I think your arms length comment kinda says it all, Steve. That's just what
armchair seekers like Judy DO. They never actually DO anything much to
further their own self discovery...they just read about other people's, and
then argue about the stuff they think about it.
One of the reasons
On 2/12/2014 11:02 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
In the real world some people here would remain friendless and
wouldn't be invited a second time to the gathering at Starbucks.
It would be a strange meeting at Starbucks to be invited for coffee if
you'd just been called a dumb hick, a
That's it, Richard! I'm moving to Austin and hanging out at Starbuck's! But
might visit Whole Foods now and then, just to stock up on Larabars and quinoa
(-:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:54 AM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/12/2014 11:02 PM,
I wonder why Barry assumes I never met Robin.
So Bhairitu, you think Barry is just kidding with this post? He seems awfully
wound up to me. There's always tremendous negative energy behind his
demonizations of Robin or Ann or me or others he doesn't like. It's as if he
was fighting for his
It's funny you should say this about me without including Barry, whose attacks
on those he doesn't like are almost all dead serious.
As to the Internet being made for me, what makes you think all my friends
are electronic-only?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:
On 2/12/2014 10:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
It's odd, isn't it, that most people here in this place for the
insane nevertheless manage to get their facts straight most of the
time and ground their opinions in those facts rather than in
hallucinatory fantasies and deliberate distortions,
Um, yeah, except he figured nobody here was stupid enough to think he was
serious, given how vanishingly unlikely it was that he would ally himself with
Barry. And anyone who was that stupid who watched for signs of any
rapprochement with Barry or opposition to me after that would have had a
What's funny about this is that I posted my comment yesterday morning
and it only showed up on the web site in the evening. It came through
by mail yesterday morning. The NSA must be really busy these days. :-D
Perhaps it depends on one's pedigree. Some folks I met during my time
in TM
We know you cut the cable as far as TV is concerned. Did you dump TWC
for broadband too? Comcast wants to gobble it up if you've been paying
attention to the news. The Roberts family must want to own the world.
On 02/13/2014 06:54 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 2/12/2014 11:02 PM,
We could all meet at Starbucks in Austin and get those YouTube people
down here to film it and put it online.
It would be an interesting meeting but seriously, I doubt if Judy would
be invited and still get all the others to show up for the meeting. But,
assuming she did show up, after Barry
On 2/13/2014 11:55 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Did you dump TWC for broadband too?
We've still got the ATT DSL at the place in San Antonio. When we move
to Austin we will get on the fiber optic. Go figure.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
It's funny you should say this about me without including Barry, whose attacks
on those he doesn't like are almost all dead serious.
It just an area where we have a difference of opinion. In general, I think
Barry's approach to
You must be very selective in the posts by Barry that you read. You're a piker
compared to him. Did you see his post this morning? Its viciousness (and
inaccuracy) is typical.
Your experience with making and keeping friends live vs. electronically is
most definitely not the same as mine.
On 2/13/2014 3:04 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Judy has arguably the *least* actual hands on spiritual experience
of anyone on this forum.
Maybe that's to Judy's credit - she was not as gullible as you were for
example, donating thousands of dollars to MMY and to the Rama guy -
spending half of
U-Verse or something else? Did I read that they are doing a community
fiber in Austin? I have U-Verse and the fiber terminates about 1/2
block away so it is copper from there to the pole. Not much of any
problem but it is overpriced. They should have done community fiber
here but we would
YouTube people is us. You have a smart phone with a camera don't
you? My phone takes 1080p HD and has a wide angle lens (instead of a
52mm standard like point and shoots). I also have other HD cameras.
I suspect that folks who read like they would kill each other on FFL
would just be
noozguru and Richard, if youtube is us, then why the heck can't I find what I
just posted there? Mr first youtube and I can't even figure out how to find it!
Go figure!
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:34 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
YouTube people is us. You have a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
What's funny about this is that I posted my comment yesterday morning and it
only showed up on the web site in the evening. It came through by mail
yesterday morning. The NSA must be really busy these days. :-D
Perhaps it
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
I wonder why Barry assumes I never met Robin.
So Bhairitu, you think Barry is just kidding with this post? He seems awfully
wound up to me. There's always tremendous negative energy behind his
demonizations of Robin or Ann or me
Judy, take your dysfunctionality somewhere else. Whether it was 12,000 words
or 5,000 words it defied any kind of logic or reason. You may be about the
only person to whom it made sense. I am not sure why that would be. Perhaps it
gave you some sense of closeness the Maharishi that never got
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:
Judy, take your dysfunctionality somewhere else. Whether it was 12,000 words
or 5,000 words it defied any kind of logic or reason. You may be about the
only person to whom it made sense. I am not sure why that would be. Perhaps it
Wait. You keep misquoting me after I've corrected you, and I'm dysfunctional?
How does that work, again? And what makes you think I'm disputing the number of
words?
