We run Exchange 2000, I was just trying to get peoples opinions about backing up
Individual Mailboxes. We backup the DB using Veritas Backup Exec, but we also backup
the individual mailboxes as well, is this necessary or can we just backup the DB?
Many Thanks
Jez
List Charter and FAQ at:
Hi,
Im running Ex5.5 sp 4 on Win2k server
I have a user with a million appointments in his Calendar. He wants to
clear out everything prior to Jan 1, 2002. Is there a quick way to do this
without having to delete each appointment manually?
Thanks,
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: RE: Email that isn't decoded
Had an identical issue about a year ago, ended up with no resolution because as you stated, 99.9% of all other attachments come into the exchange server in a correctly viewable format. We spent HOURS on this issue (4 people) and ended up having the sender
This is the 3rd time my IMS hung over the past 3 months. I am not sure what
happened, as I do not see any errors in the Event Log. When trying to stop
the IMS, it timed out after approximately 15 mins with a message essentially
saying it could not be stopped. When trying to restart it, I get a
1) rerun performance optimiser.
or
2) Apply Service Pack 4.
Then rerun Performance Optimiser.
or
3) remove and reinstall the IMS. Repply service pack 3, then
rerun performance optimiser.
William Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Why at me?
Will
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Calendar Deletion
Advanced find...
Sort by date
Delete at will
- Original Message -
From: Sethi,
Patrick,
It sure can be done. But you will have to open a lot of port on
your firewall. And you know what this means : NOT SAFE!!!
Better off with OWA using SSL. The OWA server being inside the
network. You just redirect the HTTPS connexions fron the firewall to the
OWA server.
You don't really gain anything putting the OWA part in the DMZ. OWA acts as
what I call MAPI-by-proxy so the number of holes you need to punch in the
internal firewall basically denigrates your DMZ.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a
while back. Anyway, the information store won't start up because it says
the transaction logs are too full. I re-enabled circular logging, but the
information store still won't start. Any ideas?
List Charter and FAQ at:
A user is trying to send an HTML email to one of their associates. Every
time that they send it the receiving end only gets a bunch of hyperlinks
where the HTML part was. I checked in the IMS and noticed that the
attachments outbound is set to MIME, but only plain text is checked. Is
there any
What email clients are the sender and receiver using (I'm more interested in
the rcvr)
-Original Message-
From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: HTML Email
A user is trying to send an HTML email to one of
Sorry, that wasn't helpful, was it?
Please read:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Disaster.asp
Circular logging is important to allow for restore to point of failure. The
logs are purged
You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the FAQ [8] and
read about circular logging. Then post here what your error message is
in the Event log.
[1] sar Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig drives?? /sar [2]
[2] Remembered the tags this time [3]
[3] But seriously Circular
The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
Is Snoop Dog your bro?
William
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please
I tested it for myself sending Outlook 98 and receiving Outlook Express 6.
Same result.
What email clients are the sender and receiver using (I'm more interested in
the rcvr)
-Original Message-
From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:27 PM
To:
The other part of my question, which I guess I am also interested in your
comments on, is in regards to the max connections, both inbound and
outbound. Any thoughts, positive or negative?
TIA,
Mike Z
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:00 PM
To:
Hey, which Giuseppe?
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the FAQ [8] and
read about
Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
Architect? The world-famous Dogg Foundation?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs
Repr'sentin the West SIide
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
Is Snoop Dog your bro?
William
THE Milton R Dogg?!?!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
Architect? The
Yes. Gracing this list with his presence. Even if he doesn't read subject
lines.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
THE Milton R
The very same. He worked hand in hand with Al Gore on the design of the
internet.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
THE Milton R Dogg?!?!
You guys are gonna cause me physical harm.
I almost tipped back in my chair..
ROTFLMAO...
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
The very same. He
I usually leave it as default, which is what? 30 inbound, 20 outbound?
Is this server stressed?
