concerning BLB's, has anyone tested this
product?
If so, does it function as advertised?  Since I don't have a test lab
available, I would be interested in hearing some opinions.

TIA,

Jim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exact same thing as Power Controls, which is what we use.  Nice products
for DR. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Aelita Recovery Manager (ARM) for Exchange...

Not sure how many of you have seen this...most I would imagine:

http://www.aelita.com/products/ARMEx.htm

For all of you folks that *insist* on doing BLB's, I would think this
product would make you a hero, if it works as advertised.

Regardless of your policy concerning BLB's, has anyone tested this
product?
If so, does it function as advertised?  Since I don't have a test lab
available, I would be interested in hearing some opinions.

TIA,

Jim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook 2k3 Beta Synch Errors

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exch2k3 with Outlook2k3 tech refresh...I get these errors every time
it synchs and from looking around I notice other admins are having the
same issue.  Is it a beta problem with Outlook I hope?  Anyone else
seeing this?  Thanks.



9:38:23 Synchronizer Version 11.0.5329
9:38:23 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Woodruff, Michael'
9:38:23 Done
9:38:23 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
9:38:23 0X8004010F

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

[Woodruff, Michael]

We only run a 2 tier AV protection as well.  Mailsweeper at the Gateway
and Sophos on the Desktops.  We are looking into Sophos for Exchange,
but I'm not sure we even need it.  Our level of detection and protection
so far has been outstanding. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email
systems. 
My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with
desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is
Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also
protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels.

_
Get MSN 8 and help protect your children with advanced parental
controls.  http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Netdiag kerberos ticket error

[Woodruff, Michael]

Aside from Samanthas problem, I am running netdiag form my soon to be
Exchange 2k3 box.  Its running Win2k3.  All tests pass except the
Kerberos Test.  Here is the error...


Kerberos test. . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
Found DC 'Domain Controller' in domain 'Domain'.
[FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for
host/servername.domain.com.

The articles on KB do not reflect my problem.  I do not have any event
entries or errors anywhere.  I seen from a post on Google that the
problem was a bug with netdiag and I seen the Q244474 article on KB, but
it also states other errors which I do not receive so I am weary about
making those changes.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Storage limts not working

[Woodruff, Michael]

That would probably be it..  Thanks, didn't see that one.  I tried to
run the post SP3 patch, but it hosed my server and had to roll back out.
Restarting the IS is not an option so I guess they are screwed. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Storage limts not working

Does this fit the bill?

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327378

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 15
August 2003 14:44 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Storage limts not working
Subject: Storage limts not working


Exchange 2k sp3.  A user went over our storage limits and cant send.  I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until she sends out
these important emails while she is on the road.  The exchange server
isn't reflecting the change though even after I ran the RUS with no
errors?  Any ideas?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Storage limts not working

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exchange 2k sp3.  A user went over our storage limits and cant send.  I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until she sends out
these important emails while she is on the road.  The exchange server
isn't reflecting the change though even after I ran the RUS with no
errors?  Any ideas?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

[Woodruff, Michael]

Veritas Backup Exec 

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Hello All.

What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000?  Need to do
brick levels too.  I know...management wants the brick levelstried
talking them out of it.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Monitoring DL Usage

[Woodruff, Michael]

Promodag has a report for used DLs.  It works great for us.  A ton of
reporting. 

-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage

I actually was just asking what people might be using and would/could
recommend. I don't remember asking anyone to research, I can do that all
on my own. Reading through some posts I found MessageStats, which was
recommended by Missy for mailbox limits and I will also look at NetIQ's
product which was just mentioned by Kevin. Thanks all...

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage


Well since you want us to recommend and research this for you, how much 
money do you want to spend and how do you want the reports to run 
manually/auto if so daily/weekly. Which version of Exchange and what is
your

configuration. Are any of the DL personal?


From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:03:26 -0700

Ya, I thought about that one but I thought there might be something out
there that people use for reporting and could recommend

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Monitoring DL Usage


Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail.