Not only can you not remember what I said a couple of days ago, you don't seem
able to read what I wrote last night. As far as
Wow, Barry. Is this the best you can do? Pretty slim pickings given how many
posts I've written about your own lies and misrepresentations.
Here are the two sentences from your post I was remembering when I said you'd
called Robin's last post a 12,000-word rant:
Nowhere is this to be
Barry does not seem to aspire to the kind of precision you enjoy. He seems
mostly to rely on his writing skills and memory when posting on FFL. And we all
know human memory is exceptionally pliable. He posts things he is interested
in, occasionally replies to people, and there is a certain
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
Barry does not seem to aspire to the kind of precision you enjoy. He seems
mostly to rely on his writing skills and memory when posting on FFL. And we all
know human memory is exceptionally pliable. He posts things he is interested
Ooopsie Judy. That should be: And it most certainly is NOT the case that lies
and misrepresentations have the same value as facts and opinions based on
facts.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
Ooopsie Judy. That should be: And it most certainly is NOT the case that lies
and misrepresentations have the same value as facts and opinions based on
facts.
I don't think Mr Xeno cares one way or another. He makes his own
It's odd, isn't it, that most people here in this place for the insane
nevertheless manage to get their facts straight most of the time and ground
their opinions in those facts rather than in hallucinatory fantasies and
deliberate distortions, especially regarding other FFLers. Doesn't mean
No it is not odd. I am old enough now that I just do not really care that much
about what people say. Lying and deception drive whole populations to behave in
certain ways, whether something is true or not does not mitigate the effects.
We live the effect of untruth all day long. It's in our
And yet Xeno seemed to care enough to go dig up a post of Barry's from the
archives that I had quoted and (as I said) ostentatiously report that I had
misidentified the person Barry was referring to. His not caring appears to be
conspicuously selective. That's what I find odd. Perhaps needless
No, I have not addressed the issue you raised. By the way your comments on the
CBO report seem to be accurate.
http://www.factcheck.org/2014/02/the-aca-losing-job-vs-choosing-not-to-work/
http://www.factcheck.org/2014/02/the-aca-losing-job-vs-choosing-not-to-work/
---In
Duh. So sorry to disappoint you.
No, I have not addressed the issue you raised. By the way your comments on
the CBO report seem to be accurate.
http://www.factcheck.org/2014/02/the-aca-losing-job-vs-choosing-not-to-work/
On 2/12/2014 9:39 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
This place is for the insane; perhaps there are a few amateur
sociologists and researchers hanging in here collecting data, but who
might they be?
This place is supposed to be for sharing information about life
experiences and views, but
Not disappointed. For some reason I did attempt to check your quote of Barry's.
Normally I do not check anyone's quotes. Yahoo's Neo was simply giving me an
error message. I logged in to an ATT account which seems to have a connexion
to Yahoo through a server without Neo. It took a while to pin
Correction: Some people get their coffee beans at Revelations and some
people get their coffee at Cafe Paridiso, in Fairfield, IA.
[image: Inline image 2]
http://kartikasays.com/category/life-in-fairfield-iowa/ .
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.comwrote:
Judy, I'm gonna guess that you excelled in dodge ball as a grade schooler. I'm
not going to bother to sort out the details of what you are saying here. I
think the broad outlines of Robin's posts are pretty clear. Now within the
broad outlines you can create any tale you like, but what he
Of course you're not going to bother to sort out the details of what I wrote.
You're in too deep a hole to even see over the edge.
Apparently his intent was not at all clear to you. His overall objective was
neither to write posts for posterity, nor to set the record straight, or
whatever
These are all your usual come ons, and of course, put downs. Prolonged
discussions with you rarely result in any benefit, and often devolve into your
mind reading abilities.
But I guess it must give you pride to be the self appointed RWC expert.
Something to hang your hat on.
Do you not know what come-on means? Look it up.
Stevie, you practically solicit putdowns with your non sequiturs and
inability, or unwillingness, to say anything relevant. You have no interest in
actual discussion. It's not possible to have an intelligent discussion with
you. There are any
Excellent points. For most of us, it is just a chat room. A place to banter
about. And so, it is sort of jarring when someone like Judy takes everything so
seriously and personally. Like it squeezes most of the fun out of it.
Of course you will never convince her of that. She views herself
I wonder if wisdom will descend on Judy as it has on you taxius. I gather you
are a few years her senior, but maybe not by too much. I guess realistically,
it ain't gonna happen. But I enjoy your comments. Like, especially the short
ones. (opsie, I hope that was alright to say) (-:
You know what Judy. Your response here seems pretty balanced to me. Like it
didn't have an inordinate amount of meanness. That's kind of nice.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
Do you not know what come-on means? Look it up.
Stevie, you practically solicit
On 2/12/2014 8:00 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
And so, it is sort of jarring when someone like Judy takes everything
so seriously and personally.
Nothing posted here should be taken seriously. Go figure.
