Hello,
One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate
Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit
on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from
it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit
t I heard (I was of course not in the office at the time), she did the
equivalent of a "move & paste" and not a "copy & paste".
Allison Wittstock
inubit AG
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> I think you are confused. The mailbox size limit does
> not apply to
.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
>
> "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for
> Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz
> 8-16-01
>
>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >&
where, no?
Yes, I have seen your quote, but the fact is, I'm the
Administrator and I am expected to solve any technical problem for my users.
Allison Wittstock
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> Could be...I've seen users with Tens of thousands of items and only have
> 25MB. On the o
wley
> Compaq Computer
>
> --- Allison Wittstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ed,
> >
> > The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her
> > .pst was opened temporarily
> > to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc
> > for per
right now.
Until then,
Allison Wittstock
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> Second thoughtDo you buy chance have deleted item rention time turned
> on? If so, with the dumpster always on reg hack you should be able to
> recover at least mail for the amount of days you have r
change Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
> http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
>
> "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for
> Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)...&
#x27;t that impact business? The
> other limits I can understand, but the receive limit seems rater
> fzcked...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison
> Wittstock
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:15 A
you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz
> 8-16-01
>
>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 AM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
>
t; of PST.
> Go to the OLD Server Or where ever the mail was and try to recover what ever
> was lost via the Deleted Item Retention time and the dumpster always on Reg
> hack.
>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Kevinm,
Um, where is it written that it requires 7 times? Why do I not believe you? :)
Allison Wittstock
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> Did you run it the required minimum of 7 times??? Then compact the file
> then run it some more.
>
> Kevinm WLKM
Yes. And she had the "remove mail from Server" option set on her client.
n Thu, 04 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> Wll, how did they get delivered there? Was she on Internet Mail only prior?
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
I believe it is short for Anwort, German for answer.
AW
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, you wrote:
> what is this AW in front of the message subjects? does anyone know?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: Ex
now, and still there is no error.
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> And the internet mail was delivered to the PST by your Exchange server?
>
> I think DumpsterAlwaysOn will do it unless this was a connection directly to
> the ISP.
>
> -Original Message-----
> Fr
Hello Lori, Matthew,
I was told to drop this task. But thank you for your help and patience.
Allison Wittstock
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> And the internet mail was delivered to the PST by your Exchange server?
>
> I think DumpsterAlwaysOn will do it unless this was a c
German and nothing
else. If you want English, you have to buy the English version. Someone please
tell me if I am wrong (and/or how to get English Exchange)
Allison Wittstock
inubit AG
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, you wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have looked through my books and still cannot find how t
Hi,
I had a user with the same problem. It turned out to be the Internet Explorer
he upgraded to had a bug. Is your user runing IE 6?
Check out this link below for a fix:
http://email.about.com/library/daily/dd/01/05/bl_dd052401.htm
Allison Wittstock
inubit AG
On Thu, 01 Nov 2001, you
quot; is
unchecked.
> If your problem is just with a few external domains, you might want to
> try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if the result is
> better.
It seems to be coming only from about half the users, to anywhere they send
emails.
> Tom.
>
>
d watch what is being sent from
> > Exchange.
> >
> > Chris
> > --
> > Chris Scharff
> > Senior Sales Engineer
> > MessageOne
> > If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
Hallo,
I am hoping someone has experience with non-Outlook clients. When my Exchange
(2000) users send an appointment to my non-Exchange users, only the code I
pasted below is viewable by the user. I have tried with Netscape 4.x and
Netscape 6.x. The user prefers to use Netscape. I've already t
n, 18 Feb 2002, you wrote:
> I tried at one site. Could not find anything really easy for the users to
> use. Outlook is the answer.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Allison Wittstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROT
m
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OT(?) Exchange appointments viewed with Non-Outlook client
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Outlook isn'
How about OWA then?
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OT(?) Exchange appointments viewed with Non-Outlook client
>
>
> Hi,
>
&g
ut OWA then?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OT(?) Exchange appointments viewed with Non-Outlook client
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Outlook isn't
>
> Roger
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
>
uot;icalendar" at
> MS' website brought up multiple hits.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Allison Wittstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:02 AM
Hallo,
I installed a new Exchange (2000) server on the weekend, and afterwards, the
client requested that the GAL user names be listed in the form Lastname,
Firstname.
I searched Technet and found Q250455. What worries me is the final line, which
states "Making these changes can have adverse ef
27 matches
Mail list logo