 > From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700
 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Subject: Monitoring DL Usage
 >
 >> Hello,
 >>
 >> I would like to monitor the use of our many DL's to see if they're
>>
even being used. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to go  >>
about
this? A search of KB's didn't turn up anything but I might not  >> have
used
the right query syntax.  >>  >> Cheers,  >> Tony


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exchange was made available on the 4th?  I havne't seen or heard
anything yet. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FWIW, should be soon.  It was made available to Volume Licensing
customers as of Aug. 4.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released
then go to it and skip Ex2K?  What we are/planning on doing is to get
our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let
exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3
(OS & EX) and complete the migration.  I don't see any real advantages
in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months.
You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come
home using an RC product. Just my thoughts.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003



OK, next question:  If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers
(member servers) with exchange 2000.  And then upgrade to exchange 2003
later?


-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Hey, sorry that I asked this question...  didn't mean to start up a
major discussion.  Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. 

However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange
2003 in bata or rtm at this time?  I have the enterprise edition 120 day
eval copy at this time.  Once I install it, then I will have to use the
enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires.  

Ron


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003
platform?


Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Woodruff, Michael]

>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SPAM Product

[Woodruff, Michael]

We just purchased MailFrontier and I have to say this is the most
amazing Anti Spam product I have seen.   Compared to Mailsweeper that we
were running, MailFrontier blows it away.  In the last day out of 20,000
messages, 14,000 has been caught as SPAM.   Only 2 false positives out
of the whole deal so far.   Just thought I'd let some of you know since
you were looking for a good product.  No content scanning yet, but they
said it will be coming in future releases.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

[Woodruff, Michael]

We have a 40GB store on a XIOTECH SAN useing BE 9.0 with the Exchange
Agent and backing up with a ADIC Scalar 100 LTO.  ADIC says a gig a
minute is normal

-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Wow, how are you doing the gig a minute?  I have a 160GB backup and it
takes almost 24 hours on Veritas 8.6.  It really slows down when it hits
the mailboxes though.  Do you have the drive mounted directly to the
exchange server?

Thanks,
Paul

-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000


A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote
agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange
server).
I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately
3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000


I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. 

-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great.  Just make sure your IS is
not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information
Stores...does brick level also.

Nick Thakkar
Network Administrator
American Medical Response
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
209-993-6974
 

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Hello All.

What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000?  Need to do
brick levels too.  I know...management wants the brick levelstried
talking them out of it.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
that is

confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and
delete
this
message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
reproduction 
of this message or the information contained in this message or the
taking
of
any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your cooperation.


**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Woodruff, Michael]

They don't have to be in place upgrades correct?  We can bring in a new
Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old?
Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the
non-supported possibility always exists otherwise.

Neil

-Original Message-----
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


Here is my structure...  I have a FE and a few BE servers.  I want to
bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our
users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers.  So I cant bring
in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right?  I
would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade
our current FE to Exchange 2003 first.  Damn, that sucks.  I don't trust
in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE?  Can you
have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative
Group?  Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Windows 2000 Backup

[Woodruff, Michael]

Why not run a full everynight and then use something like Power Controls
to access the backup if needed?  How often do you see yourself restoring
someones mail? 

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Backup

Sorry for the confusion I caused.  I mean the W2k NTBackup that comes
with Windows 2000 Advanced Server when Exchange 2000 is loaded you can
see the BL or mailboxes.  

Seems from your message that you use the backup that comes with WIN2k
server.  How does it work for you.  My management wants the BLBs and I
want to know if anyone used the W2k NTBackup for this?

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup


Hello Samantha:

In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents!

NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge
to export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier).

We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k
data to tape and it works very well.

Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your
backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and
steps) is key as well.

Good luck!
-Juancho





> NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have 
> that level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that

> kind of inefficiency.
> 
> > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Windows 2000 Backup
> > 
> > Hello All.
> > 
> > I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000
Backup.
> > Anyone had any experience with this?  It looks like it does BLB too!
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Woodruff, Michael]

These upgrade articles are kind of quirky to me.  I don't think they
quite explain the upgrade scenarios that well.  For instance the part
about removing MMIS before an upgrade to Exchange 2003.  Would if I am
not doing an in place upgrade and doing a fresh intall on a separate
server?  I shouldn't have to remove it then correct? 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