William
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMS hung up again...
The
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
100% agree with Mr. William..
I also recommend a product for IIS called SECUREIIS by eEye.com. It works very well with IIS 4.0/5.0 and protects against virtually any DOS/Hack attacks. Costs about $800 per server, and very reasonable for what it
Almost? Ill try harder next time.
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
You guys are gonna cause me physical harm.
I almost tipped back in my chair..
Come on now, dont me in the same line as al gore. That is just not
nice.
vengeance
VooDoo Blackstone
http://www.miltonrdogg.dns2go.com/voodoo.jpg
Get your own Blackstone doll.
http://www.andgor.com/
/vengeance
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Martin
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Come on now, don't me in the same line as al gore. That is just not
nice.
vengeance
VooDoo Blackstone
LOLx2!!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January
Generally speaking, no it's not, but I am considering that IMS might be
processing too much mail, pegging out the processor, and somehow causing the
service to hang. This machine does do a few other network functions, ie:
WINS, PDC, STMP, but I don't think they stress the server either.
Mike Z
aol
LOL3
/aol
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
LOLx2!!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL
How is the server connected? Make sure you have the most up to date NIC
drivers.
Was there anything in the app event log at all that might assist?
William
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Kevin, You need a good grammar checker!
HAHAH
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Come on now, don't me in the same line as al gore. That is just
What character sets do you have set up in the IMS properties?
Does it work correctly for other addresses to which you send?
ps. I think this is a receiver's problem.
-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
The Miata has gone to
Kevin?
William
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Kevin, You need a good grammar checker!
HAHAH
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg
Who's Kevin?
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Kevin, You need a good grammar checker!
HAHAH
jlc
-Original Message-
From:
The character set is Western European (ISO-8859-1). I have tried it to a
few different addresses and they are all the same. I thought I would just
need to check the HTML option under Attachments Outbound/MIME. Are you
saying that this should work with just plain text checked?
What character
I am not certain what you are asking.
They don't want to make the internal mail server addresses public
The sender would need to know, right? Do you mean the SMTP addresses or the
IP addresses?
-Original Message-
From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
SMTP headers?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: forwarding question
I am not certain what you are asking.
They don't want to make the internal mail server addresses
Excellent. Worked like a charm
Thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Calendar Deletion
Advanced find...
Sort by date
Delete at will
-
The SMTP address, you can't send from the internet to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] because it is not a registered domain, the
address wouldn't be resolved.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Not sure exactly what you mean by how the server is connected, but let me
see what I can do...
The server is connected directly to our network, soon to be put in the DMZ,
only has one nic, with current drivers. Not sure what else might be
helpful.
I noticed that mail stopped flowing on Monday
Mine does.
your server also mangled my name, d00d.
-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California
GirlImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.comThe
Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:http://members.cardomain.com/bpituleyTiggercam:
An external sender would need some SMTP address, right? Internally, you can
forward that wherever you want. I'm not sure what application this would be
beneficial for.
In Exchange2000, you can create a silly SMTP address. In fact a mailbox
requires some SMTP address in order to function.
I t seems to me I saw a discussion of the ways of blocking spam at the
server level without it ever getting to the workstation. I have need of
being able to block some spam type email at the server, how is that done.
Murray
List Charter and FAQ at:
If you know the domain/SMTP address of the sender, you can use message
filtering at the IMS. Otherwise, a third party app is really required.
Message filtering:
IMS Properties--Connections Tab--MessageFiltering button.
Rudimentary filtering is available on many email clients as well, including
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
o
you could just use URLScan and IISLockdown from Microsoft for nothing..
:)
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002
07:01To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ,
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
On
your OWA server?