I like to think of this place as if we are sitting around a table at
Starbucks. First off, most folks at the table wouldn't get so wound up
on assertions because they would know the asserter is just kidding
them. And we would hope that before someone replied they didn't say,
just a minute as
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
I like to think of this place as if we are sitting around a table at
Starbucks. First off, most folks at the table wouldn't get so wound up on
assertions because they would know the asserter is just kidding them. And we
would hope
This post is a superb example of why I said it really sucks to be Barry. Either
he believes the delusional crap he wrote, or he knows it's crap but stupidly
expects others to believe it.
I'm going to start with a particularly embarrassing Barry-goof. He writes,
According to Judy, he told
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
This post is a superb example of why I said it really sucks to be
Barry. Either he believes the delusional crap he wrote, or he knows it's
crap but stupidly expects others to believe it.
What on earth makes you believe that anyone CARES what you
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
This post is a superb example of why I said it really sucks to be Barry.
Either he believes the delusional crap he wrote, or he knows it's crap but
stupidly expects others to believe it.
I'm going to start with a particularly
Oh, too bad, then you missed my catch of the huge blooper you made concerning
Robin having been near suicide. Not to mention the others I identified.
And sorry to tell you, I don't put the same value on original posts that you
do. I'm much more interested in interaction than showing off.
I'm chuckling at Barry's posturing again because I just happened to look at my
post to Seraphita again, and realized that I'd made my comment about Robin
having been near suicide down in the second paragraph, well below the first
few 'Message View' words of the post. Obviously Barry does care
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
I was raised to not let anyone bully me. So in the late 1960s when
there were all kinds of cult leader types I just blew them off.
When
Robin showed up here you may recall I told him in a message to break
up
his wall of words as I felt
On 02/11/2014 09:26 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
I was raised to not let anyone bully me. So in the late 1960s when
there were all kinds of cult leader types I just blew them off. When
Robin showed up here you may recall I told him in a message
That December 9, 2011 post by Barry is discussing suicide in relation to Ravi,
not Robin. Robin, as maskedzebra, was also a part of the thread. My comment
here is only in relation to this one item in this post.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
This post is a superb
That is correct. My bad, and my most humble apologies to Barry. I only read the
one paragraph, and since Barry demonizes both Ravi and Robin in very similar
terms, I assumed he was referring to Robin.
However, my distinct recollection is that in at least one of Robin's posts he
either
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
That is correct. My bad, and my most humble apologies to Barry. I only read
the one paragraph, and since Barry demonizes both Ravi and Robin in very
similar terms, I assumed he was referring to Robin.
In their wildest
I admit, I found it awfully strange that when Robin first came on board he had
that wall of words manner of writing. It seemed like a rather large blind
spot on his part, since it made what he wrote almost unreadable.
And I remember Barry 2 speaking up, and then Robin started breaking
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:
I admit, I found it awfully strange that when Robin first came on board he had
that wall of words manner of writing. It seemed like a rather large blind
spot on his part, since it made what he wrote almost unreadable.
And I
I believe I said he wanted it (his final response to his last exchange with
Curtis) on the record, not that he was writing it for posterity. Charming
bit of anti-Robin spin, Stevie-boy.
You also apparently missed what I said about the 12,000 words including
Curtis's contributions to the
Yes, Rick invited him. He'd been posting comments on John Knapp's (now Mike
Doughney's) TM-Free blog before that. And of course I never said he was
writing for posterity.
And yes, that's my understanding, that he considered it an exercise for his
own benefit, to interact with other TMers
You live in a weird world Judy.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
I believe I said he wanted it (his final response to his last exchange with
Curtis) on the record, not that he was writing it for posterity. Charming
bit of anti-Robin spin, Stevie-boy.
You also
I thought Judy said a few days ago, that the purpose of his extraordinarily
long posts was to basically, set the record straight especially with regard
to this interactions with Curtis.
And yes, I can't believe we're still talking about this.
On the other hand, I kind of wish that
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
Yes, Rick invited him. He'd been posting comments on John Knapp's (now Mike
Doughney's) TM-Free blog before that. And of course I never said he was
writing for posterity.
And yes, that's my understanding, that he considered
I just told you what I said. Why are you still misquoting me? And I wasn't
talking about anything but his last series of posts, his last exchange with
Curtis, in any case, what Barry dishonestly called a 12,000-word rant.
He did write some long posts, but no single post was anywhere near
Just for fun, since it appears that she's up at 2:00 AM again obsessing:
Speaking of poor memories, Barry never used the phrase 12,000-word
rant. That's a lie. The only person who has used that phrase, according
to the Yahoo Search engine, is Judy Stein, in three separate posts
today.
Opsie.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
Just for fun, since it appears that she's up at 2:00 AM again
obsessing:
Speaking of poor memories, Barry never used the phrase 12,000-word
rant. That's a lie. The only person who has used that phrase,
according
to the Yahoo Search
65 matches
Mail list logo