Sure.  I don't fear in-place upgrades from 2000 to 2003 like I did from
5.5 to 2000, though.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:26 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


They don't have to be in place upgrades correct?  We can bring in a new
Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old?
Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the
non-supported possibility always exists otherwise.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


Here is my structure...  I have a FE and a few BE servers.  I want to
bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our
users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers.  So I cant bring
in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right?  I
would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade
our current FE to Exchange 2003 first.  Damn, that sucks.  I don't trust
in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE?  Can you
have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative
Group?  Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-----Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To u

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[Woodruff, Michael]

Sweet, thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download
it from the site as of that date.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Exchange was made available on the 4th?  I havne't seen or heard
anything yet. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FWIW, should be soon.  It was made available to Volume Licensing
customers as of Aug. 4.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released
then go to it and skip Ex2K?  What we are/planning on doing is to get
our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let
exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3
(OS & EX) and complete the migration.  I don't see any real advantages
in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months.
You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come
home using an RC product. Just my thoughts.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003



OK, next question:  If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers
(member servers) with exchange 2000.  And then upgrade to exchange 2003
later?


-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Hey, sorry that I asked this question...  didn't mean to start up a
major discussion.  Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. 

However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange
2003 in bata or rtm at this time?  I have the enterprise edition 120 day
eval copy at this time.  Once I install it, then I will have to use the
enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires.  

Ron


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003
platform?


Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:

RE: SPAM Product

[Woodruff, Michael]

The cost is per user.   We got a huge discount for holding out for a
while.  I can tell you it is much much cheaper than some others we
looked at.  Its well worth the money if you are wanting to stop SPAM
dead.   They claim they can block 95% and they have kept their word and
more. 

-Original Message-
From: Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SPAM Product

Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much?
Thanx

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Woodruff, Michael]

Even if I plan on not using the FE to access the new Exchange 2003
server?   

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

You always have to upgrade FEs first



-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick question...

[Woodruff, Michael]

You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder.  Besides you
probably can't anyway since they are in use.  Are they of large size and
maybe taking a little while to be sent?  The badmail you can safely
delete. 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question...

Hi, Exch 2000
I have items in my badmail directory  - most recent from 28/07/03 and I
also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder.
Can I delete these items?  Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system
manager Thanks

Support Analyst
TKC Group Ltd
Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est
Keynsham
BS31 1TZ
UK
0117 916 1320


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yeah, it grabbed a GC, but it wasn't working.   It keeps saying no
entries were found with the search and I know they exist.  I broadened
the search scope to the top of the domain (dc=domain,dc=tld) and it
works.  It I add another lever like (cn=Company
Directory,dc=domain,dc=tld) it doesn't work. Is it maybe the spaces in
the company directory name?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage

It's going to use the same account that it used to authenticate against
the mailbox. In my config, it automatically selected a GC to query, and
is doing AD lookups out of the box. I take it, it's not for you? Are you
getting errors?

> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:57:45 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> Yes sir. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: New Entourage
> 
> You are using the Exchange service?
> 
>> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:43:54 -0400
>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>> 
>> I can't get the darn thing to do active directory lookups?   Where do
>> you specify the cn to the account to use to do searches?
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>> 
>> An amazing soy substitute!
>> 
>> -Ben-
>> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information 
>> Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
>> 
>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 18:00
>>> To: Exchange Discussions
>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>>> 
>>> It's not Outlook, but an incredible simulation!
>>> 
>>> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
>>> "Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century."
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
> Scharff
>>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:02 PM
>>> To: Exchange Discussions
>>> Subject: Re: New Entourage
>>> 
>>> Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange aware, you

>>> mean 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and 
>>> automatic configuration of address book and other account settings 
>>> to support Exchange qualifies, then maybe.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
>>>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>>>> 
>>>> I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be Exchange-aware if it

>>>> was, right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user
>>> ~18 months
>>>> ago we had to settle for the previous version of Outlook
>>> and the user
>>>> had to switch between OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we 
>>>> didn't want to open up IMAP or
>>>> POP3 for him. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _
>>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>> Web Interface:
>>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
>>> ext_mode=&lang
>>> =english
>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _
>>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>> Web Interface: 
>>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
>>> ext_mode=&lang=english
>>> To unsubscribe:

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

[Woodruff, Michael]

I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. 

