RE: Exchange server migration

2002-10-16 Thread Rob Hackney
oops sorry misread question. apologies -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server migration If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If your in mixed you

Exchange server migration

2002-10-15 Thread Albert Charron
Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site

Re: Exchange server migration

2002-10-15 Thread Tony Hlabse
: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:27 AM Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data

RE: Exchange server migration

2002-10-15 Thread Rob Hackney
out of their mailboxes. I've got some notes if you'd like me to pmail them to you? Rob -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Orin Rehorst
/topas.html -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server migration Same what Tony H. sayed. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Tony Hlabse
No tickie no washie - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM Subject: RE: Server migration Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go to E2K. True

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.
Very much true, yes. -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go to E2K. True? Regards, Orin

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
True dat. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Michelle M. Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration Very much true, yes. -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Chris Scharff
Not true at all. -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go to E2K. True? Regards

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread William Lefkovics
You are *so* mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration Not true at all. -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Chris Scharff
options. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration You are *so* mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread William Lefkovics
Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration It's not true. He doesn't need to set up AD to migrate to E2K... He could outsource his Exchange environment to any number of companies who would take away all that technical hassle for him. It was a vague question. There's nothing wrong with expanding upon

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Chris Scharff
That's not what I call you :* -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration And they call me pedantic. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Chris Scharff
I noticed you avoided me for the majority of the week... Was it someone I ate? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration I knew you were going to reply

RE: Server migration

2002-10-14 Thread Ed Crowley
, October 14, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server migration I noticed you avoided me for the majority of the week... Was it someone I ate? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange

Server migration

2002-10-13 Thread Orin Rehorst
Using 5.5 (14 GB) on NT. Have new server with Win2k. Want new server to have 4 Exchange databases for faster restores to recover a mailbox. What is best way to migrate? a. Move mailboxes to 5.5 on new server, then upgrade to E2K. b. Move mailboxes to E2K. Pls advise. TIA Orin Rehorst

Re: Server migration

2002-10-13 Thread Tony Hlabse
13, 2002 9:35 AM Subject: Server migration Using 5.5 (14 GB) on NT. Have new server with Win2k. Want new server to have 4 Exchange databases for faster restores to recover a mailbox. What is best way to migrate? a. Move mailboxes to 5.5 on new server, then upgrade to E2K. b. Move

Re: Server migration

2002-10-13 Thread Uso
Same what Tony H. sayed. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 6:35 PM Subject: Server migration Using 5.5 (14 GB) on NT. Have new server with Win2k. Want new server to have 4 Exchange