RE: Archive exchange attachments to a fileserver

2003-02-02 Thread Tony Hlabse
http://www.kvsplc.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archive exchange attachments to a fileserver Is ther any software that export from

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Louis Joyce
Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Swynk end Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive E... I got about 25 copies

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread dcouch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-29 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread David Florea
Dependent on business needs, and for some companies on legal requirements. Some financial institutions may have to hold some tapes for years. Officially, I don't keep anything beyond 30 days. In the unfortunate event of a subpoena, my job is much simpler. -Original Message- From:

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Akerlund, Scott
In today's world when it comes to this stuff, your only way to look at this is LEGAL. Check with your legal department and see what they want done, of course you may need to educate them first. After that your scheme be easy to deploy, but not necessarily easy to live with. :o) Scott

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Soysal, Serdar
-Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive Dependent on business needs, and for some companies on legal requirements. Some financial institutions may have to hold some tapes for years

Re: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
Another way to look at it: What's the worth of old e-mail? Ed Crowley hp Services --- Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How long do most of you hold tapes? We are looking to establish a standard on how long to keep tapes in archived before reintroducing them back into the tape rotation to be

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread David Florea
Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I sincerely hope that your legal department agrees with the 30 day tape retention. A good lawyer once told me that any attorney will have a field day at court if your e-mail retention period did not match your printed document retention period. I tend to agree

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
. ;-} -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I sincerely hope that your legal department agrees with the 30 day tape retention. A good lawyer once told me that any

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
What does your Legal department say? Or do they take the lead from IT? [1] [1] Note to self: quickly run away from any company that takes legal advice from IT. -Original Message- From: Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
They should buy Soap on a Rope? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive You know what they say about those who act as their own attorney! Ed Crowley hp Services --- David Florea

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Soysal, Serdar
That's as bad as taking technology advice from marketing. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive What does your Legal department say? Or do they take the lead

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Roger Seielstad
: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive That's as bad as taking technology advice from marketing. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
The pool hall after a night of Bushmills and Coke? [1] [1] And buttery nipples -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive We work in a tech company - where do you think

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Martin Blackstone
Jim!! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive The pool hall after a night of Bushmills and Coke? [1] [1] And buttery nipples -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Archive Another way to look at it: What's the worth of old e-mail? Ed Crowley hp Services --- Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How long do most of you hold tapes? We are looking to establish a standard on how long to keep tapes in archived before reintroducing

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 5:46 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Archive Another way to look at it: What's the worth of old e-mail? Ed Crowley hp Services --- Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How long do most of you hold tapes? We are looking

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Orin Rehorst
/topas.html -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act ethically. I don't think it makes

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Christopher Hummert
I make sure to always archive your e-mails Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread David Florea
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act ethically. I don't think it makes sense to destroy all your evidence when those with an axe to grind keep all theirs. Those with nothing to hide shouldn't be hiding

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive Keeping your e-mails excessively long means they can become evidence excessively long. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Yes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Friggin' Lyris! Great to have you back Ed! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that e-mail administrators are the best ones

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Ed Crowley
matter, that's different, and I agree with you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive As I've always said, document retention will benefit those organizations who act

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Don Couch
E... I got about 25 copies of the same message - is there a problem on my end or on the server end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive I

Re: Archive message log

2002-02-06 Thread Daniel Chenault
Do you mean the SMTP archive log? It's plain text; grep will do it as will most any other text-file search utility. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Archive message log Is there

Re: Archive message log

2002-02-06 Thread Tony Hlabse
There is a tool on the BORK. I believe it is eventlogview something - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: Archive message log Is there a utility that will allow me to search the

RE: Archive message log

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
If there were one, it'd be on http://www.slipstick.com. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

RE: Archive message log

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Archive message log There is a tool on the BORK. I believe it is eventlogview something - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:59

RE: Archive Mails

2002-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Yes. -Original Message- From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archive Mails does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.

RE: Archive Mails

2002-01-17 Thread Andy David
There goes that New Year's Resolution! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive Mails Yes. -Original Message- From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Archive Mails

2002-01-17 Thread Ben Schorr
]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive Mails There goes that New Year's Resolution! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: Archive Mails

2002-01-17 Thread Ben Schorr
It would help if you were a little more specific. Are some messages being archived and others not or does it just fail to archive entirely? Are you getting error messages? Does it only happen on some folders and not others... Chances are the problem is that some messages aren't archiving

RE: Archive process

2001-12-18 Thread Martin Blackstone
You should run scanpst about 3 times. Then delete the PST and tell the user PST=BAD -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archive process I have a user who was recently

  1   2   >