-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great.  Just make sure your IS is
not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information
Stores...does brick level also.

Nick Thakkar
Network Administrator
American Medical Response
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
209-993-6974
 

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Hello All.

What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000?  Need to do
brick levels too.  I know...management wants the brick levelstried
talking them out of it.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Woodruff, Michael]

Here is my structure...  I have a FE and a few BE servers.  I want to
bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our
users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers.  So I cant bring
in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right?  I
would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade
our current FE to Exchange 2003 first.  Damn, that sucks.  I don't trust
in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE?  Can you
have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative
Group?  Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yes sir. 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage

You are using the Exchange service?

> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:43:54 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> I can't get the darn thing to do active directory lookups?   Where do
> you specify the cn to the account to use to do searches?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> An amazing soy substitute!
> 
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information 
> Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 18:00
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>> 
>> It's not Outlook, but an incredible simulation!
>> 
>> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
>> "Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century."
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Scharff
>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:02 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: New Entourage
>> 
>> Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange aware, you
>> mean 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and
>> automatic configuration of address book and other account settings to
>> support Exchange qualifies, then maybe.
>> 
>> 
>>> From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
>>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>>> 
>>> I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be Exchange-aware if it
>>> was, right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user
>> ~18 months
>>> ago we had to settle for the previous version of Outlook
>> and the user
>>> had to switch between OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we
>>> didn't want to open up IMAP or
>>> POP3 for him.  
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Web Interface:
>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
>> ext_mode=&lang
>> =english
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Web Interface: 
>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
>> ext_mode=&lang=english
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Woodruff, Michael]

I can't get the darn thing to do active directory lookups?   Where do
you specify the cn to the account to use to do searches? 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage

An amazing soy substitute!

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 18:00
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> It's not Outlook, but an incredible simulation! 
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> "Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century."
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: New Entourage
> 
> Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange aware, you 
> mean 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and 
> automatic configuration of address book and other account settings to 
> support Exchange qualifies, then maybe.
> 
> 
> > From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > 
> > I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be Exchange-aware if it 
> > was, right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user
> ~18 months
> > ago we had to settle for the previous version of Outlook
> and the user
> > had to switch between OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we 
> > didn't want to open up IMAP or
> > POP3 for him.  
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Messages stuck in queue

[Woodruff, Michael]

Do you have someone sending out large messages? 

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messages stuck in queue

One of my exchange servers is failing to route messages.  They are all
stuck in either a queue to our other exchange server or in an internet
mail queue. 
  We're running Exchange 2k SP3 and Win2k SP3.  Any ideas?  Ive searched
technet and google and haven't found anything useful.

Jason Rader
Printpack Inc

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4

[Woodruff, Michael]

I just heard on August 4th there will be an announcment by Microsoft
concerning the beta. 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4

NDAs make that somewhat difficult.

On 07/30/03 10:03, "Holstrom, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'd be interested in hearing about it as well...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4
> 
> Anybody trying to work with this yet?  Please email offlist.
> 
> Thanks.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: High Availability Exchange 2000

[Woodruff, Michael]

no 

-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000

yes.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

[Woodruff, Michael]

You have to copy the whole edb to hard disk first. 

-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

This powertools sounds interesting. When it reads the online backup from
the tape does it need to read the whole thing or can it locate a
mailbox, message etc on the tape and extract it? I tried to find out on
the website but it's not exactly clear as to whether you can do this...

We've had to do a few recovery restores to get back mailboxes in the
past and while this is dead easy, it takes hours to restore the IS from
tape. 


