On 12/19/2013 10:56 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 12/19/2013 3:26 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Richard is one self-indulgent SOB who has no ability to self-limit
Sorry, Ann - I thought this thread was about Feste and Judy; now
you've made it all
You are making an ass of yourself again, auth, as anyone who cares to read the
relevant thread can see for themselves.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
(Also for Barry and Richard.)
...Again, these are fake quotes. Palin. Did. Not. Say. Any. Of. These.
This is just trolling by Judy - more fibs by the ankel-biter.
On 12/19/2013 2:29 PM, feste37 wrote:
You are making an ass of yourself again, auth, as anyone who cares to
read the relevant thread can see for themselves.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
(Also for
Hee hee. In the relevant thread, Feste didn't believe me when I explained to
him that the period-after-every-word convention was now a standard way to
indicate emphasis on the Web:
I don't think you have even remotely established this as 'standard practice.;
On the contrary, it's an unusual
Richard, this is so tedious I can barely stand to scroll by it. Can't you just
STFU and leave Judy be, at least through the new year. Doesn't meditation give
you any ability to exercise self-discipline?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
Richard, this is so tedious I can barely stand to scroll by it. Can't you
just STFU and leave Judy be, at least through the new year. Doesn't meditation
give you any ability to exercise self-discipline?
Em, Richard is
You are so silly, auth. You have not proved a thing. You said it was standard
practice, which it isn't. OK, so you've found a few examples of it. Very
clever, but my point remains valid. And. That's. All. I. Have. To. Say.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Hee
I explained what i meant by standard practice. Did you miss that part of my
post?
Feste backed and filled:
You are so silly, auth. You have not proved a thing. You said it was
standard practice, which it isn't. OK, so you've found a few examples of it.
Very clever, but my point remains
You're in a real hole, auth, as anyone can see. You said it was standard
practice, which it isn't, as I pointed out. Then you backtracked and redefined
standard practice, wanting to make that phrase mean what you needed it to
mean to get yourself out of the hole you had dug for yourself. But
No, dummy, that's what I meant initially by standard practice. You decided to
reinterpret it to suit your desperate need to get me. I corrected you as soon
as I saw what you were trying to do. The hole is all yours, and you're still in
it, digging, digging, digging.
Just to make your
We are going to have to agree to disagree, if you are capable of that, auth. I
am on the Internet all day reading all kinds of stuff and I have still never
encountered this practice, other than in the examples you cite. So I do not
think it standard, even in the definition you have provided
Think maybe I read a lot of stuff that you don't?
I have no problem accepting that you don't see it in what you read. Can you
accept that I've seen it often enough in what I read to call it standard
practice in that material (mostly blogs and comments) and to have picked it up
and used it
Not exactly clear what you are getting at, Emily. What is so tedious
about reading an occasional post from Judy? This is the fourth
installment posted by Judy to Feste. However, in answer to your
question: some people just feel better when they have someone to talk
to. Go figure.
On
It's not standard practice on Twitter, the most popular instant
messenger program on the internet - anyone would be an idiot to waste a
character by putting dots in between words when you're limited to 140
characters. It would be stupid, really stupid. If anyone did that on
Twitter, they'd
On 12/19/2013 3:26 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard is one self-indulgent SOB who has no ability to self-limit
Sorry, Ann - I thought this thread was about Feste and Judy; now you've
made it all about me.
Is it alright with you, Ann, if I post a few messages here, for just
about
He would be a normal human being, p'raps.
On Thu, 12/19/13, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hey, Feste...here#39;s number four
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 19, 2013, 9
I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
You are so silly, auth. You have not proved a thing. You said it was standard
practice, which it isn't. OK, so you've found a few examples of it. Very
clever, but my point remains valid. And. That's. All. I. Have. To.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
You're in a real hole, auth, as anyone can see. You said it was standard
practice, which it isn't, as I pointed out. Then you backtracked and redefined
standard practice, wanting to make that phrase mean what you needed
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/19/2013 3:26 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Richard is one self-indulgent SOB who has no ability to self-limit Sorry, Ann
- I thought this thread was about Feste and Judy; now you've made it all
Keep up the good work, Feste. There are NO standard practices on the
internet or the web. And, that includes capitalizing the word web. It
used to be that the standard practice was to capitalize the word
internet, but that has all changed. These days NOBODY capitalized
Web or Internet. That's
21 matches
Mail list logo