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
o
you could just use URLScan and
I was assuming that this was the answer since I found Q251006 (not sending
from IE as mentioned in that article, but I get the same results when
sending an embedded HTML email from Outlook) and it was not working for
several domains. I was mainly asking the question to see if there were
any ill
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Just be
aware:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309508
-Original
Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002
1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ,
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
yup it
works fine. The original version of IISLockdown was completely unsafe to
use, and in some cases rendered your system unusable. But the new version
has options for OWA systems in the install. Check it out
sometime.
-Original
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Of
course. :o)
Months
ago.
William
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:52
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
yup it
works fine.
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
That
areticle seems to be posted after the original versions. In the install of
ver 2 its simply an option you select for "Microsoft Exchange OWA
system"
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
ah, I see. :-)
Do you have Word enabled as your email editor?
but, seriously, mine works with just Plain Text selected.
-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Neat!
Also
for E2K:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309677
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:56
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA
I wonder what the difference would be? When I send an email that
basically has a web page in it (pictures, hyperlinks and such) all that
comes through is text with a bunch of links.
ah, I see. :-)
Do you have Word enabled as your email editor?
but, seriously, mine works with just Plain
Is mycompany.internal.com a exchange server?
Can you send SMTP mail to it?
If you can send SMTP to it, put an entry in the HOSTS file or DNS server to
mycompany.internal.com. Then you should be able to create a custom SMTP
recipient to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then choose an alternate recipient
for
Title: Message
it is
an option.. however be aware this version is very IIS patch aware. If you're not
running the latest, most current patches, you might run into more trouble that
you wish you hadn't. I found problems in my testing as we have sites that are
not on the most current
That's what we are here for ;)
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 16:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Calendar Deletion
Excellent. Worked like a charm
Thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
Title: Message
I read how, but it sounded like a big pain in the neck to me. That and we arent using server-based
storage yet. Stupid PSTs
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Pesochin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: Message
You can adjust what attachments are shown through Exchange. But you cant block them or
anything. It just hides them from
Outlook as far as I can tell.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:58 PM
Title: RE: IMS hung up again...
Possibly check your backup schedules in relationship to your Maintenance Schedule. I had this problem before and it turned out that backups were kicking off at the same as my IMS's Maintenance Schedule. As soon as I changed that around it stopped happening.
Happen to me before when backup giving problems and the transaction log
building up. You need to remove some log files manually. Move all log
files before today. I assumed any transaction log older than today have
been committed to the Information Stores. Be careful don't touch these
3 files
I don't think that's right buddy, they aren't committed until you
backup, then they are flushed. They should be an ntfs partition, a
better solution is to compress a few, then back the darn thing up. If
those logs aren't committed, I don't know wtf would happen if you
removed them and backed up,
Paul:
Check out ServScan at http://www.omnitrend.com
ServScan will monitor multiple servers and report conditions and problems
to you cell phone via SMS text messaging. Also supports pagers and email
reporting.
Its modular and comes with templates for Microsoft Exchange 5.5 and 2000.
ELM is definitely something you should look at too:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=533
Warm regards,
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Carbone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Version 3 will be out in a month or so - it's a major change and provides so
much than just monitoring of an individual server. It now adds a quality of
service feature it's very cool.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
Ya, I was scared reading that.
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
I don't think that's right buddy, they aren't committed until you
backup, then they
HAHAHAHAHAH
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Ya, I was scared reading that.
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL
They are committed - up to a point. The fun part is finding that point and
not deleting past it... there are technet notes which describe how to work
out where the checkpoint is, and therefore which logs can be removed.
Personally though I'd take the compression and backup/flush option if
Those pesky EDB files? :)
-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
They are committed - up to a point. The fun part is finding that point and
not deleting
Interesting, do you know what technet article?
I am curious to read its explanation.
I still wouldn't do it, but just curious!
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Q240145- which log files can be removed safely (ie have been committed) But
I thought upon a graceful shutdown (ie succ. stop of IS) that logs files
were committed. Maybe I should go read entire thread...
Pat
There are several, this one isn't bad.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q259751
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in
74 matches
Mail list logo