> -Original Message-
> From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 July 2003 17:50
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> 
> 
> Right in that case the latest version of PowerTools is able to read 
> the backup tape and get the priv.edb file directly from the Online 
> Backup. Note I wrote online backup not offline backup. I don't know 
> how this works as well use Netbackup but that is the way it is 
> supposed to work, if not then call Ontrack support. You are never 
> going to be able to backup the priv.edb unless you stop the 
> information store which is not a good idea. If it can't read the tape 
> directly then you would need to do an online restore to a separate 
> server where the priv.edb will be located and you can then use 
> PowerTools to access it. We have evaluated PowerTools and were not 
> overly impressed it couldn't read priv.edb files if the database had 
> been under load and created lots of transaction logs. I believe a 
> newer version currently in beta and to be released in September may 
> work better.
> 
> Paul
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 July 2003 17:39
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> 
> 
> Bingo,
> 
> That's the one...
> 
> We were tryin to back-up the PRIV.EDB for easier access by the 
> utility. But, we were sure that you can't directly back-up the 
> PRIV.EDB.  Just trying to quell an argument with one my guys, and 
> needed to make sure that you weren't able to backup the PRIV.EDB 
> without stopping the services.
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> 
> That is not possible you can't do a file backup of the databases files

> they are locked open unless you stop the IS.
> What app are you trying to use to read the edb files is it Ontrack's 
> Power Tools?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 July 2003 17:30
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> 
> 
> We are ticking off the option for the Information Store, but have now 
> modified the job to backup the PRIV.EDB as well.
> Only reason we're doing this is because we would like to have the 
> actual PRIV.EDB in a backup media for access by one of our 3rd party 
> applications that can access the PRIV.EDB, and extract mailboxes or 
> actual messages.
> 
> Paul
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> 
> No, you don't have to stop the services.
> 
> Please clarify how you are using veritas; i.e. are you looking on the 
> relevant drive and ticking priv.edb as a file to backup? If so, this 
> won't work, you need to tick 'Microsoft Exchange Information Store' in

> the veritas directory tree. If this doesn't appear then your exchange 
> agent isn't installed properly.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 30 July 2003 17:16
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> > 
> > 
> > Well, actually we are running veritas with the exchange agent, only 
> > thing is that the PRIV.EDB file is skipped.  I thought that in order

> > to backup the PRIV.EDB file you have to stop the exchange services?
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > Paul
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
> > 
> > Oh, the backup won't cause any problems.  Not that it would be of 
> > any use...
> > 
> > 
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:14 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: R

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

[Woodruff, Michael]

If he is using Veritas he needs the Exchange Agent to do an online
backup. 

-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

Hello All,

First, wanted to say that you guys have always been a great help in the
past.  I have a simple, but probably dumb question.  I need some ammo
though before I get back to one of my employees about what he's doing.
Can someone just verify what I'm saying...
It is not possible to back-up the PRIV.EDB files on Exchange 5.5 unless
you stop the Exchange services right?  One of my guys is trying to run a
veritas backup that includes the PRIV.EDB file, and the file is skipped
during the back-up operation.  I advised him as to why it does this, and
how to correctly do it.  He still swears that it's veritas software
screwing up...

Any help would be great,

Thanks
Paul

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

(FYI the mailbox needs Owner rights.)  So if the EventConfig permissions
are set, reinstall the AutoAccept script on the mailbox and you should
be able
to test it immediately.   If that doesn't work, try stopping and
starting
the Event service again and retest.   

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Rob,

I found it and set the permissions.  I suppose it takes time to synch it
up..

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Rob

I am fairly new at AutoAccept utilities... Where do I look for the
EventConfig folder?  Sorry.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Hi Mike.   Have you set up the client permissions for the mailbox in the
EventConfig folder?   I've forgotten to do that on occasion.And I
think
I learned the hard way that if this step was missed, you need to
uninstall
the Autoaccept script again, set up the EventConfig settings, then
reinstall
the script.

Rob Sargent

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Ed,

Thanks.  I thought that was the case, so I deleted the AutoAccept folder
on
the resource. I then ran the AutoAccept utility script on that new
resource.
I checked the event Service and it was running.  Nothing happened.

I then stopped and started the service again.  To no avail.  Nothing
happens.  Help

Thanks... Ed, you are the best, or so they say!!!

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


A script does not move with a mailbox.  You must reinstall the script on
the
new server and ensure that the Event Service is running.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 6:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Good morning,

Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 

I moved server of my resource mailboxes for one server to another.  Once
I
did this my Auto Accept script stopped working.  I ran the Auto Accept
script on these resources again, and again no auto accepting? What am I
doing wrong?

Thanks,


Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211

"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take but by the
moments
that take our breath away."


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
htt