RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not be able to read RTF format and some wont be able to read HTML format. Have you or your lawyers saw some email messages that had some junk HTML code within a message so bad that you can't read the message itself. And there's waayyy to many people have different preference on how to decorate their email message with HTML to a point it can be quite annoying for those who receive it. So the main point is - plain text is the best email format out there - barnone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text. Nothing more, nothing less. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on the best message format. Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. Thanks, Darrin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Have you ever read legal briefs? They make plain text look good. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on the best message format.
I try not to look at anyone else's briefs. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Have you ever read legal briefs? They make plain text look good. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
It's common law. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J. Carter Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on the best message format.
An HTML message will take up more space than the same content in plain text message. Also, not every mail client will display the contents correctly (my linux mail client shows the HTML code). Read this: http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml AW On Thursday 09 January 2003 06:10 pm, you wrote: Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it. - Original Message - From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM Subject: Opinions on the best message format. Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. Thanks, Darrin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on the best message format.
For $200 an hour, I'd be happy to explain it to the bloosuc^H^H^H^H^H^H^H gentlemen. On 1/9/03 11:10, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Each had its own purpose, time and place. Most people that I know, use them all. It is common for Exchange Server users with the heavy Outlook client to set their default to RTF and use the others on an as needed basis. You do understand that under the hood, this is a silly question. Body part 3 or RFC defined message text is plain text by definition, and anything else almost always gets packaged as one of the following: MME, body part 14, or body part 15. Systems like Exchange/Outlook disguise that and make RTF look like regular message text. Except for this misleading display thing that is going on, it is really an apples and oranges comparison. -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on the best message format. Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. Thanks, Darrin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Yeah - you're more of a thong man yourself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. I try not to look at anyone else's briefs. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Have you ever read legal briefs? They make plain text look good. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? 1) Not every reader in the world can read html or RTF, but to be fair that's less and less of a concern. 2) For the same reason the lawyers use plain text on court documents. RTF and HTML allow you to get too cought up in colors and fonts making the text harder, not easier, to read. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Yeah, like those g0ddamn musical e-mails some people think are so funny. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Jeremy Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not be able to read RTF format and some wont be able to read HTML format. Have you or your lawyers saw some email messages that had some junk HTML code within a message so bad that you can't read the message itself. And there's waayyy to many people have different preference on how to decorate their email message with HTML to a point it can be quite annoying for those who receive it. So the main point is - plain text is the best email format out there - barnone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
