RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-27 Thread Ed Crowley
:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS ratio

Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-27 Thread Martin Tuip
: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:06 AM Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate A reasonably good estimate based on the inputs I got came to about 2GB/hour. Your mileage may vary widely. So figure 20 hours. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Thank you all for your response, I'll try the move mailbox. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 01:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate I agree with missy - Original Message

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Andy David
Lift with your legs, not your back. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 08:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Thank you all for your

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
How much does 40GB weigh anyway Andy? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 02:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Lift with your legs, not your back. Andy David J Muller International

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Mynhier
Guess it depends on how big those ones and zeros are... -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/26/01 7:26 AM Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate How much does 40GB weigh anyway Andy? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Osborn, Joel
Is Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Jim Helfer
Rate Guess it depends on how big those ones and zeros are... -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/26/01 7:26 AM Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate How much does 40GB weigh anyway Andy? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Mynhier
Transfer Rate Guess it depends on how big those ones and zeros are... -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/26/01 7:26 AM Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate How much does 40GB weigh anyway Andy? -Original Message- From: Andy David

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Khandu Veer
Discussions Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Exmerge will kill his single instance storage, and his 40GB database will end up at almost 50GB if he's got only a 1.2:1 ratio. I'd try moving the mailboxes in chunks of 50-100 at a time, and ensure that it's done from the receiving server's Admin program

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Khandu Veer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Missy, I had

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled form. My

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Thanks Tom That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
September 2001 03:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate No, that was by selecting 850 mailboxes and moving them all. One by one? Heh. Someone's a glutton for punishment. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Herrick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate No, that was by selecting 850 mailboxes and moving them all. One by one? Heh. Someone's a glutton

Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Glenn Corbett
Sander, Any reason you think that exmerge will bring along corrupted messages ? Since Exmerge is essentially copying the message from the mailbox store to the .PST file, a corrupted message will cause Exmerge to hiccup. We had major store corruption some time ago, approx 600 of the 1600

Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread missy koslosky
- Original Message - From: Glenn Corbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:19 PM Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Sander, Any reason you think that exmerge will bring along corrupted messages ? Since Exmerge